A hybrid language understanding approach for robust selection of tutoring goals

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 2363, Issue , 2002, Pages 552-561

  Rosé, Carolyn P ^a   Bhembe, Dumisizwe ^a   Roque, Antonio ^a   Siler, Stephanie ^a   Srivastava, Ramesh ^a   Van Lehn, Kurt ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; COMPUTERS;

HYBRID APPROACH; HYBRID LANGUAGES; KNOWLEDGE CONSTRUCTION; QUALITATIVE PHYSICS; STATISTICAL APPROACH;

COMPUTER AIDED INSTRUCTION;

EID: 84943244160     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-47987-2_57     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. V. Aleven, O. Popescu, and K. Koedinger. 2001. Pedagogical content knowledge in a tutorial dialogue system to support self-explanation. In Papers of the AIED-2001 Workshop on Tutorial Dialogue Systems.
2. C. Burgess, K. Livesay, and K. Lund. 1998. Explorations in context space: Words, sentences, discourse. Discourse Processes, 25(2):211-257.
3. M. Chi, N. de Leeuw, M. Chiu, and C. LaVancher. 1981. Eliciting self-exsplanations improves understanding. Cognitive Science, 18(3).
4. M. G. Core, J. D. Moore, and C. Zinn. 2001. Initiative management for tutorial dialogue. In Proceedings of the NAACL Workshop Adaption in Dialogue Systems.
5. M. S. Glass. 1999. Broadening Input Understanding in an Intelligent Tutoring System. Ph.D. thesis, Illinois Institute of Technology.
6. Pamela W. Jordan, Maxim Makatchev, Michael Ringenberg, and Kurt VanLehn. 2002. Engineering the Tacitus-lite weighted abductive inference engine for use in the Why-Atlas qualitative physics tutoring system. submitted.
7. W. Kintsch. 2002. Predication. to appear in the Cognitive Science Journal.
8. T. K. Landauer, P. W. Foltz, and D. Laham. 1998. Introduction to latent semantic analysis. To Appear in Discourse Processes.
9. AndrewKachites McCallum. 1996. Bow: A toolkit for statistical language modeling, text retrieval, classification and clustering. http://www.cs.cmu.edu/ mccallum/bow.
10. Mitchel, T. 1997. Machine Learning. McGrawHill.
11. C. P. Rosé, P. Jordan, M. Ringenberg, S. Siler, K. VanLehn, and A. Weinstein. 2001. Interactive conceptual tutoring in atlas-andes. In Proceedings of Artificial Intelligence in Education.
12. C. P. Rosé. 2000. A framework for robust sentence level interpretation. In Proceedings of the First Meeting of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Lingusitics.
13. K. VanLehn, P. Jordan, C. P. Rosé, and The Natural Language Tutoring Group. 2002. The architecture of why2-atlas: a coach for qualitative physics essay writing. In Proceedings of the Intelligent Tutoring Conference.
14. P. Wiemer-Hastings and I. Zipitria. 2001. Rules for syntax, vectors for semantics. In Proceedings of the Twenty-third Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.
15. P. Wiemer-Hastings, A. Graesser, D. Harter, and the Tutoring Research Group. 1998. The foundations and architecture of autotutor. In B. Goettl, H. Halff, C. Redfield, and V. Shute, editors, Intelligent Tutoring Systems: 4th International Conference (ITS’98), pages 334-343. Springer Verlag.