Histological and Histomorphometric Evaluation of Zirconia Dental Implants Modified by Femtosecond Laser versus Titanium Implants: An Experimental Study in Fox Hound Dogs

Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research

Volumn 17, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 525-532

  Calvo Guirado, Jose Luis ^a   Aguilar Salvatierra, Antonio ^a   Delgado Ruiz, Rafael Arcesio ^b   Negri, Bruno ^a   Fernández, María Piedad Ramírez ^a   Maté Sánchez de Val, José Eduardo ^a   Gómez Moreno, Gerardo ^c   Romanos, Georgios E ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MURCIA   (Spain)

^b STONY BROOK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF GRANADA   (Spain)

Author keywords

BIC; Crestal bone loss; Zirconia implants

Indexed keywords

CALCIUM; CARBON; PHOSPHORUS; TITANIUM; ZIRCONIUM; ZIRCONIUM OXIDE;

ANIMAL; CHEMISTRY; DENTAL ETCHING; DOG; LASER; MALE; MANDIBLE; PROCEDURES; RANDOMIZATION; SPECTROMETRY; SURFACE PROPERTY; SURGERY; TOOTH IMPLANTATION;

ANIMALS; CALCIUM; CARBON; DENTAL ETCHING; DOGS; IMMEDIATE DENTAL IMPLANT LOADING; LASERS; MALE; MANDIBLE; PHOSPHORUS; RANDOM ALLOCATION; SPECTROMETRY, X-RAY EMISSION; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TITANIUM; ZIRCONIUM;

EID: 84943222985     PISSN: 15230899     EISSN: 17088208     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/cid.12162     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Albrektsson T, Sennerby L, Wennerberg A. State of the art of oral implants. Periodontol 2000 2008; 47:15-26.
2. Jacobs R, Pittayapat P, van Steenberghe D, etal. A split-mouth comparative study up to 16 years of two screw-shaped titanium implant systems. J Clin Periodontol 2010; 37:1119-1127.
3. Dierens M, Vandeweghe S, Kisch J, Nilner K, De Bruyn H. Long-term follow-up of turned single implants placed in periodontally healthy patients after 16-22 years: radiographic and peri-implant outcome. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012; 23:197-204.
4. Malo P, de AraujoNobre M, Lopes A, Moss SM, Molina GJ. A longitudinal study of the survival of All-on-4 implants in the mandible with up to 10 years of follow-up. J Am Dent Assoc 2011; 142:310-320.
5. Sicilia A, Cuesta S, Coma G, etal. Titanium allergy in dental implant patients: a clinical study on 1500 consecutive patients. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008; 19:823-835.
6. Javed F, Al-Hezaimi K, Almas K, Romanos GE. Is titanium sensitivity associated with allergic reactions in patients with dental implants? A systematic review. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2013; 15:47-52.
7. Siddiqi A, Payne AG, De Silva RK, Duncan WJ. Titanium allergy: could it affect dental implant integration? Clin Oral Implants Res 2011; 22:673-680.
8. Verdugo F, Simonian K, Nowzari H. Periodontal biotype influence on the volume maintenance of onlay grafts. J Periodontol 2009; 80:816-823.
9. Nisapakultorn K, Suphanantachat S, Silkosessak O, Rattanamongkolgul S. Factors affecting soft tissue level around anterior maxillary single-tooth implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010; 21:662-670.
10. Kan JY, Rungcharassaeng K, Lozada JL, Zimmerman G. Facial gingival tissue stability following immediate placement and provisionalization of maxillary anterior single implants: a 2- to 8-year follow-up. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2011; 26:179-187.
11. Kohal RJ, Weng D, Bächle M, Strub JR. Loaded custom-made zirconia and titanium implants show similar osseointegration: an animal experiment. J Periodontol 2004; 75:1262-1268.
12. Scarano A, Piattelli M, Caputi S, Favero GA, Piattelli A. Bacterial adhesion on commercially pure titanium and zirconium oxide disks: an in vivo human study. J Periodontol 2004; 75:292-296.
13. Sennerby L, Dasmah A, Larsson B, Iverhed M. Bone tissue responses to surface-modified zirconia implants: a histomorphometric and removal torque study in the rabbit. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2005; 7:13-20.
14. Deville S, Chevalier J, Gremillard L. Influence of surface finish and residual stresses on the ageing sensitivity of biomedical grade zirconia. Biomaterials 2006; 27:2186-2192.
15. Manicone PF, Rossi Iommetti P, Raffaelli L. An overview of zirconia ceramics: basic properties and clinical applications. J Dent 2007; 35:819-826.
16. Depprich R, Zipprich H, Ommerborn M, etal. Osseointegration of zirconia implants compared with titanium: an in vivo study. Head Face Med 2008; 4:30. DOI: 10.1186/1746-160X-4-30.
17. Quan R, Yang D, Wu X, Wang H, Miao X, Li W. In vitro and in vivo biocompatibility of graded hydroxyapatite-zirconia composite bioceramic. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2008; 19:183-187.
18. Andreiotelli M, Kohal RJ. Fracture strength of zirconia implants after artificial aging. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2009; 11:158-166.
19. Hisbergues M, Vendeville S, Vendeville P. Zirconia: established facts and perspectives for a biomaterial in dental implantology. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2009; 88:519-529.
20. Al-Hamdan K, Al-Moaber SH, Junker R, Jansen JA. Effect of implant surface properties on peri-implant bone healing: a histological and histomorphometric study in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res 2011; 22:399-405.
21. Sammons RL, Lumbikanonda N, Gross M, Cantzler P. Comparison of osteoblast spreading on microstructured dental implant surfaces and cell behaviour in an explant model of osseointegration. A scanning electron microscopic study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005; 16:657-666.
22. ter Brugge PJ, Jansen JA. Initial interaction of rat bone marrow cells with non-coated and calcium phosphate coated titanium substrates. Biomaterials 2002; 23:3269-3277.
23. Delgado-Ruíz RA, Calvo-Guirado JL, Moreno P, etal. Femtosecond laser microstructuring of zirconia dental implants. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2011; 96:91-100.
24. Piconi C, Maccauro G, Muratori F, Brach Del Prever E. Alumina and zirconia ceramics in joint replacements. J Appl Biomater Biomech 2003; 1:19-32.
25. Donath K, Breuner G. A method for the study of undecalcified bones and teeth with attached soft tissues. The Säge-Schliff (sawing and grinding) technique. J Oral Pathol 1982; 11:318-336.
26. Schenk EA, Churukian C, Willis C, Stotz E. Staining problems with eosin Y: a note from the Biological Stain Commission. Stain Technol 1983; 58:377-379.
27. Calvo-Guirado JL, Aguilar-Salvatierra A, Guardia J, etal. Evaluation of periimplant bone neoformation using different scanning electron microscope methods for measuring BIC. A dog study. J Clin Exp Dent 2011; 4:8-13.
28. Calvo-Guirado JL, Aguilar-Salvatierra A, Gomez-Moreno G, Guardia J, Delgado-Ruiz RA, Mate-Sanchez de Val JE. Histological, radiological and histomorphometric evaluation of immediate vs. non-immediate loading of a zirconia implant with surface treatment in a dog model. Clin Oral Implants Res 2013. DOI: 10.1111/clr.12145.
29. Stadlinger B, Hennig M, Eckelt U, Kuhlisch E, Mai R. Comparison of zirconia and titanium implants after a short healing period. A pilot study in minipigs. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2010; 39:585-592.
30. Romanos G, Froum S, Hery C, Cho SC, Tarnow D. Survival rate of immediately vs delayed loaded implants: analysis of the current literature. J Oral Implantol 2010; 36:315-324.
31. Andreiotelli M, Wenz HJ, Kohal R-J. Are ceramic implants a viable alternative to titanium implants? A systematic literature review. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009; 20:32-47.
32. Wenz HJ, Bartsch J, Wolfart S, Kern M. Osseointegration and clinical success of zirconia dental implants: a systematic review. Int J Prosthodont 2008; 21:27-36.
33. Cannizzaro G, Torchio C, Felice P, Leone M, Esposito M. Immediate occlusal versus non-occlusal loading of single zirconia implants. A multicentre pragmatic randomized clinical trial. Eur. J Oral Implantol 2010; 3:111-120.
34. Nickenig HJ, Wichmann M, Schlegel KA, Nkenke E, Eitner S. Radiographic evaluation of marginal bone levels adjacent to parallel-screw cylinder machined-neck implants and rough-surfaced microthreaded implants using digitized panoramic radiographs. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009; 20:550-554.
35. Pearce AI, Richards RG, Milz S, Schneider E, Pearce SG. Animal models for implant biomaterial research in bone: a review. Eur Cell Mater 2007; 13:1-10.