Conifer Defense and Resistance to Bark Beetles

Bark Beetles: Biology and Ecology of Native and Invasive Species

Volumn , Issue , 2015, Pages 177-207

  Krokene, Paal ^a  

^a NORWEGIAN INSTITUTE OF BIOECONOMY RESEARCH   (Norway)

Author keywords

Anatomical defenses; Bark beetles; Beetle symbiont complex; Bluestain fungus; Chemical defenses; Defense priming; Inducible defenses; Na ve hosts; Preformed defenses; Terpenes

Indexed keywords

EID: 84943205673     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-417156-5.00005-8     Document Type: Chapter

References (189)

1. Abbott E., Hall D., Hamberger B., Bohlmann J. Laser microdissection of conifer stem tissues: isolation and analysis of high quality RNA, terpene synthase enzyme activity and terpenoid metabolites from resin ducts and cambial zone tissue of white spruce (Picea glauca). BMC Plant Biol. 2010, 10:106.
2. Adams A.S., Aylward F.O., Adams S.M., Erbilgin N., Aukema B.H., Currie C.R., et al. Mountain pine beetles colonizing historical and naive host trees are associated with a bacterial community highly enriched in genes contributing to terpene metabolism. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2013, 79:3468-3475.
3. Alcock J. Natural selection and communication among bark beetles. Fla. Entomol. 1982, 65:17-32.
4. Alfaro R.I., He F.L., Tomlin E., Kiss G. White spruce resistance to white pine weevil related to bark resin canal density. Can. J. Bot. 1997, 75:568-573.
5. Alfieri F.J., Evert R.F. Structure and seasonal development of secondary phloem in Pinaceae. Bot. Gaz. 1973, 134:17-25.
6. Allen C.D., Macalady A.K., Chenchouni H., Bachelet D., McDowell N., Vennetier M., et al. A global overview of drought and heat-induced tree mortality reveals emerging climate change risks for forests. For. Ecol. Manage. 2010, 259:660-684.
7. Aukema J.E., McCullough D.G., Von Holle B., Liebhold A.M., Britton K., Frankel S.J. Historical accumulation of nonindigenous forest pests in the continental United States. Bioscience 2010, 60:886-897.
8. Ayres M.P., Lombardero M.J. Assessing the consequences of global change for forest disturbance from herbivores and pathogens. Sci. Total Environ. 2000, 262:263-286.
9. Ayres M.P., Wilkens R.T., Ruel J.J., Lombardero M.J., Vallery E. Nitrogen budgets of phloem-feeding bark beetles with and without symbiotic fungi. Ecology 2000, 81:2198-2210.
10. Bannan M.W. Vertical resin ducts in the secondary wood of the Abietineae. New Phytol. 1936, 35:11-46.
11. Benayoun J., Fahn A. Intracellular transport and elimination of resin from epithelial duct-cells of Pinus halepensis. Ann. Bot. 1979, 43:179-181.
12. Bentz B.J., Régnière J., Fettig C.J., Hansen E.M., Hayes J.L., Hicke J.A., et al. Climate change and bark beetles of the Western United States and Canada: direct and indirect effects. Bioscience 2010, 60:602-613.
13. Berg E.E., Henry J.D., Fastie C.L., De Volder A.D., Matsuoka S.M. Spruce beetle outbreaks on the Kenai Peninsula, Alaska, and Kluane National Park and Reserve, Yukon Territory: relationship to summer temperatures and regional differences in disturbance regimes. For. Ecol. Manage. 2006, 227:219-232.
14. Berryman A.A. Resistance of conifers to invasion by bark beetle-fungus associations. Bioscience 1972, 22:598-602.
15. Berryman A.A. Biological control, thresholds, and pest outbreaks. Environ. Entomol. 1982, 11:544-549.
16. Björkman C., Larsson S., Bommarco R. Oviposition preferences in pine sawflies: a trade-off between larval growth and defence against natural enemies. Oikos 1997, 79:45-52.
17. Bleiker K.P., Six D.L. Dietary benefits of fungal associates to an eruptive herbivore: potential implication of multiple associates on host population dynamics. Environ. Entomol. 2007, 36:1384-1396.
18. Blomquist G.J., Figueroa-Teran R., Aw M., Song M., Gorzalski A., Abbott N.L., et al. Pheromone production in bark beetles. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2010, 40:699-712.
19. Bonello P., Blodgett J.T. Pinus nigra-Sphaeropsis sapinea as a model pathosystem to investigate local and systemic effects of fungal infection of pines. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2003, 63:249-261.
20. Bonello P., Gordon T.R., Storer A.J. Systemic induced resistance in Monterey pine. Forest Pathol. 2001, 31:99-106.
21. Bonello P., Gordon T.R., Herms D.A., Wood D.L., Erbilgin N. Nature and ecological implications of pathogen-induced systemic resistance in conifers: a novel hypothesis. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2006, 68:95-104.
22. Boone C.K., Aukema B.H., Bohlmann J., Carroll A.L., Raffa K.F. Efficacy of tree defense physiology varies with bark beetle population density: a basis for positive feedback in eruptive species. Can. J. Forest Res. 2011, 41:1174-1188.
23. Boone C.K., Keefover-Ring K., Mapes A.C., Adams A.S., Bohlmann J., Raffa K.F. Bacteria associated with a tree-killing insect reduce concentrations of plant defense compounds. J. Chem. Ecol. 2013, 39:1003-1006.
24. Bordasch R.P., Berryman A.A. Host resistance to the fir engraver beetle, Scolytus ventralis (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). 2. Repellency of Abies grandis resins and some monoterpenes. Can. Entomol. 1977, 109:95-100.
25. Borden J.H. Aggregating pheromones. Bark Beetles in North American Conifers. A System for the Study of Evolutionary Biology 1982, 74-139. University of Texas Press, Austin. J.B. Mitton, K.B. Sturgeon (Eds.).
26. Brignolas F., Lacroix B., Lieutier F., Sauvard D., Drouet A., Claudot A.-C., et al. Induced responses in phenolic metabolism in two Norway spruce clones after wounding and inoculations with Ophiostoma polonicum, a bark beetle-associated fungus. Plant Physiol. 1995, 109:821-827.
27. Brignolas F., Lieutier F., Sauvard D., Yart A., Drouet A., Claudot A.-C. Changes in soluble-phenol content of Norway-spruce (Picea abies) phloem in response to wounding and inoculation with Ophiostoma polonicum. Eur. J. Forest Pathol. 1995, 25:253-265.
28. Brignolas F., Lieutier F., Sauvard D., Christiansen E., Berryman A.A. Phenolic predictors for Norway spruce resistance to the bark beetle Ips typographus (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) and an associated fungus, Ceratocystis polonica. Can. J. Forest Res. 1998, 28:720-728.
29. Charon J., Launay J., Carde J.-P. Spatial organization and volume density of leucoplasts in pine secretory cells. Protoplasma 1987, 138:45-53.
30. Christiansen E. Ips/Ceratocystis-infection of Norway spruce: what is a deadly dosage?. Zeitschrift für Angewandte Entomologie 1985, 99:6-11.
31. Christiansen E., Glosli A.M. Mild drought enhances the resistance of Norway spruce to a bark beetle-transmitted blue-stain fungus. USDA For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. NC 1996, 192-199.
32. Christiansen E., Krokene P. Can Norway spruce trees be "vaccinated" against attack by Ips typographus?. Agr. Forest Entomol. 1999, 1:185-187.
33. Christiansen E., Krokene P., Berryman A.A., Franceschi V.R., Krekling T., Lieutier F., et al. Mechanical injury and fungal infection induce acquired resistance in Norway spruce. Tree Physiol. 1999, 19:399-403.
34. Christiansen E., Franceschi V.R., Nagy N.E., Krekling T., Berryman A.A., Krokene P., Solheim H. Traumatic resin duct formation in Norway spruce after wounding or infection with a bark beetle-associated blue-stain fungus, Ceratocystis polonica. Physiology and Genetics of Tree-Phytophage Interactions 1999, 79-89. INRA Editions, Versailles. F. Lieutier, W.J. Mattson, M.R. Wagner (Eds.).
35. Christiansen E., Waring R.H., Berryman A.A. Resistance of conifers to bark beetle attack: searching for general relationships. For. Ecol. Manage. 1987, 22:89-106.
36. Cipollini D., Heil M. Costs and benefits of induced resistance to herbivores and pathogens in plants. CAB Rev.-Perspectives in Agriculture, Veterinary Science Nutrition and Natural Resources 2010, 5:1-25.
37. Conrath U. Molecular aspects of defence priming. Trends Plant Sci. 2011, 16:524-531.
38. Conrath U., Beckers G.J.M., Flors V., García-Agustín P., Jakab G., Mauch F., et al. Priming: getting ready for battle. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 2006, 19:1062-1071.
39. Craighead F.C. Interrelation of tree-killing bark beetles (Dendroctonus) and blue stains. J. For. 1928, 26:886-887.
40. Cudmore T.J., Björklund N., Carroll A.L., Lindgren B.S. Climate change and range expansion of an aggressive bark beetle: evidence of higher beetle reproduction in naïve host tree populations. J. Appl. Ecol. 2010, 47:1036-1043.
41. de la Giroday H.-M.C., Carroll A.L., Aukema B.H. Breach of the northern Rocky Mountain geoclimatic barrier: initiation of range expansion by the mountain pine beetle. J. Biogeogr. 2012, 39:1112-1123.
42. DiGuistini S., Wang Y., Liao N.Y., Taylor G., Tanguay P., Feau N., et al. Genome and transcriptome analyses of the mountain pine beetle-fungal symbiont Grosmannia clavigera, a lodgepole pine pathogen. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2011, 108:2504-2509.
43. Dixon R.A., Chen F., Guo D., Parvathi K. The biosynthesis of monolignols: a "metabolic grid", or independent pathways to guaiacyl and syringyl units?. Phytochemistry 2001, 57:1069-1084.
44. Enebak S.A., Carey W.A. Evidence for induced systemic protection to fusiform rust in loblolly pine by plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria. Plant Dis. 2000, 84:306-308.
45. Erbilgin N., Krokene P., Christiansen E., Zeneli G., Gershenzon J. Exogenous application of methyl jasmonate elicits defenses in Norway spruce (Picea abies) and reduces host colonization by the bark beetle Ips typographus. Oecologia 2006, 148:426-436.
46. Erbilgin N., Krokene P., Kvamme T., Christiansen E. A host monoterpene influences Ips typographus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae, Scolytinae) responses to its aggregation pheromone. Agr. Forest Entomol. 2007, 9:135-140.
47. Erbilgin N., Ma C., Whitehouse C., Shan B., Najar A., Evenden M. Chemical similarity between historical and novel host plants promotes range and host expansion of the mountain pine beetle in a naïve host ecosystem. New Phytol. 2014, 201:940-950.
48. Evensen P.C., Solheim H., Høiland K., Stenersen J. Induced resistance of Norway spruce, variation of phenolic compounds and their effects on fungal pathogens. For. Pathol. 2000, 30:97-108.
49. Everaerts C., Grégoire J.-C., Merlin J. The toxicity of Norway spruce monoterpenes to two bark beetle species and their associates. Mechanisms of Woody Plant Defenses Against Insects-Search for Pattern 1988, 333-344. Springer-Verlag, New York. W.J. Mattson, J. Levieux, C. Bernard-Dagan (Eds.).
50. Eyles A., Bonello P., Ganley R., Mohammed C. Induced resistance to pests and pathogens in trees. New Phytol. 2010, 185:893-908.
51. Faccoli M., Schlyter F. Conifer phenolic resistance markers are bark beetle antifeedant semiochemicals. Agr. Forest Entomol. 2007, 9:237-245.
52. Fahn A. Secretory Tissues in Plants 1979, Academic Press, London.
53. Fahn A. Plant Anatomy 1990, Pergamon Press, Oxford.
54. Fahn A., Werker E., Ben-Tzur P. Seasonal effects of wounding and growth substances on development of traumatic resin ducts in Cedrus libani. New Phytol. 1979, 82:537-544.
55. Fäldt J., Solheim H., Långström B., Borg-Karlson A.-K. Influence of fungal infection and wounding on contents and enantiomeric compositions of monoterpenes in phloem of Pinus sylvestris. J. Chem. Ecol. 2006, 32:1779-1795.
56. Farjon A. World Checklist and Bibliography of Conifers 2001, Royal Botanical Gardens, Kew, Richmond, UK. Second ed.
57. Feeny P. Plant apparency and chemical defense. Biochemichal Interaction between Plants and Insects 1976, 1-40. Plenum Press, New York. J.W. Wallace, R.T. Mansell (Eds.).
58. Fettig C.J., Klepzig K.D., Billings R.F., Munson A.S., Nebeker T.E., Negrón J.F., Nowak J.T. The effectiveness of vegetation management practices for prevention and control of bark beetle infestations in coniferous forests of the western and southern United States. For. Ecol. Manage. 2007, 238:24-53.
59. Fossdal C.G., Hietala A.M., Kvaalen H., Solheim H. Changes in host chitinase isoforms in relation to wounding and colonization by Heterobasidion annosum: early and strong defense response in 33-year-old resistant Norway spruce clone. Tree Physiol. 2006, 26:169-177.
60. Franceschi V.R., Krekling T., Berryman A.A., Christiansen E. Specialized phloem parenchyma cells in Norway spruce (Pinaceae) bark are an important site of defense reactions. Am. J. Bot. 1998, 85:601-615.
61. Franceschi V.R., Krokene P., Krekling T., Christiansen E. Phloem parenchyma cells are involved in local and distant defense responses to fungal inoculation or bark-beetle attack in Norway spruce (Pinaceae). Am. J. Bot. 2000, 87:314-326.
62. Franceschi V.R., Krekling T., Christiansen E. Application of methyl jasmonate on Picea abies (Pinaceae) stems induces defense-related responses in phloem and xylem. Am. J. Bot. 2002, 89:602-610.
63. Franceschi V.R., Krokene P., Christiansen E., Krekling T. Anatomical and chemical defenses of conifer bark against bark beetles and other pests. New Phytol. 2005, 167:353-375.
64. Frost C.J., Mescher M.C., Carlson J.E., De Moraes C.M. Plant defense priming against herbivores: getting ready for a different battle. Plant Physiol. 2008, 146:818-824.
65. Furniss R.L., Carolin V.M. Western forest insects. Miscellaneous publication no. 1339 1977, US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Washington DC.
66. Gaylord M.L., Hofstetter R.W., Kolb T.E., Wagner M.R. Limited response of ponderosa pine bole defenses to wounding and fungi. Tree Physiol. 2011, 31:428-437.
67. Gershenzon J. Metabolic costs of terpenoid accumulation in higher plants. J. Chem. Ecol. 1994, 20:1281-1328.
68. Gershenzon J., Croteau R. Regulation of monoterpene biosynthesis in higher plants. Recent Advances in Phytochemistry 1990, 24:99-160. G.H.N. Towers, H.A. Stafford (Eds.).
69. Gijzen M., Lewinsohn E., Savage T.J., Croteau R.B. Conifer monoterpenes-biochemistry and bark beetle chemical ecology. ACS Symp. Ser. 1993, 525:8-22.
70. Hammerbacher A., Schmidt A., Wadke N., Wright L.P., Schneider B., Bohlmann J., et al. A common fungal associate of the spruce bark beetle metabolizes the stilbene defenses of Norway spruce. Plant Physiol. 2013, 162:1324-1336.
71. Hammerbacher A., Paetz C., Wright L.P., Fischer T.C., Bohlmann J., Davis A.J., et al. Flavan-3-ols in Norway spruce: biosynthesis, accumulation, and function in response to attack by the bark beetle-associated fungus Ceratocystis polonica. Plant Physiol. 2014, 164:2107-2122.
72. Harrington T.C. Diseases of conifers caused by species of Ophiostoma and Leptographium. Ceratocystis and Ophiostoma. Taxonomy, Ecology, and Pathogenicity 1993, 161-172. APS Press, St. Paul. M.J. Wingfield, K.A. Seifert, J.F. Webber (Eds.).
73. Herms D.A., Mattson W.J. The dilemma of plants: to grow or defend. Q. Rev. Biol. 1992, 67:283-335.
74. Hietala A.M., Kvaalen H., Schmidt A., Jøhnk N., Solheim H., Fossdal C.G. Temporal and spatial profiles of chitinase expression by Norway spruce in response to bark colonization by Heterobasidion annosum. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2004, 70:3948-3953.
75. Horntvedt R. Resistance of Picea abies to Ips typographus: tree response to monthly inoculations with Ophiostoma polonicum, a beetle transmitted blue-stain fungus. Scand. J. Forest Res. 1988, 3:107-114.
76. Horntvedt R., Christiansen E., Solheim H., Wang S. Artificial inoculation with Ips typographus-associated blue-stain fungi can kill healthy Norway spruce trees. Meddelelser fra Norsk Institutt for Skogforskning 1983, 38:1-20.
77. Hudgins J.W., Franceschi V.R. Methyl jasmonate-induced ethylene production is responsible for conifer phloem defense responses and reprogramming of stem cambial zone for traumatic resin duct formation. Plant Physiol. 2004, 13:2134-2149.
78. Hudgins J.W., Christiansen E., Franceschi V.R. Methyl jasmonate induces changes mimicking anatomical and chemical defenses in diverse members of the Pinaceae. Tree Physiol. 2003, 23:361-371.
79. Hudgins J.W., Krekling T., Franceschi V.R. Distribution of calcium oxalate crystals in the secondary phloem of conifers: a constitutive defense mechanism?. New Phytol. 2003, 159:677-690.
80. Hudgins J.W., Christiansen E., Franceschi V.R. Induction of anatomically based defense responses in stems of diverse conifers by methyl jasmonate: a phylogenetic perspective. Tree Physiol. 2004, 24:251-264.
81. Hudgins J.W., McDonald G.I., Zambino P.J., Klopfenstein N.B., Franceschi V.R. Anatomical and cellular responses of Pinus monticola stem tissues to invasion by Cronartium ribicola. Forest Pathology 2005, 35:423-443.
82. Jönsson A.M., Appelberg G., Harding S., Bärring L. Spatio-temporal impact of climate change on the activity and voltinism of the spruce bark beetle, Ips typographus. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2009, 15:486-499.
83. Kane J.M., Kolb T.E. Importance of resin ducts in reducing ponderosa pine mortality from bark beetle attack. Oecologia 2010, 164:601-609.
84. Karban R., Baldwin I.T. Induced Responses to Herbivory 1997, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
85. Karban R., Myers J.H. Induced plant responses to herbivory. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 1989, 20:331-348.
86. Karlsson M., Hietala A.M., Kvaalen H., Solheim H., Olson Å., Stenlid J., Fossdal C.G. Quantification of host and pathogen DNA and RNA transcripts in the interaction of Norway spruce with Heterobasidion parviporum. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2007, 70:99-109.
87. Keeling C.I., Bohlmann J. Genes, enzymes and chemicals of terpenoid diversity in the constitutive and induced defence of conifers against insects and pathogens. New Phytol. 2006, 170:657-675.
88. Keeling C.I., Weisshaar S., Lin R.P.C., Bohlmann J. Functional plasticity of paralogous diterpene synthases involved in conifer defense. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2008, 105:1085-1090.
89. Kirkendall L.R., Kent D.S., Raffa K.F. Interaction among males, females and offspring in bark and ambrosia beetles: the significance of living in tunnels for the evolution of social behavior. The Evolution of Social Behavior in Insects and Arachnids 1997, 181-215. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. J.C. Choe, B.J. Crespi (Eds.).
90. Klepzig K.D., Raffa K.F., Smalley E.B. Association of an insect-fungal complex with red pine decline in Wisconsin. For. Sci. 1991, 37:1119-1139.
91. Krekling T., Franceschi V.R., Berryman A.A., Christiansen E. The structure and development of polyphenolic parenchyma cells in Norway spruce (Picea abies) bark. Flora 2000, 195:354-369.
92. Krekling T., Franceschi V.R., Krokene P., Solheim H. Differential anatomical response of Norway spruce stem tissues to sterile and fungus infected inoculations. Trees 2004, 18:1-9.
93. Krokene P., Nagy N.E. Anatomical aspects of resin-based defences in pine. Pine Resin: Biology, Chemistry and Applications 2012, 67-86. Research Signpost, Kerala. A.G. Fett-Neto, K.C.S. Rodrigues-Corrêa (Eds.).
94. Krokene P., Solheim H. Fungal associates of five bark beetle species colonizing Norway spruce. Can. J. Forest Res. 1996, 26:2115-2122.
95. Krokene P., Christiansen E., Solheim H., Franceschi V., Berryman A. Induced resistance to pathogenic fungi in Norway spruce. Plant Physiol. 1999, 121:565-570.
96. Krokene P., Solheim H., Långström B. Fungal infection and mechanical wounding induce disease resistance in Scots pine. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2000, 106:537-541.
97. Krokene P., Solheim H., Christiansen E. Induction of disease resistance in Norway spruce (Picea abies) by necrotizing fungi. Plant Pathol. 2001, 50:230-233.
98. Krokene P., Solheim H., Krekling T., Christiansen E. Inducible anatomical defense responses in Norway spruce stems and their possible role in induced resistance. Tree Physiol. 2003, 23:191-197.
99. Krokene P., Nagy N.E., Krekling T. Traumatic resin ducts and polyphenolic parenchyma cells in conifers. Induced Plant Resistance to Herbivory 2008, 147-169. Springer, Berlin. A. Schaller (Ed.).
100. Krokene P., Nagy N.E., Solheim H. Methyl jasmonate and oxalic acid treatment of Norway spruce: anatomically based defense responses and increased resistance against fungal infection. Tree Physiol. 2008, 28:29-35.
101. Krokene P., Lahr E., Dalen L.S., Skrøppa T., Solheim H. Effect of phenology on susceptibility of Norway spruce (Picea abies) to fungal pathogens. Plant Pathol. 2012, 61:57-62.
102. Krokene P., Fossdal C.G., Nagy N.E., Solheim H. Conifer defense against insects and fungi. Ophiostomatoid Fungi: Expanding Frontiers 2013, 141-154. CBS Biodiversity Series 12. CBS Press, Utrecht. K.A. Seifert, Z.W. de Beer, M.J. Wingfield (Eds.).
103. Kuć J. Induced immunity to plant disease. Bioscience 1982, 32:854-860.
104. Kurz W.A., Dymond C.C., Stinson G., Rampley G.J., Neilson E.T., Carroll A.L., et al. Mountain pine beetle and forest carbon feedback to climate change. Nature 2008, 452:987-990.
105. Lahr E.C., Krokene P. Conifer stored resources and resistance to a fungus associated with the spruce bark beetle Ips typographus. PLoS One 2013, 8(8):e72405.
106. Larsson S. Stressful times for the plant stress: insect performance hypothesis. Oikos 1989, 56:277-283.
107. Larsson S. Resistance in trees to insects-an overview of mechanisms and interactions. Mechanisms and Deployment of Resistance in Trees to Insects 2002, 1-29. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht. M.R. Wagner, K.M. Clancy, F. Lieutier, T.D. Paine (Eds.).
108. Latty T.M., Reid M.L. Who goes first? Condition and danger dependent pioneering in a group-living bark beetle (Dendroctonus ponderosae). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 2009, 64:639-646.
109. Li S.-H., Nagy N.E., Hammerbacher A., Krokene P., Niu X.-M., Gershenzon J., Schneider B. Localization of phenolics in phloem parenchyma cells of Norway spruce (Picea abies). Chembiochem 2012, 13:2707-2713.
110. Liebhold A.M., MacDonald W.L., Bergdahl D., Mastro V.C. Invasion by exotic forest pests: a threat to forest ecosystems. Forest Science Monograph 1995, 30:1-49.
111. Lieutier F. Mechanisms of resistance in conifers and bark beetle attack strategies. Mechanisms and Deployment of Resistance in Trees to Insects 2002, 31-77. Springer, Netherlands. M.R. Wagner, K.M. Clancy, F. Lieutier, T.D. Paine (Eds.).
112. Lieutier F. Host resistance to bark beetles and its variations. Bark and Wood Boring Insects in Living Trees in Europe, a Synthesis 2004, 135-180. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht. F. Lieutier, K.R. Day, A. Battisti, J.-C. Grégoire, H.F. Evans (Eds.).
113. Lieutier F., Yart A., Jay-Allemand C., Delorme L. Preliminary investigations on phenolics as a response of Scots pine phloem to attacks by bark beetles and associated fungi. Eur. J. Forest Pathol. 1991, 21:354-364.
114. Lieutier F., Sauvard D., Brignolas F., Picron V., Yart A., Bastien C., Jay-Allemand C. Changes in phenolic metabolites of Scots-pine phloem induced by Ophiostoma brunneo-ciliatum, a bark- beetle-associated fungus. Eur. J. Forest Pathol. 1996, 26:145-158.
115. Lieutier F., Brignolas F., Sauvard D., Yart A., Galet C., Burnet M., Van de Sype H. Intra- and inter-provenance variability in phloem phenols of Picea abies and relationship to a bark beetle-associated fungus. Tree Physiol. 2003, 23:247-256.
116. Lieutier F., Yart A., Salle A. Stimulation of tree defenses by Ophiostomatoid fungi can explain attack success of bark beetles on conifers. Ann. Forest Sci. 2009, 66:801.
117. Lindberg M., Lundgren L., Gref R., Johansson M. Stilbenes and resin acids in relation to the penetration of Heterobasidion annosum through the bark of Picea abies. Eur. J. Forest Pathol. 1992, 22:95-106.
118. Logan J.A., Powell J.A. Ghost forests, global warming, and the mountain pine beetle (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). American Entomologist 2001, 47:160-172.
119. Logan J.A., Macfarlane W.W., Willcox L. Whitebark pine vulnerability to climate-driven mountain pine beetle disturbance in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem. Ecol. Appl. 2010, 20:895-902.
120. Lombardero M.J., Ayres M.P., Lorio P.L.J., Ruel J.J. Environmental effects on constitutive and inducible resin defences of Pinus taeda. Ecol. Lett. 2000, 3:329-339.
121. Luchi N., Ma R., Capretti P., Bonello P. Systemic induction of traumatic resin ducts and resin flow in Austrian pine by wounding and inoculation with Sphaeropsis sapinea and Diplodia scrobiculata. Planta 2005, 221:75-84.
122. Luna E., Bruce T.J.A., Roberts M.R., Flors V., Ton J. Next-generation systemic acquired resistance. Plant Physiol. 2012, 158:844-853.
123. Martin D., Tholl D., Gershenzon J., Bohlmann J. Methyl jasmonate induces traumatic resin ducts, terpenoid resin biosynthesis, and terpenoid accumulation in developing xylem of Norway spruce stems. Plant Physiol. 2002, 129:1003-1018.
124. Mattson W.J., Haack R.A. The role of drought in outbreaks of plant-eating insects. Bioscience 1987, 37:110-118.
125. McDowell N., Pockman W.T., Allen C.D., Breshears D.D., Cobb N., Kolb T., et al. Mechanisms of plant survival and mortality during drought: why do some plants survive while others succumb to drought?. New Phytol. 2008, 178:719-739.
126. McNee W.R., Bonello P., Storer A.J., Wood D.L., Gordon T.R. Feeding response of Ips paraconfusus to phloem and phloem metabolites of Heterobasidion annosum-inoculated ponderosa pine, Pinus ponderosa. J. Chem. Ecol. 2003, 29:1183-1202.
127. Miller D.R., Borden J.H. Dose-dependent and species-specific responses of pine bark beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) to monoterpenes in association with pheromones. Can. Entomol. 2000, 132:183-195.
128. Mulock P., Christiansen E. The threshold of successful attack by Ips typographus on Picea abies: a field experiment. For. Ecol. Manage. 1986, 14:125-132.
129. Nagy N.E., Franceschi V.R., Solheim H., Krekling T., Christiansen E. Wound-induced traumatic resin duct formation in stems of Norway spruce (Pinaceae): anatomy and cytochemical traits. Am. J. Bot. 2000, 87:302-313.
130. Nagy N.E., Fossdal C.G., Krokene P., Krekling T., Lönneborg A., Solheim H. Induced responses to pathogen infection in Norway spruce phloem: changes in polyphenolic parenchyma cells, chalcone synthase transcript levels and peroxidase activity. Tree Physiol. 2004, 24:505-515.
131. Nagy N.E., Krokene P., Solheim H. Anatomical-based defense responses of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) stems to two fungal pathogens. Tree Physiol. 2006, 26:159-167.
132. Ohmart C.P. Why are there so few tree-killing bark beetles associated with angiosperms?. Oikos 1989, 54:242-245.
133. Paine T.D., Baker F.A. Abiotic and biotic predisposition. Beetle-Pathogen Interactions in Conifer Forests 1993, 61-79. Academic Press, London. T.D. Schowalter, G.M. Filip (Eds.).
134. Paine T.D., Raffa K.F., Harrington T.C. Interactions among scolytid bark beetles, their associated fungi, and live host conifers. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 1997, 42:179-206.
135. Parham R.A., Kaustinen H.M. Differential staining of tannin in sections of epoxy-embedded plant cells. Stain Technol. 1976, 51:237-240.
136. Phillips M.A., Croteau R.B. Resin-based defense in conifers. Trends in Plant Sci. 1999, 4:184-190.
137. Raffa K.F. Induced defensive reactions in conifer-bark beetle systems. Phytochemical Induction by Herbivores 1991, 245-276. John Wiley and Sons, New York. D.W. Tallamy, M.J. Raupp (Eds.).
138. Raffa K.F., Berryman A.A. The role of host plant resistance in the colonization behaviour and ecology of bark beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Ecol. Monogr. 1983, 53:27-49.
139. Raffa K.F., Berryman A.A. Interacting selective pressures in conifer-bark beetle systems: a basis for reciprocal adaptations?. Am. Nat. 1987, 129:234-262.
140. Raffa K.F., Berryman A.A., Simasko J., Teal W., Wong B.L. Effects of grand fir monoterpenes on the fir engraver, Scolytus ventralis (Coleoptera: Scolytidae), and its symbiotic fungus. Environ. Entomol. 1985, 14:552-556.
141. Raffa K.F., Phillips T.W., Salom S.M. Strategies and mechanisms of host colonization by bark beetles. Beetle-Pathogen Interactions in Conifer Forests 1993, 103-128. Academic Press, London. T.D. Schowalter, G.M. Filip (Eds.).
142. Raffa, K.F., Aukema, B.H., Erbilgin, N., Klepzig, K.D., Wallin, K.F., 2005. Interactions among conifer terpenoids and bark beetles across multiple levels of scale: an attempt to understand links between population patterns and physiological processes. In: Romeo, J. (Ed.), Chemical Ecology and Phytochemistry of Forest Ecosystems. In: Recent Adv. Phytochem. 39, 79-118.
143. Raffa K.F., Aukema B.H., Bentz B.J., Carroll A.L., Hicke J.A., Turner M.G., Romme W.H. Cross-scale drivers of natural disturbances prone to anthropogenic amplification: the dynamics of bark beetle eruptions. Bioscience 2008, 58:501-517.
144. Raffa K.F., Powell E.N., Townsend P.A. Temperature-driven range expansion of an irruptive insect heightened by weakly coevolved plant defenses. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2013, 110:2193-2198.
145. Ralph S.G., Yueh H., Friedmann M., Aeschliman D., Zeznik J.A., Nelson C.C., et al. Conifer defence against insects: microarray gene expression profiling of Sitka spruce (Picea sitchensis) induced by mechanical wounding or feeding by spruce budworms (Choristoneura occidentalis) or white pine weevils (Pissodes strobi) reveals large-scale. Plant Cell Environ. 2006, 29:1545-1570.
146. Ralph S.G., Hudgins J.W., Jancsik S., Franceschi V.R., Bohlmann J. Aminocyclopropane carboxylic acid synthase is a regulated step in ethylene-dependent induced conifer defense. Full-length cDNA cloning of a multigene family, differential constitutive, and wound-and insect-induced expression, and cellular and subcellular localization in spruce and Douglas fir. Plant Physiol. 2007, 143:410-424.
147. Reglinski T., Stavely F.J.L., Taylor J.T. Induction of phenylalanine ammonia lyase activity and control of Sphaeropsis sapinea infection in Pinus radiata by 5-chlorosalicylic acid. Eur. J. Forest Pathol. 1998, 28:153-158.
148. Reid R.W., Watson J.A. Sizes, distributions, and numbers of vertical resin ducts in lodgepole pine. Can. J. Bot. 1966, 44:519-525.
149. Reid R.W., Whitney H.S., Watson J.A. Reactions of lodgepole pine to attack by Dendroctonus ponderosae Hopkins and blue stain fungi. Can. J. Bot. 1967, 45:1115-1126.
150. Richard S., Lapointe G., Rutledge G., Seguin A. Induction of chalcone synthase expression in white spruce by wounding and jasmonate. Plant Cell Physiol. 2000, 41:982-987.
151. Ro D.-K., Arimura G.-I., Lau S.Y.W., Piers E., Bohlmann J. Loblolly pine abietadienol/abietadienal oxidase PtAO (CYP720B1) is a multifunctional, multisubstrate cytochrome P450 monooxygenase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2005, 102:8060-8065.
152. Rosner S., Führer E. The significance of lenticels for successful Pityogenes chalcographus (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) invasion of Norway spruce trees [Picea abies (Pinaceae)]. Trees 2002, 16:497-503.
153. Ross A.F. Systemic acquired resistance induced by localized virus infections in plants. Virology 1961, 14:340-358.
154. Rudinsky J.A., Novák V., Švihra P. Pheromone and terpene attraction in the bark beetle Ips typographus L. Experientia 1971, 27:161-162.
155. Ruel J.J., Ayres M.P., Lorio P.L. Loblolly pine responds to mechanical wounding with increased resin flow. Can. J. Forest Res. 1998, 28:596-602.
156. Schiebe C., Hammerbacher A., Birgersson G., Witzell J., Brodelius P.E., Gershenzon J., et al. Inducibility of chemical defenses in Norway spruce bark is correlated with unsuccessful mass attacks by the spruce bark beetle. Oecologia 2012, 170:183-198.
157. Schmidt A., Zeneli G., Hietala A.M., Fossdal C.G., Krokene P., Christiansen E., Gershenzon J. Induced chemical defenses in conifers: biochemical and molecular approaches to studying their function. Recent Adv. Phytochem 2005, 39:1-28. J. Romeo (Ed.).
158. Schmidt A., Nagel R., Krekling T., Christiansen E., Gershenzon J., Krokene P. Induction of isoprenyl diphosphate synthases, plant hormones and defense signalling genes correlates with traumatic resin duct formation in Norway spruce (Picea abies). Plant Mol. Biol. 2011, 77:577-590.
159. Seifert K.A., de Beer Z.W., Wingfield M.J. Ophiostomatoid Fungi: Expanding Frontiers. CBS Biodiversity Series 12 2013, CBS Press, Utrecht.
160. Seybold S.J., Bohlmann J., Raffa K.F. Biosynthesis of coniferophagous bark beetle pheromones and conifer isoprenoids: evolutionary perspective and synthesis. Can. Entomol. 2000, 132:697-753.
161. Sharma M., Smith M., Burkhart H.E., Amateis R.L. Modeling the impact of thinning on height development of dominant and codominant loblolly pine trees. Ann. Forest Sci. 2006, 63:349-354.
162. Six D.L. The bark beetle holobiont: why microbes matter. J. Chem. Ecol. 2013, 39:989-1002.
163. Six D.L., Wingfield M.J. The role of phytopathogenicity in bark beetle-fungus symbioses: a challenge to the classic paradigm. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2011, 56:255-272.
164. Smith G.D., Carroll A.L., Lindgren B.S. Facilitation in bark beetles: endemic mountain pine beetle gets a helping hand. Agr. Forest Entomol. 2011, 13:37-43.
165. Smith R.H. The fumigant toxicity of three pine resins to Dendroctonus brevicomis and D. jeffreyi. J. Econ. Entomol. 1961, 54:365-369.
166. Speight M.R., Wainhouse D. Ecology and Management of Forest Insects 1989, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
167. Steele C.L., Crock J., Bohlmann J., Croteau R. Sesquiterpene synthases from grand fir (Abies grandis)-comparison of constitutive and wound-induced activities, and cDNA isolation, characterization and bacterial expression of delta-selinene synthase and gamma-humulene synthase. J. Biol. Chem. 1998, 273:2078-2089.
168. Steppuhn A., Baldwin I.T. Induced defences and the cost-benefit paradigm. Induced Plant Resistance to Herbivory 2008, 61-83. Springer, Berlin. A. Schaller (Ed.).
169. Thalenhorst W. Grundzuge der Populationdynamik des grossen Fichtenborkenkafers Ips typographus L. Schriften aus der Forstlichen Fakultät der Universität Göttingen 1958, 21:1-126.
170. Tomlin E.S., Borden J.H. Relationship between leader morphology and resistance or susceptibility of Sitka spruce to the white pine weevil. Can. J. Forest Res. 1994, 24:810-816.
171. Vanderwel D., Oehlschlager A.C. Biosynthesis of pheromones and endocrine regulation of pheromone production in Coleoptera. Pheromone Biochemistry 1987, 175-215. Academic Press, New York. G.D. Prestwich, G.J. Blomquist (Eds.).
172. Viiri H., Annila E., Kitunen V., Niemelä P. Induced responses in stilbenes and terpenes in fertilized Norway spruce after inoculation with blue-stain fungus, Ceratocystis polonica. Trees 2001, 15:112-122.
173. Wainhouse D., Cross D.J., Howell R.S. The role of lignin as a defense against the spruce bark beetle Dendroctonus micans-effect on larvae and adults. Oecologia 1990, 85:257-265.
174. Wainhouse D., Rose D.R., Peace A.J. The influence of preformed defences on the dynamic wound response in spruce bark. Funct. Ecol. 1997, 11:564-572.
175. Wallin K.F., Kolb T.E., Skov K.R., Wagner M.R. Effects of crown scorch on ponderosa pine resistance to bark beetles in northern Arizona. Environ. Entomol. 2003, 32:652-661.
176. Walters D.R. Are plants in the field already induced? Implications for practical disease control. Crop Protect. 2009, 28:459-465.
177. Wang Y., Lim L., DiGuistini S., Robertson G., Bohlmann J., Breuil C. A specialized ABC efflux transporter GcABC-G1 confers monoterpene resistance to Grosmannia clavigera, a bark beetle-associated fungal pathogen of pine trees. New Phytol. 2013, 197:886-898.
178. Werker E., Fahn A. Resin ducts of Pinus halepensis Mill.-their structure, development and pattern of arrangement. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 1969, 62:379-411.
179. Weslien, J., 1989. The role of trapping in population management of the spruce bark beetle Ips typographus (L.). PhD thesis, Division of Forest Entomology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala.
180. Whitney H.S. Relationships between bark beetles and symbiotic organisms. Bark Beetles in North American Conifers. A System for the Study of Evolutionary Biology 1982, 183-211. University of Texas Press, Austin. J.B. Mitton, K.B. Sturgeon (Eds.).
181. Wingfield M.J., Seifert K.A., Webber J.F. Ceratocystis and Ophiostoma. Taxonomy, Ecology, and Pathogenicity 1993, APS Press, St. Paul.
182. Wood D.L. Selection and colonization of ponderosa pine by bark beetles. Insect/Plant Relationships 1972, 101-117. Blackwell Scientific, London. H.F. van Emden (Ed.).
183. Wood D.L. The role of pheromones, kairomones, and allomones in the host selection and colonization behaviour of bark beetles. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 1982, 27:411-446.
184. Wu H., Hu Z. Comparative anatomy of resin ducts of the Pinaceae. Trees 1997, 11:135-143.
185. Zeneli G., Krokene P., Christiansen E., Krekling T., Gershenzon J. Methyl jasmonate treatment of mature Norway spruce (Picea abies) trees increases the accumulation of terpenoid resin components and protects against infection by Ceratocystis polonica, a bark beetle-associated fungus. Tree Physiol. 2006, 26:977-988.
186. Zhao T., Krokene P., Björklund N., Långström B., Solheim H., Christiansen E., Borg-Karlson A.-K. The influence of Ceratocystis polonica inoculation and methyl jasmonate application on terpene chemistry of Norway spruce, Picea abies. Phytochemistry 2010, 71:1332-1341.
187. Zhao T., Borg-Karlson A.-K., Erbilgin N., Krokene P. Host resistance elicited by methyl jasmonate reduces emission of aggregation pheromones by the spruce bark beetle, Ips typographus. Oecologia 2011, 167:691-699.
188. Zhao T., Krokene P., Hu J., Christiansen E., Björklund N., Långström B., et al. Induced terpene accumulation in Norway spruce inhibits bark beetle colonization in a dose-dependent manner. PLoS One 2011, 6(10):e26649.
189. Zulak K.G., Dullat H.K., Keeling C.I., Lippert D., Bohlmann J. Immunofluorescence localization of levopimaradiene/abietadiene synthase in methyl jasmonate treated stems of Sitka spruce (Picea sitchensis) shows activation of diterpenoid biosynthesis in cortical and developing traumatic resin ducts. Phytochemistry 2010, 71:1695-1699.