Using Charm to Adjust for Cross-Hauling: The Case of the Province of Hubei, China

Economic Systems Research

Volumn 27, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 391-413

  Flegg, Anthony T ^a   Huang, Yongming ^b   Tohmo, Timo ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF THE WEST OF ENGLAND   (United Kingdom)

^b Wuhan University   (China)

^c UNIVERSITY OF JYVÄSKYLÄ   (Finland)

Author keywords

CHARM; China; Cross hauling; Non survey methods; Regional input output tables

Indexed keywords

COMMODITY; DEMAND ANALYSIS; EXPORT; HETEROGENEITY; IMPORT; INPUT-OUTPUT ANALYSIS; REGIONAL ECONOMY; REGIONAL TRADE;

CHINA; HUBEI;

EID: 84943197941     PISSN: 09535314     EISSN: 14695758     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09535314.2015.1043516     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. A.Bonfiglio, and F.Chelli (2008) Assessing the Behaviour of Non-Survey Methods for Constructing Regional Input–Output Tables Through a Monte Carlo Simulation. Economic Systems Research, 20, 243–258. doi: 10.1080/09535310802344315
2. P.Boomsma, and J.Oosterhaven (1992) A Double-Entry Method for the Construction of Bi-Regional Input–Output Tables. Journal of Regional Science, 32, 269–284. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9787.1992.tb00186.x
3. A.T.Flegg, and T.Tohmo (2013a) A Comment on Tobias Kronenberg's “Construction of Regional Input–Output Tables Using Nonsurvey Methods: The Role of Cross-Hauling”. International Regional Science Review, 36, 235–257. doi: 10.1177/0160017612446371
4. A.T.Flegg, and T.Tohmo (2013b) Regional Input–Output Tables and the FLQ Formula: A Case Study of Finland. Regional Studies, 47, 703–721. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2011.592138
5. A.T.Flegg, and T.Tohmo (2014) Estimating Regional Input Coefficients and Multipliers: The Use of FLQ is not a Gamble. Regional Studies, forthcoming.
6. A.T.Flegg, and C.D.Webber (1997) On the Appropriate Use of Location Quotients in Generating Regional Input–Output Tables: Reply. Regional Studies, 31, 795–805. doi: 10.1080/713693401
7. A.T.Flegg, and C.D.Webber (2000) Regional Size, Regional Specialization and the FLQ Formula. Regional Studies, 34, 563–569. doi: 10.1080/00343400050085675
8. A.T.Flegg,, C.D.Webber and M.V.Elliott (1995) On the Appropriate Use of Location Quotients in Generating Regional Input–Output Tables. Regional Studies, 29, 547–561. doi: 10.1080/00343409512331349173
9. F.Harrigan,, J.W.McGilvray and I.H.McNicoll (1981) The Estimation of Interregional Trade Flows. Journal of Regional Science, 21, 65–77. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9787.1981.tb00681.x
10. Hubei Bureau of Statistics. (2011) Hubei Statistical Yearbook 2011. Beijing, China Statistics Press.
11. W.Isard, (1953) Regional Commodity Balances and Interregional Commodity Flows. American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings, 43, 167–180.
12. R.W.Jackson, (1998) Regionalizing National Commodity-by-Industry Accounts. Economic Systems Research, 10, 223–238. doi: 10.1080/762947109
13. R.W.Jackson, (2014) Cross-Hauling in Input–Output Tables: Comments on CHARM. Working Paper 2014-02, Regional Research Institute, West Virginia University. Accessed July 28. rri.wvu.edu
14. R.C.Jensen, (1980) The Concept of Accuracy in Regional Input–Output Models. International Regional Science Review, 5, 139–154. doi: 10.1177/016001768000500203
15. J.Kowalewski, (2015) Regionalization of National Input–Output Tables: Empirical Evidence on the Use of the FLQ Formula. Regional Studies, 49, 240–250. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2013.766318
16. T.Kronenberg, (2009) Construction of Regional Input–Output Tables Using Nonsurvey Methods: The Role of Cross-Hauling. International Regional Science Review, 32, 40–64. doi: 10.1177/0160017608322555
17. T.Kronenberg, (2010) Erstellung Einer Input-Output-tabelle für Mecklenburg-Vorpommern. AStA Wirtschafts- und Sozialstatistisches Archiv, 4, 223–248. doi: 10.1007/s11943-010-0084-9
18. T.Kronenberg, (2012) Regional Input–Output Models and the Treatment of Imports in the European System of Accounts. Jahrbuch für Regionalwissenschaft [Review of Regional Research], 32, 175–191. doi: 10.1007/s10037-012-0065-2
19. T.Kronenberg, and J.Többen (2013) Über die Erstellung regionaler Input-Output-Tabellen und die Verbuchung von Importen. In: IWH (ed.) Neuere Anwendungsfelder der Input-Output-Analyse. Beiträge zum Halleschen Input-Output-Workshop 2012, Halle (Saale).
20. M.L.Lahr, (1993) A Review of the Literature Supporting the Hybrid Approach to Constructing Regional Input–Output Models. Economic Systems Research, 5, 277–293. doi: 10.1080/09535319300000023
21. M.L.Lahr, (2001) Reconciling Domestication Techniques, the Notion of Re-exports and Some Comments on Regional Accounting. Economic Systems Research, 13, 165–179. doi: 10.1080/09537320120052443
22. R.E.Miller, and P.D.Blair (2009) Input–Output Analysis: Foundations and Extensions. 2nd ed. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
23. National Bureau of Statistics of China. (2009) China Statistical Yearbook 2008. Beijing, China Statistics Press.
24. National Bureau of Statistics of China. (2011a) China Statistical Yearbook 2011. Beijing, China Statistics Press.
25. National Bureau of Statistics of China. (2011b) Chinese National and Regional Input–Output Tables 2007. Beijing, China Statistics Press.
26. H.W.Richardson, (1985) Input–Output and Economic Base Multipliers: Looking Backward and Foreward. Journal of Regional Science, 25, 607–661. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9787.1985.tb00325.x
27. M.H.Robison, and J.R.Miller (1988) Cross-Hauling and Nonsurvey Input–Output Models: Some Lessons from Small-Area Timber Economies. Environment and Planning A, 20, 1523–1530. doi: 10.1068/a201523
28. J.I.Round, (1972) Regional Input–Output Models in the U.K.: A Reappraisal of Some Techniques. Regional Studies, 6, 1–9. doi: 10.1080/09595237200185011
29. T.Tohmo, (2004) New Developments in the Use of Location Quotients to Estimate Regional Input–Output Coefficients and Multipliers. Regional Studies, 38, 43–54. doi: 10.1080/00343400310001632262
30. United Nations. (1973) Input–Output Tables and Analysis. New York, United Nations.