SORTA: A system for ontology-based re-coding and technical annotation of biomedical phenotype data

Database

Volumn 2015, Issue , 2015, Pages

  Pang, Chao ^a   Sollie, Annet ^a   Sijtsma, Anna ^a,b   Hendriksen, Dennis ^a   Charbon, Bart ^a   De Haan, Mark ^a   De Boer, Tommy ^a   Kelpin, Fleur ^a   Jetten, Jonathan ^a   Van Der Velde, Joeri K ^a   Smidt, Nynke ^a,b   Sijmons, Rolf ^a   Hillege, Hans ^a   Swertz, Morris A ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

^b The LifeLines Cohort Study   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL ONTOLOGY; FACTUAL DATABASE; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; KNOWLEDGE BASE; PROCEDURES; SOFTWARE;

ANIMALS; BIOLOGICAL ONTOLOGIES; DATA CURATION; DATABASES, FACTUAL; HUMANS; KNOWLEDGE BASES; SOFTWARE;

EID: 84943178454     PISSN: 17580463     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/database/bav089     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. BioShaRE (2011) BioSHaRE project. https://www.bioshare.eu/
2. Pang, C., Hendriksen, D., Dijkstra, M. et al. (2015) BiobankConnect: Software to rapidly connect data elements for pooled analysis across biobanks using ontological and lexical indexing. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2013-002577.
3. Poggi, A., Lembo, D., Calvanese, D. et al. (2008) Linking data to ontologies. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics). Springer, Vol. 4900 LNCS, pp. 133-173.
4. Rubin, D.L., Shah, N.H. and Noy, N.F. (2008) Biomedical ontologies: A functional perspective. Brief. Bioinf., 9, 75-90.
5. Scholtens, S., Smidt, N., Swertz, M.A. et al. (2014) Cohort Profile: LifeLines, a three-generation cohort study and biobank. Int. J. Epidemiol., doi: 10.1093/ije/dyu229.
6. Zwamborn-Hanssen, A.M.N., Bijlsma, J.B., Hennekam, E.F.A.M. et al. (1997) The Dutch uniform multicenter registration system for genetic disorders and malformation syndromes. Am. J. Med. Genet., 70, 444-447.
7. Euzenat, J. and Shvaiko, P. (2013) Ontology Matching Second. http://www.springer.com/computer/database+management+& +information+retrieval/book/978-3-642-38720-3. Last date accessed, 26th June 2015
8. Navarro, G. (2001) A guided tour to approximate string matching. ACM Comput. Surv., 33, 31-88.
9. Brown, P.F., DeSouza, P.V., Mercer, R.L. et al. (1992) Classbased n-gram models of natural language. Comput. Linguistics, 18, 467-479.
10. Levenshtein, V.I. (1966) Binary codes capable of correcting deletions, insertions, and reversals. Soviet Phys.Doklady, 10, 707-710.
11. Salton, G., Wong, A. and Yang, C.S. (1975) A vector space model for automatic indexing. Commun. ACM, 18, 613-620.
12. Saruladha, K. (2011) A comparative analysis of ontology and schema matching systems. Int. J. Comput. Appl., 34, 14-21.
13. Mathur, I. and Joshi, N. (2014) Shiva ++: An enhanced graph based ontology matcher. Int. J. Comput. Appl., 92, 30-34.
14. Cruz, I.F. (2009) AgreementMaker: Efficient matching for large real-world schemas and ontologies. PVLDB, 2, 1586-1589.
15. Jiménez-Ruiz, E. and Cuenca Grau, B. (2011) LogMap: Logicbased and scalable ontology matching. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics). Springer, 7031 LNCS, pp. 273-288.
16. Schuemie, M.J., Jelier, R. and Kors, J. (2007) Peregrine: Lightweight gene name normalization by dictionary lookup. In: Proceedings of the Second BioCreative Challenge Evaluation Workshop. pp. 131-133.
17. Whetzel, P.L., Shah, N.H., Noy, N.F. et al. (2009) BioPortal: Ontologies and integrated data resources at the click of a mouse. Nucleic Acids Res., 37, 170-3.
18. Funk, C., Baumgartner, W., Garcia, B. et al. (2014) Large-scale biomedical concept recognition: An evaluation of current automatic annotators and their parameters. BMC Bioinformatics, 15, 59.
19. Burdett, T., Jupp, S., Malone, J. et al. (2012) Zooma2-a repository of annotation knowledge and curation API. http://www.ebi.ac.uk/spot/zooma/index.html. (26th June 2015, date last accessed).
20. The Apache Software Foundation (2006) Apache Lucene. Agenda, 2009. https://lucene.apache.org/core/. (5th May 2015, date last accessed).
21. Apache Software Foundation (2001) Lucene Similarity Score. https://lucene.apache.org/core/4-6-0/core/overview-summary.html. (26th June 2015, date last accessed).
22. ElasticSearch (2015) ElasticSearch: Lucene's Practical Scoring Function. https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/elasticsearch/guide/master/practical-scoring-function.html#query-norm. (26th June 2015, date last accessed).
23. Van Vliet-Ostaptchouk, J.V, Nuotio, M.-L., Slagter, S.N. et al. (2014) The prevalence of Metabolic Syndrome and metabolically healthy obesity in Europe: A collaborative analysis of ten large cohort studies. BMC Endocr. Disord., 14, 1-13.
24. Ainsworth, B.E., Haskell, W.L., Leon, A.S. et al. (1993) Compendium of physical activities: Classification of energy costs of human physical activities. Med. Sci. Sports Exer., 25, 71-80.
25. Sollie, A., Sijmons, R.H., Lindhout, D. et al. (2013) A new coding system for metabolic disorders demonstrates gaps in the international disease classifications ICD-10 and SNOMED-CT, which can be barriers to genotype-phenotype data sharing. Hum. Mutat., 34, 967-973.
26. Sernadela, P., Horst, E., Thompson, M. et al. (2014) A nanopublishing architecture for biomedical data. In: 8th International Conference on Practical Applications of Computational Biology &Bioinformatics (PACBB 2014). pp. 277-284.