Using service utilization metrics to assess the structure of product line architectures

Proceedings - International Software Metrics Symposium

Volumn 2003-January, Issue , 2003, Pages 298-308

  Van Der Hoek, A ^a   Dincel, E ^b   Medvidovic N ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b Computer Science Department University of Southern California ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

Application software; Computer architecture; Computer science; Context aware services; History; Programmable logic arrays; Programming; Software architecture; Software engineering; Software measurement

Indexed keywords

APPLICATION PROGRAMS; COMPUTER ARCHITECTURE; COMPUTER PROGRAMMING; COMPUTER SCIENCE; COMPUTER SOFTWARE; HISTORY; INFORMATION SERVICES; MATHEMATICAL PROGRAMMING; SOFTWARE ARCHITECTURE; SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

ARCHITECTURAL DECISION; ARCHITECTURAL ELEMENT; CONTEXT AWARE SERVICES; PRODUCT LINE ARCHITECTURE; PROGRAMMABLE LOGIC ARRAY; SOFTWARE MEASUREMENT; SOFTWARE PRODUCT LINE ARCHITECTURE; SOFTWARE PRODUCTS;

SOFTWARE DESIGN;

EID: 84943167526     PISSN: 15301435     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/METRIC.2003.1232476     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (34)

1. Albrecht, A., and Gaffney, J., Software Function, Source Lines of Code, and Development Effort Prediction: a Software Science Validation. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 1983. 9(6): p. 639-648.
2. Allen, R. and D. Garlan, A Formal Basis for Architectural Connection. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology, 1997. 6(3): p. 213-249.
3. Bastani, F.B., An Approach to Measuring Program Complexity, in COMPSAC'83. 1983, IEEE Computer Science Press: MD p. 1-8.
4. Bayer, J., Muthig, D., Göpfert, B., The Library System Product Line- A KobrA Case Study, http://www.iese.fraunhofer.de/pdf-files/iese-024-01.pdf
5. Bosch, J., Design and Use of Software Architectures: Adopting and Evolving a Product-Line Approach. 2000, New York, New York: Addison-Wesley.
6. Chidamber, S. and C. Kemerer, A Metrics Suite for Object-Oriented Design. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 1994. 20(6): p. 476-493.
7. Davis, J.S. and R.J. LeBlanc, A Study of the Applicability of Complexity Measures. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 1988. 14(9): p. 1366-1371.
8. Dix, A.J., Formal Methods for Interactive Systems. 1991, London: Academic Press.
9. Don Batory, et al., Achieving Extensibility Through Product-Lines and Domain-Specific Languages: A Case Study. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology, 2002. 11(2): p. 191-214.
10. Fenton, N.E. and M. Neil, Bayesian Belief Nets: a Causal Model for Predicting Defect Rates and Resource Requirements, in Software Testing and Quality Engineering. 2000 p. 48-53.
11. Fenton, N.E. and S.L. Pfleeger, Software Metrics: A Rigorous and Practical Approach. 2nd ed. 1997, London,U.K.: International Thomson Computer Press.
12. Gannon, J.D., E.E. Katz, and V. Basili, Metrics for ADA Packages: An Initial Study. Communications of the ACM, 1986. 29(7): p. 616-623.
13. Garlan, D., R. Allen, and J. Ockerbloom. Exploiting Style in Architectural Design Environments. in ACM SIGSOFT '94 Second Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering. 1994. New Orleans, LA: ACM Press: p. 175-188.
14. Halstead, M.H., Elements of Software Science. 1977, New York: Elsevier.
15. Henry, S. and D. Kafura, Software Metrics Based on Information Flow. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 1981. 7(5): p. 510-518.
16. Hitz, M. and B. Montazeri. Measuring Coupling and Cohesion in Object-Oriented Systems. in Proceedings of the International Symposium on Applied Corporate Computing. 1995: p. 25-27.
17. Johansson, E. and M. Höst. Tracking Degradation in Software Product Lines through Measurement of Design Rule Violations. in In Proceedings of 14th International Conference in Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering (SEKE). 2002. Ischia, Italy
18. Jones, C., Programming Productivity. 1986, New York: McGraw Hill.
19. Lorenz, M. and J. Kidd, Object-Oriented Software Metrics. 1994: Prentice-Hall.
20. Luckham, D.C. and J. Vera, An Event-Based Architecture Definition Language. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 1995. 21(9): p. 717-734.
21. Magee, J. and J. Kramer. Dynamic Structure in Software Architectures. in ACM SIGSOFT '96 Fourth Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering. 1996. San Francisco, CA: ACM SIGSOFT: p. 3-14.
22. McCabe, T.J., A Complexity Measure. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 1976. 2(4): p. 308-320.
23. Medvidovic, N., D.S. Rosenblum, and R.N. Taylor. A Language and Environment for Architecture-Based Software Development and Evolution. in 21st International Conference on Software Engineering. 1999. Los Angeles, CA: IEEE Computer Society: p. 44-53.
24. Medvidovic, N. and R.N. Taylor, A Classification and Comparison Framework for Software Architecture Description Languages. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 2000. 26(1): p. 70-93.
25. Myers, G.J., Composite/Structured Design. 1978, New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
26. Pant, Y.R., Verner, J. M., Software Quality and Productivity. Theory, Practice, Education and Training. 1995, London: Chapman & Hall.
27. Perry, D.E. Generic Descriptions for Product Line Architectures. in Second International Workshop on Development and Evolution of Software Architectures for Product Families. 1998. Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain
28. Shaw, M., et al., Abstractions for Software Architecture and Tools to Support Them. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 1995. 21(4): p. 314-335.
29. Shaw, M. and D. Garlan, eds. Software Architecture: Perspectives on an Emerging Discipline. 1996, Prentice-Hall.
30. Simon, F., F. Steinbrückner, and C. Lewerentz. Metrics-Based Refactoring. in Proceedings of the European Conference on Software Maintenance and Reengineering. 2001: IEEE Computer Society Press: p. 30-38.
31. Tracz, W., DSSA (Domain-Specific Software Architecture) Pedagogical Example, in ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes. 1995.
32. van der Hoek, A., et al. Taming Architectural Evolution. in Sixth European Software Engineering Conference (ESEC) and the Ninth ACM SIGSOFT Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering (FSE-9). 2001. Vienna, Austria: p. 1-10.
33. van Ommering, R., et al., The Koala Component Model for Consumer Electronics Software. Computer, 2000. 33(3): p. 78-85.
34. Wolf, A.L., L.A. Clarke, and J.C. Wileden, The AdaPIC Toolset: Supporting Interface Control and Analysis Throughout the Software Development Process. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 1989. SE-15(3): p. 250-263.