Design for values and operator roles in sociotechnical systems

Handbook of Ethics, Values, and Technological Design: Sources, Theory, Values and Application Domains

Volumn , Issue , 2015, Pages 117-149

  Franssen, Maarten ^a  

^a DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Autonomy; Operator; Responsibility; Sociotechnical system; System design

Indexed keywords

HARDWARE; HYBRID SYSTEMS;

AUTONOMY; DESIGN FOR VALUES; HARDWARE COMPONENTS; OPERATOR; RESPONSIBILITY; SOCIOTECHNICAL SYSTEMS; TRADITIONAL ENGINEERINGS; TRADITIONAL SYSTEMS;

SYSTEMS ANALYSIS;

EID: 84943153563     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-6970-0_8     Document Type: Chapter

References (48)

1. Alexijewitsch S (2013) Secondhand-Zeit: Leben auf den Trümmern des Sozialismus. Hanser, Berlin, Transl. from the Russian original Vremja second-hand: konec krasnogo čeloveka, Moskva: Vremja, 2013
2. Amalberti R (2001) The paradoxes of almost totally safe transportation systems. Saf Sci 37:109–126
3. Björnsson G (2011) Joint responsibility without individual control: applying the explanation hypothesis. In: Vincent N, van de Poel I, van den Hoven J (eds) Moral responsibility: beyond free will and determinism. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 181–199
4. Bovens M (1998) The quest for responsibility: accountability and citizenship in complex organisations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
5. Buede D (2009) The engineering design of systems: models and methods, 2nd edn. Wiley, Hoboken
6. Checkland P (1981) Systems thinking, systems practice. Wiley, Chichester
7. Christman J (2009) Autonomy in moral and political philosophy. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (on-line), substantively revised (first published 2003)
8. Del Frate L, Zwart SD, Kroes P (2011) Root cause as a U-turn’. Eng Fail Anal 18:747–758
9. de Weck OL, Roos D, Magee CL (2011) Engineering systems: meeting human needs in a complex technological world. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
10. Feld MD (1975) Middle-class society and the rise of military professionalism: the Dutch army, 1589-1609. Armed Forces Soc 1:419–442
11. Franssen M (2014) Modelling systems in technology as instrumental systems. In: Magnani L (ed) Model-based reasoning in science and technology: theoretical and cognitive issues. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 543–562
12. Franssen M, Kroes P (2009) Sociotechnical systems. In: Berg Olsen JK, Pedersen SA, Hendricks VF (eds) A companion to the philosophy of technology. Wiley-Blackwell, Malden/Oxford, pp 223–226
13. Kelly JE (1978) A reappraisal of sociotechnical systems theory. Hum Rel 31:1069–1099
14. Kleinschmidt H (1999) Using the gun: manual drill and the proliferation of portable firearms. J Mil Hist 63:601–630
15. Ladkin PB (2004) Causal analysis of the ACAS/TCAS sociotechnical system. In: Cant T (ed) 9th Australian workshop on safety related programmable systems (SCS’04), Brisbane. Conferences in research and practice in information technology, vol 47. unpag
16. Medvedev G (1989) Chernobyl notebook. JPRS Report no JPRS-UEA-89-034, 23 October 1989. English translation of original Russian publ. by Novy Mir, June 1989
17. Mitchell CM, Roberts DW (2009) Model-based design of human interaction with complex systems. In: Sage A, Rouse W (eds) Handbook of systems engineering and management. Wiley, Hoboken, pp 837–908
18. Mumford L (1934) Technics and civilization. Harcourt Brace, New York
19. Perrow C (1984) Normal accidents. Basic Books, New York
20. Pritchett AR, Fleming ES, Cleveland WP, Zoetrum JJ, Popescu VM, Thakkar DA (2012a) Pilot interaction with TCAS and Air Traffic Control. In: Smith A (ed) ATACCS’2012, 29–31 May 2012. IRIT Press, London, pp 117–126
21. Pritchett AR, Fleming ES, Cleveland WP, Zoetrum JJ, Popescu VM, & Thakkar DA (2012b) Pilot’s information use during TCAS events, and relationship to compliance to TCAS Resolution Advisories. In: Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomic society 56th annual meeting, Boston 2012, pp 26–30
22. Rooksby E (2009) How to be a responsible slave: managing the use of expert information systems. Ethics Inf Technol 11:81–90
23. Sage A, Armstrong J Jr (2000) Introduction to systems engineering. Wiley, New York
24. Tarnow E (2000) Towards the zero accident goal: assisting the first officer monitor and challenge captain errors. J Aviation/Aerosp Educ Res 10:29–38
25. Thompson DE (1980) Moral responsibility of public officials: the problem of many hands. Am Polit Sci Rev 74:905–916
26. van den Hoven MJ (1998) Moral responsibility, public office and information technology. In: Snellen ITM, van den Donk WBHJ (eds) Public administration in an information age: a handbook. IOS Press, Amsterdam, pp 97–111
27. van de Poel I (2011) The relation between forward-looking and backward-looking responsibility. In: Vincent N, van de Poel I, van den Hoven J (eds) Moral responsibility: beyond free will and determinism. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 37–52
28. Varfolomeiev T (2007) Soviet rocketry that conquered space. Part 8: successes and failures of a three-stage launcher. Online: http://cosmopark.ru/r7/prig8.htm. Retrieved Jan 2014
29. Vermaas PE, Kroes P, van de Poel I, Franssen M, Houkes W (2011) A philosophy of technology: from technical artefacts to sociotechnical systems. Morgan & Claypool, San Rafael
30. Weyer J (2006) Modes of governance of hybrid systems: the mid-air collision at Ueberlingen and the impact of smart technology. Sci Technol Innov Stud 2:127–141
31. Whittingham RB (2004) The blame machine: why human error causes accidents. Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford/Burlington
32. [AA587] (2004) Aircraft accident report: in-flight separation of vertical stabilizer American Airlines Flight 587 Airbus Industrie A300-605R, N14053 Belle Harbor, New York, 12 Nov 2001. National Transportation Safety Board, Washington, DC
33. [Aeroflot593] (1995) Akt po rezultatam rassledovanija katastrofy samoleta A310-308 F-OGQS, proisšedšej 22 marta 1994 g. v rajone g. Meždurečenska. Departament Vozdušnogo Transporta, Kommisija po Rassledovaniju Aviacionnogo Proisšestvija, Moskva. In Russian
34. [AirFrance447] (2012) Final report on the accident on 1st June 2009 to the Airbus A330-203 registered F-GZCP operated by Air France flight AF 447 Rio de Janeiro – Paris. Bureau d’Enquêtes et d’Analyses pour la Se´curite´ de l’Aviation Civile. Official translation of the original French version
35. [Amazonas] (2008) Final report A-00X/CENIPA/2008. Comando Aeronáutico, Estado-Maior da Aeronáutica, Centro de Investigação e Prevenção de Acidentes Aeronáuticos, Brasilia. Official translation of the Portuguese version
36. [Concorde] (2000) Accident on 25 July 2000 at La Patte d’Oie in Gonesse (95) to the Concorde registered F-BTSC operated by Air France. Bureau d’Enquêtes et d’Analyses pour la sécurité de l’aviation civile. Official translation of the original French version
37. [EgyptAir990] (2002) Aircraft accident brief: EgyptAir Flight 990 Boeing 67-366ER, SU-GAP 60 Miles South of Nantucket, 31 Oct 1999. National Transportation Safety Board, Washington, DC
38. [Eurocontrol] (2002) ACAS II Bulletin, Eurocontrol
39. [ICAO8168] (2006) Procedures for Air Navigation Services: Aircraft operations. Volume I, Flight procedures, Fifth edn. International Civil Aviation Organization, document 8168
40. [ICAO9863] (2006) Airborne Collision Avoidance System (ACAS) manual, First edn. International Civil Aviation Organization, document 9863
41. [ICAOAnn2] (2005) Rules of the air: Annex 2 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation, Tenth edn. International Civil Aviation Organization
42. [INSAG-7] (1992) INSAG-7; The Chernobyl accident: an updating of INSAG-1. A report by the International Nuclear Safety Advisory Group. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna. Safety Series No. 75
43. [JA907/958] (2002) Aircraft accident investigation report: Japan Airlines Flight 907, Boeing 747-400D, JA8904, Japan Airlines Flight 958, Douglas-DC-10-40, a near midair collision over the sea off Yaizu City, Shizuoka Prefecture, Japan, at about 15:55 JST, January 31, 2001. Aircraft and Railway Accidents Investigation Commission. Official translation of the original Japanese version
44. [Ladbroke Grove] (2001) The Ladbroke Grove rail inquiry. Part 1 report. The Rt Hon Lord Cullen PC. HSE Books
45. [Linate] (2004) Final report (as approved by ANSV Board on the 20th of January 2004): accident involved aircraft Boeing MD-87, registration SE-DMA and Cessna 525-A, registration D-IEVX Milano Linate airport, 8 Oct 2001. Agenzia Nazionale per la Sicurezza del Volo, Roma. Official translation of the original Italian version
46. [Lufthansa2904] (1994) Report on the accident to Airbus A320-211 aircraft in Warsaw on 14 Sep 1993. Unofficial translation of the original Polish report, Państwowa Komisja Badania Wypadków Lotniczych, Warsaw, by Peter Ladkin
47. [Rules of the Air 2007] (2007) The rules of the air: regulations 2007. Statutory instruments 2007 No. 734; Civil aviation. The Stationery Office Limited, London
48. [Tenerife] (1978) Joint report K.L.M.-P.A.A. 12.7.1978. Colisión aeronaves Boeing 747 PH-BUF de K.L.M. y Boeing 747 N 737 PA de PanAm en Los Rodeos (Tenerife) el 27 de marzo de 1.977. Ministerio de Transportes y Comunicaciones, Subsecretaría de Aviación Civil, Dirección de Transporte Aereo, Comisión de Accidentes, Madrid