A comparative evaluation of AMQP and MQTT protocols over unstable and mobile networks

2015 12th Annual IEEE Consumer Communications and Networking Conference, CCNC 2015

Volumn , Issue , 2015, Pages 931-936

  Luzuriaga, Jorge E ^a   Perez, Miguel ^b   Boronat, Pablo ^b   Cano, Juan Carlos ^a   Calafate, Carlos ^a   Manzoni, Pietro ^a  

^a UNIVERSITAT POLITÈCNICA DE VALÈNCIA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITAT JAUME I   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DISTRIBUTED DATABASE SYSTEMS; MIDDLEWARE;

BOUNDARY VALUES; COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS; DISTRIBUTED SYSTEMS; EXPERIMENTAL EVALUATION; MESSAGE ORIENTED MIDDLEWARE; PARTICIPATING SYSTEMS; SOFTWARE INFRASTRUCTURE; VEHICULAR NETWORKS;

INTERNET PROTOCOLS;

EID: 84943143812     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/CCNC.2015.7158101     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Appel, Stefan and Sachs, Kai and Buchmann, Alejandro, Towards benchmarking of AMQP, ACM, Proceedings of the Fourth ACM International Conference on Distributed Event-Based Systems, 99-100, 2010.
2. Chen, Whei-Jen and Gupta, Rahul and Lampkin, Valerie and Robertson, Dale M. and Subrahmanyam, Nagesh, Responsive Mobile User Experience Using MQTT and IBM MessageSight IBM Corp., 2014.
3. Gluhak, A. and Krco, S. and Nati, M. and Pfisterer, D. and Mitton, N. and Razafindralambo, T., A survey on facilities for experimental internet of things research, IEEE, Communications Magazine, pp. 58-67, 2009.
4. Gusmeroli, S. and Piccione, S. and Rotondi, D., IoT@Work automation middleware system design and architecture, IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation ETFA, 2012.
5. Fernandes, J.L. and Lopes, I.C. and Rodrigues, J.J.P.C. and Ullah, S., Performance evaluation of RESTful web services and AMQP protocol, IEEE ICUFN, pp. 810-815, 2013.
6. Kramer, Joshua Advanced Message Queuing Protocol (AMQP), Linux Journal 187, Houston, TX, 2009.
7. Lee, Shinho and Kim, Hyeonwoo and Hong, Dong Kweon and Ju, Hongtaek Correlation analysis of MQTT loss and delay according to QoS level, International Conference on Information Networking, pp. 714-717, 2013.
8. Luzuriaga, J. and Perez, M. and Boronat, P. and Cano, J. C. and Calafate, C. and Manzoni, P. Testing AMQP Protocol on Unstable and Mobile Networks, Internet and Distributed Computing Systems, 7th International Conference, IDCS 2014, Italy, Proceedings Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 250-260.
9. O'Hara, John, Toward a Commodity Enterprise Middleware, ACM, Communications Magazine, 2007
10. Subramoni, Hari and Marsh, Gregory and Narravula, Sundeep and Lai, Ping and Panda, Dhabaleswar K. Design and evaluation of benchmarks for financial applications using advanced message queuing protocol (AMQP) over infiniband, Workshop on High Performance Computational Finance, WHPCF 2008.
11. Vermesan, O. and Harrison, V. M. and Kalaboukas, H.K. and Tomasella, M. and (Eds.) The Internet of Things-Strategic Research Roadmap, Cluster of European Research Projects on the IoT, CERP-IoT, 2009.
12. Vinoski, S, Advanced Message Queuing Protocol, IEEE Internet Computing, vol.10, 2006.
13. Cohn, Raphael StormMQ: A Comparison of AMQP and MQTT, Available: www.stormmq.com, 2011.
14. OpenStack, Foundation AMQP and Nova, Available: http://docs.openstack.org/developer/nova/devref/rpc.html, 2014.
15. IMatix, Corporation Security and Robustness, Available: http://zeromq.org/docs:welcome-from-amqp, 2014.
16. Pivotal Software, Inc., Messaging that just works, Available: https://www.rabbitmq.com/reliability.html, 2014.
17. OASIS, Standard OASIS Advanced Message Queuing Protocol AMQP Version 1.0, 2014.