Accounting for inertia in modal choices: Some new evidence using a RP/SP dataset

Transportation

Volumn 38, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 679-695

  Cherchi, Elisabetta ^a   Manca, Francesco ^b  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF DENMARK   (Denmark)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CAGLIARI   (Italy)

Author keywords

Inertia; Modal choice; RP SP dataset; Weighted experiences

Indexed keywords

EXPERIMENTS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

DATA SETS; INERTIA; INERTIA EFFECTS; LEARNING PROCESS; MIXED LOGIT MODELS; MODAL CHOICE; REVEALED PREFERENCE; RP/SP DATASET; STATED PREFERENCES; WEIGHTED EXPERIENCES;

DECISION MAKING;

DATA SET; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; INERTIA; LEARNING; LOGIT ANALYSIS; METHODOLOGY; OBSERVATIONAL METHOD; PREFERENCE BEHAVIOR;

EID: 84943014875     PISSN: 00494488     EISSN: 15729435     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11116-011-9338-9     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Adamowicz, W.: Habit formation and variety seeking in a discrete choice model of recreation demand. J. Agric. Resour. Econ. 19, 19-31 (1994).
2. Bhat, C., Castelar, S.: A unified mixed logit framework for modeling revealed and stated preferences: formulation and application to congestion pricing analysis in the San Francisco bay area. Transp. Res. B 36(7), 577-669 (2002).
3. Bradley, M.: A practical comparison of modeling approaches for panel data. In: Golob, T. F., Kitamura, R., Long, L. (eds.) Panels for Transportation Planning: Methods and Applications. Kluwer, Boston (1997).
4. Bradley, M., Daly, A.: Estimation of logit choice models using mixed stated preference and revealed preference information. In: Stopher, P., Lee-Gosselin, M. (eds.) Understanding Travel Behaviour in an Era of Change. Pergamon, Oxford (1997).
5. Cantillo, V., Ortúzar, J. de D., Williams, H. C. W. L.: Modelling discrete choices in the presence of inertia and serial correlation. Transp. Sci. 41(2), 195-205 (2007).
6. Chatterjee, K., Ma, K.: Behavioural responses to a new transport option-a dynamic analysis using a six-month panel survey. In: 11th International conference on travel behaviour research, Kyoto, Japan (2006).
7. Cherchi, E., Cirillo, C.: On the day-to-day variability in modal choices: a mixed logit mode choice model on panel data. In: XV Panamerican Conference. Lisbon, Portugal (2010).
8. Cherchi, E., Ortúzar, J. de D.: Mixed RP/SP models incorporating interaction effects: modelling new suburban train services in Cagliari. Transportation 29(4), 371-395 (2002).
9. Cherchi, E., Ortúzar, J. de D.: Use of mixed revealed-preference and stated-preference models with nonlinear effects in forecasting. Transp. Res. Rec. 1977, 27-34 (2006).
10. Cherchi, E., Ortúzar, J. de D.: On the use of mixed RP/SP models in prediction: accounting for random taste heterogeneity. Transp. Sci. 45(1), 98-108 (2011).
11. Clarke, M., Dix, M., Goodwin, P.: Some issues of dynamics in forecasting travel behaviour-a discussion paper. Transportation 11(2), 153-172 (1982).
12. Gärling, T., Axhausen, K.: Introduction: habitual travel choice. Transportation 30, 1-11 (2003).
13. Garvill, J., Marell, A., Nordlund, A.: Effects of increate awareness on choice of travel mode. Transportation 30, 63-79 (2003).
14. Golob, T.: Structural equation modelling of travel choice dynamics. In: Jones, P. (ed.) Developments in Dynamic and Activity-Based Approaches to Travel Analysis. Aldershot, Hants, England, Gower (1990).
15. Goodwin, P.: Habit and Hysteresis in Mode Choice. Urban Studies 14, 95-98 (1977).
16. Hanson, S., Huff, J.: Classification issues in the analysis of complex travel behaviour. Transportation 13(3), 271-293 (1986).
17. Heckman, J., Singer, B.: Econometric analysis of longitudinal data. In: Griliches, Z., Intriligator, M. (eds.) Handbook of Econometrics. North-Holland, Amsterdam (1986).
18. Hirobata, Y., Kawakami, S.: Modeling disaggregate behavioral modal switching models based on intention data. Transp. Res. B 24(1), 15-25 (1990).
19. Jara-Díaz, S. R., Farah, M.: Transport demand and users' benefits with fixed income: the goods/leisure trade-off revisited. Transp. Res. B 21(2), 165-170 (1987).
20. Hoeffler, S., Ariely, D.: Constructing stable preferences: a look into dimensions of experience and their impact on preference stability. Journal of Consumer Psychology 8(2), 113-139 (1999).
21. Huff, J., Hanson, S.: Measurement of habitual behaviour: examining systematic variability in repetitive travel. In: Jones, P. (ed.) Developments in Dynamic and Activity-Based Approach to Travel Analysis, pp. 229-249. Aldershot, Hants, England, Gower (1990).
22. Johannesson, M., Lundin, D.: The impact of physical preferences and patient habits on the diffusion of new drug', Working Paper, Department of Economics, Stockholm School of Economics (2000).
23. Kitamura, R., van der Hoorn, T.: Regularity and irreversibility of weekly travel behaviour. Transportation 14(3), 227-251 (1987).
24. Morikawa, T.: Correcting state dependence and serial correlation in the RP/SP combined estimation method. Transportation 21(2), 153-165 (1994).
25. Ortúzar, J. de D.: Modelling Transport, 4th edn. Wiley, Chichester (2011).
26. Pas, E., Koppelman, F.: An examination of the determinants of day-to-day variability in individuals' urban travel behaviour. Transportation 13(2), 183-200 (1986).
27. Pas, E., Sundar, S.: Intrapersonal variability in daily urban travel behavior: some additional evidence. Transportation 22(2), 135-150 (1995).
28. Ramadurai, G., Srinivasan, K.: Dynamics and variability in within-day mode choice decisions: role of state dependence, habit persistence, and unobserved heterogeneity. Transp. Res. Rec. 1977, 43-52 (2006).
29. Srinivasan, K., Bhargavi, P.: Longer-term changes in mode choice decisions in Chennai: a comparison between cross-sectional and dynamic models. Transportation 34(3), 355-374 (2007).
30. Swait, J., Adamowicz, W., van Bueren, M.: Choice and temporal welfare impacts: incorporating history into discrete choice models. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 47(1), 94-116 (2004).
31. Train, K.: Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2009).
32. Walker, J.: Extended discrete choice models: integrated framework, flexible error structures and latent variables. PhD Thesis, MIT (2001).
33. Williams, H. C. W. L., Ortúzar, J. de D.: Behavioural theories of dispersion and the misspecification of travel demand models. Transp. Res. 16B, 167-219 (1982).
34. Yáñez, F., Cherchi, E., Heydecker, B. G., Ortúzar, J. de D.: Inertia and shock effects on mode choice panel data: implications of the Transantiago implementation. In: 12th International Conference on Travel Behaviour Research. Jaipur, India (2009).
35. Yáñez, F., Cherchi, E., Heydecker, B. G., Ortúzar, J. de D.: On the treatment of repeated observations in panel data: efficiency of Mixed Logit parameter estimates. Netw. Spatial Econ. (2010a). doi: 10. 1007/s11067-010-9143-6.
36. Yáñez, F., Cherchi, E., Ortúzar, J. de D.: Defining inter-alternative error structures for joint RP-SP modelling: some new evidence. Transp. Res. Rec. 2175, 65-73 (2010).
37. Yañez, F., Cherchi, E., Ortúzar, J. de D.: Forecasting with discrete choice panel models incorporating temporal effects. In: 12th World Conference on Transport Research. Lisbon, Portugal (2010c).