Reliability and construct validity of PROMIS® measures for patients with heart failure who undergo heart transplant

Quality of Life Research

Volumn 24, Issue 11, 2015, Pages 2591-2599

  Flynn, Kathryn E ^a   Dew, Mary Amanda ^b,c   Lin, Li ^e   Fawzy, Maria ^e   Graham, Felicia L ^e   Hahn, Elizabeth A ^g   Hays, Ron D ^h   Kormos, Robert L ^d   Liu, Honghu ^h   McNulty, Mary ^b   Weinfurt, Kevin P ^e,f  

^a MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^e DUKE CLINICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^f DUKE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^g NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^h UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Congestive heart failure; Outcomes research; Patient reported outcomes

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AFRICAN AMERICAN; ARTICLE; ASIAN; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE ASSESSMENT; CAUCASIAN; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONSTRUCT VALIDITY; CONVERGENT VALIDITY; DEPRESSION; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEALTH STATUS; HEART FAILURE; HEART GRAFT; HISPANIC; HUMAN; MALE; MEDICAL RECORD REVIEW; MIDDLE AGED; NEW YORK HEART ASSOCIATION CLASS; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PATIENT HEALTH QUESTIONNAIRE 2; PATIENT REPORTED OUTCOMES MEASUREMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM; POSTGRADUATE STUDENT; RELIABILITY; SELF REPORT; SHORT FORM 36; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL INTERACTION; SOCIAL STATUS; TELEPHONE INTERVIEW; FATIGUE; HEART TRANSPLANTATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PSYCHOLOGY; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; REHABILITATION; REPRODUCIBILITY; VALIDATION STUDY;

ADULT; DEPRESSION; FATIGUE; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS; HEART FAILURE; HEART TRANSPLANTATION; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); QUALITY OF LIFE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 84942987863     PISSN: 09629343     EISSN: 15732649     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11136-015-1010-y     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Barnes, S., Gott, M., Payne, S., Parker, C., Seamark, D., Gariball, S., & Small, N. (2006). Prevalence of symptoms in a community-based sample of heart failure patients. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management,32(3), 208–216.
2. Dracup, K., Walden, J. A., Stevenson, L. W., & Brecht, M. L. (1992). Quality of life in patients with advanced heart failure. Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation,11(2 Pt 1), 273–279.
3. Rumsfeld, J. S., Alexander, K. P., Goff, D. C, Jr, Graham, M. M., Ho, P. M., Masoudi, F. A., et al. (2013). Cardiovascular health: The importance of measuring patient-reported health status: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation,127(22), 2233–2249.
4. Garin, O., Herdman, M., Vilagut, G., Ferrer, M., Ribera, A., Rajmil, L., et al. (2014). Assessing health-related quality of life in patients with heart failure: A systematic, standardized comparison of available measures. Heart Failure Reviews,19(3), 359–367.
5. Rector, T. S., & Cohn, J. N. (1992). Assessment of patient outcome with the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure questionnaire: Reliability and validity during a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of pimobendan. Pimobendan Multicenter Research Group. American Heart Journal,124(4), 1017–1025.
6. Green, C. P., Porter, C. B., Bresnahan, D. R., & Spertus, J. A. (2000). Development and evaluation of the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire: A new health status measure for heart failure. Journal of the American College of Cardiology,35(5), 1245–1255.
7. Kappelman, M. D., Long, M. D., Martin, C., DeWalt, D. A., Kinneer, P. M., Chen, W., et al. (2014). Evaluation of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System in a large cohort of patients with inflammatory bowel diseases. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology,12(8), 1315–1323. e2.
8. Fries, J. F., Cella, D., Rose, M., Krishnan, E., & Bruce, B. (2009). Progress in assessing physical function in arthritis: PROMIS short forms and computerized adaptive testing. Journal of Rheumatology,36(9), 2061–2066.
9. Hays, R. D., Spritzer, K. L., Fries, J. F., & Krishnan, E. (2013). Responsiveness and minimally important difference for the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) 20-item physical functioning short form in a prospective observational study of rheumatoid arthritis. Annals of Rheumatic Diseases,. doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204053.
10. Broderick, J. E., Schneider, S., Junghaenel, D. U., Schwartz, J. E., & Stone, A. A. (2013). Validity and reliability of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System instruments in osteoarthritis. Arthritis Care & Research,65(10), 1625–1633.
11. Yost, K. J., Eton, D. T., Garcia, S. F., & Cella, D. (2011). Minimally important differences were estimated for six Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-Cancer scales in advanced-stage cancer patients. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology,64(5), 507–516.
12. Hahn, E. A., Devellis, R. F., Bode, R. K., Garcia, S. F., Castel, L. D., Eisen, S. V., et al. (2010). Measuring social health in the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS): Item bank development and testing. Quality of Life Research,19(7), 1035–1044.
13. Pilkonis, P. A., Choi, S. W., Reise, S. P., Stover, A. M., Riley, W. T., Cella, D., & PROMIS Cooperative Group. (2011). Item banks for measuring emotional distress from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS): Depression, anxiety, and anger. Assessment,18(3), 263–283.
14. Cella, D., Riley, W., Stone, A., Rothrock, N., Reeve, B., Yount, S., et al. (2010). The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) developed and tested its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item banks: 2005–2008. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology,63(11), 1179–1194.
15. McHorney, C. A., Ware, J. E, Jr, Lu, J. F., & Sherbourne, C. D. (1994). The MOS 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): III. Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability across diverse patient groups. Medical Care,32(1), 40–66.
16. Ware, J. E, Jr, & Sherbourne, C. D. (1992). The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Medical Care,30(6), 473–483.
17. Kroenke, K., Spitzer, R. L., & Williams, J. B. (2003). The Patient Health Questionnaire-2: Validity of a two-item depression screener. Medical Care,41(11), 1284–1292.
18. Balke, B. (1963). A simple field test for the assessment of physical fitness. Oklahoma City, OK: Civil Aeromedical Research Institute, Aeromedical Research Division, 1963 Apr. Report No.: 63-6.
19. ATS Committee on Proficiency Standards for Clinical Pulmonary Function Laboratories. (2002). ATS statement: Guidelines for the six-minute walk test. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine,166(1), 111–117.
20. Grady, K. L., & Lanuza, D. M. (2005). Physical functional outcomes after cardiothoracic transplantation. Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing,20(5 Suppl), S43–S50.
21. Molzahn, A. E., Burton, J. R., McCormick, P., Modry, D. L., Soetaert, P., & Taylor, P. (1997). Quality of life of candidates for and recipients of heart transplants. Canadian Journal of Cardiology,13(2), 141–146.
22. Paris, W., & White-Williams, C. (2005). Social adaptation after cardiothoracic transplantation: a review of the literature. Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing,20(5 Suppl), S67–S73.
23. Hays, R. D., & Reeve, B. B. (2010). Measurement and modeling of health-related quality of life. In J. Killewo, H. K. Heggenhougen, & S. R. Quah (Eds.), Epidemiology and demography in public health (pp. 195–205). San Diego: Academic Press.
24. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
25. Efron, B., & Tibshirani, R. J. (1993). An introduction to the bootstrap. New York: Chapman & Hall.
26. Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin,56(2), 81–105.
27. Bjorner, J. B., Rose, M., Gandek, B., Stone, A. A., Junghaenel, D. U., & Ware, J. E, Jr. (2014). Difference in method of administration did not significantly impact item response: An IRT-based analysis from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) initiative. Quality of Life Research,23(1), 217–227.
28. Hahn, E. A., Rao, D., Cella, D., & Choi, S. W. (2008). Comparability of interview- and self-administration of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) in English- and Spanish-speaking ambulatory cancer patients. Medical Care,46(4), 423–431.