Experimental pragmatics: Towards testing relevance-based predictions about anaphoric bridging inferences

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 2116, Issue , 2001, Pages 248-260

  Matsui, Tomoko ^a  

^a INTERNATIONAL CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; COMPUTER SCIENCE; COMPUTERS;

EXPERIMENTAL PRAGMATICS; RELEVANCE THEORIES;

FORECASTING;

EID: 84942927105     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-44607-9_19     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. Bach, K. Conversational impliciture. Mind and Language 9, 124-162. 1994
2. Carston, R. Implicature, explicature and truth-theoretic semantics. R. Kempson (ed.), Mental Representations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1988
3. Carston, R. Pragmatics and the Explicit-Implicit Distinction. PhD thesis, University College London. 1998
4. Carston, R. Cognitive pragmatics and explicit communication. Paper given at Mind & Language Pragmatics and Cognitive Science Workshop, Oxford. 2000a
5. Carston, R. Explicature and semantics. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 12, 1-44. 2000b
6. Clark, H., Bridging, P. Wason & P. Johnson-Laird (eds), Thinking: Readings in Cognitive Science, 411-420. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1977
7. Gibbs, R. The Poetics of Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1994
8. Gibbs, R. & Moise, J. Pragmatics in understanding what is said. Cognition 62, 51-74. 1997
9. Grice, H. P. Logic and conversation. P. Cole & J. Morgan (eds), Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech Acts, 41-58. New York: Academic Press. 1975
10. Levinson, S. Presumptive Meaning. Cambridge, Mass: The MIT Press. 2000
11. Matsui, T. Pragmatic criteria for reference assignment: A relevance-theoretic account of the acceptability of bridging. Pragmatics and Cognition 6 (1/2): 47-97. 1998
12. Matsui, T. Bridging and Relevance. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 2000
13. Recanati, F. The pragmatics of what is said. Mind and Language 4, 295-329. 1989
14. Recanati, F. Direct Reference: From Language to Thought. Oxford: Blackwell. 1993
15. Revlin, R. & Hegarty, M. Resolving signals to cohesion: two models of bridging inference. Discourse Processes 27/1, 77-102. 1999
16. Sanford, A. & Garrod, S.Understanding Written Language. Chichester: John Wiley. 1981
17. Sanford, A. & Garrod, S. The role of scenario mapping in text comprehension. Discourse Processes 26(2&3), 159-190. 1998
18. Sperber, D. & Wilson, D. Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell. 1986/95
19. Wilson, D. & Matsui, T. Recent approaches to bridging: truth, coherence, and relevance. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 10: 173-200. 1998
20. Wilson, D. & Sperber, D. Mood and the analysis of non-declarative sentences. J. Darcy, J. Moravcsik & C. Taylor (eds), Human Agency: Language, Duty and Value, 77-101. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. 1988
21. Wilson, D. & Sperber, D. Truthfulness and relevance. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 12, 215-254. 2000.