Rule reduction over numerical attributes in decision trees using multilayer perceptron

Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence (Subseries of Lecture Notes in Computer Science)

Volumn 2035, Issue , 2001, Pages 538-549

  Kim, Dae Eun ^a   Lee, Jaeho ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^b University of Seoul   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BACKPROPAGATION; DECISION TREES; MULTILAYERS; TREES (MATHEMATICS);

COMPACT SETS; CONTINUOUS-VALUED ATTRIBUTE; INPUT VARIABLES; LINEAR CLASSIFIERS; NEURAL NETWORK MODEL; NONLINEAR CHARACTERISTICS; NUMERICAL ATTRIBUTES; RULE REDUCTION;

DATA MINING;

EID: 84942926848     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-45357-1_57     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. R. Andrews, J. Diederich, and A.B. Tickle. A survey and critique of techniques for extracting rules from trained artificial neural networks. Knowledge-Based Systems, 8(6), 1996.
2. C. Blake, E. Keogh, and C.J. Merz. UCI repository of machine learning databases. In Preceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Machine Learning, http://www.ics.uci.edu/~mlearn, 1998.
3. G. Cybenko. Continuous valued neural networks with two hidden layers are sufficient. Technical report, Technical Report, Department of Computer Science, Tufts University, Medford, MA, 1988.
4. T.G. Dietterich, H. Hild, and G. Bakiri. A comparative study of id3 and backpropagation for english text-to-speech mapping. In Proceedings of the 1990 Machine Learning Conference, pages 24-31. Austin, TX, 1990.
5. U.M. Fayyad and K.B. Irani. Multi-interval discretization of continuous-valued attributes for classification learning. In Proceedings of IJCAI'93, pages 1022-1027.
6. Morgan Kaufmann, 1993.
7. D.H. Fisher and K.B. McKusick. An empirical comparison of id3 and backpropagation. In Proceedings of 11th International Joint Conference on AI, pages 788-793, 1989.
8. L. Fu. Rule learning by searching on adaptive nets. In Preceedings of the 9th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 590-595, 1991.
9. L. Fu. Neural Networks in Computer Intelligence. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1994.
10. S.S. Haykin. Neural networks : A comprehensive foundation. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, N.J., 2nd edition, 1999.
11. J. Hertz, R.G. Palmer, and A.S. Krogh. Introduction to the Theory of Neural Computation. Addision Wesley, Redwood City, Calif., 1991.
12. K. Hornik, M. Stinchrombe, and H. White. Multilayer feedforward networks are universal approximators. Neural Networks, 2(5):359-366, 1989.
13. K.B. Irani and Qian Z. Karsm : A combined response surface / knowledge acquisition approach for deriving rules for expert system. In TECHCON'90 Conference, pages 209-212, 1990.
14. D. Kim. Knowledge acquisition based on neural network modeling. Technical report, Directed Study, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, 1991.
15. D. Kim and J. Lee. Handling continuous-valued attributes in decision tree using neural network modeling. In European Conference on Machine Learning, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence 1810, pages 211-219. Springer Verlag, 2000.
16. W. Kweldo and M. Kretowski. An evolutionary algorithm using multivariate discretization for decision rule induction. In Proceedings of the Third European Conference on Principles of Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, pages 392-397. Springer, 1999.
17. J.R. Quinlan. Comparing connectionist and symbolic learning methods. In Computational Learning Theory and Natural Learning Systems, pages 445-456. MIT Press, 1994.
18. J.R. Quinlan. Improved use of continuous attributes in c4.5. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Approach, (4):77-90, 1996.
19. R. Setiono and Huan Lie. Symbolic representation of neural networks. Computer, 29(3):71-77, 1996.
20. R. Setiono and H. Liu. Neurolinear: A system for extracting oblique decision rules from neural networks. In European Conference on Machine Learning, pages 221- 233. Springer Verlag, 1997.
21. J.W. Shavlik, R.J. Mooney, and G.G. Towell. Symbolic and neural learning algorithms: An experimental comparison. Machine Learning, 6(2):111-143, 1991.
22. Ismail A. Taha and Joydeep Ghosh. Symbolic interpretation of artificial neural networks. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 11(3):448-463, 1999.
23. G.G. Towell and J.W. Shavlik. Extracting refined rules from knowledge-based neural networks. Machine Learning, 13(1):71-101, Oct. 1993.