Modelling trust for system design using the i∗ Strategic actors framework

Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence (Subseries of Lecture Notes in Computer Science)

Volumn 2246, Issue , 2001, Pages 175-194

  Eric, Yu ^a   Lin, Liu ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; SMART CARDS;

AGENT-ORIENTED SYSTEMS; CLEAR CUTS; DEPENDENCY RELATIONSHIP; HIGH-LEVEL DESIGN; MODEL QUALITIES; QUALITATIVE REASONING; SUPPORT REQUIREMENTS; TRUST RELATIONSHIP;

AUTONOMOUS AGENTS;

EID: 84942921136     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (28)

1. Birk, A.: Trust in an N-Player Iterated Prisoner's Dilemma. Proc. of Deception, Fraud and Trust in Agent Societies Workshop, Autonomous Agent 1999, Seattle, USA, May 1999.
2. Biswas, A., Mundhe, M., Debnath, S., Sen, S.:ABayesian Network Based Approach for Modeling Agent Relationships. Proc. of Deception, Fraud and Trust in Agent Societies Workshop, Autonomous Agent 1999, Seattle, USA, May 1999.
3. Camp, L.J.: Trust and Risk in Internet Commerce. MIT Press, 2000.
4. Castelfranchi, C. and Falcone, R.: The Dynamics of Trust: From Beliefs to Action. Proc. of Deception, Fraud and Trust in Agent Societies Workshop, Autonomous Agent 1999, Seattle, USA, May 1999. 49-60.
5. Castelfranchi, C. and Falcone, R.: Does Control Reduce or Increase Trust? A complex relationship. Proc. of Deception, Fraud and Trust in Agent Societies workshop, Autonomous Agent 2000, Barcelona, Spain, June 2000. 49-60.
6. Chung, L.: Representing and Using Non-Functional Requirements for the Information System Development: A Process-Oriented Approach, Ph.D. Thesis, also Tech. Report DKBS-TR-93-1, Dept. of Computer Science, University of Toronto, June 1993.
7. Chung, L., Nixon, B. A., Yu, E., Mylopoulos, J.: Non-Functional Requirements in Software Engineering. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2000.
8. Jonker, C. M., Treur, J.: Formal Analysis of Models for the Dynamics of Trust Based on Experiences. Proc. of Deception, Fraud and Trust in Agent SocietiesWorkshop, Autonomous Agent 1999, Seattle, USA, May 1999.
9. Marsh, S., Meech, J.F., Dabbour, A.: Putting Trust into E-Commerce - One Page at a Time. Proc. of Deception, Fraud and Trust in Agent Societies Workshop, Autonomous Agents'2000. Barcelona, Spain, June 2000.
10. Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., Schoorman, F. D.:AnIntegration Model of Organizational Trust, Academy of Management. The Academy of Management Review, Vol. 20(3), Jul 1995.
11. Mylopoulos, J., Chung, L., Wang, H.Q., Liao, S., Yu, E.: Extending Object-Oriented Analysis to Explore Alternatives. IEEE Software. January/February 2001.
12. Mylopoulos, J., Chung, L., Nixon, B.: Representing and Using the Non-Functional Requirements: A Process-Oriented Approach, IEEE Trans. Software Engineering. 18(6), June 1992.
13. Mylopoulos, J., Chung, L., Yu, E.: From Object-Oriented to Goal-Oriented Requirements Analysis, Communications of the ACM, 42(1): 31-37, January 1999.
14. Salter, S., Saydjari, O., Schneier, B., Wallner, J.: Toward a Secure System Engineering Methodology, Proc. of New Security Paradigms Workshop 1998, IEEE Computer Society Press.
15. Schillo, M., Funk, P., Rovatsos, M.: Who Can You Trust: Dealing with Deception. Proc. of Deception, Fraud and Trust in Agent Societies Workshop, Autonomous Agent 1999, Seattle, USA, May 1999.
16. Schneider, F. B.: Trust in Cyberspace. Committee on Information Systems Trustworthiness, Computer Science and Telecommunications Board, National Research Council. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press, 1999. Also available at http://cryptome.org/tic.htm.
17. Schneier, B.: Attack Trees Modelling Security Threats. Dr.Dobb's Journal, December 1999. Also available at http://www.counterpane.com/attacktrees-ddj-ft.html.
18. Schneier, B., Shostack, A.: Breaking Up Is Hard To Do: Modelling Security Threats for Smart Cards.Available at http://www.counterpane.com/smart-card-threats.html. Also First USENIX Symposium on Smart Cards, USENIX Press, to appear.
19. Serban, R, van de Riet, R.: Hiding in a Group: Who is Responsible? Proc. of Deception, Fraud and Trust in Agent Societies Workshop, Autonomous Agents'2000. Barcelona, Spain, June, 2000.
20. Stalder, F., Clement, A.: Exploring Policy Issues of Electronic Cash: The Mondex Case, Canadian Journal of Communication, 24(2). 1999.
21. Tan, Y., Thoen, W.: Formal Aspects of a Generic Model of Trust for Electronic Commerce. Proc. of Deception, Fraud and Trust in Agent Societies Workshop, Autonomous Agents'2000. Barcelona, Spain, June 2000.
22. Tan, Y., Thoen, W.: Towards a Generic Model of Trust for Electronic Commerce. Proc. of Deception, Fraud and Trust in Agent Societies Workshop, Autonomous Agent 1999, Seattle, USA, May 1999.
23. Yu, E.: Modelling Strategic Relationships for Process Reengineering, Ph.D. thesis, also Tech. Report DKBS-TR-94-6, Dept. of Computer Science, University of Toronto, 1995.
24. Yu, E.: Towards Modelling and Reasoning Support for Early-Phase Requirements Engineering, Proc. 3rd IEEE Int. Symp. On Requirements Engineering (RE'97), Annapolis, Maryland, USA, January 1997.
25. Yu, E., Mylopoulos, J.: From E-R to 'A-R' - Modelling Strategic Relationships for Business Process Reengineering, Int. Journal of Intelligent and Cooperative Information Systems, 4(2&3), 1995, pp.125-144.
26. Yu, E., Mylopoulos, J.: Understanding 'Why' in Software Process Modelling, Analysis, and Design, Proceedings of 16th International Conference On Software Engineering, May 1994, pp. 159-168.
27. Yu, E., Mylopoulos, J., Lesperance, Y.: AI Models for Business Process Reengineering, IEEE Expert, August 1996, pp.16-23.
28. Zacharia, G.: Trust Management through Reputation Mechanisms. Proc. of Deception, Fraud and Trust in Agent Societies Workshop, Autonomous Agent 1999, Seattle, USA, May 1999.