Digital photoplethysmography for assessment of arterial stiffness: Repeatability and comparison with applanation tonometry

PLoS ONE

Volumn 10, Issue 8, 2015, Pages

  Von Wowern, Emma ^a   Östling, Gerd ^a   Nilsson, Peter M ^a   Olofsson, Per ^a  

^a LUND UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; AGED; ARTERIAL STIFFNESS; ARTICLE; BODY HEIGHT; BODY MASS; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIGITAL IMAGING; FEMALE; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE EJECTION TIME; HEART RATE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; MEASUREMENT REPEATABILITY; PHOTOELECTRIC PLETHYSMOGRAPHY; PREGNANT WOMAN; PULSE WAVE; TONOMETRY; AORTA; ARTERY; BLOOD PRESSURE; ELASTICITY; MANOMETRY; MIDDLE AGED; PHYSIOLOGY; PREGNANCY; PROCEDURES; PULSE RATE; RISK FACTOR; VERY ELDERLY; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AORTA; ARTERIES; BLOOD PRESSURE; ELASTICITY; FEMALE; HEART RATE; HUMANS; MALE; MANOMETRY; MIDDLE AGED; PHOTOPLETHYSMOGRAPHY; PREGNANCY; PULSE; PULSE WAVE ANALYSIS; RISK FACTORS; VASCULAR STIFFNESS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84942913371     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0135659     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Boutouyrie P, Tropeano AI, Asmar R, Gautier I, Benetos A, Lacolley P, et al. Aortic stiffness is an independent predictor of primary coronary events in hypertensive patients: a longitudinal study. Hypertension 2002; 39:10-15. PMID: 11799071
2. Laurent S, Cockcroft J, Van Bortel L, Boutouyrie P, Giannattasio C, Hayoz D, et al. on behalf of the European Network for Non-invasive investigation of large arteries. Expert consensus document on arterial stiffness: methodological issues and clinical applications. Europ Heart J 2006; 27:2588-26053.
3. Blacher J, Asmar R, Djane S, London GM, Safar ME. Aortic pulse wave velocity as a marker of cardiovascular risk in hypertensive patients. Hypertension 1999; 33:1111-17. PMID: 10334796
4. Bortolotto LA, Blacher J, Kondo T, Takazawa K, Safar ME. Assessment of vascular aging and atherosclerosis in hypertensive subjects: second derivative of photoplethysmogram versus pulse wave velocity. Am J Hypertens 2000; 13:165-71. PMID: 10701816
5. Yasmin, Brown MJ. Similarities and differences between augmentation index and pulse wave velocity in the assessment of arterial stiffness. Q J Med 1999; 92:595-600.
6. Kelly RP, Millasseau SC, Ritter JM, Chowienczyk PJ. Vasoactive drugs influence aortic augmenation index independently of pulse-wave velocity in healthy men. Hypertension 2001; 37:1429-33. PMID: 11408390
7. Nichols WW. Clinical measurement of arterial stiffness obtained from noninvasive pressure waveforms. AJH 2005; 18:3S-10S. PMID: 15683725
8. Nürnberger J, Keflioglu-Scheiber A, Opazo Saez AM, Wenzel RR, Thomas Philipp T, Schäfers RF. Augmentation index is associated with cardiovascular risk. J Hypertens 2002; 20:2407-14. PMID: 12473865
9. Patvardhan E, Heffernan KS, Ruan J, Hession M, Warner P, Karas RH, et al. Augmentation index derived from peripheral arterial tonometry correlates with cardiovascular risk factors. Card Res Pract 2011, Article ID 253758, pp.1-6.
10. Janner JH, Godtfredsen NS, Ladelund S, Vestbo J, Prescott E. The association between aortic augmentation index and cardiovascular risk factors in a large unselected population. J Hum Hypertens 2012; 26:476-84. doi: 10.1038/jhh.2011.59 PMID: 21654851
11. Elgendi M. On the analysis of fingertip photoplethysmogram signals. Curr Cardiol Rev 2012; 8:14-25. PMID: 22845812
12. Millasseau SC, Guigui FG, Kelly RP, Prasad K, Cockcroft JR, Ritter JM, et al. Noninvasive assessment of the digital volume pulse: comparison with the peripheral pressure pulse. Hypertension 2000; 36:952-6. PMID: 11116106
13. Takada H, Washino K, Harrel JS, Iwata H. Acceleration plethysmography to evaluate aging effect in cardiovascular system. Using new criteria of four wave patterns. Med Prog Technol 1996-1997; 21:205-10.
14. Takazawa K, Tanaka N, Fujita M, Matsuoka O, Saiki T, Aikawa M, et al. Assessment of vasocative agents and vascular aging by the second derivative of photoplethysmogram waveform. Hypertension. 1998; 32:365-70. PMID: 9719069
15. Imanaga I, Hara H, Koyanagi S, Tanaka K. Correlation between wave components of the second derivative of plethysmogram and arterial distensibility. Jpn Heart J 1998; 39:775-84. PMID: 10089939
16. Hashimoto J, Chonan K, Aoki Y, Nishimura T, Ohkubo T, Hozawa A, et al. Pulse wave velocity and the second derivative of the finger photoplethysmogram in treated hypertensive patients: their relationship and associating factors. J Hypertens 2002; 20:2415-22. PMID: 12473866
17. Otsuka T, Kawada T, Katsumata M, Ibuki C. Utility of second derivative of the finger photoplethysmogram for the estimation of the risk of coronary heart disease in the general population. Circ J 2006; 70: 304-10. PMID: 16501297
18. Baek HJ, Kim JS, Kim YS, Lee HB, Park KS. Second derivative of photoplethysmography for estimating vascular aging. The 6th International Special Topic Conference on Information Technology Applications in Biomedicine 2007; pp. 70-2.
19. Gonzales R, Manzo A, Delgado J, Padilla JM, Trenor B, Saiz J. A computer base photoplethysmographic vascular analyser through derivatives. Comp Cardiol 2008; 35:177-80
20. Davies JI, Struthers AD. Pulse wave analysis and pulse wave velocity: a critical review of their strengths and weaknesses. J Hypertens 2003, 21:463-72. PMID: 12640232
21. Skinner SL, Barin E, Gallery EDM, Beattie J, Avolio A, Kamen P. Clinical guide pulse wave analysis. Available: https://www.ttu.ee/public/t/Tehnomeedikum/Instituudid/Biomeditsiinitehnika-instituut/ Oppetoo/Oppematerjalid/Sphygmocor-Clinical-Guide.pdf Accessed 10 June 2015. See also www. atcormedical.com
22. Nichols WW, O'Rourke MF. McDonald's Blood Flow in Arteries. Theoretical, experimental and clinical principles. 4th ed. London: Arnold; 1998.
23. Wilkinson IB, Mohammad NH, Tyrrell S, Hall IR, Webb DJ, Paul VE, et al. Heart rate dependency of pulse pressure amplification and arterial stiffness. Am J Hypertens 2002; 15:24-30. PMID: 11824855
24. Elgendi M. Standard terminologies for photoplethysmogram signals. Curr Cardiol Rev. 2012; 8:215-9. PMID: 22708915
25. Millasseau SC, Rittera JM, Takazaw K, Chowienczyk PJ. Contour analysis of the photoplethysmographic pulse measured at the finger. J Hypertens 2006; 24:1449-56. PMID: 16877944
26. Ozawa T. Pattern of second derivative of volume pulse wave, the relation between non-invasive index of ventricular function and peak acceleration and effect of preloading to peak velocity. Myakuha (Pulse Wave) 1978; 8:22-31 (In Japanese).
27. Antonelli L, Ohley W, Khamlach R. Dicrotic notch detection using wavelet transform analysis. Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 1994. Engineering Advances: New Opportunities for Biomedical Engineers. Proceedings of the 16th Annual International Conference of the IEEE. 1994;2:1216-7. 10.1109/IEMBS.1994.415400.
28. Sharma T. Feature extraction from finger pulse profile for high pitta detection. Thesis. Thapar University, Patiala, Punjab, 2012.
29. Dorlas JC, Nijboer JA. Photo-electric plethysmography as a monitoring device in anaesthesia. Application and interpretation. Br J Anaesth 1985; 57:524-30. PMID: 3994887
30. Murray WB, Foster PA. The peripheral pulse wave: information overlooked. J Clin Monit Comput 1996; 12:365-77.
31. Weissler AM, Peeler RG, Roehll WH. Relationships between left ventricular ejection time, stroke volume, and heart rate in normal individuals and patients with cardiovascular disease. Am Heart J 1961; 62:367-78. PMID: 13784135
32. Bazett HC. An analysis of the time-relations of electrocardiograms. Heart 1920; 7:35-70.
33. Lewis RP, Rittgers SE, Forester WF, Boudoulas H. A critical review of the systolic time intervals. Circulation 1977; 56:146-58. PMID: 872305
34. Bartlett JW, Frost C. Reliability, repeatability and reproducibility: analysis of measurement errors in continuous variables. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2008; 31:466-75. doi: 10.1002/uog.5256 PMID: 18306169
35. Vaz S, Falkmer T, Passmore AE, Parsons R, Andreou P. The case for using the repeatability coefficient when calculating test-retest reliability. PLoS ONE 2013; 8:1-7.
36. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 327:307-10.
37. Bland JM, Altman DG. Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Methods Med Res 1999; 8:135-60. PMID: 10501650
38. Portney LG, Watkins MP. Foundations of Clinical Research. Applications and Practice. Norwalk: Appleton & Lange 1993:509-16.
39. Jang D-G, Park S-H, Hahn M. A comparison of correction algorithms to pulse parameters for estimation of arterial stiffness. ICSP2010 Proceedings. 2010 IEEE 10th International Conference on Signal Processing. Beijing, China 2010:1742-4.
40. Jang D-G, Park S-H, Hahn M. Enhancing the pulse contour analysis based arterial stiffness estimation using a novel photoplethysmographic parameter. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform 2014; 19:256-62.
41. Quan H, Shih WJ. Assessing reproducibility by the within-subject coefficient of variation with randome effects models. Biometrics 1996; 52:1195-1203. PMID: 8962450
42. Elgendi M. Detection of c, d and e waves in the acceleration photoplethysmogram. Comput Meth Progr Biomed 2014; 117:125-36.
43. Elgendi M, Norton I, Brearley M, Abbott D, Schuurmans D. Detection of a and b waves in the acceleration photoplethysmogram. Biomed Engin OnLine 2014; 13:139.
44. Jang D-G, Park J-H, Park S-H, Hahn M. A morphological approach to calculation of the second derivative of photoplethysmography. ICSP2010 Proceedings. 2010 IEEE 10th International Conference on Signal Processing. Beijing, China 2010:1734-7.
45. Avolio A. The finger volume pulse and assessment of arterial properties. J Hypertens 2002; 20:2341-3. PMID: 12473852
46. Korhonen I, Yli-Hankala A. Photoplethysmography and nociception. Acta Anaesth Scand 2009; 53:975-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2009.02026.x PMID: 19572939
47. Kawaguchi M, Hay I, Fetics B, Kass DA. Combined ventricular systolic and arterial stiffening in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction. Implications for systolic and diastolic reserve limitations. Circulation 2003; 107:714-20. PMID: 12578874
48. Millasseau SC, Kelly RP, Ritter JM, Chowienczyk PJ. Determination of age-related increases in large artery stiffness by digital pulse contour analysis. Clinical Sciences 2002; 103:371-377.
49. Chirife R, Pigott VM, Spodick DH. Measurement of the left ventricular ejection time by digital plethysmography. Am Heart J 1971; 82:222-7. PMID: 5557203
50. Itshikawa H, Honjo A, Kagoshima T, Doi M, Nonaka H, Saishin M. Left ventricular ejection time measured by finger-tip plethysmography in healthy young Japanese its correction for heart rate. Jpn Circ J 1975; 39:133-41. PMID: 1117538
51. Salvi V, Karnad DR, Panicker GK, Kothari S. Update on the evaluation of a new drug for effects on cardiac repolarization in humans: issues in early drug development. Br J Pharmacol 2010; 159: 34-48. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2009.00427.x PMID: 19775279