Regeneration patterns of European oak species (Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl., Quercus robur L.) in dependence of environment and neighborhood

PLoS ONE

Volumn 10, Issue 8, 2015, Pages

  Annighöfer, Peter ^a   Beckschäfer, Philip ^a   Vor, Torsten ^a   Ammer, Christian ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GÖTTINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

IRON; SOIL;

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; GERMANY; LIGHT; NONHUMAN; OAK; PLANT DEVELOPMENT; PLANT REGENERATION; PLANT REPRODUCTION; QUERCUS PETRAEA; QUERCUS ROBUR; SOIL ACIDITY; SOIL CHEMISTRY; SPECIES COMPOSITION; BIOMASS; CHEMISTRY; CLIMATE; ECOSYSTEM; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; METABOLISM; PH; PHYSIOLOGY; PLANT DISPERSAL; PLANT LEAF; SEEDLING; SOIL;

BIOMASS; CLIMATE; CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; ECOSYSTEM; GERMANY; HYDROGEN-ION CONCENTRATION; LIGHT; PLANT DISPERSAL; PLANT LEAVES; QUERCUS; SEEDLINGS; SOIL;

EID: 84942862453     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0134935     Document Type: Article

References (76)

1. Aas G. Quercus robur L, 1753. Stieleiche. In: Roloff A, WeisgerberH, Lang U, Stimm B, Schütt P, editors. Enzyklopädie der Holzgewächse. Handbuch und Atlas der Dendrologie: Wiley-VCH. 2002.
2. Bohn U, Gollub G, Hettwer C, Zupancic M, Puncer I, Seliskar A. Kartedernatürlichen Vegetation Euro-pas: Maßstab 1:2 500 000 (Map of the natural vegetation of Europe: scale 1:2 500 000); 2004.
3. Bossema I. Jays and Oaks: An Eco-Ethological Study of a Symbiosis. Behaviour. 1979;70:1-117.
4. Askew RR. The Diversity of Insect Communities in Leafmines and Plant Galls. Journal of Animal Ecology. 1980;49:817-29, doi: 10.2307/4229
5. Ammer U, Schubert H. Arten-, Prozeß- und Ressourcenschutzvordem Hintergrundfaunistischer Untersuchungen im Kronenraumdes Waldes. ForstwissenschaftlichesCentralblatt. 1999;118:70-87, doi: 10.1007/BF02768976
6. Böhme J. Phytophage Käfer und ihre Wirtspflanzen in Mitteleuropa-ein Kompendium. Heroldsberg: Bioform; 2001.
7. Müller J, Gossner M. Single host trees in a closed forest canopy matrix: a highly fragmented landscape? Journal of Applied Entomology. 2007;131:613-20.
8. Müller J, Pöllath J, Moshammer R, Schröder B. Predicting the occurrence of Middle Spotted Woodpecker Dendrocopos medius on a regional scale, using forest inventory data. Forest Ecology and Management. 2009;257:502-09.
9. BMELV. Die zweite Bundeswaldinventur-BWI2-Das Wichtigste in Kürze zu den Erhebungen 2001 bis 2002. Bonn; 2002.
10. Von Lüpke B. Regeneration of beech-oak-mixed stands in Central Europe under continuous cover management (Proceedings from the 7th International Beech Symposium, IUFRO Research Group 1.10.00, 10-20 May 2004, Tehran, Iran). 2004:128-34.
11. Bolte A, Ammer C, Löf M, Madsen P, Nabuurs G, Schall P, et al. Adaptive forest management in central Europe: Climate change impacts, strategies and integrative concept. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research. 2009;24:473-82, doi: 10.1080/02827580903418224
12. Reif A, Bruckner U, Kratzer R, Schmiedinger A, Bauhuns J. Forest management in times of climate change-synergies and potential conflicts between forestry and nature conservation. Naturschutz und Landschaftsplanung. 2010;42:261-66.
13. Roloff A, Grundmann BM. Waldbaumarten undihre Verwendung im Klimawandel. Arch. Forstw. 2008;42:97-109.
14. Aas G. Quercus petraea (Mattuschka) Lieblein, 1784. Traubeneiche. In: Roloff A, WeisgerberH, Lang U, Stimm B, Schütt P, editors. Enzyklopädie der Holzgewächse. Handbuch und Atlas der Dendrologie: Wiley-VCH. 2002.
15. Dreyer E. Compared sensitivity of seedlings from 3 woody species (Quercus roburL, Quercus rubra L.and Fagus sylvatica L.) to water-logging and associated root hypoxia: effects on water relations and photosynthesis. Annales des Sciences Forestières. 1994;51:417-29.
16. Alaoui-Sossé B, Gérard B, Binet P, Toussaint M, Badot P. Influence of flooding on growth, nitrogen availability in soil, and nitrate reduction of young oak seedlings (Quercus roburL.). Annals of Forest Science. 2005;62:593-600, doi: 10.1051/forest:2005052
17. Bourtsoukidis E, Kawaletz H, Radacki D, Schütz S, Hakola H, Hellén H, et al. Impact of flooding and drought conditions on the emission of volatile organic compounds of Quercus robur and Prunus sero-tina. Trees. 2014;28:193-204, doi: 10.1007/s00468-013-0942-5
18. Schmull M, Thomas FM. Morphological and physiological reactions of young deciduous trees (Quercus roburL., Q.petraea [Matt.] Liebl., Fagus sylvatica L.) to waterlogging. Plant and Soil. 2000;225:227-42, doi: 10.1023/A:1026516027096
19. Bréda N, Cochard H, Dreyer E, Granier A. Field comparison of transpiration, stomatal conductance and vulnerability to cavitation of Quercus petraea and Quercus robur under water stress. Annales des Sciences Forestières. 1993;50:571-82, doi: 10.1051/forest:19930606
20. Parelle J, Brendel O, Jolivet Y, Dreyer E. Intra- and interspecific diversity in the response to waterlogging of two co-occurring white oak species (Quercus robur and Q.petraea). Tree Physiol. 2007;27:1027-34. PMID: 17403656
21. Röhrig E, Bartsch N, Von Lüpke B. Waldbauauf ökologischer Grundlage. 7th ed. Stuttgart: Ulmer; 2006.
22. Watt AS. On the Causes of Failure of Natural Regeneration in British Oakwoods. Journal of Ecology. 1919;7:173-203, doi: 10.2307/2255275
23. Shaw MW. Factors affecting the natural regeneration of sessile oak (Quercus petraea) in North Wales: I. A preliminary study of acorn production, viability and losses. Journal of Ecology. 1968;56:565-83, doi: 10.2307/2258251
24. Meyer P, Wevell Von Krüger A, Steffens R, Unkrig W. Naturwälder in Niedersachsen-Schutz und For-schung, 1. öttingen: Nordwestdt. Forstl. Vers. Anst; 2006.
25. Löf M, Gemmel P, Nilsson U, Welander NT. The influence of site preparation on growth in Quercus robur L.seedlings in a southern Sweden clear-cut and shelterwood. Forest Ecology and Management. 1998;109:241-49, doi: 10.1016/S0378-1127 (98) 00254-0
26. Crow TR. Reproductive Mode and Mechanisms for Self-Replacement of Northern Red Oak (Quercus rubra)-A Review. Forest Science. 1988;34:19-40.
27. Kühne C. Verjüngung der Stieleiche (Quercus robur L.) in oberrheinischen Auenwäldern. Georg-August-University Göttingen, Göttingen; 2004.
28. Ovington JD, MacRae C. The growth of seedlings of Quercus petraea. Journal of Ecology. 1960;48:549-55, doi: 10.2307/2257332
29. Saha S, Kuehne C, Kohnle U, Brang P, Ehring A, Geisel J, et al. Growth and quality of young oaks (Quercus robur and Quercus petraea) grown in cluster plantings in central Europe: A weighted metaanalysis. Forest Ecology and Management. 2012;283:106-18, doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2012.07.021
30. Ligot G, Balandier P, Fayolle A, Lejeune P, Claessens H. Height competition between Quercus petraea and Fagus sylvatica natural regeneration in mixed and uneven-aged stands. Forest Ecology and Management. 2013;304:391-98, doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2013.05.050
31. Shaw MW. Factors affecting the natural regeneration of sessile oak (Quercus petraea) in North Wales: II. Acorn losses and germination under field conditions. Journal of Ecology. 1968;56:647-60, doi: 10. 2307/2258097
32. Harmer R. Natural regeneration of broadleaved trees in Britain: II. Seed production and predation. Forestry. 1994;67:275-86.
33. Nilsson U, Gemmel P, Löf M, Welander T. Germination and early growth of sown Quercus roburL.in relation to soil preparation, sowing depths and prevention against predation. New Forest. 1996;12:69-86, doi: 10.1007/BF00029983
34. Reif A, Gärtner S. Die natürliche Verjüngung der laubabwerfenden Eichenarten Stieleiche (Quercus robur L.) und Traubeneiche (Quercus petraea Liebl.)-eine Literaturstudie mitbesonderer Berücksich-tigung der Waldweide; (Natural regeneration of the deciduous oak species Pedunculate Oak (Quercus robur L.) and Sessile Oak (Quercus petraea Liebl.)-a literature review with focus on wood pasture). Waldoekologie online. 2007;5:79-116.
35. Larsen DR, Metzger MA, Johnson PS. Oak regeneration and overstory density in the Missouri Ozarks. Can. J. For. Res. 1997;27:869-75.
36. Parrott DL, Lhotka JM, Stringer JW. The effect of soil scarification on Quercus seedling establishment within upland stands of the Northern Cumberland Plateau. North. J. appl. For. 2013;30:125-30.
37. Ulrich B. Kationenaustausch-Gleichgewichte in Böden. Zeitschriftfür Pflanzenernährung, Düngung, Bodenkunde. 1966;113:141-59, doi: 10.1002/jpln. 19661130208
38. Ak Stok. Forstliche Standortsaufnahme. Begriffe, Definitionen, Einteilungen, Kennzeichnungen, Erläu-terungen. 6th ed. Echingbei München: IHW-Verl; 2003.
39. Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Kindt R, Legendre P, Minchin PR, O'Hara RB, et al. vegan: Community Ecology Package. R package version 2.0-9. http://CRAN. R-project.org/package/vegan; 2013.
40. Kursa MB, Rudnicki WR. Feature Selection with the Boruta Package. Journal of Statistical Software. 2010;36:1-13.
41. Breiman L. Random Forests. Machine Learning. 2001;45:5-32.
42. Liaw A, Wiener M. Classification and Regression by random Forest. 2012;2:18-22.
43. Giraudoux P. pgirmess: Data analysis in ecology. R package version 1.5.9. http://CRAN. R-project.org/web/packages/pgirmess; 2014.
44. Crawley MJ. The R Book. Chippenham, Wiltshire: John Wiley & Sons Ltd; 2007.
45. R Development Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing; 2013.
46. Jarvis PG. The Adaptability to Light Intensity of Seedlings of Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl. Journal of Ecology. 1964;52:545-71, doi: 10.2307/2257848
47. Ziegenhagen B, Kausch W. Productivity of young shaded oaks (Quercus robur L.) as corresponding to shoot morphology and leaf anatomy. Forest Ecology and Management. 1995;72:97-108, doi: 10. 1016/0378-1127 (94) 03482-C
48. Von Lüpke B, Hauskeller-Bullerjahn K. Beitrag zur Modellierung der Jungwuchsentwicklung am Beis-piel vonTraubeneichen-Buchen-Mischverjüngungen. Allg. Forst Jagdztg. 2004;175:61-69.
49. Dech JP, Robinson LM, Nosko P. Understorey plant community characteristics and natural hardwood regeneration under three partial harvest treatments applied in a northern red oak (Quercus rubra L.) stand in the Great Lakes-St. Lawrence forest region of Canada. Forest Ecology and Management. 2008;256:760-73, doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2008.05.033
50. Gill RMA. A Review of Damage by Mammals in North Temperate Forests: 3. Impact on Trees and Forests. Forestry. 1992;65:363-88, doi: 10.1093/forestry/65.4.363
51. Lorimer CG, Chapman JW, Lambert WD. Tall Understorey Vegetation as a Factor in the Poor Development of Oak Seedlings Beneath Mature Stands. Journal of Ecology. 1994;82:227-37, doi: 10.2307/2261291
52. Collet C, Guehl J, Frochot H, Ferhi A. Effect of two forest grasses differing in their growth dynamics on the water relations and the growth of Quercus petraea seedlings. Can. J. Bot. 1996;74:1562-71.
53. Cater M, Batic F. Groundwater and Light Conditions as Factors in the Survival of Pedunculate Oak (Quercus robur L.) Seedlings. Eur J Forest Res. 2006;125:419-26, doi: 10.1007/s10342-006-0134-6
54. Krahl-Urban J. DieEichen. Forstliche MonographiederTraubeneicheund der Stieleiche. Hamburg, Berlin: Parey; 1959.
55. Shaw MW. The reproductive characteristics of oak. In: Morris MG., Perring FH., editors. The British Oak: Its History and Natural History. Faringdon, Berkshire, UK: E. W. Classey, Ltd. 1974. p. 162-181.
56. Eitingen G. DerWuchs der Eiche in Abhängigkeitvon dem Gewichtder Eicheln. Forstwissenschaf-tliches Centralblatt. 1926;48:849-63, doi: 10.1007/BF02423252
57. Aas G. Morphologischeundökologische Variation mitteleuropäischer Quercus-Arten: Ein Beitrag zum VerständnisderBiodiversität. Libri Botanici, 19. Eching: IHW-Verlag; 1998.
58. Ammer C, Stimm B, Mosandl R. Ontogenetic variation in the relative influence of light and belowground resources on European beech seedling growth. Tree Physiology. 2008;28:721-28, doi: 10.1093/treephys/28.5.721 PMID: 18316304
59. Wada N, Ribbens E. Japanese Maple (Acer palmatum var. Matsumurae, Aceraceae) Recruitment Patterns: Seeds, Seedlings, and Saplings in Relation to Conspecific Adult Neighbors. American Journal of Botany. 1997;84:1294-300, doi: 10.2307/2446055 PMID: 21708686
60. Parker WC, Dey DC. Influence of overstory density on ecophysiology of red oak (Quercus rubra) and sugar maple (Acersaccharum) seedlings in central Ontario shelterwoods. Tree Physiol. 2008;28:797-804. PMID: 18316311
61. Major KC, Nosko P, Kuehne C, Campbell D, Bauhus J. Regeneration dynamics of non-native northern red oak (Quercus rubra L.) populations as influenced by environmental factors: A case study in managed hardwood forests of southwestern Germany. Forest Ecology and Management. 2013;291:144-53, doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2012.12.006
62. Shimoda K, Kimura K, Kanzaki M, Yoda K. The regeneration of pioneer tree species under browsing pressure of Sika deer in an evergreen oak forest. Ecol. Res. 1994;9:85-92, doi: 10.1007/BF02347245
63. Bergquist J, Löf M, Örlander G. Effects of roe deer browsing and site preparation on performance of planted broadleaved and conifer seedlings when using temporary fences. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research. 2009;24:308-17, doi: 10.1080/02827580903117420
64. Wiedemann E. Über den künstlichen gruppenweisen Voranbau von Tanne und Buche. Allg. Forst Jagdztg. 1927;103:433-52.
65. Abrams MD. Fire and the Development of Oak Forests. BioScience. 1992;42:346-53, doi: 10.2307/1311781
66. Abrams MD. Prescribing Fire in Eastern Oak Forests: Is Time Running Out? Northern Journal of Applied Forestry. 2005;22:190-96.
67. Dey DC, Guyette RP. Anthropogenic fire history and red oak forests in south-central Ontario. Forestry chronicle. 2000;76:339-47.
68. Aldrich PR, Parker GR, Romero-Severson J, Michler CH. Confirmation of Oak Recruitment Failure in Indiana Old-Growth Forest: 75 Years of Data. Forest Science. 2005;51:406-16.
69. Weber-Blaschke G, Heitz R, Blaschke M, Ammer C. Growth and nutrition of young European ash (Frax-inus excelsior L.) and sycamore maple (Acer pseudoplatanus L.) on sites with different nutrient and water statuses. Eur J Forest Res. 2008;127:465-79, doi: 10.1007/s10342-008-0230-x
70. Von Lüpke B, Hauskeller-Bullerjahn K. Production forestry without clear felling: will oak become marginalized? Forst und Holz. 1999;54:563-68.
71. Pretzsch H. Modellierungdes Waldwachstums. Berlin, Wien, 314 pp: Parey Buchverlag im Blackwell-Wissenschaftsverlag; 2001.
72. Ellenberg H, Weber HE, Düll R, Wirth V, Werner W. Zeigerwerte von Pflanzen in Mitteneuropa. 3rd ed. Göttingen: Goltze; 2001.
73. Löf M. Establishment and growth in seedlings of Fagus sylvatica and Quercus robur: influence of interference from herbaceous vegetation. Can. J. For. Res. 2000;30:855-64, doi: 10.1139/x99-257
74. Löf M, Welander NT. Influence of herbaceous competitors on early growth in direct seeded Fagus sylvatica L.and Quercus robur L. Annals of Forest Science. 2004;61:781-88, doi: 10.1051/forest:2004075
75. Vasic V, Konstantinovic B, Orlovic S. Application of post-emergence herbicides in the regeneration of pedunculate oak (Quercus robur L.) forests. Forestry. 2014;87:407-15, doi: 10.1093/forestry/cpt060
76. Goldberg DE. Components of resource competition in plant communities. In: Grace JB., Tilman D, editors. Perspectives on plant competition. San Diego: Academic Press. 1990. p. 27-49.