EXPANDING A TIME-SENSITIVE CONVERSATIONAL ARCHITECTURE FOR TURN-TAKING TO HANDLE CONTENT-DRIVEN INTERRUPTION

5th International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, ICSLP 1998

Volumn , Issue , 1998, Pages

  Aist, Gregory ^a  

^a Carnegie Mellon University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BARGES;

BARGE-IN; IN-INTERRUPTION; PUSH-TO-TALK; READING TUTORS; SPOKEN LANGUAGES; STUDENT-BASED; TURN-TAKING;

ARCHITECTURE;

EID: 84942857586     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Aist, G. S. 1997. Challenges for a Mixed Initiative Spoken Dialog System for Oral Reading Tutoring. AAAI 1997 Spring Symposium on Computational Models for Mixed Initiative Interaction. AAAI Technical Report SS-97-04.
2. Aist, G. S., and Mostow, J. 1997. Adapting Human Tutorial Interventions for a Reading Tutor that Listens: Using Continuous Speech Recognition in Interactive Educational Multimedia. In Proceedings of CALL 97: Theory and Practice of Multimedia in Computer Assisted Language Learning. Exeter, UK.
3. Bernstein, J., and Rtischev, D. 1991. A voice interactive language instruction system. In Proceedings of the Second European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology (EUROSPEECH 91), Genova, Italy, vol. 2, pp. 981-984.
4. Duncan, S. 1972. Some signals and rules for taking speaking turns in conversations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 23(2):283-292.
5. Fox, B. A., The Human Tutorial Dialogue Project: Issues in the Design of Instructional Systems, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale NJ, 1993.
6. Mostow, J., Hauptmann, A. G., Chase, L. L., and Roth. S. 1993. Towards a Reading Coach that Listens: Automatic Detection of Oral Reading Errors. In Proceedings of the Eleventh National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-93), 392-397. Washington DC: American Association for Artificial Intelligence.
7. Mostow, J., Roth, S. F., Hauptmann, A. G., and Kane, M. 1994. A Prototype Reading Coach that Listens. In Proceedings of the Twelfth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-94), Seattle WA. Selected as the AAAI-94 Outstanding Paper.
8. Mostow, J., Hauptmann, A., and Roth, S. F. 1995. Demonstration of a Reading Coach that Listens. In Proceedings of the Eighth Annual Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, Pittsburgh PA. Sponsored by ACM SIGGRAPH and SIGCHI in cooperation with SIGSOFT.
9. Mostow, J., and Aist, G. S. 1997. The Sounds of Silence: Towards Automatic Evaluation of Student Learning in a Reading Tutor that Listens. In Proceedings of the 1997 National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI 97), pages 355-361.
10. Mostow, J., and Aist, G. S. 1997. When Speech Input is Not an Afterthought: A Reading Tutor that Listens. Workshop on Perceptual User Interfaces, Banff, Alberta, Canada, October 1997.
11. Phillips, M., McCandless, M., and Zue, V. 1992. Literacy tutor: An interactive reading aid. Technical report, Spoken Language Systems Group, MIT, 545 Technology Square, NE43-601, Cambridge MA 02139 USA.
12. Rowe, M. B., “Wait-time and rewards as instructional variables: Their influence in language, logic and fate control,” National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Chicago IL, 1972.
13. Russell, M., Brown, C., Skilling, A., Series, R., Wallace, J., Bohnam, B., and Barker, P. 1996. Applications of automatic speech recognition to speech and language development in young children. ICSLP 96, Philadelphia.
14. Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., and Jefferson, G. 1974. A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language 50(4): 696-735.
15. Stahl, R. J., “Using 'Think-Time' and 'Wait-Time' skillfully in the classroom”, ERIC Abstracts Report number EDO-SO-94-3, 1994.
16. Tobin, K., “Effects of teacher wait time on discourse characteristics in mathematics and language arts classes”, American Educational Research Journal, Vol. 23, No. 2, 1986, pp. 191-200.
17. Tobin, K., “The role of wait time in higher cognitive level learning”, Review of Educational Research, Vol. 57, No.1, 1987, pp. 69-95.