Deliberative normative agents: Principles and architecture

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 1757, Issue , 2000, Pages 364-378

  Castelfranchi, Cristiano ^a   Dignum, Frank ^b   Jonker, Catholijn M ^c   Treur, Jan ^c  

^a CNR   (Italy)

^b EINDHOVEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^c VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INTELLIGENT AGENTS;

AGENT ARCHITECTURES; AGENT SOCIETY; GOAL SELECTION; NORM VIOLATION; NORMATIVE AGENTS; PLAN GENERATION;

ARCHITECTURE;

EID: 84942843814     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/10719619_27     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (26)

1. Boella, G., Damiano, R., and Lesmo, L. (2000). Cooperating to the group’s utility. In: N.R. Jennings, Y. Lesperance (eds.), Intelligent Agents VI. Proc. of the Sixth International Workshop on Agent Theories, Architectures and Languages, ATAL’99. Lecture Notes in AI, Springer Verlag. This volume.
2. Boman, M. (1997). Norms as Constraints on Real_time Autonomous Agent Action. In: M. Boman, W. van de Velde (eds.), Multi-Agent Rationality, Proceedings of the 8th European Workshop on Modelling Autonomous Agents in a Multi- Agent World, MAAMAW’97, Lecture Notes in AI, vol. 1237, Springer Verlag, Berlin, 1997, pp. 36-44.
3. Brainov, S. (2000). The role and the impact of preferences on multi-agent interaction. In: N.R. Jennings, Y. Lesperance (eds.), Intelligent Agents VI. Proc. of the Sixth International Workshop on Agent Theories, Architectures and Languages, ATAL’99. Lecture Notes in AI, Springer Verlag. This volume.
4. Brazier, F.M.T., Dunin Keplicz, B., Jennings, N., and Treur, J. (1997). DESIRE: Modelling Multi-Agent Systems in a Compositional Formal Framework. International Journal of Cooperative Information Systems, vol. 6, Special Issue on Formal Methods in Cooperative Information Systems: Multi-Agent Systems, (M. Huhns and M. Singh, eds.), 1997, pp. 67-94. Preliminary shorter version in: Lesser V. (ed.), Proceedings of the First International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems, ICMAS’95, MIT Press, Menlo Park, VS, 1995, pp. 25-32
5. Brazier, F.M.T., Eck van, P.A.T., and Treur, J. (1997). Modelling a Society of Simple Agents: From Conceptual Specification to Experimentation. In: Conte, R., Hegselmann, R. and Terna, P. (eds.) Simulating Social Phenomena, Proc. of the International Conference on Computer Simulations and Social Sciences, ICCS&SS’97, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, Vol. 456, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1997, pp. 103-107.
6. Brazier, F.M.T., Jonker, C.M., and Treur, J. (1998). Principles of Compositional Multiagent System Development. In: J. Cuena (ed.), Proceedings of the 15th IFIP World Computer Congress, WCC’98, Conference on Information Technology and Knowledge Systems, IT&KNOWS’98, 1998, pp. 347-360.
7. Brazier, F.M.T., Jonker, C.M., and Treur, J. (1999). Compositional Design and Reuse of a Generic Agent Model. In; B. Gaines, M. Musen (eds.). Proceedings of the Knowledge Acquisition Workshop, KAW’99, Banff, 1999. URL: http://sern.ucalgary.ca/KSI/KAW/KAW99/papers/Brazier1/KAW_brazier.pdf.
8. Cohen, P., and Levesque, H. (1991). Teamwork, Nous, vol.35, pp. 487-512.
9. Conte, R., and Castelfranchi, C., (1995a). Cognitive and Social Action. UCL Press, London.
10. Conte, R., and Castelfranchi, C. (1995b). Understanding the effects of norms in social groups through simulation. In Artificial societies: the computer simulation of social life. Eds. G.N. Gilbert and R. Conte, London, UCL Press.
11. Conte, R. and Castelfranchi, C. (1996). From Conventions to Prescriptions: Toward an integrated Theory of Norms, ModelAge’96 Workshop, Sesimbra, January 1996 (AI&Law, forthcoming).
12. Conte, R., Castelfranchi, C., and Dignum, F. (1999). Autonomous Norm-Acceptance, In: J.P. Mueller, M.P. Singh, A.S. Rao (eds.), Intelligent Agents V, Proc. of the Fifth International Workshop on Agent Theories, Architectures and Languages, ATAL’98. Lecture Notes in AI, vol. 1555, Springer Verlag, Berlin, Springer Verlag.
13. Conte, R., Falcone, R., Sartor, G. (1999). Agents and norms: How to fill the gap? In: Conte, R., Falcone, R. and Sartor, G. (eds) Agents and Norms, special issue, AI&Law, Vol.7, No.1, pp. 1-15, 1999.
14. Dignum, F. (1996). Autonomous Agents and Social Norms. In: R. Falcone and R. Conte (eds.), ICMAS’96 Workshop on Norms, Obligations and Conventions, Kyoto, pp. 56-71. Revised version in In AI & Law, Vol.7, 1999, No.1, pp. 69-79.
15. Hilpinen (ed.) (1971). Deontic Logic: Introductory and Systematic Readings. Reidel.
16. Hogg, L., and Jennings, N.R. (2000). Variable sociability in agent-based decision making. In: N.R. Jennings, Y. Lesperance (eds.), Intelligent Agents VI. Proc. of the Sixth International Workshop on Agent Theories, Architectures and Languages, ATAL'99. Lecture Notes in AI, Springer Verlag. This volume.
17. Jennings N.R., (1993). Commitments and conventions: The foundation of coordination in multi-agent systems. The Knowledge Engineering Review, 3, 223-250.
18. Jennings N.R. and Campos, J.R. (1997). Towards a Social Level Characterisation of Socially Responsible Agents. IEEE Proc. on Software Engineering, vol. 144, 1, pp.11-25
19. Meyer, J.-J., Ch., and Wieringa, R.J. (eds.) (1993). Deontic Logic in Computer Science. John Wiley and Sons Ltd., Chicester, UK.
20. Rao, A.S., and Georgeff, M.P. (1991). Modeling rational agents within a BDI architecture. In: R. Fikes and E. Sandewall (eds.), Proc. of the Second Conference on Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, Morgan Kaufman, pp. 473-484.
21. Rosenschein, J., and Zlotkin, G. (1994). Rules of Encounters. MIT Press, Cambrige, USA.
22. Shoham, Y and Tenneholtz, M. (1992a). On the synthesis of useful social laws for artificial agent societies (preliminary report). Proceedings of the AAAI Conference, 276-281.
23. Shoham, Y. and Tenneholtz, M. (1992b). Emergent conventions in multi-agent systems: Initial experimental results and observations. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on KR&R. Cambridge, MA, 225-232.
24. Wagner, T., and Lesser, V. (2000). Relating quantified motivations for organizationally situated agents. In: N.R. Jennings, Y. Lesperance (eds.), Intelligent Agents VI. Proc. of the Sixth International Workshop on Agent Theories, Architectures and Languages, ATAL'99. LN AI, Springer Verlag. This volume.
25. Wright, G. von (1951), Deontic Logic. Mind, vol. 60, pp. 58-74.
26. Xuan, P., and V. Lesser, V., Incorporating uncertainty in agent commitments. In: N.R. Jennings, Y. Lesperance (eds.), Intelligent Agents VI. Proc. of the Sixth International Workshop on Agent Theories, Architectures and Languages, ATAL'99. Lecture Notes in AI, Springer Verlag. This volume.