Minimalist transcatheter aortic valve replacement: The new standard for surgeons and cardiologists using transfemoral access? Read at the 95th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Thoracic Surgery, Seattle, Washington, April 25-29, 2015.

Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

Volumn 150, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 833-840

  Jensen, Hanna A ^a   Condado, Jose F ^a   Devireddy, Chandan ^a   Binongo, Jose ^b   Leshnower, Bradley G ^a   Babaliaros, Vasilis ^a   Sarin, Eric L ^a   Lerakis, Stamatios ^a   Guyton, Robert A ^a   Stewart, James P ^a   Syed, Amjadullah Q ^a   Mavromatis, Kreton ^a   Kaebnick, Brian ^a   Rajaei, Mohammad Hossein ^a   Tsai, Lillian L ^a   Rahman, Ayaz ^a   Simone, Amy ^a   Keegan, Patricia ^a   Block, Peter C ^a   Thourani, Vinod H ^a  

^a EMORY UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b EMORY UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

aortic valve; percutaneous; replacement; transapical

Indexed keywords

ADVERSE OUTCOME; AGED; ARTIFICIAL HEART PACEMAKER; CARDIOLOGIST; CARDIOVASCULAR MORTALITY; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONFERENCE PAPER; DEMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HEART EJECTION FRACTION; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MINIMALIST TRANSCATHETER AORTIC VALVE REPLACEMENT; MORBIDITY; PARAVALVULAR LEAK; PATIENT SAFETY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SURGEON; SURGICAL EQUIPMENT; SURGICAL RISK; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TRANSCATHETER AORTIC VALVE IMPLANTATION; TRANSESOPHAGEAL ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; TRANSFEMORAL ACCESS; VALVE; VASCULAR ACCESS; VASCULAR DISEASE; CARDIOLOGY; FEMORAL ARTERY; LEARNING CURVE; PROCEDURES; STANDARDS; THORAX SURGERY; VERY ELDERLY;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CARDIOLOGY; FEMALE; FEMORAL ARTERY; HUMANS; LEARNING CURVE; MALE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; THORACIC SURGERY; TRANSCATHETER AORTIC VALVE REPLACEMENT;

EID: 84942818068     PISSN: 00225223     EISSN: 1097685X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.07.078     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. C.R. Smith, M.B. Leon, M.J. Mack, D.C. Miller, J.W. Moses, L.G. Svensson, and et al. Transcatheter versus surgical aortic-valve replacement in high-risk patients N Engl J Med 364 2011 2187 2198
2. M.B. Leon, C.R. Smith, M. Mack, D.C. Miller, J.W. Moses, L.G. Svensson, and et al. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation for aortic stenosis in patients who cannot undergo surgery N Engl J Med 363 2010 1597 1607
3. M.J. Reardon, D.H. Adams, J.S. Coselli, G.M. Deeb, N.S. Kleiman, S. Chetcuti, and et al. Self-expanding transcatheter aortic valve replacement using alternative access sites in symptomatic patients with severe aortic stenosis deemed extreme risk of surgery J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 148 2014 2869 2876
4. D.H. Adams, J.J. Popma, M.J. Reardon, S.J. Yakubov, J.S. Coselli, G.M. Deeb, and et al. Transcatheter aortic-valve replacement with a self-expanding prosthesis N Engl J Med 370 2014 1790 1795
5. J.J. Popma, D.H. Adams, M.J. Reardon, S.J. Yakubov, N.S. Kleiman, D. Heimansohn, and et al. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement using a self-expanding bioprosthesis in patients with severe aortic stenosis at extreme risk for surgery J Am Coll Cardiol 63 2014 1972 1981
6. S. Agarwal, E.M. Tuzcu, A. Krishnaswamy, P. Schoenhagen, W.J. Stewart, L.G. Svensson, and et al. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement: current perspectives and future implications Heart 101 2015 169 177
7. V. Babaliaros, C. Devireddy, S. Lerakis, R. Leonardi, S.A. Iturra, K. Mavromatis, and et al. Comparison of transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement performed in the catheterization laboratory (minimalist approach) versus hybrid operating room (standard approach): outcomes and cost analysis JACC Cardiovasc Interv 7 2014 898 904
8. A.P. Kappetein, S.J. Head, P. Généreux, N. Piazza, N.M. van Mieghem, E.H. Blackstone, and et al. Updated standardized endpoint definitions for transcatheter aortic valve implantation: the Valve Academic Research Consortium 2 consensus document J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 145 2013 6 23
9. G.R. Hartlage, V.C. Babaliaros, V.H. Thourani, S. Hayek, C. Chrysohoou, N. Ghasemzadeh, and et al. The role of cardiovascular magnetic resonance in stratifying paravalvular leak severity after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: an observational outcome study J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 16 2014 93
10. P. Généreux, S. Kodali, R. Hahn, T. Nazif, M. Williams, and M.B. Leon Paravalvular leak after transcatheter aortic valve replacement Minerva Cardioangiol 61 2013 529 537
11. S. Lerakis, S.S. Hayek, and P.S. Douglas Paravalvular aortic leak after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: current knowledge Circulation 127 2013 397 407
12. S.K. Kodali, M.R. Williams, C.R. Smith, L.G. Svensson, J.G. Webb, R.R. Makkar, and et al. Two-year outcomes after transcatheter or surgical aortic-valve replacement N Engl J Med 366 2012 1686 1695
13. V. Babaliaros To size or not to size-there is no question: balloon sizing for transcatheter aortic valve replacement JACC Cardiovasc Interv 6 2013 972 973
14. S. Hayek, A. Harzand, H. Gay, C. Chrysohoou, J.C. Condado, V. Babaliaros, and et al. The incidence of paravalvular regurgitation in transthoracic echocardiography-guided deployment of transcatheter aortic valve is comparable to that of transesophageal echocardiography-guided deployment J Am Coll Cardiol 65 10 Suppl 2015 A1703
15. R. Marcantuono, J. Gutsche, M. Burke-Julien, S. Anwaruddin, J.G. Augoustides, D. Jones, and et al. Rationale, development, implementation, and initial results of a fast track protocol for transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 85 2015 648 654
16. M.R. Reynolds, E.A. Magnuson, Y. Lei, K. Wang, K. Vilain, H. Li, and et al. Cost-effectiveness of transcatheter aortic valve replacement compared with surgical aortic valve replacement in high-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis: results of the PARTNER (Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valves) trial (Cohort A) J Am Coll Cardiol 60 2012 2683 2692
17. A. Ribera, J. Slof, R. Andrea, C. Falces, E. Gutiérrez, R. Del Valle-Fernández, and et al. Transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement compared with surgical replacement in patients with severe aortic stenosis and comparable risk: cost-utility and its determinants Int J Cardiol 182C 2014 321 328