Pain associated with cesarean delivery skin closure: A randomized controlled trial

Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 126, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 702-707

  Mackeen, A Dhanya ^a   Khalifeh, Adeeb ^a   Fleisher, Jonah ^a   Han, Christina ^a   Leiby, Benjamin ^a   Berghella, Vincenzo ^a  

^a GEISINGER HEALTH SYSTEM   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CODEINE; HYDROCODONE; HYDROMORPHONE; MORPHINE; NALBUPHINE; NARCOTIC AGENT; NONSTEROID ANTIINFLAMMATORY AGENT; OXYCODONE; PARACETAMOL; PETHIDINE; ANALGESIC AGENT;

ADULT; CESAREAN SECTION; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; MORBIDITY; MULTICENTER STUDY; NOCICEPTION; PAIN ASSESSMENT; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SECONDARY ANALYSIS; SKIN INCISION; SUTURE; UNITED STATES; WOUND CLOSURE; ADVERSE EFFECTS; ANALGESIA; CLINICAL TRIAL; PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE; PREGNANCY; SUTURING METHOD;

ADULT; ANALGESICS; CESAREAN SECTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; PAIN MANAGEMENT; PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE; PREGNANCY; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SUTURE TECHNIQUES; SUTURES;

EID: 84942783898     PISSN: 00297844     EISSN: 1873233X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001043     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. Declercq E, Young R, Cabral H, Ecker J. Is a rising cesarean delivery rate inevitable? Trends in industrialized countries, 1987 to 2007. Birth 2011;38:99-104.
2. Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Ventura SJ, Osterman MJK, Wilson EC, Mathews TJ. Births: final data for 2010. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2012;61:1-72.
3. Mackeen AD, Berghella V, Larsen ML. Techniques and materials for skin closure in caesarean section. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2012, Issue 11. Art. No.: CD003577. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003577.pub3.
4. Mackeen AD, Schuster M, Berghella V. Suture versus staples for skin closure after cesarean: a meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015;212:621.e1-10.
5. Mackeen AD, Khalifeh K, Fleisher J, Vogell A, Han C, Sendecki J, et al; CROSS Consortium. Suture compared with staple skin closure after cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2014;123:1169-75.
6. Rousseau JA, Girard K, Turcot-Lemay L, Thomas N. A randomized study comparing skin closure in cesarean sections: staples vs subcuticular sutures. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009; 200:265.e1-4.
7. Sharma C, Verma A Soni A, Thusoo M, Mahajan VK, Verma S. A randomized controlled trial comparing cosmetic outcome after skin closure with 'staples' or 'subcuticular sutures' in emergency cesarean section. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2014;290:655-9.
8. Figueroa D, Jauk VC, Szychowski JM, Garner R Biggio JR Andrews WW, et al. Surgical staples compared with subcuticular suture for skin closure after cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2013;121:33-8.
9. Frishman GN, Schwartz T, Hogan JW. Closure of Pfannenstiel skin incisions. Staples vs. subcuticular suture. J Reprod Med 1997;42:627-30.
10. Huppelschoten AG, van Ginderen JC, van den Broek KC, Bouwma AE, Oosterbaan HP. Different ways of subcutaneous tissue and skin closure at cesarean section: a randomized clinical trial on the long-term cosmetic outcome. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2013;92:916-24.
11. de Graaf I, Rengerink KO, Wiersma IC, Donker M, Mol BW, Pajkrt E. Techniques for wound closure at caesarean section: a randomized clinical trial. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2012;165:47-52.
12. Practical pain management. The opioid calculator. Available at: http://opioidcalculator.practicalpainmanagement.com. Retrieved August 17, 2015.
13. Aabakke AJ, Krebs L, Pipper CB, Secher NJ. Subcuticular suture compared with staples for skin closure after cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2013;122:878-84.
14. Gaertner E, Burkhardt T, Beinder E. Scar appearance of different skin and subcutaneous tissue closure techniques in caesar-ean section: a randomized study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol 2008; 138:29-33.