Diagnosis of gleason pattern 5 prostate adenocarcinoma on core needle biopsy: An interobserver reproducibility study among urologic pathologists

American Journal of Surgical Pathology

Volumn 39, Issue 9, 2015, Pages 1242-1249

  Shah, Rajal B ^a   Li, Jianbo ^c   Cheng, Liang ^d   Egevad, Lars ^e   Deng, Fang Ming ^f   Fine, Samson W ^g   Kunju, Lakshmi P ^h   Melamed, Jonathan ^f   Mehra, Rohit ^h   Osunkoya, Adeboye O ⁱ   Paner, Gladell P ^j   Shen, Steve S ^b   Tsuzuki, Toyonori ^k   Trpkov, Kiril ^l   Tian, Wei ^a   Yang, Ximing J ^m   Zhou, Ming ^f  

^a MIRACA LIFE SCIENCES   (United States)

^b HOUSTON METHODIST HOSPITAL   (United States)

^c LERNER RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^d INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e NEW YORK UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^f MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER   (United States)

^g UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^h EMORY UNIVERSITY   (United States)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

^j NORTHWESTERN MEMORIAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

^k KAROLINSKA INSTITUTE   (Sweden)

^l NAGOYA DAINI RED CROSS HOSPITAL   (Japan)

^m CALGARY LABORATORY SERVICES   (Canada)

more..

Author keywords

Gleason pattern 5; Gleason score; Interobserver reproducibility; Prostate cancer; Prostate core needle biopsy

Indexed keywords

ADENOCARCINOMA; CANCER GRADING; CONSENSUS; HUMAN; LARGE CORE NEEDLE BIOPSY; MALE; OBSERVER VARIATION; PATHOLOGY; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PROSTATE TUMOR; REPRODUCIBILITY;

ADENOCARCINOMA; BIOPSY, LARGE-CORE NEEDLE; CONSENSUS; HUMANS; MALE; NEOPLASM GRADING; OBSERVER VARIATION; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 84942754710     PISSN: 01475185     EISSN: 15320979     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000442     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Bostwick DG, Grignon DJ, Hammond ME, et al. Prognostic factors in prostate cancer. College of American Pathologists Consensus Statement 1999. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2000;124:995-1000.
2. Gleason DF, Mellinger GT. Prediction of prognosis for prostatic adenocarcinoma by combined histological grading and clinical staging. J Urol. 1974;111:58-64.
3. Mellinger GT. Prognosis of prostatic carcinoma. Recent Results Cancer Res. 1977;60:61-72.
4. Shah RB. Current perspectives on the Gleason grading of prostate cancer. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2009;133:1810-1816.
5. Brimo F, Montironi R, Egevad L, et al. Contemporary grading for prostate cancer: implications for patient care. Eur Urol. 2013;63: 892-901.
6. Ellis CL, Partin AW, Han M, et al. Adenocarcinoma of the prostate with Gleason score 9-10 on core biopsy: correlation with findings at radical prostatectomy and prognosis. J Urol. 2013;190:2068-2073.
7. Iczkowski KA, Torkko KC, Kotnis GR, et al. Digital quantification of five high-grade prostate cancer patterns, including the cribriform pattern, and their association with adverse outcome. Am J Clin Pathol. 2011;136:98-107.
8. Pierorazio PM, Guzzo TJ, Han M, et al. Long-term survival after radical prostatectomy for men with high Gleason sum in pathologic specimen. Urology. 2010;76:715-721.
9. Pierorazio PM, Walsh PC, Partin AW, et al. Prognostic Gleason grade grouping: data based on the modified Gleason scoring system. BJU Int. 2013;111:753-760.
10. Sabolch A, Feng FY, Daignault-Newton S, et al. Gleason pattern 5 is the greatest risk factor for clinical failure and death from prostate cancer after dose-escalated radiation therapy and hormonal ablation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011;81:e351-e360.
11. Trpkov K, Zhang J, Chan M, et al. Prostate cancer with tertiary Gleason pattern 5 in prostate needle biopsy: clinicopathologic findings and disease progression. Am J Surg Pathol. 2009;33:233-240.
12. Al-Hussain TO, Nagar MS, Epstein JI. Gleason pattern 5 is frequently underdiagnosed on prostate needle-core biopsy. Urology. 2012;79:178-181.
13. Epstein JI, Allsbrook WC Jr., Amin MB, et al. The 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 2005;29:1228-1242.
14. Fajardo DA, Miyamoto H, Miller JS, et al. Identification of Gleason pattern 5 on prostatic needle core biopsy: frequency of underdiagnosis and relation to morphology. Am J Surg Pathol. 2011;35:1706-1711.
15. Gottipati S, Warncke J, Vollmer R, et al. Usual and unusual histologic patterns of high Gleason score 8 to 10 adenocarcinoma of the prostate in needle biopsy tissue. Am J Surg Pathol. 2012;36:900-907.
16. Shah RB, Tadros Y. Adenocarcinoma of the prostate with Gleason pattern 5 on core biopsy: frequency of diagnosis, morphologic subpatterns, and relation to pattern distribution based on the modified Gleason grading system. Hum Pathol. 2014;45: 2263-2269.
17. Tamas EF, Epstein JI. Prognostic significance of paneth cell-like neuroendocrine differentiation in adenocarcinoma of the prostate. Am J Surg Pathol. 2006;30:980-985.