Introduction: The future of social movement research

The Future of Social Movement Research: Dynamics, Mechanisms, and Processes

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages xi-xxii

  Van Stekelenburg, Jacquelien ^a   Roggeband, Conny ^b  

^a VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b FLACSO ECUADOR   (Ecuador)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84942694003     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Editorial

References (26)

1. Bauman, Zygmunt. 2000. Liquid Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
2. Beck, Ulrich. 1992. Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. New Delhi: Sage.
3. Burt, Ronald S. 2000. “The Network Structure of Social Capital.” In Research in Organizational Behavior, edited by Robert I. Sutton and Barry M. Staw, 345-423. Greenwich, Conn.: JAI Press.
4. Castells, Manuel. 1996. The Rise of the Network Society. Oxford: Blackwell.
5. Della Porta, Donatella, Hanspeter Kriesi, and Dieter Rucht. 1999. Social Movements in a Globalizing World New York: Macmillan.
6. Della Porta, “Donatella, and Sidney Tarrow”. 2005. Transnational Protest and Global Activism. New York: Rowman and Littlefield.
7. Diani, Mario, and Doug McAdam. 2003. “Social Movements and Networks: Relational Approaches to Collective Action”. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
8. Duyvendak, Jan Willem, and Menno Hurenkamp. 2004. “Kiezen voor de kudde: Lichte gemeenschappen en de nieuwe meerderheid”. Amsterdam: Van Gennep.
9. Goodwin, Jeff, and James M. Jasper. 2004. “Rethinking Social Movements: Structure, Meaning, and Emotion. Lanham”, Md.: Rowman and Littlefield.
10. Johnston, Hank, and Bert Klandermans. 1995. “Social Movements and Culture”. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
11. Keck, Margaret E., and Kathryn Sikkink. 1998. “Activists beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics”. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
12. Klandermans, Bert. 2004. “The Demand and Supply of Participation: SocialPsychological Correlates of Participation in Social Movements.” In The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements, edited by David A. Snow, Sarah A. Soule, and Hanspeter Kriesi, 360-79. Oxford: Blackwell.
13. Klandermans, Bert, Hanspeter Kriesi, and Sidney Tarrow. 1988. “From Structure to Action: Comparing Social Movement Research across Cultures”. Vol. 1. Greenwich, Conn.: JAI Press.
14. Klandermans, Bert, and Conny Roggeband. 2007. “Social Movements across Disciplines”. New York: Springer.
15. Kriesi, H., R. Koopmans, J. W. Duyvendak et al. 1995. “New Social Movements in Western Europe: A Comparative Analysis”. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
16. McAdam, Doug, John D. McCarthy, and Mayer N. Zald. 1996. “Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements”. New York: Cambridge University Press.
17. McAdam, Doug, Sidney Tarrow, and Charles Tilly. 2001. “Dynamics of Contention”.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18. Melucci, Alberto. 1996. “Challenging Codes: Collective Action in the Information Age”.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
19. Morris, Aldon D., and Carol M. Mueller. 1992. “Frontiers in Social Movement Theory”.New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.
20. Norris, E 2001. “Digital Divide? Civic Engagement, Information Poverty, and the Internet Worldwide”. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21. Snow, David, Doug McAdam, Donatella della Porta, and Bert Klandermans. 2013.”Blackwell Encyclopedia of Social and Political Movements”. Oxford: Blackwell.
22. Snow, David A., Sarah A. Soule, and Hanspeter Kriesi. 2004”The Bktckwell Companion to Social Movements”. Oxford: Blackwell.
23. Sociological Forum. 1999. “Mini-Symposium: Social Movements.” 14:27-136.
24. Tarrow, Sidney, and Doug McAdam. 2005. “Scale Shift in Transnational Contention.” In Transnational Protest andGlobal Activism, edited by D. della Porta and S. Tarrow, 121-47. Lanham, Md.: Rowman and Littlefield.
25. Taylor, Verta. 1989. “Social Movement Continuity: The Women’s Movement in Abeyance.” American Sociological Review 54:761-75.
26. Taylor, Verta. 2000. “Mobilizing for Change in a Social Movement Society.” ContemporarySociology 29:219-30.