Beyond formal procedures: The interpersonal context of procedural justice

Applied Social Psychology and Organizational Settings

Volumn 6, Issue , 2015, Pages 77-98

  Tyler, Tom R ^a   Bies, Robert J ^a  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84942583671     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781315728377     Document Type: Chapter

References (65)

1. Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 267-299). New York: Academic Press.
2. Adler, J. W., Hensler, D., & Nelson, C. E. (1983). Simple justice: How litigants fare in the Pittsburgh Court arbitration program. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
3. Aram, J. D., & Salipante, P. F., Jr. (1981). An evaluation of organizational due process in the resolution of employee/employer conflict. Academy of Management Review, 6, 197-204.
4. Barrett-Howard, E., & Tyler, T. R. (1986). Procedural justice as a criterion in allocation decisions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychobgy, 50, 296-304.
5. Bies, R. J. (1986, August). Identifying principles of interactional justice: The case of corporate recruiting. In R. J. Bies (Chair), Moving beyond equity theory: New directions in research on justice in organizations. Symposium conducted at the meeting of the Academy of Management, Chicago, IL.
6. Bies, R. J. (1987a). Beyond ''voice": The influence of decision-maker justification and sincerity in procedural fairness judgments. Representative Research in Social Psychobgy, 17, 3-14.
7. Bies, R. J. (1987b). The predicament of injustice: The management of moral outrage. In L. L. Cummings & B. M. Staw (Eds.,), Research in organizational Behavior (Vol. 9, pp. 289-319). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
8. Bies, R. J. (1988a). The delivery of bad news in organizations: Managerial strategies and tactics. Unpublished manuscript.
9. Bies, R. J. (1988b, August). Saying no: Communicating fairness in rejection. In J. Greenberg & R. J. Bies (Co-chairs), Communicating fairness in organizations. Symposium conducted at the meeting of the Academy of Management, Anaheim, CA.
10. Bies, R. J. (1989). Managing conflict before it happens: The role of accounts. In M. A. Rahim (Ed.), Managing conflict: An interdisciplinary approach (pp. 83-91). New York: Praeger.
11. Bies, R. J., & Moag, J. S. (1986). Interactional justice: Communication criteria of fairness. In R. J. Lewicki, B. H. Sheppard, & M. H. Bazerman (Eds.), Research on negotiations in organizations (Vol. 1, pp. 43-55). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
12. Bies, R. J., & Shapiro, D. L. (1987). Interactional fairness judgments: The influence of causal accounts. Social Justice Research, I, 199-218.
13. Bies, R. J., & Shapiro, D. L. (1988). Voice and justification: Their influence on procedural fairness judgments. Academy of Management Journal, 31, 676-685.
14. Bies, R. J., Shapiro, D. L., & Cummings, L. L. (1988). Causal accounts and managing organizational conflict: Is it enough to say it's not my fault? Communication Research, 15, 381-399.
15. Blumstein, P. W. (1974). The honoring of accounts. American Sociobgical Review, 39, 551-566.
16. Cahn, E. (1949). The sense of injustice. New York: New York University Press.
17. Casper, J. D., Tyler, T. R & Fisher, B. (1988). Procedural justice in felony cases. Law and Society Review, 22, 483-507.
18. Cohen, R. L. (1985). Procedural justice and participation. Human Relations, 38, 643-663.
19. Crosby, F. (1984). A relative deprivation in organizational settings. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 6, pp. 51-93). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
20. Cyert, R. M., & March, J. G. (1963). A behavioral theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
21. Deutsch, M. (1982). Interdependence and psychological orientation. In V. J. Derlager & J. Grzelak (Eds.), Cooperation and helping behaviors: Theory and research (pp. 15-42). New York.
22. Deutsch, M. (1985). Distributive justice. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
23. Folger, R. (1977). Distributive and procedural justice: Combined impact of "voice" and improvement on experienced inequity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 108-119.
24. Folger, R., & Bies, R. J. (in press). Managerial responsibilities and procedural justice. The Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal.
25. Folger, R., & Greenberg, J. (1985). Procedural justice: An interpretive analysis of personnel systems. In K. Rowland & G. Ferris (Eds.). Research in personnel and human resources management (Vol. 3, pp. 141-183). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
26. Folger, R., & Martin, J. (1986). Relative deprivation and referent cognitions: Distributive and procedural justice effects. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22, 531-546.
27. Folger, R., Rosenfield, D., Grove, J., & Corkran, L. (1979). Effects of "voice" and peer opinions on responses to inequity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 2253-2261.
28. Folger, R., Rosenfield, D., & Robinson, T. (1983). Relative deprivation and procedural justifications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychobgy, 45, 268-27.
29. Friedland, N., Thibaut, J., & Walker, L. (1973). Some determinants of the violation of rules. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 3, 103-118.
30. Fry, W. R., & Cheney, G. (1981, May). Perceptions of procedural fairness as a function of distributive preferences. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwestern Psychological Association, Detroit, MI.
31. Fry, W. R., & Leventhal, G. S. (1979, March). Cross-situational preferences: A comparison of allocation preferences and equity across different social settings. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Southeastern Psychological Association, Washington, DC.
32. Glass, D. C., & Singer, J. E. (1972). Urban stress. New York: Academic Press.
33. Greenberg, J. (1982). Approaching equity and avoiding inequity in groups and organizations. In J. Greenberg & R. L. Cohen (Eds.), Equity and justice in social behavior (pp. 389-435). New York: Academic Press.
34. Greenberg, J. (1986). Determinants of perceived fairness of performance evaluations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 340-342.
35. Greenberg, J. (1987). A taxonomy of organizational justice theories. Academy of Management Review, 12, 9-22.
36. Greenberg, J. (in press). Looking fair: Managing impressions of organizational justice. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.) Research in organizational behavior. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
37. Greenberg, J., & Folger, R. (1983). Procedural justice, participation, and the fair process effect in groups and organizations. In P. B. Paulus (Ed.), Basic group processes (pp. 235-256). New York: Springer-Verlag.
38. Homans, G. C. (1961). Social behavior: Its elementary forms. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
39. Houlden, P. (1980). Plea bargaining. Law and Society Review, 15, 267-291.
40. Katz, D., Gutek, B. A., Kahn, R. L., & Barton, E. (1975). Bureaucratic encounters. Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research.
41. Lane, R. (1985). Procedural justice: How one is treated vs. what one gets. Unpublished manuscript, Yale University, New Haven, CT.
42. Leventhal, G. S. (1976). The distribution of rewards and resources in groups and organizations. In L. Berkowitz & E. Walster (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 9, pp. 91-131). New York: Academic Press.
43. Leventhal, G. S. (1980). What should be done with equity theory? New approaches to the study of fairness in social relationships. In K. Gergen, M. Greenberg, & R. Willis (Eds.), Social exchange: Advances in theory and research (pp. 27-55). New York: Plenum.
44. Lind, E. A., Kurtz, S., Musante, L., Walker, L., & Thibaut, J. W. (1980). Procedure and outcome effects on reactions to adjudicated resolution of conflicts of interest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 643-653.
45. Lind, E. A., & Lissak, R. I. (1985). Apparent impropriety and procedural fairness judgments. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 21, 19-29.
46. Lind, E. A., & Tyler, T. R. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. New York: Plenum.
47. Lissak, R. I. (1983). Procedural fairness: How employees evaluate procedures. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois, Champaign, IL.
48. McCall, M. W., Jr., & Kaplan, R. E. (1985). Whatever it takes: Decision-makers at work. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
49. Martin, J. (1981). Relative deprivation: A theory of distributive injustice for an era of shrinking resources. In L. L. Cummings & B. M. Staw (Eds.) Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 3, pp. 53-107). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
50. Martin, J., Feldman, M. S., Hatch, M. J., & Sitkin, S. B. (1983). The uniqueness paradox in organizational stories. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28, 438-453.
51. Mikula, G. (1986). The experience of injustice: Toward a better understanding of its phenomenology. In H. W. Bierhoff, R. L. Cohen, & J. Greenberg (Eds.), Justice in social relations. New York: Plenum, pp. 103-124.
52. Reuter, V. G. (1977). Suggestion systems: Utilization, evaluation, and implementation. California Management Review, 19, 78-89.
53. Rousseau, D. M. (1988). Human resources planning for the future. In J. Hage (Ed.), Futures of organizations: Innovating to adapt strategy and human resources to rapid technological change (pp. 245-266). Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
54. Sheppard, B. H. (1984). Third-party conflict intervention: A procedural framework. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 6, pp. 141-190). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
55. Sheppard, B. H., & Lewicki, R. J. (1987). Toward general principles of managerial fairness. Social Justice Research, 1, 161-176.
56. Sheppard, B. H., Lewicki, R. J., & Minton, J. W. (1986). A "new" view of organic zations: Some retrospective comments and integrative themes. In R. J. Lewicki, B. H. Sheppard, & M. H. Bazerman (Eds.), Research on negotiation in organization (Vol. 1, pp. 311-321). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
57. Steil, J., Tuchman, B., & Deutsch, M. (1978). An exploratory study of the meanings of injustice and frustration. Personality and Social Psychobgy Bulletin, 4, 393-398.
58. Thibaut, J., & Walker, L. (1975). Procedural justice. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
59. Thibaut, J., & Walker, L. (1978). A theory of procedure. California Law Review, 66, 541-566.
60. Tyler, T. R. (1987). Conditions leading to value expressive effects in judgments of procedural justice: A test of four models. Journal of Personality and Social Psychobgy, 52, 333-344.
61. Tyler, T. R. (1988). What is procedural justice? Law and Society Review, 22, 301-335.
62. Tyler, T. R. (in press). Why people obey the law: Procedural justice, legitimacy and compliance. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
63. Tyler, T. R., & Caine, A. (1981). The influence of outcomes and procedures on satisfaction with formal leaders. Journal of Personality and Social Psychobgy, 41, 642-655.
64. Tyler, T. R., & Folger, R. (1980). Distributional and procedural aspects of satisfaction with citizen-police encounters. Basic and Applied Social Psychobgy, 1, 281-292.
65. Walster, E., Berscheid, E., & Walster, E. (1973). New directions in equity research. Journal of Personality and Social Psychobgy, 25, 151-176.