The durable slum: Dharavi and the right to stay put in globalizing Mumbai

The Durable Slum: Dharavi and the Right to Stay Put in Globalizing Mumbai

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 1-219

  Weinstein, Liza ^a  

^a NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84942564224     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Book

References (256)

1. Albert Mayer Papers. 1934-1975. Box 17. Archives: University of Chicago Library.
2. AlSayyad, N. 2004. “Urban Informality as a New Way of Life.” In A. Roy and N. AlSayyad, eds., Urban Informality: Transnational Perspectives from the Middle East, Latin America, and South Asia. Lanham, Md.: Lexington Books, 7-30.
3. Anand, N., and A. Rademacher. 2011. “Housing in the Urban Age: Inequality and Aspiration in Mumbai.” Antipode 43(5): 1748-72.
4. Angotti, T. 2006. “Apocalyptic Anti-Urbanism: Mike Davis and His Planet of Slums.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 30(4): 961-67.
5. Anjaria, J. S. 2006. “Urban Calamities: A View from Mumbai.” Space and Culture 9(1): 80-82.
6. Anjaria, J. S. 2009. “Guardians of the Bourgeois City.” City and Community 8(4):391-406.
7. Anjaria, J. S. 2011. “Ordinary States: Everyday Corruption and the Politics of Space in Mumbai.” American Ethnologist 38(1): 58-72.
8. Anwar, N. H. 2011. “State Power, Civic Participation, and the Urban Frontier: The Politics of the Commons in Karachi.” Antipode 44(3): 601-20.
9. Appadurai, A. 2000. “Grassroots Globalization and the Research Imagination.” Public Culture 12(1): 1-19.
10. Appadurai, A. 2001. “Deep Democracy: Urban Governmentality and the Horizon of Politics.” Environment and Urbanization 13(2): 23-43.
11. Arabindoo, P. 2011. “Beyond the Return of the ‘Slum.’” Analysis of Urban Trends, Culture, Theory, Policy, Action 15(6): 631-35.
12. Arora, S. K. 1956. “The Reorganization of the Indian States.” Far Eastern Survey 25(2): 27-30.
13. Associated Press. 1985. “Slum Dwellers Face Eviction, Hut Demolition in Controversy over Poor.” October 31.
14. Baken, R. J. 2003. Plotting, Squatting, Public Purpose, and Politics: Land Market Development, Low Income Housing, and Public Intervention in India. Burlington, Vt.: Ashgate Publishing.
15. Banerjee, S. 2000. Warriors in Politics: Hindu Nationalism, Violence, and the Shiv Sena in India. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.
16. Banerjee-Guha, S. 1995. “Urban Development Process in Bombay: Planning for Whom?” In S. Patel and A. Thorner, eds., Bombay: Metaphor for Modern India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 100-120.
17. Bapat, M. 1990. “Allocation of Urban Space: Rhetoric and Reality-Evidence from Recent Jurisprudence.” Economic and Political Weekly 25(28): 1502-7.
18. Bardhan, P. 1996. “Decentralized Development.” Indian Economic Review 31(2): 139-56.
19. Baud, I., and N. Nainan. 2008. “‘Negotiated Spaces’ for Representation in Mumbai: Ward Committees, Advanced Locality Management, and the Politics of Middle-Class Activism.” Environment and Urbanization 20(2): 483-99.
20. Baviskar, A. 2003. “Between Violence and Desire: Space, Power, and Identity in the Making of Metropolitan Delhi.” International Social Science Journal 55(175): 89-98.
21. Bayat, A. 1997. Street Politics: Poor People’s Movements in Iran. New York: Columbia University Press.
22. Bayat, A. 2004. “Globalization and the Politics of Informals in the Global South.” In A. Roy and N. AlSayyad, eds., Urban Informality: Transnational Perspectives from the Middle East, Latin America, and South Asia. Lanham, Md.: Lexington Books, 79-102.
23. Bayat, A.. 2009. Life as Politics: How Ordinary People Change the Middle East.Palo Alto, Calif.: Stanford University Press.
24. Bedi, T. 2008. “Piety, Violence, and the Politics of Performance: Shiv Sena Women and the Feminine Subject in Maharashtra, India.” Doctoral dissertation submitted to the faculty of the University of Illinois at Chicago.
25. Benjamin, S. 2000. “Governance, Economic Settings, and Poverty in Bangalore.” Environment and Urbanization 12(1): 35-56.
26. Benjamin, S. 2005. “Touts, Pirates, and Ghosts.” Sarai Reader: Bare Acts. New Delhi:Sarai Centre for the Study of Culture.
27. Benjamin, S. 2007. “Occupancy Urbanism: Ten Theses.” Sarai Reader 07: Frontiers.Delhi: Sarai Programme, CSDS, 538-63.
28. Benjamin, S. 2008. “Occupancy Urbanism: Radicalizing Politics and Economy beyond Policy and Programs.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 32(3): 719-29.
29. Bhagwati, J., and A. Panagariya. 2012. Reform and Economic Transformation in India. New York: Oxford University Press.
30. Bhandare, S. 2006. “Maintaining Mumbai’s Premier Financial Service Center Status.” In R. Swaminathan and J. Goyal, eds., Mumbai Vision 2015: Agenda for Urban Renewal. New Delhi: Macmillan India, 169-78.
31. Bharucha, N. 2009a. “Dharavi Makeover Hits Bump.” Times of India, June 9.
32. Bharucha, N. 2009b. “Dharavi Remake Plan a Land Grab, Says Panel.” Times of India,July 8.
33. Bharucha, N. 2009c. “7 Builders Left in Fray for 5 Dharavi Sectors.” Times of India,October 30.
34. Bhowmik, S., and N. More. 2001. “Coping with Urban Poverty: Ex-Textile Mill Workers in Central Mumbai.” Economic and Political Weekly 36(52): 4822-27.
35. Bjorkman, L. 2012. “You Can’t Buy a Vote: Cash and the Discourse of Corruption in a Mumbai Election.” Conference paper presented at the Centre for Modern Indian Studies (CeMIS) at the University of Gottingen, December 5-7.
36. Bjorkman, L. 2014. “Becoming a Slum: From Municipal Colony to Illegal Settlement in Liberalization Era Mumbai.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 38(1): 36-59.
37. Bombay First. 2003. Bombay First: Adding Value to Mumbai. Mumbai: Bombay First.
38. Bose, N. K. 1965. “Calcutta: A Premature Metropolis.” Scientific American 213(3): 81-102.
39. Brenner, N. 2004. New State Spaces, Urban Governance, and the Rescaling of Statehood. New York: Oxford University Press.
40. Brenner, N. 2011. “Urban Locational Policies and the Geographies of Post-Keynesian Statehood in Western Europe.” In S. Patel and A. Thorner, eds., Cities and Sovereignty: Identity Politics in Urban Spaces. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 152-75.
41. Brenner, N., and N. Theodore. 2002. “Cities and the Geographies of ‘Actually Existing Neoliberalism.’” Antipode 34(3): 356-86.
42. Bunsha, D. 2004. “Developing Doubts.” Frontline Magazine 21(12), January 5-18.
43. Burawoy, M. 2000. “A Sociology for the Second Great Transformation?” Annual Review of Sociology 26: 693-95.
44. Burawoy, M. 2010. “From Polanyi to Pollyanna: The False Optimism of Global Labor Studies.” Global Labour Journal 1(2): 301-13.
45. Burra, S. 2005. “Towards a Pro-Poor Framework for Slum Upgrading in Mumbai, India.” Environment and Urbanization 17(1): 67-88.
46. Business Standard. 2007. “Bandra-Kurla Land Deal Struck at Record Price.” Business Standard, November 27.
47. Castells, M. 1983. The City and the Grassroots: A Cross-Cultural Theory of Urban Social Movements. Berkeley: University of California Press.
48. Centner, R. 2011. “Recombinant Geographies of Citizenship: Differentiations of the ‘Right to the City’ in Sao Paulo, Caracas, and Buenos Aires.” Paper presented at the ASA Annual Meeting, Las Vegas, Nevada.
49. Chakrabarty, D. 1992. “Of Garbage, Modernity, and the Citizen’s Gaze.” Economic and Political Weekly 27(10/11): 541-47.
50. Chandavarkar, R. 1994. The Origins of Industrial Capitalism in India: Business Strategies and the Working Classes in Bombay, 1900-1940. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
51. Chatterjee, P. 2004. Politics of the Governed. New Delhi: Permanent Black. Chatterji, R. 2005. “Plans, Habitation, and Slum Redevelopment: The Production of Community in Dharavi, Mumbai.” Contributions to Indian Sociology39(2): 197-218.
52. Chatterji, R., and D. Mehta. 2007. Living with Violence: An Anthropology of Events and Everyday Life. London: Routledge.
53. Chhabria, S. M. 2012. “Making the Modern Slum: Housing, Mobility, and Poverty in Bombay and Its Peripheries.” Doctoral dissertation submitted to the faculty of Columbia University.
54. Chibber, V. 2003. Locked in Place: State-Building and Late Industrialization in India. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
55. Clothey, F. 2006. Ritualizing on the Boundaries: Continuity and Innovation in the Tamil Diaspora. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.
56. Committee for the Right to Housing (CRH). 2006. Demolitions: Driving Urban Poor to the Edge-Impact Assessment Study of Demolitions in Mumbai. Mumbai: Committee for the Right to Housing.
57. Corbridge, S., and J. Harriss. 2000. Reinventing India: Liberalization, Hindu Nationalism, and Popular Democracy. Malden, Mass.: Polity Press.
58. Dandekar, H. C. 1986. Men to Bombay, Women at Home: Urban Influence on Sugao Village, Deccan Maharashtra, India, 1942-1982. Ann Arbor: Center for South and Southeast Asian Studies, University of Michigan.
59. Das, P. K. 2003. “Slums: The Continuing Struggle for Housing.” In S. Patel and J. Masselos, eds., Bombay and Mumbai: The City in Transition. New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 207-34.
60. Davis, D. E. 2011. “Theoretical and Empirical Reflections on Cities, Sovereignty, Identity, and Conflict.” In D. E. Davis and N. Libertun de Duren, eds., Cities and Sovereignty: Identity Politics in Urban Spaces. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 226-56.
61. Davis, K., and H. H. Golden. 1954. “Urbanization and the Development of PreIndustrial Areas.” Economic Development and Cultural Change 3(1): 6-26.
62. Davis, M. 2006. Planet ofSlums. London: Verso.
63. Denoon, D. B. H. 1998. “Cycles in Indian Economic Liberalization, 1966-1996.” Comparative Politics 31(1): 43-60.
64. Desai, A. R., and S. D. Pillai. 1972. A Profile of an Indian Slum. Bombay: Popular Prakashan.
65. Desai, R. 2012. “Governing the Urban Poor: Riverfront Development, Slum Resettlement, and the Politics of Inclusion in Ahmedabad.” Economic and Political Weekly 47(2): 49-56.
66. Deshmukh, S. 2007. “78 Firms in Race for Dharavi Makeover.” DNA. August 31.
67. Dhareshwar, V., and R. Srivatsan. 1996. “‘Rowdy-Sheeters’: An Essay on Sub- alternity and Politics.” In S. Amin and D. Chakrabarty, eds., Subaltern Studies IX. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
68. D’Monte, Darryl. 2002. Ripping the Fabric: The Decline of Mumbai and Its Mills. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
69. DNA (Daily News and Analysis). 2007. “Dharavi Slumdwellers Threaten Agitation.” May 29.
70. DNA (Daily News and Analysis). 2008. “Panel for Redevelopment of Dharavi Slum.” August 13.
71. Doshi, S. 2012. “The Politics of the Evicted: Redevelopment, Subjectivity, and Difference in Mumbai’s Slum Frontier.” Antipode 45(4): 844-65.
72. Dossal, M. 1991. Imperial Designs and Indian Realities: The Planning of Bombay City, 1845-1875. Bombay: Oxford University Press.
73. Drèze, J., and A. Sen. 1995. India: Economic Development and Social Opportunity. Delhi: Oxford University Press.
74. Dua, A. 1989. “Towards Shelter for All: The Bombay Experiments.” In National Institute of Urban Affairs, ed. Urban Management in Asia: Issues and Opportunities. New Delhi: National Institute of Urban Affairs, 161-73.
75. Dupont, V. 2011. “The Dream of Delhi as a Global City.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 35(3): 533-54.
76. Dwivedi, S., and R. Mehotra. 2001. Bombay: The Cities Within. Mumbai: Eminence Designs.
77. Economic Times. 2008. “90,000 Dharavi Slum-Dwellers to Be Rehabilitated: NGO.” May 6.
78. Fernandes, L. 2004. “The Politics of Forgetting: Class Politics, State Power, and the Restructuring of Urban Space in India.” Urban Studies 41(12): 2415-30.
79. Foucault, M. 1991 (1978). “Governmentality.” In G. Burchell, C. Gordon, and P. Miller, eds., The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 87-104.
80. Frankel, P. 1980. “The Politics of Poverty: Political Competition in Soweto.” Canadian Journal of African Studies 14(2): 201-20.
81. Frontline Magazine. 1998. “Editorial: Article 356, Bommai and Fair Play.” July 4-17.
82. Gans, H. 1962. The Urban Villagers: Group and Class in the Life of Italian- Americans. Glencoe, Ill.: Free Press of Glencoe.
83. Ghadyalpatil, A. 2008. “Govt’s Bid to Hike Flat Size Halts Dharavi Makeover.” Economic Times. May 1.
84. Ghertner, D. A. 2011. “Gentrifying the State, Gentrifying Participation: Elite Governance Programs in Delhi.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 35(3): 504-32.
85. Gilbert, A. 2004. “Love in the Time of Advanced Capital Flows: Reflections on the Links between Liberalization and Informality.” In A. Roy and N. AlSayyad, eds., Urban Informality: Transnational Perspectives from the Middle East, Latin America, and South Asia. Lanham, Md.: Lexington Books.
86. Gilbert, A. 2007. “The Return of the Slum: Does Language Matter?” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 31(4): 697-713.
87. Goldman, M. 2011. “Speculative Urbanism and the Making of the Next World City.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 35(3): 555-81.
88. Government of Bombay. 1882. Gazetteer of the Bombay Presidency. Volume 14: Thana, Places of Interest. Bombay: Government Central Press.
89. Government of Bombay.1946. Preliminary Report of the Development of Suburbs and Town Planning Panel. Bombay: Post-War Development Committee.
90. Government of Bombay. 1978 (1909). The Gazetteer of Bombay City and Island, Volume 2. Pune:Government Photozinco Press.
91. Government of India. 1992. The Constitution (Seventy-fourth Amendment) Act, http://india.gov.in/govt/documents/amendment/amend74.htm.
92. Gurumukhi, K. T. 2000. “Slum Related Policies and Programmes.” Shelter 3(2).
93. Handelman, H. 1975. “The Political Mobilization of Urban Squatter Settlements: Santiago’s Recent Experience and Its Implications for Urban Research.” Latin American Research Review 10(2): 35-72.
94. Hansen, T. B. 2001. Wages of Violence: Naming and Identity in Postcolonial Bombay. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
95. Hansen, T. B., and F. Stepputat. 2005. “Introduction.” In T. B. Hansen and F. Step- putat, eds., Sovereign Bodies: Citizens, Migrants, and States in the Postcolonial World. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1-36.
96. Harris, N. 1995. “Bombay in the Global Economy.” In S. Patel and A. Thorner, eds., Bombay: Metaphor for Modern India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
97. Harriss, J. 2005. “Middle-Class Activism and Poor People’s Politics: An Exploration of Civil Society in Chennai.” London School of Economics Development Studies Institute Working Paper Series, N. 05-72.
98. Harriss, J. 2007. “Antinomies of Empowerment: Observations on Civil Society, Politics, and Urban Governance in India.” Economic and Political Weekly 4(26): 2716-24.
99. Hartman, C. 1974. Yerba Buena: Land Grab and Community Resistance in San Francisco. Glide Publications.
100. Hartman, C. 1984. “The Right to Stay Put.” In C. Geisler and F. Popper, eds., Land Reform, American Style. Totowa, N.J,: Rowman & Allanheld, 302-18.
101. Harvey, D. 1989. “From Managerialism to Entrepreneurialism: The Transformation of Urban Governance in Late Capitalism.” Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography 71(1): 3-17.
102. Harvey, D. 1990. The Condition of Post Modernity. Cambridge, Mass.: Blackwell Publishers.
103. Harvey, D. 2003. The New Imperialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
104. Harvey, D. 2008. “The Right to the City.” New Left Review 53 (September-October 2008): 23-40.
105. Hazareesingh, S. 2001. “Colonial Modernism and the Flawed Paradigms of Renewal: The Uneven Development of Bombay City, 1900-1925.” Urban History 28(2): 235-55.
106. Hettne, B. 1999. “Globalization and the New Regionalism: The Second Great Transformation.” Globalism and the New Regionalism 1: 1-24.
107. The Hindu. 2008. “Residents of Dharavi Oppose Redevelopment Plan.” June 19.
108. Howard-Hassman, R. E. 2010. Can Globalization Promote Human Rights? University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
109. Hueze, G. 1995. “Cultural Populism: The Appeal of the Shiv Sena.” In S. Patel and A. Thorner, eds., Bombay: Metaphor for Modern India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
110. Indian Express. 2005. “Crores to Be Spent to Turn Mumbai into Shanghai.” February 8.
111. Indian Express. 2008. “Dharavi Makeover: 19 Consortia in the Running.” January 10.
112. Jenkins, P., H. Smith, and Y. P. Wang. 2006. Planning and Housing in the Rapidly Urbanising World. London: Routledge.
113. Jessop, B. 2002. “Liberalism, Neoliberalism, and Urban Governance: A State- Theoretical Perspective.” Antipode 34(3): 452-72.
114. Kalia, Ravi. 1990. Chandigarh: The Making of an Indian City. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
115. Kamat, A. R. 1980. “Politico-Economic Developments in Maharashtra: A Review of the Post-Independence Period.” Economic and Political Weekly 15(40): 1669-71,1673, 1675, 1677-78.
116. Kamath, N. 2010a. “Is Dharavi Consultant Being Paid Out-of-Turn?” Hindustan Times, Mumbai edition, March 4.
117. Kamath, N. 2010b. “State Still Spending Crores for Stalled Dharavi Makeover.” Hindustan Times, Mumbai edition, August 28.
118. Katzenstein, M. F. 1979. Ethnicity and Equality: The Shiv Sena Party and Preferential Policies in Bombay. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
119. Katzenstein, M. F., U. Mehta, and U. Thakkar. 1997. “The Rebirth of Shiv Sena: The Symbiosis of Discursive and Organizational Power.” Journal of Asian Studies 56(2): 371-90.
120. Kaviraj, S. 1997. “Filth and the Public Sphere: Concepts and Practices about Space in Calcutta.” Public Culture 10(1): 83-113.
121. Khagram, S. 2004. Dams and Development: Transnational Struggles for Water and Power. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
122. Kipfer, S., K. Goonewardena, C. Schmid, and R. Milgrom. 2008. “On the Production of Henri Lefebvre.” In K. Goonewardena et al., eds., Space, Difference, and Everyday Life: Reading Henri Lefebvre. New York: Routledge.
123. Kosambi, M. 1986. Bombay in Transition: The Growth and Social Ecology of a Colonial City: 1880-1980. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell International.
124. Lefebvre, H. 1996 (1998). “The Right to the City.” In E. Kofman and E. Lebas, eds., Writings on Cities. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell.
125. Lele, J. 1981. Elite Pluralism and Class Rule: Political Development in Maharashtra, India. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
126. Lele, J. 1995. “Saffronization of the Shiv Sena.” In S. Patel and A. Thorner, eds.,Bombay: Metaphor for Modern India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press
127. Lemarchand, R., and K. Legg. 1972. “Political Clientelism and Development: A Preliminary Analysis.” Comparative Politics 4(2): 149-78.
128. Lokhande, D. 2006. “NRIs Eye Dharavi after BKC Auction.” Midday. January 10.
129. Lynch, O. 1974. “Political Mobilization and Ethnicity among Adi-Dravidas in a Bombay Slum.” Economic and Political Weekly 9(39): 1657-792.
130. Lynch, O.. 1979. “Potters, Plotters, and Prodders: Marx and Meaning or Meaning versus Marx.” Urban Anthropology 8(1): 1-27.
131. McCartney, M. 2010. Political Economy, Growth, and Liberalization in India, 1991-2008. New York: Routledge.
132. Madon, S., and S. Sahay. 2002. “An Information-Based Model of NGO Mediation for the Empowerment of Slum Dwellers in Bangalore.” Information Society: An International Journal 18(1): 13-19.
133. Mahadevia, D. 1998. “State-Supported Segmentation of Mumbai: Policy Options in the Global Economy.” Review of Development and Change 3(1): 12-41.
134. Mahadevia, D., and H. Narayanan. 2008. “Shanghaing Mumbai: Politics of Evictions and Resistance in Slum Settlements.” In D. Mahadevia, ed., Inside the Transforming Urban Asia: Processes, Policies and Public Actions. New Delhi: Concept Publishing, 549-89.
135. Mangin, W. 1967. “Latin American Squatter Settlements: A Problem and a Solution.” Latin American Research Review 2(3): 65-98.
136. Manor, J. 1978. “Where Congress Survived: Five States in the Indian General Election of 1977.” Asian Survey 18(8): 785-803.
137. Marpakwar, P. 2006. “McKinsey Shows Makeover Way.” Times of India. November 2.
138. Marx, K., and F. Engels. 1978. “The Communist Manifesto.” In Robert Tucker, ed., The Marx-Engels Reader. New York: W. W. Norton.
139. Mazumdar, R. 2007. Bombay Cinema:An Archive of the City. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
140. Mbembe, A. 2001. On the Postcolony. Berkeley: University of California Press.
141. McFarlane, C. 2004. “Geographical Imaginations and Spaces of Political Engagement: Examples from the Indian Alliance.” Antipode 36(5): 890-916.
142. McFarlane, C. 2008. “Sanitation in Mumbai’s Informal Settlements: State, ‘Slum,’ and Infrastructure.” Environment and Planning A 40(1): 88-107.
143. McFarlane, C. 2011. Learning the City: Knowledge and Translocal Assemblage. London: John Wiley and Sons.
144. Mehta, A. 2000. Power Play: A Study of the Enron Project. Mumbai: Orient Longman.
145. Mehta, R. 2009a. “Dharavi Redevelopment Plan Is Caught in the Crossfire.” DNA: Daily News and Analysis. November 2.
146. Mehta, R. 2009b. “Dharavi Panel in the Firing Line.” DNA: Daily News and Analysis. November 3.
147. Mehta, S. 2005. Maximum City: Bombay Lost and Found. New York: Knopf.
148. Menon, M. 2004. “Dharavi Residents Wary of New Project.” The Hindu. August 8.
149. Menon, M. 2008. “Supreme Court Order Cheers Dharavi Residents.” The Hindu.April 6.
150. Menon, M., and N. Adarkar. 2004. One Hundred Years, One Hundred Voices: Mill Workers of Girangoan: An Oral History. Calcutta: Seagull Books.
151. Mitra, S. K. 2001. “Making Local Government Work: Local Elites, Panchayat Raj, and Governance in India.” In A. Kohli, ed., The Success of India’s Democracy. New Delhi: Cambridge University Press.
152. Modak, N. and A. Mayer. 1948. An Outline for the Master Plan for Greater Bombay. Bombay: Bombay Municipal Printing Press.
153. Mukhija, V. 2001a. “Enabling Slum Redevelopment in Mumbai: Policy Paradox in Practice.” Housing Studies 16(6): 791-806.
154. Mukhija, V. 2001b. “Upgrading Housing Settlements in Developing Countries: The Impact of Existing Physical Conditions.” Cities 18(4): 213-22.
155. Mukhija, V. 2003. Squatters as Developers: Slum Redevelopment in Mumbai. Burlington, Vt.: Ashgate.
156. Naidu, R. 2006. “Dilapidation and Slum Formation.” In S. Patel and K. Deb, eds., Urban Studies. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
157. Nainan, N. 2006. “Parallel Universes: Quasilegal Networks in Mumbai Governance.” Presented at Urban Governance in an International Perspective Seminar, Amsterdam, January 7.
158. National Slum Dwellers Federation (NSDF). 1986. Dharavi Survey, http://wwwNAPMdharavi.org/.
159. Nayar, B. R. 2001. Globalization and Nationalism: The Changing Balance of India’s Economic Policy. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage.
160. Nayar, B. R. 2006. India’s Globalization: Evaluating the Economic Consequences.Washington, D.C.: Policy Studies 2, East-West Center.
161. Newman, K., and E. Wyly. 2006. “The Right to Stay Put, Revisited: Gentrifica- tion and Resistance to Displacement in New York City.” Urban Studies 43(1): 23-57.
162. Nijman, J. 2000. “Mumbai’s Real Estate Market in the 1990s: De-Regulation, Global Money, and Casino Capitalism.” Economic and Political Weekly 35: 575-82.
163. Nijman, J. 2006. “Mumbai’s Mysterious Middle Class.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 30(4): 758-75.
164. Nijman, J. 2008. “Against the Odds: Slum Rehabilitation in Neoliberal Mumbai.” Cities 25(2): 73-85.
165. O’Hare, G., D. Abbott, and M. Barke. 1998. “A Review of Slum Housing Policies in Mumbai.” Cities 15: 269-83.
166. Ong, A. 2011. “Introduction: Worlding Cities, or the Art of Being Global.” In A. Roy and A. Ong, eds., Worlding Cities: Asian Experiments and the Art of Being Global. Malden, Mass.: Wiley Blackwell, 1-26.
167. Palmer, N. D. 1976. “India in 1975: Democracy in Eclipse.” Asian Survey 16(2) (A Survey of Asia in 1975, part 2): 95-110.
168. Palmer, N. D. 1977. “India in 1976: Politics of Depolticization. Asian Survey 17(2) (A Survey of Asia in 1976, part 2): 160-80.
169. Panwalkar, P. 1995. “Upgradation of Slums: A World Bank Programme.” In S. Patel and A. Thorner, eds., Bombay: Metaphor for Modern India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
170. Patel, S., and D. Mitlin. 2002. “Sharing Experiences and Changing Lives.” Community Development Journal 37(2): 125-36.
171. Patel, S. B. 1996. “Slum Rehabilitation in Mumbai: Possible If Done Differently.” Economic and Political Weekly 31(18): 1047-50.
172. Patel, S., C. d’Cruz, and S. Burra. 2002. “Beyond Evictions in a Global City: People-Managed Resettlement in Mumbai.” Environment and Urbanization 14 (1): 159-72.
173. Pedersen, J. D. 2000. “Explaining Economics Liberalization in India: State and Society Perspectives.” World Development 28(2): 265-82.
174. Pendharkar, S. P. 2003. Population and Employment Profile of the Metropolitan Mumbai Region. Mumbai: Metropolitan Mumbai Regional Development Authority.
175. Perlman, J. 1976. The Myth of Marginality. Berkeley: University of California Press.
176. Perlman, J. 2004. “Marginality: From Myth to Reality in the Favelas of Rio de Janeiro, 1969-2002.” In A. Roy and N. AlSayyad, eds., Urban Informality: Transnational Perspectives from the Middle East, Latin America, and South Asia. Lanham, Md.: Lexington Books.
177. Pimple, M., and L. John. 2002. “Security of Tenure: Mumbai’s Experience.” In A. Durand-Lassarve and L. Royston, eds., Holding Their Ground: Secure Land Tenure for the Urban Poor in Developing Countries. Sterling, Va.: Earth- scan Publications, 75-85.
178. Pinto, D. A., and M. Pinto. 2005. Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and Ward Administration. Seattle, Wash.: Konark Publishers.
179. Pinto, M. 2000. Metropolitan City Governance in India. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage.
180. Pinto, M. 2008. “Urban Governance in India-Spotlight on Mumbai.” In I. Baud and J. de Wit, eds., New Forms of Urban Governance in India: Shifts, Models, Networks and Governance. New Delhi: Sage.
181. Polanyi, K. 2001 (1944). The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time. Boston: Beacon Press.
182. Pugh, C. 1989. “The World Bank and Urban Shelter in Bombay.” Habitat International 13(3): 23-49.
183. Raffin, A. 2011. “Imperial Nationhood and Its Impact on Colonial Cities: Issues of Inter-Group Peace and Conflict in Pondicherry and Vietnam.” In D. E. Davis and N. Libertun de Duren, eds., Cities and Sovereignty: Identity Politics in Urban Spaces. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 28-58.
184. Rajyashree, K. S. 1986. An Ethnolinguistic Survey of Dharavi. Mysore: Central Institute of Indian Languages.
185. Ramachandran, S. 2003. “‘Operation Pushback’: Sangh Parivar, State, Slums, and Surreptitious Bangladeshis in New Delhi.” Economic and Political Weekly 38(7): 637-47.
186. Ramanath, R. 2005. “From Conflict to Collaboration: Nongovernmental Organizations and Their Negotiations for Local Control of Slum and Squatter Housing in Mumbai, India.” Doctoral dissertation submitted to the faculty of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.
187. Ramanath, R., and A. Ebrahim. 2010. “Strategies and Tactics in NGO-Government Relations: Insights from Slum Housing in Mumbai.” Nonprofit Management and Leadership 21(1): 21-42.
188. Ramanathan, U. 2005. “Demolition Drive.” Economic and Political Weekly, July 2.
189. Ramesh, R. 2005. “Poor Squeezed Out by Mumbai’s Dream Plan.” The Guardian. March 1.
190. Ranganathan, M. 2009. Govind Narayan’s Mumbai: An Urban Biography from 1863. New York: Anthem Press.
191. Rao, V. 2006. “Slum as Theory: The South/Asian City and Globalization.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 30(1): 225-32.
192. Rao, K. R., and M. S. A. Rao. 1991. “Cities, Slums and Urban Development: A Case Study of a Slum in Vijayawada.” In M. S. A. Rao, C. Bhat, and L. N. Kadekar, eds., A Reader in Urban Sociology. Hyderagad: Orient Longman, 314-34.
193. Raval, S. 2000. “Mills and Boom.” India Today. May 8.
194. Risbud, N. 2003. “The Case of Mumbai, India.” In Understanding Slums: Case Studies for the Global Report on Human Settlements. Nairobi: UN-Habitat. www.ucl.ac.uk/dpu-projects/Global_Report/home.htm.
195. Roy, A. 2003. City Requiem, Calcutta: Gender and the Politics of Poverty. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
196. Roy, A. 2004a. “The Gentlemen’s City: Urban Informality in Calcutta.” In A. Roy and N. AlSayyad, eds., Urban Informality: Transnational Perspectives from the Middle East, Latin America, and South Asia. Lanham, Md.: Lexington Books, 147-70.
197. Roy, A. 2004b. “Transnational Trespassings: The Geopolitics of Urban Informality.” In A. Roy and N. AlSayyad, eds., Urban Informality: Transnational Perspectives from the Middle East, Latin America, and South Asia. Lanham, Md.: Lexington Books, 289-317.
198. Roy, A. 2009a. “Why India Cannot Plan Its Cities: Informality, Insurgency, and the Idiom of Urbanization.” Planning Theory 8(1): 76-87.
199. Roy, A. 2009b. “Civic Governmentality: The Politics of Inclusion in Beruit and Mumbai.” Antipode 41: 159-79.
200. Roy, A., and N. AlSayyad, eds., 2004. Urban Informality: Transnational Perspectives from the Middle East, Latin America, and South Asia. Lanham, Md.: Lexington Books.
201. Rudolph, L., and S. H. Rudolph. 1976. The Modernity of Tradition: Political Development in India. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
202. Rudolph, L., and S. H. Rudolph. 1987. In Pursuit of Lakshmi: The Political Economy of the Indian State. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
203. Sassen, S. 2006. Territory, Authority, Rights: From Medieval to Global Assemblages. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
204. Scott, J. C. 1972. “Patron-Client Politics and Political Change in Southeast Asia.” American Political Science Review 66(1): 91-113.
205. Scott, J. C. 1976. The Moral Economy of the Peasant: Rebellion and Subsistence in Southeast Asia. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.
206. Searle, L. G. 2010. “Making Space for Capital: The Production of Global Landscapes in Contemporary India.” Doctoral dissertation submitted to the faculty of the University of Pennsylvania.
207. Sebastian, P. A. 1981. “Operation Eviction.” Economic and Political Weekly 16(38): 1526.
208. Selznick, P. 1966 (1949). TVA and the Grassroots: A Study in the Sociology of Formal Organization. New York: Harper Torch Books.
209. Sharma, K. 1995. “Chronicle of a Riot Foretold.” In S. Patel and A. Thorner, eds., Bombay: Metaphor for Modern India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 268-86.
210. Sharma, K. 2000. Rediscovering Dharavi: Stories from Asia’s Largest Slum. New Delhi: Penguin Books.
211. Sharma, R. N. 2004. “Housing Market in Metropolitan Mumbai and Its Irrelevance to Average Citizens.” Unpublished white paper.
212. Shatkin, G., and S. Vidyarthi. 2014. “Contesting Space: Power, Politics, and Claims to the City.” In G. Shatkin, ed., Global Visions and Politics of the Local. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell, 1-38.
213. Shaw, A. 1996. “Urban Policy in Post-Independence India.” Economic and Political Weekly 31(4): 224-28.
214. Shaw, A. 2004. The Making of Navi Mumbai. Hyderabad: Orient Longman.
215. Sheng, Y. K. 1989. “Some Low-Income Housing Delivery Subsystems in Bangkok, Thailand.” Environment and Urbanization 1(2): 27-37.
216. Singh, G. 1986. “Bombay Slums Face Operation Demolition.” Economic and Political Weekly 21(16): 684-87.
217. Singh G., and P. K. Das. 1995. “Building Castles in Air: Housing Scheme for Bombay’s Slum-Dwellers.” Economic and Political Weekly 30(40): 2477-81.
218. Smith, N. 2002. “New Globalism, New Urbanism: Gentrification as Global Urban Strategy.” Antipode 34(3): 427-50.
219. Sovani, N. V. 1969. “The Analysis of ‘Over-Urbanization.’” In G. W. Breese, ed., The City in Newly Developing Countries: Readings on Urbanism and Urbanization. Englewood Cliffs, N,J,: Prentice-Hall, 322-30.
220. SPARC. 1998. Enumeration as a Tool for Mobilization: The Community Census of Structures in Dharavi. Mumbai: Society for the Preservation of Area Resources.
221. Spodek, H. 1983. “Squatter Settlements in Urban India: Self-help and Government Policies.” Economic and Political Weekly 18(36/37): 1575-77 and 1579-86.
222. Srinivas, M. N. 1955. “The Social System of a Mysore Village.” In M. Marriott, ed., Village India. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1-35.
223. Srinivasan, S. 2005. “Tsunami-Like Devastation Hits Mumbai Slum Dwellers.” Inter Press Service. January 30.
224. Srivastava, S. 2005. “Mumbai Struggles to Catch Up with Shanghai.” Asian Times. March 16.
225. State of Maharashtra. 1971. Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance and Redevelopment Act), 1971. Mumbai: Department of Urban Development.
226. State of Maharashtra. 2004. Transforming Mumbai into a World-Class City. Mumbai: Chief Minister’s Taskforce.
227. State of Maharashtra. 2007. Global Expression of Interest for Dharavi Redevelopment Project Mumbai: Slum Rehabilitation Authority. (Advertisement run in several newspapers, including Times of India. June 1.)
228. Stepan, A. 1999. “Federalism and Democracy: Beyond the U.S. Model.” Journal of Democracy 10(4): 19-34.
229. Supreme Court of India. 1985. Olga Tellis & Ors v Bombay Municipal Council [1985] 2 Supp SCR 51. http://www.escr-net.org/docs/iZ401006.
230. Swanstrom, T., and R. Kerstein. 1989. “Job and Housing Displacement: A Review of Competing Policy Perspectives.” In M. P. Smith, ed., Pacific Rim Cities in the World Economy: Comparative Urban and Community Research. New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction Publishers, 254-96.
231. Tare, K. 2008. “Parties Tally behind Sena on Dharavi.” Daily News Analysis: DNA. March 13.
232. Tarlo, E. 2003. Unsettling Memories: Narratives of the Emergency in Delhi. Berkeley: University of California Press.
233. Taub, R. P. 1969. Bureaucrats under Stress: Administrators and Administration in an Indian State. Berkeley: University of California Press.
234. Tembhekar, C. 2009. “4 Firms Drop Out of Dharavi Plan.” Times of India.March 3.
235. Times of India. 1985. “‘Rasta Roko’ Stir to Be Resumed.” Times of India. June 18
236. Times of India. 2008. “Give Right to Choose Developer: Dharavi Slumdwellers.”August 14.
237. Tummala, K. K. 1992. “India’s Federalism under Stress.” Asian Survey 32(6): 538-53.
238. Turner, J. F. C. 1969. “Uncontrolled Urban Settlement: Problems and Policies.” In G. W. Breese, ed., The City in Newly Developing Countries: Readings on Urbanism and Urbanization. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 507-34.
239. Turner, J. F. C. 1976. Housing by People: Towards Autonomy in Building Environments. London: Marion Boyars.
240. Van Wersch, H. 1995. “Flying a Kite, Losing the String: Communication during the Bombay Textile Strike.” In S. Patel and A. Thorner, eds., Bombay: Metaphor for Modern India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 64-85.
241. Varshney, A. 2007. “Mass Politics or Elite Politics? Understanding the Politics of India’s Economic Reforms.” In R. Mukherji, ed., India’s Economic Transition: The Politics of Reforms. New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 146-69.
242. Verney, D. V. 1995. “Federalism, Federative Systems, and Federations: The United States, Canada, and India.” Publius 25(2): 81-97.
243. Vidyarthi, Sanjeev. 2010. “Reimagining the American Neighborhood Unit for India.” In P. Healy and R. Upton, eds., Crossing Borders:International Exchange and Planning Practices. London: Routledge, 73-94.
244. Vora, R. 1996. “Shift of Power from Rural to Urban Sector.” Economic and Political Weekly 31(2-3): 171-73.
245. Wapner, P. 1995. “Politics beyond the State: Environmental Activism and World Civic Politics.” World Politics 47(3): 311-40.
246. Ward, P. M. 1976. “The Squatter Settlements as Slum or Housing Solution: Evidence from Mexico City.” Land Economics 2(3): 330-46.
247. Weber, M. 1946 (1921). “Politics as a Vocation.” In Gerth and Mills, eds., From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology. New York: Oxford University Press, 77-128.
248. Weiner, M. 1977. “The 1977 Parliamentary Elections in India.” Asian Survey 17(7): 619-26.
249. Weintraub, R. M. 1988. “Burgeoning City Slums Change Face of India; Millions Leave Villages in Countryside to Find Work, Resources in Urban Areas.” Washington Post. October 15.
250. Weisman, S. R. 1988. “Bombay Journal; A City Where Stark Contrast Is King.” New York Times. July 23.
251. Werlin, H. 1999. “The Slum Upgrading Myth.” Urban Studies 36(9): 1523-34.
252. Wiebe, P. D. 1975. Social Life in an Indian Slum. Durham, N.C.: Carolina Academic Press.
253. World Bank. 1997. Implementation Completion Report: India: Bombay Urban Development Project. wds.worldbank.org/.
254. World Bank and UN-Habitat. 1999. Cities Alliance for Cities without Slums: Action Plan for Moving Slum Upgrading to Scale. Washington D.C.: The World Bank.
255. Youth for Unity and Voluntary Action (YUVA). 1999. “Our Home Is a Slum: An Exploration of a Community and Local Government Collaboration in a Tenants’ Struggle to Establish Legal Residency.” Unpublished Discussion Paper no. 107. August.
256. Zerah, M.-H. 2007. “Middle Class Neighbourhood Associations as Political Players in Mumbai.” Economic and Political Weekly 42(47): 61-68.