Antenatal Care Among Poor Women in Mexico in the Context of Universal Health Coverage

Maternal and Child Health Journal

Volumn 19, Issue 10, 2015, Pages 2314-2322

  Servan Mori, Edson ^a   Wirtz, Veronika ^b   Avila Burgos, Leticia ^a   Heredia Pi, Ileana ^a  

^a INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE SALUD PÚBLICA   (Mexico)

^b BOSTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

Antenatal care; Mexico; Seguro Popular; Universal health

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; ECONOMICS; EPIDEMIOLOGY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INSURANCE; MEXICO; MIDDLE AGED; POVERTY; PREGNANCY; PRENATAL CARE; QUESTIONNAIRE; SOCIOECONOMICS; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MEXICO; MIDDLE AGED; POVERTY; PREGNANCY; PRENATAL CARE; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES; UNIVERSAL COVERAGE;

EID: 84942372440     PISSN: 10927875     EISSN: 15736628     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10995-015-1751-9     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Hogan, M. C., Foreman, K. J., Naghavi, M., Ahn, S. Y., Wang, M., Makela, S. M., & Murray, C. J. (2010). Maternal mortality for 181 countries, 1980–2008: A systematic analysis of progress towards millennium development goal 5. The Lancet,375(9726), 1609–1623. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60518-1.
2. WHO. Trends in maternal mortality: 1990 to 2013. Estimates by WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA, The World Bank and the United Nations Population Division. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/112682/2/9789241507226_eng.pdf
3. World Health Organization. (2013). World Health statistics. Geneva: WHO.
4. Fajardo-Dolci, G., Meljem-Moctezuma, J., Vicente-González, E., Venegas-Páez, F. V., Villalba-Espinoza, I., Pérez-Cardoso, A. L., et al. (2013). Analysis of maternal deaths in Mexico occurred during 2009. Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc.,51(5), 486–495.
5. Secretaría de Salud. Sistema de Protección Social en Salud. (2006). Elementos conceptuales, financieros y operativos. Coord. de Eduardo González Pier, Mariana Barraza Lloréns, Cristina Gutiérrez Delgado, Armando Vargas Palacios. (2da Ed.) México: FCE, Secretaría de Salud, Fundación Mexicana para la Salud, Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública.
6. Gutierrez, J. P., Rivera-Dommarco, J., Shamah-Levy, T., Villalpando-Hernández, S., Franco, A., Cuevas-Nasu, L., Romero-Martínez, M., Hernández-Avila, M. (2012). Encuesta Nacional de Salud y Nutrición 2012. Resultados Nacionales. Cuernavaca, México: Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública (MX).
7. Magadi, M. A., Agwanda, A. O., & Obare, F. O. (2007). A comparative analysis of the use of maternal health services between teenagers and older mothers in sub-saharan Africa: Evidence from demographic and health surveys (DHS). Social Science and Medicine,64(6), 1311–1325. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.11.004.
8. Brown, C. J., Pagán, J. A., & Rodríguez-Oreggia, E. (2005). The decision-making process of health care utilization in Mexico. Health Policy,72(1), 81–91. doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2004.06.008.
9. Lopez-Cevallos, D., Chi, C. (2010). Health care utilization in Ecuador: A multilevel analysis of socio-economic determinants and inequality issues. Health Policy and Planning25(3), 209–218. http://heapol.oxfordjournals.org/content/by/year.
10. Glei, D. A., Goldman, N., Rodíguez, G. (2003). Utilization of care during pregnancy in rural Guatemala: Does obstetrical need matter? Social Science and Medicine,57(12), 2447–2463. doi:10.1016/S0277-9536(03)00140-0.
11. Gyimah, S. O., Takyi, B. K., & Addai, I. (2006). Challenges to the reproductive-health needs of african women: On religion and maternal health utilization in Ghana. Social Science and Medicine,62(12), 2930–2944. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.11.034.
12. Andersen, R. M. (1995). Revisiting the behavioral model and access to medical care: Does it matter? Journal of Health and Social Behavior,1, 1. doi:10.2307/2137284.
13. Sahn, D. E., Younger, S. D., & Genicot, G. (2003). The demand for health care services in rural Tanzania. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics,65(2), 241–259. doi:10.1111/1468-0084.t01-2-00046.
14. Valdivia, M. (2002). Public health infrastructure and equity in the utilization of outpatient health care services in Peru. Health Policy and Planning17(Suppl), 12–19. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=cmedm&AN=12477737&site=eds-live.
15. Deb, P., & Trivedi, P. K. (2002). The Structure of demand for health care: latent class versus two-part models. Journal of Health Economics,21(4), 601–625.
16. Comisión Nacional de Desarrollo de los Pueblos Indígenas (CDI). (2009). Indicadores socioeconómicos de los pueblos indígenas de México, 2002. Disponible en http://www.cdi.gob.mx/.
17. Teruel, G. L., Rubalcava, L. (2005). Escalas de Equivalencia para México, D.F. Serie: Documentos de Investigación. SEDESOL. Documentos de investigación 23, SEDESOL.
18. Kolenikov, S., & Angeles, G. (2004). The use of discrete data in PCA: Theory, simulations, and applications to socioeconomic indices. Chapel Hill: Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina.
19. Consejo Nacional de Población (CONAPO). Índice de marginación por localidad. Disponible en http://www.conapo.gob.mx/es/CONAPO/Indice_de_Marginacion_por_Localidad_2010. Último acceso [11 de noviembre 2012].
20. Wirtz, V., Santa-Ana-Tellez, Y., Servan-Mori, E., & Avila-Burgos, L. (2012). Heterogeneous effects of health insurance on out-of-pocket expenditure on medicines in Mexico. Value in Health,15(5), 593–603. doi:10.1016/j.jval.2012.01.006.
21. Sosa-Rubí, S. G., Salinas-Rodríguez, A., & Galárraga, O. (2011). Impacto del seguro popular en el gasto catastrófico y de bolsillo en el México rural y urbano, 2005-2008. Salud Pública de México,53, 425–435.
22. Sosa-Rubí, S. G., Galárraga, O., & Harris, J. E. (2009). Heterogeneous impact of the “Seguro popular” program on the utilization of obstetrical services in Mexico, 2001–2006: A multinomial probit model with a discrete endogenous variable. Journal of Health Economics,28(1), 20–34. doi:10.1016/j.jhealeco.2008.08.002.
23. Rosenbaum, P., & Rubin, D. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika,70, 41–50.
24. Abadie, A., & Imbens, G. (2006). Large sample properties of matching estimators for average treatment effects. Econometrica,74, 235–267.
25. Rosenbaum, P., & Rubin, D. (1985). Constructing a control group using multivariate matched sampling methods that incorporate the propensity score. Journal of the American Statistical Association,39, 33–38.
26. Dehejia, R. H., & Wahba, S. (2002). Propensity score matching methods for non-experimental causal studies. The Review of Economics and Statistics,84(1), 151–161.
27. Hosmer, D., & Lemeshow, S. (2000). Applied logistic regression (2nd ed.). Canada: Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics.
28. Stata Corp. LP. (2011). Stata/SE 13.1 for Windows XP 64 bits. College Station Texas, USA: Stata Corp LP.
29. Secretaría de Salud. Observatorio del Desempeño Ambulatorio 2010. México 2010. Disponible en www.dged.salud.gob.mx.
30. OMS. Mortalidad Materna: Nota descriptiva N°348. Mayo 2012. (2012). Retrieved Noviembre 10, 2012, from http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs348/es/.
31. Villar, J., & Bergsjo, P. (2002). WHO antenatal care randomized trial: Manual for the Implementation of the New Model. Geneva: WHO.
32. Rosenzweig, M. R., & Schultz, T. P. (1982). The behavior of mothers as inputs to child health: the determinants of birth weight, gestation, and rate of fetal growth. In V. Fuchs (Ed.), Economic aspects of health (pp. 53–92). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
33. Evans, W. N., & Lien, D. S. (2005). The benefits of prenatal care: evidence from the PAT bus strike. Journal of Econometrics,125, 207–239.
34. World Health Organization. (2006). Provision of effective antenatal care. http://who.int/reproductive-health/publications/maternal_newborn.en.html
35. Sunil, T. S., Spears, W. D., Hook, L., Castillo, J., & Torres, C. (2010). Initiation of and barriers to prenatal care use among low-income women in San Antonio, Texas. Maternal and Child Health Journal,14, 133–140.
36. Johnson, A. A., Hatcher, B. J., El-Khorazaty, M. N., Milligan, R. A., Bhaskar, B., Rodan, M. F., et al. (2007). Determinants of inadequate prenatal care utilization by African American women. Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved,18, 620–636.
37. Adekanle, D. A., & Isawumi, A. I. (2008). Late antenatal care booking and its predictors among pregnant women in South Western Nigeria. Online Journal of Health and Allied Sciences,7, 4.
38. McCaw-Binns, A., La Grenade, J., & Ashley, D. (1995). Under-users of antenatal care: a comparison of non-attenders and late attenders for antenatal care, with early attenders. Social Science and Medicine,40, 1003–1012.
39. Secretaría de Salud (SeSa). Sexto Informe de Labores. Dirección General de Evaluación del Desempeño. Secretaría de Salud 2012. Consulta 14 de Abril de 20132011, from http://www.dged.salud.gob.mx/contenidos/evaluacion_programas/informe_labores.html
40. King, G., Gakidou, E., Imai, K., Lakin, J., Moore, R. T., Nall, C., & Llamas, H. (2009). Public policy for the poor? A randomised assessment of the mexican universal health insurance programme. The Lancet,373(9673), 1447–1454. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60239-7.
41. Heredia-Pi, I., Serván-Mori, E., Reyes-Morales, H., & Lozano, R. (2013). Brechas en la cobertura de atención continua del embarazo y el parto en México. Salud Pública Mex,55(suppl 2), S249–S258.
42. González-Block, M. A., Sauceda-Valenzuela, A. L., & Santa Ana-Téllez, Y. (2010). Factores asociados a la demanda de servicios para la atención del parto en México. Salud Publica de Mexico,52, 416–423.
43. Diaz, J. J., & Handa, S. (2006). An assessment of propensity score matching as a non-experimental impact estimator: Evidence from Mexico’s PROGRESA program. J Hum Resour, 41(2):319–345.