Membrane technology

Membranes for Industrial Wastewater Recovery and Re-use

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 13-74

  Judd, Simon ^a  

^a CRANFIELD UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MEMBRANES; MICROFILTRATION; POLLUTION; WASTEWATER TREATMENT; WATER POLLUTION;

APPLIED PRESSURE; BULK WATER; FILTRATION PROCESS; GAS TRANSFER; PURIFIED WATER; SELECTIVE PERMEATION; SEPARATION OF COMPONENTS; SPECIFIC COMPONENT;

MEMBRANE TECHNOLOGY;

EID: 84942240959     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1016/B978-185617389-6/50003-5     Document Type: Chapter

References (75)

1. Ahmed S.P., Alansari M.S. Biological fouling and control at RAS Abu JarjurRO plant-a new approach. Desalination 1989, 74:69-84.
2. Applegate L.E., Erkenbrecher C.W., Winters H. Monitoring control of biological activity in Permasep seawater RO plants. Desalination 1986, 65:331-359.
3. Arroyo Fonade C. Use of intermittent jets to enhance flux in crossflow filtration. J.Membrane Sci. 1993, 80:117-129.
4. ASTM D3739, Standard practice for calculation and adjustment of the Langelier saturation index for reverse osmosis.
5. ASTM D4189, Standard test method for Silt Density Index (SDI) of water.
6. ASTM D4582, Standard practice for calculation and adjustment of the Stiff and Davis stability index for reverse osmosis.
7. 4 for reverse osmosis.
8. ASTM D4993, Standard practice for calculation and adjustment of silica scaling for reverse osmosis.
9. Belfort G., Davis R.H., Zydney A.L. The behaviour of suspension and macromolecular solutions in crossflow microfiltration. J. Membrane Sci. 1994, 96:1-58.
10. Bertram CD., Hoogland M.R., Li H., Odell R.A., Fane A.G. Flux enhancement in crossflow microfiltration using a collapsible-tube pulsation generator. J.Membrane Sci. 1993, 84:279-292.
11. Bhattacharyya D., Williams M.E Reverse osmosis: theory. Membrane Handbook 1992, 269-280. Nostrand Reinhold, New York. Ho, W.S.W. and Sirkar, K.K. (Eds.).
12. Bouhabila E.H., Ben Aim, R.Buisson H. Microfiltration of activated sludge using submerged membrane with aior bubbling. Desalination 1998, 118:315-322.
13. Bowen W.R., Calvo J.I., Hernandez A. Steps of membrane blocking in flux decline during protein microfiltration. J. Membrane Sci. 1995, 101:153-165.
14. Bowen W.R., Doneva A.D., Yin H.-B Separation of humic acid from a model surface water with PSU/SPEEK blend UF/NF membranes. J. Membrane Sci. 2001, 206:417-429.
15. Cabassud C, Laborie S., Lainé J.M. How slug flow can enhance the ultrafiltration flux in organic hollow fibres. J. Membrane Sci. 1997, 128:93.
16. Chang I.-S, Le-Clech P., Jefferson B., Judd S.J. Membrane fouling in membrane bioreactors for wastewater treatment. Environ. Eng. Sci. 2002, (in press).
17. Chang I.S., Bag S.O., Lee C.H. Effects of membrane fouling on solute rejection during membrane filtration of activated sludge. Process Biochemistry 2001, 36(8-9):855-860.
18. Chang I.-S., Lee C.-H. Membrane filtration characteristics in membrane coupled activated sludge system-the effect of physiological states of activated sludge on membrane fouling. Desalination 1998, 120:221-233.
19. Characklis W.G., Marshall K.C. Biofilms 1990, Wiley.
20. Cheryan M. Ultrafiltration and microfiltration handbook 1998, pp. 138-152, Technomic, Basel.
21. Chiolle A., Gianotti G., Gramando M., Parrini G. Mathematical model of reverse osmosis in parallel channels with turbulence promoting nets. Desalination 1978, 26:3-16.
22. Cho B.D., Fane A.G. Fouling transients in nominally sub-critical flux operation of a membrane bioreactor. J. Membrane Sci. 2002, (in press).
23. Choo K.-H., Lee C.-H. Membrane fouling mechanisms in the membrane-coupled anerobic bioreactor. Wat. Res. 1996, 30:1771-1780.
24. Davis R.H. Theory for cossflow microfiltration. Membrane handbook. Nostrand Reinhold 1992, 483-505. New York. H. W.S.W., S. K.K. (Eds.).
25. Davis R.H., Sherwood J.D. A similarity solution for steady-state crossflow microfiltration. Chem. Eng. Sci. 1990, 45:3203-3209.
26. Defrance L., Jaffrin M.Y. Reversibility of activated sludge filtration. J.Membrane Sci. 1999, 152:203-210.
27. Defrance L., Jaffrin M.Y. Reversibility of fouling formed in activated sludge filtration. J.Membrane Sci. 1999, 157:73-84.
28. Drew D.A., Schonberg J.A., Beifort G. Lateral inertial migration of a small sphere in fast laminar flow through a membrane duct. Chem. Eng. Sci 1991, 46:3219-3244.
29. Ecstein E.C., Bailey P.G., Shapiro A.H. Self-diffusion of particles in shear flow of suspension. J. Fluid Mech. 1977, 79:191-208.
30. Fane A.G. Ultrafiltration: factors influencing flux and rejection. Prog. Filt. Sep. 1986, 4:101-179.
31. Field R.W., Wu D., Howell J.A., Gupta B.B. Critical flux concept for microfiltration fouling. J. Membrane Sci. 1995, 100:259-272.
32. Flemming H.C. Mechanistic aspects of reverse osmosis membrane biofouling and prevention. Reverse osmosis membrane technology, water chemistry and industrial applications 1992, Nostrand Reinhold, New York. Amjad, Z. (Ed.).
33. Ghosh R., Cui Z.F. Mass transfer in gas-sparged ultrafiltration: upward slug flow in tubular membranes. J.Membrane Sci. 1999, 162:91-102.
34. Grace H.P. Resistance and compressibility of filter cakes. Chem. Eng. Prog. 1956, 49:303-318.
35. Graham S.I., Reitx R.L., Hickman C.E. Improving reverse osmosis performance through periodic cleaning. Desalination 1989, 74:113-124.
36. Green G., Beifort G. Fouling of ultrafiltration membranes: lateral migration and the particle trajectory model. Desalination 1980, 35:129-147.
37. Guiver M.D., Black P., Tarn C.M., Deslandes Y. Functionalised PSU membranes by heterogeneous lithiation. J. Appl. Polymer Sci. 1993, 48:1597.
38. Gupta B.B., Banplain P., Jaffrin M.Y. Permeate flux enhancement by pressure and flow pulsations in microfiltration with mineral membranes. J.Membrane Sci 1992, 70:257.
39. Gupta B.B., Ding L.H., Jaffrin M.Y. Progress in Artificial Organs 1985, 891. ISAO Press, Cleveland. Nose, Y., Kjellstrand, C. and Ivanovich, P. (Eds.).
40. Gupta B.B., Howell J.A., Wu D., Field R.W. Critical flux concept for microfiltration fouling. J. Membrane Sci 1995, 100:259-272.
41. Hermia J. Constant pressure blocking filtration laws: application to power-law non-Newtonian fluids. Trans. Inst. Chem. Eng. 1982, 60:183.
42. Howell J.A. Subcritical flux operation of microfiltration. J. Membrane Sci. 1995, 107:165-171.
43. Ishiguro K., Imai K., Sawada S. Effects of biological treatment conditions on permeate flux of UF membrane in a membrane/activated sludge wastewater treatement system. Desalination 1994, 98:119-126.
44. IUPAC Reporting physisorption data. Pure Appl. Chem. 1985, 57:603.
45. Judd S.J., Hillis P. Coagulation pretreatment for crossflow microfiltration of upland waters. Wat. Res. 2001, 35:2895-2904.
46. Kesting R.E. The nature of pores in integrally skinned phase inversion membranes. Advances in reverse osmosis and ultrafiltration 1989, 1-13. National Research Council of Canada. Matsuura, T. and Sourijan, S. (Eds.).
47. Kim S., Park H. Prediction of critical flux conditions in crossflow microfiltration using a concentration polarisation model. Proc. Membrane Technology in Environmental Management 1999, 186-193.
48. Knoell T., Safarik J., Cormack T., Riley R., Lin S.W., Ridgeway H. Biofouling potentials of microporous polysulphone membranes containing a sulphonated polyether-ethersulphone polyethersulphone block copolymer: correlation of. J.Membrane Sci. vn157 1999, 117-138.
49. Krauth K.H., Staab K.F. Pressurized bioreactor with membrane filtration for wastewater treatment. Wat. Res. 1993, 27:405-411.
50. Kwon D.Y., Vigneswaran S. Influence of particle size and surface charge on critical flux of crossflow microfiltration. Wat. Sci. Technol 1998, 38:481-488.
51. Kwon D.Y., Vigneswaran S., Fane A.G., Ben Aim R. Experimental determination of critical flux in cross flow microfiltration. Separation and Purification Tech 2000, 19:169-181.
52. Lévêque J.A. Les lois de la transmission de chaleur par convection. Ann. Mines 1928, 13:305-382.
53. Lonsdale H.K., Merten U., Riley R.L. Transport properties of cellulose acetate osmotic membranes. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1965, 9:1341.
54. Matsuura T., Sourirajan S. Reverse osmosis transport through capillary pores under the influence of surface forces. Ind. Eng. Chem. Process Des.Dev. 1981, 20:273.
55. Mercier M., Fonade C., Lafforgue-Delmorme C. How slug flow can enhance the ultrafiltration flux of mineral tubular membranes. J. Membrane Sci. 1997, 128:103.
56. Nunes S.P., Peinemann K.V. Membrane technology in the chemical industry 2001, Wiley, Weinheim.
57. Ould-Dris A., Jaffrin M.Y., Si-Hassen D., Neggaz Y. Effect of cake thickness and particle polydispersity on prediction of permeate flux in microfiltration of particulate suspensions by a hydrodynamic diffusion. J. Membrane Sci. 2000, 164:211-227.
58. Porter M.C. Concentration polarisation with membrane ultrafiltration. Ind. Eng. Chem. Prod. Res. Dev. 1972, 11:233-248.
59. Ridgeway H.F. Microbial adhesion and biofouling on reverse osmosis membranes. Reverse osmosis technology 1988, 429-481. Marcel Dekker, New York. Parekh, B.S. (Ed.).
60. Rodgers V.G.J., Sparks H.E. Effects of solution properties on polarization redevelopment and flux in pressure pulsed ultrafiltration. J. Membrane Sci. 1993, 78:163.
61. Romero C.A., Davis R.H. Global model of crossflow microfiltration based on hydrodynamic particle diffusion. J. Membrane Sci. 1988, 39:157-185.
62. Romero C.A., Davis R.H. Transient model of crossflow microfiltration. Chem. Eng. Sci. 1990, 45:13-25.
63. Romero C.A., Davis R.H. Experimental verification of the shear-induced hydrodynamic diffusion model of crossflow microfiltration. J. Membrane Sci. 1991, 62:249-2 73.
64. Sato T., Ishii Y. Effects of activated sludge properties on water flux of ultrafiltration membrane used for human excrement treatment. Wat. Sci. Tech. 1991, 23:1601-1608.
65. Sherwood T., Brian P., Fisher R. desalination by reverse osmosis. Ind. Eng. Chem. Fundam. 1967, 6:2.
66. Shimizu Y., Shimodera K.I., Watanabe A. Cross flow microfiltration of bacterial cells. J. Fermentation and Bioengineering 1993, 76:493-500.
67. Shimizu Y., Okuno Y.I., Uryu K., Ohtsubo S., Watanabe A. Filtration characteristics of hollow fiber microfiltration membranes used in membrane bioreactor for domestic wastewater treatment. Wat. Res. 1996, 30:2385-2392.
68. Song L., Elimelech M. Theory of concentration polarization in crossflw microfiltration. J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. 1995, 91:3389-3398.
69. Sourirajan S., Matsuura T. Reverse osmosis/ultrafiltration principles 1985, National Research Council of Canada, Ottawa.
70. Stephenson T., Judd S.J., Jefferson B., Brindle K. Membrane bioreactors in wastewater treatment 2000, IAW Publishing, London.
71. Strathmann H. Ion-exchange membranes in industrial separation processes. J. Sep. Process Technol. 1984, 5:1-13.
72. Visvanathan C., Ben Aim R. Studies on colloidal membrane fouling mechanisms in crossflow microfiltration. J. Membrane Sci. 1989, 45:3-15.
73. Wang L., Song L. Flux decline in crossflow microfiltration and ultrafiltration: experimental verification of fouling dynamics. J. Membrane Sci. 1999, 160:41-50.
74. Winters H., Isquith I.R. In-plant microfouling in desalination. Desalination 1979, 30:337-399.
75. Zydney A.L., Colton C.K. A concentration polarisation model for the filtrate flux in crossflow microfiltration of particulate suspensions. Chem. Eng. Commun. 1986, 47:1-27.