Implementation and evaluation of four interoperable open standards for the internet of things

Sensors (Switzerland)

Volumn 15, Issue 9, 2015, Pages 24343-24373

  Jazayeri, Mohammad Ali ^a   Liang, Steve H L ^a   Huang, Chih Yuan ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

^b NATIONAL CENTRAL UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

CoAP; Internet of things; Interoperability; IoT device; OGC SWE; PUCK; Sensor; Sensor observation service; SensorThings

Indexed keywords

ELECTRON DEVICES; INTERNET; INTERNET PROTOCOLS; INTEROPERABILITY; SENSORS; STANDARDS; WEB SERVICES;

COAP; IOT DEVICE; OGC SWE; PUCK; SENSOR OBSERVATION SERVICES; SENSORTHINGS;

INTERNET OF THINGS;

EID: 84942133452     PISSN: 14248220     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/s150924343     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Telecommunication Standardization Sector of ITU. Series Y: Global information infrastructure, internet protocol aspects and next-generation networks. In Recommendation ITU-T Y, 2060–Overview of the Internet of Things; IUT: Geneva, Switzerland, 2012; pp. 1–6.
2. Bormann, C.; Castellani, A.P.; Shelby, Z. CoAP: An Application Protocol for Billions of Tiny Internet Nodes. IEEE Internet Comput. 2012, 16, 62–67.
3. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. IEEE Standard Computer Dictionary: A Compilation of IEEE Standard Computer Glossaries; ISBN 1-55937-079-3; IEEE: New York, NY, USA, 1991.
4. Rodriguez, M.J.; Martínez, J.F.; Castillejo, P.; López, L. Combining Wireless Sensor Networks and Semantic Middleware for an Internet of Things-Based Sportsman/Woman Monitoring Application. Sensors 2013, 13, 1787–1835.
5. Cox, S. Observations and Measurements—XML Implementation. Open Geospatial Consortium Inc.: 2011. Available online: http://www.opengis.net/doc/IS/OMXML/2.0 (accessed on 1 February 2013).
6. Botts, M.; Robin, A. OpenGIS® Sensor Model Language (SensorML) Implementation Specification. Open Geospatial Consortium Inc.: 2007. Available online: http://portal.opengeospatial.org/files/?artifact_id=21273 (accessed on 1 May 2013).
7. Na, A.; Priest, M. OpenGIS® Sensor Observation Service Implementation Standard. Open Geospatial Consortium Inc.: 2007. Available online: https://portal.opengeospatial.org/files/?artifact_id=26667 (accessed on 1 November 2012).
8. Simonis, I.; Dibner, P.C. OpenGIS® Sensor Planning Service Implementation Specification. Implementation Specification OGC: 2007. pp. 1–21. Available online: http://portal.opengeospatial.org/files/?artifact_id=23180 (accessed on 1 November 2012).
9. O’Reilly, T. OGC® Puck Protocol Standard Version 1.4. Open Geospatial Consortium, OGC Encoding Standard OGC: 2010. Available online: https://portal.opengeospatial.org/files/?artifact_id=47604 (accessed on 1 May 2012).
10. Shelby, Z.; Hartke, K.; Bormann, C. Constrained Application Protocol (CoAP). draft-ietf-core-coap-18, 2013. Available online: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-core-coap-18 (accessed on 1 November 2013).
11. Bröring, A.; Maué, P.; Janowicz, K.; Nüst, D.; Malewski, C. Semantically-enabled sensor plug & play for the sensor web. Sensors 2011, 11, 7568–7605.
12. Delin, K.A.; Jackson, S.P. The Sensor Web: A New Instrument Concept. In Proceedings of the 2001 Symposium on Integrated Optics: International Society for Optics and Photonics, San Jose, CA, USA, 20–26 January 2001; pp. 1–9.
13. Leopold, M.; Dydensborg, M.B.; Bonnet, P. Bluetooth and sensor networks: A reality check. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems, Los Angeles, CA, USA, 5–7 November 2003; pp. 103–113.
14. Hill, J.; Szewczyk, R.; Woo, A.; Hollar, S.; Culler, D.; Pister, K. System architecture directions for networked sensors. ACM SIGOPS Oper. Syst. Rev. 2000, 34, 93–104.
15. Bluetooth SIG. Available online: http://www.bluetooth.com/Pages/Basics.aspx (accessed on 2 September 2013).
16. Ferrari, P.; Flammini, A.; Marioli, D.; Sisinni, E.; Taroni, A. A Bluetooth-based sensor network with web interface. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 2005, 54, 2359–2363.
17. Priyantha, N.B.; Kansal, A.; Goraczko, M.; Zhao, F. Tiny Web Services: Design and Implementation of Interoperable and Evolvable Sensor Networks. In Proceedings of the 6th ACM Conference on Embedded Network Sensor Systems, Raleigh, NC, USA, 4–7 November 2008; pp. 253–266.
18. Jazayeri, M.A.; Huang, C.-Y.; Liang, S.H.L. TinySOS: Design and implementation of interoperable and tiny web service for the internet of things. In Proceedings of the First ACM SIGSPATIAL Workshop on Sensor Web Enablement, Redondo Beach, CA, USA, 6–9 November 2012.
19. Dixon, C.; Mahajan, R.; Agarwal, S.; Brush, A.J.; Lee, B.; Saroiu, S.; Bahl, V. The Home Needs an Operating System (and an App Store). In Proceedings of the HotNets IX, Monterey, CA, USA, 20–21 October 2010.
20. Botts, M. SWE and IoT. Botts Innovative Research, SWE-IoT ad-hoc during OGC TC, March 2012. Available online: http://www.ogcnetwork.net/system/files/SWE_and_IoT_Botts.pdf (accessed on 1 November 2013).
21. Fairgrieve, S.; Grumman, N. Sensor Web Standards and the IoT. In Proceedings of the Expanding GeoWeb to IoT Workshop during COM.Geo, Washington, DC, USA, 23–25 May 2011.
22. Pirt, B. Bringing IoT to the Mass Market—What should a standard do? IoT Workshop at OGC TC. November 2011. Available online: http://www.ogcnetwork.net/learn/iot_workshop_Nov2011 (accessed on 1 February 2012).
23. Percivall, G. Collaborative Development of Open Standards for Expanding GeoWeb to the Internet of Things. In Proceedings of the Expanding GeoWeb to IoT Workshop during COM.Geo, Washington, DC, USA, 24 May 2011.
24. Broring, A.; Remke, A.; Lasnia, D. SenseBox—A Generic Sensor Platform for the Web of Things. In Proceedings of the MobiQuitous, Copenhagen, Denmark, 6–9 December 2011; pp. 186–196.
25. Resch, B.; Mittlboeck, M.; Lippautz, M. Pervasive Monitoring—An Intelligent Sensor Pod Approach for Standardised Measurement Infrastructures. Sensors 2010, 10, 11440–11467.
26. Van Dam, T.; Langendoen, K. An adaptive energy-efficient MAC protocol for wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems, Los Angeles, CA, USA, 5–7 November 2003.
27. Fielding, R.T.; Taylor, R.N. Principled design of the modern Web architecture. ACM Trans. Internet Technol. (TOIT) 2002, 2, 115–150.
28. Kuladinithi, K.; Bergmann, O.; Pötsch, T.; Becker, M.; Görg, C. Implementation of CoAP and its Application in Transport Logistics. In Proceedings of the Extending the Internet to Low power and Lossy Networks (IP+SN 2011), Chicago, IL, USA, 11 April 2011.
29. Kovatsch, M.; Duquennoy, S.; Dunkels, A. A Low-Power CoAP for Contiki. In Proceedings of the Eighth IEEE International Conference on Mobile Ad-Hoc and Sensor Systems, Valencia, Spain, 17–22 October 2011; pp. 855–860.
30. Curbera, F.; Duftler, M.; Khalaf, R.; Nagy, W.; Mukhi, N.; Weerawarana, S. Unraveling the Web services web: An introduction to SOAP, WSDL, and UDDI. IEEE Internet Comput. 2002, 6, 86–93.
31. Moritz, G.; Golatowski, F.; Timmermann, D. A lightweight SOAP over CoAP transport binding for resource constraint networks. In Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE 8th International Conference on Mobile Adhoc and Sensor Systems (MASS), Valencia, Spain, 17–22 October 2011.
32. Lerche, C.; Laum, N.; Moritz, G.; Zeeb, E.; Golatowski, F.; Timmermann, D. Implementing Powerful Web Services for Highly Resource-Constrained Devices. In Proceedings of the 7th IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops (PERCOM Workshops), Seattle, WA, USA, 25 March 2011; pp. 332–335.
33. Groba, H.; Clarke, S. Web Services on Embedded Systems: A Performance Study. In Proceedings of the 8th IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops (PERCOM Workshops), Mannheim, Germany, 29 March–2 April 2010; pp. 726–731.
34. Castellani, A.P.; Gheda, M.; Bui, N.; Rossi, M.; Zorzi, M. Web Services for the Internet of Things through CoAP and EXI. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Communications Workshops (ICC), Kyoto, Japan, 5–9 June 2011; pp. 1–6.
35. Efficient XML Interchange (EXI) Format 1.0. W3C Working Draft 2008. Available online: http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-exi-20080919 (accessed on 2 October 2013).
36. XML Technology. Available online: http://www.w3.org/standards/xml (accessed on 2 October 2013).
37. OGC Web Services Common Standard. Available online: http://portal.opengeospatial.org/files/?artifact_id=38867 (accessed on 19 February 2014).
38. Hui, J.W.; Culler, D.E. IP is dead, long live IP for wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 6th ACM Conference on Embedded Network Sensor Systems, Raleigh, NC, USA, 4–7 November 2008; pp. 15–28.
39. Duquennoy, S.; Grimaud, G.; Vandewalle, J.J. The Web of Things: Interconnecting Devices with High Usability and Performance. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Embedded Software and Systems (ICESS ’09), Hangzhou, China, 25–27 May 2009; pp. 323–330.
40. Kindberg, T.; Barton, J.; Morgan, J.; Becker, G.; Caswell, D.; Debaty, P.; Gopal, G.; Frid, M.; Krishnan, V.; Morris, H., et al. People, places, things: Web presence for the real world. Mob. Netw. Appl. 2002, 7, 365–376.
41. Luckenbach, T.; Gober, P.; Arbanowski, S.; Kotsopoulos, A.; Kim, K. TinyREST—A protocol for integrating sensor networks into the internet. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Real-World Wireless Sensor Network (REALWSN), Stockholm, Sweden, 20–21 June 2005.
42. Drytkiewicz, W.; Radusch, I.; Arbanowski, S.; Popescu-Zeletin, R. pREST: A REST-based protocol for pervasive systems. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Mobile Ad-hoc and Sensor Systems (MASS’04), Lauderdale, FL, USA, 25–27 October 2004; pp. 340–348.
43. Smith, C.U.; Woodside, M. Performance validation at early stages of software development. In System Performance Evaluation: Methodologies and Applications; Performance 99: Istanbul, Turkey, 1999.
44. Pfister, C. Getting Started with the Internet of Things; Maker Media Inc.: Sebastopol, CA, USA, 2011; pp. 30–100.
45. Lynch, G.S. Single Point of Failure: The 10 Essential Laws of Supply Chain Risk Management; ISBN 978-0-470-42496-4; John Wiley and Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 7 October 2009.
46. Al-Alawi, A.I. Wi-Fi technology: Future market challenges and opportunities. J. Comput. Sci.2006, 2, 13–18.
47. Jazayeri, M.A.; Liang, S.H.L. Security and Privacy: Two Prominent Aspects for the Internet of Things. In Proceedings of the Spatial Knowledge and Information Canada Conference, Banff, AB, Canada, 7–9 February 2014.