Secreted protein eco-corona mediates uptake and impacts of polystyrene nanoparticles on Daphnia magna

Journal of Proteomics

Volumn 137, Issue , 2016, Pages 45-51

  Nasser, Fatima ^a   Lynch, Iseult ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Daphnia magna; Ecotoxicology; Nanosafety; Protein corona; Uptake

Indexed keywords

CARBOXYLIC ACID; FULLERENE DERIVATIVE; NANOPARTICLE; POLYSTYRENE; PROTEIN CORONA; SEA WATER; TITANIUM DIOXIDE; ARTHROPOD PROTEIN; POLYSTYRENE DERIVATIVE; PROTEOME;

ARTICLE; CHEMICAL COMPOSITION; CONFOCAL MICROSCOPY; DAPHNIA MAGNA; EC50; ECOTOXICITY; ECOTOXICOLOGY; ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE; HEART RATE; INCUBATION TIME; INDICATOR ORGANISM; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SURFACE AREA; ANIMAL; DAPHNIA; METABOLISM; SECRETION (PROCESS);

ANIMALS; ARTHROPOD PROTEINS; DAPHNIA; NANOPARTICLES; POLYSTYRENES; PROTEOME;

EID: 84941768337     PISSN: 18743919     EISSN: 18767737     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jprot.2015.09.005     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Tong R., et al. Photoswitchable nanoparticles for triggered tissue penetration and drug delivery. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134:8848-8855.
2. Pardeike J., et al. Lipid nanoparticles (SLN, NLC) in cosmetic and pharmaceutical dermal products. Int. J. Pharm. 2009, 366:170-184.
3. Sung D., et al. Scaling and optimization of gravure-printed silver nanoparticle lines for printed electronics. IEEE Trans. Compon. Packag. Technol. 2010, 33:105-114.
4. Gonzalez E., et al. Carving at the nanoscale: sequential galvanic exchange and kirkendall growth at room temperature. Science 2011, 334:1366-1380.
5. Charles D.E., et al. Versatile solution phase triangular silver nanoplates for highly sensitive plasmon resonance sensing. ACS Nano 2010, 4(1):55-64.
6. 2. Chem. Commun. 2011, 47:1184-1186.
7. Morris J., et al. Science policy considerations for responsible nanotechnology decisions. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2011, 6:73-77.
8. Cole M., et al. Isolation of microplastics in biota-rich seawater samples and marine organisms. Sci. Rep. 2014, 4:4528.
9. Wright S.L., et al. The physical impacts of microplastics on marine organisms: A review. Environ. Pollut. 2013, 178:483-492.
10. Eriksen M., et al. Microplastic pollution in the surface waters of the Laurentian Great Lakes. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2013, 77:177-182.
11. Brett M.T., et al. Phytoplankton, not allochthonous carbon, sustains herbivorous zooplankton production. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2009, 106:21197-21201.
12. Gaiser B.K., et al. Interspecies comparison on the uptake and toxicity of silver and cerium dioxide nanoparticles. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2012, 31(1):144-154.
13. Baun A., et al. Ecotoxicity of engineered nanoparticles to aquatic invertebrates: a brief review and recommendations for future toxicity testing. Ecotoxicology 2008, 17:387-395.
14. Barata C., et al. Antioxidant enzymes activities and lipid peroxidation in the freshwater cladoceran Daphnia magna exposed to redox cycling compounds. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 2005, 140:175-186.
15. Lovern S.B., et al. Behavioral and physiological changes in Daphnia magna when exposed to nanoparticle suspensions (titanium dioxide, nano-C60, and C60HxC70Hx). Environ. Sci. Technol. 2007, 41:4465-4470.
16. Ebert D. Ecology, epidemiology, and evolution of parasitism in Daphnia 2005, National Center for Biotechnology Information (US), Bethesda, MD.
17. McMahon J.W., Rigler F.I.I. Feeding rate of Daphnia magna straus in different foods labelled with radioactive phosphorous. Limnol. Oceanogr. 1965, 10(1):105-113.
18. Stibor H. The role of yolk protein dynamics and predator kairomones for the life history of Daphnia magna. Ecology 2002, 83:362-369.
19. Kirk K.L. Suspended clay reduces Daphnia feeding rate: behavioural mechanisms. Freshw. Biol. 1991, 25:357-365.
20. Kirk, K. L., Effects of suspended clay on Daphnia body growth.
21. Hawkins P., Lampert W. The effect of Daphnia body size on filtering rate inhibition in the presence of a filamentous cyanobacterium. Limnol. Oceanogr. 1989, 34:1084-1089.
22. 202 OECD Test No. 202: Daphnia sp. acute immobilisation test 2004.
23. OECD OECD test 211: Daphnia magna reproduction test. OECD Guidelines for testing of chemicals 1998.
24. Skjolding L.M., et al. Uptake and depuration of gold nanoparticles in Daphnia magna. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2014, 23:1172-1183.
25. Park S., et al. Regulatory ecotoxicity testing of engineered nanoparticles: are the results relevant to the natural environment. Nanotoxicology 2014, 8:583-592.
26. Latta I.V., et al. Vertical distribution of Chlamydomonas changes in response to grazer and predator kairomones. Oikos 2009, 118:853-858.
27. Albanese A., Chan W.C.W. Effect of gold nanoparticle aggregation on cell uptake and toxicity. ACS Nano 2011, 5(7):5478-5489.
28. Lundqvist M., et al. Nanoparticle size and properties determine the protein corona with possible implications for biological impacts. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2008, 105(38):14265-14270.
29. Lundqvist M., et al. The evolution of the protein corona around nanoparticles: a test study. ACS Nano 2011, 5(9):7503-7509.
30. Cedervall T., et al. Understanding the nanoparticle protein corona using methods to quantify exchange rates and affinities of proteins for nanoparticles. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2007, 104(7):2050-2055.
31. Humphries S. Filter feeders and plankton increase particle encounter rates through flow regime control. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2009, 106(19):7882-7887.
32. Anguissola S., et al. High content analysis provides mechanistic insights on the pathways of toxicity induced by amine-modified polystyrene nanoparticles. PLoS One 2015, 9:9.
33. Della Torre C., et al. Accumulation and embryotoxicity of polystyrene nanoparticles at early stage of development of sea urchin embryos Paracentrotus lividus. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2014, 48:12302-13211.
34. Docter D., et al. Quantitative profiling of the protein coronas that form around nanoparticles. Nat. Protoc. 2014, 9(9):2030-2044.