Comparative safety and neuropsychiatric adverse events associated with efavirenz use in first-line antiretroviral therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials

Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes

Volumn 69, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 422-429

  Ford, Nathan ^a   Shubber, Zara ^b   Pozniak, Anton ^c   Vitoria, Marco ^a   Doherty, Meg ^a   Kirby, Catherine ^d   Calmy, Alexandra ^e  

^a WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION   (Switzerland)

^b IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^c CHELSEA AND WESTMINSTER HOSPITAL NHS FOUNDATION TRUST   (United Kingdom)

^d ROYAL SUSSEX COUNTY HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^e GENEVA UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Central nervous system events; Efavirenz; Neuropsychiatric adverse events; Randomized trials; Suicide

Indexed keywords

ATAZANAVIR; DOLUTEGRAVIR; EFAVIRENZ; MARAVIROC; NEVIRAPINE; RALTEGRAVIR; RILPIVIRINE; TENOFOVIR; ANTI HUMAN IMMUNODEFICIENCY VIRUS AGENT; BENZOXAZINE DERIVATIVE;

ABNORMAL DREAMING; ANXIETY; CONCENTRATION LOSS; DEPRESSION; DIZZINESS; DRUG SAFETY; DRUG WITHDRAWAL; FATTY LIVER; FOLLOW UP; HEADACHE; HEPATITIS; HIGHLY ACTIVE ANTIRETROVIRAL THERAPY; HUMAN; HUMAN IMMUNODEFICIENCY VIRUS INFECTION; INSOMNIA; LACTIC ACIDOSIS; META ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); REVIEW; RISK FACTOR; SIDE EFFECT; STEVENS JOHNSON SYNDROME; SUICIDAL IDEATION; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM DISEASE; CHEMICALLY INDUCED; HIV INFECTIONS;

ANTI-HIV AGENTS; BENZOXAZINES; CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM DISEASES; HIV INFECTIONS; HUMANS;

EID: 84941767863     PISSN: 15254135     EISSN: 10779450     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000000606     Document Type: Review

References (74)

1. World Health Organization. Consolidated Guidelines on the Use of Antiretroviral Drugs for Treating and Preventing HIV Infection. Recommendations for a Public Health Approach. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO; 2013.
2. Nelson LJ, Beusenberg M, Habiyambere V, et al. Adoption of national recommendations related to use of antiretroviral therapy before and shortly following the launch of the 2013 WHO consolidated guidelines. AIDS. 2014;28(suppl 2):S217-S224.
3. Panel on Antiretroviral Guidelines for Adults and Adolescents. Anti-retroviral agents in HIV-1-infected adults and adolescents. Department of Health and Human Services. Available at: http://aidsinfo.nih.gov/ ContentFiles/AdultandAdolescentGL.pdf. Accessed April 27, 2015.
4. Gulick RM, Ribaudo HJ, Shikuma CM, et al. Triple-nucleoside regimens versus efavirenz-containing regimens for the initial treatment of HIV-1 infection. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:1850-1861.
5. Bonnet M, Bhatt N, Baudin E, et al. Nevirapine versus efavirenz for patients co-infected with HIV and tuberculosis: a randomised non-inferiority trial. Lancet Infect Dis. 2013;13:303-312.
6. Ford N, Mofenson L, Shubber Z, et al. Safety of efavirenz in the first trimester of pregnancy: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. AIDS. 2014;28(suppl 2):S123-131.
7. Shubber Z, Calmy A, Andrieux-Meyer I, et al. Adverse events associated with nevirapine and efavirenz-based first-line antiretroviral therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. AIDS. 2013;27:1403-1412.
8. Cohen CJ, Andrade-Villanueva J, Clotet B, et al. Rilpivirine versus efavirenz with two background nucleoside or nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors in treatment-naive adults infected with HIV-1 (THRIVE): a phase 3, randomised, non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2011; 378:229-237.
9. Molina JM, Cahn P, Grinsztejn B, et al. Rilpivirine versus efavirenz with tenofovir and emtricitabine in treatment-naive adults infected with HIV-1 (ECHO): a phase 3 randomised double-blind active-controlled trial. Lancet. 2011;378:238-246.
10. Walmsley SL, Antela A, Clumeck N, et al. Dolutegravir plus abacavir-lamivudine for the treatment of HIV-1 infection. N Engl J Med. 2013; 369:1807-1818.
11. Raffi F, Pozniak AL, Wainberg MA. Has the time come to abandon efavirenz for first-line antiretroviral therapy? J Antimicrob Chemother. 2014;69:1742-1747.
12. Pozniak AL, Arribas JR. FLAMINGO: how much rosier can antiretro-viral therapy get? Lancet. 2014;383:2191-2193.
13. Raffi F, Reynes J. Antiretroviral treatment French guidelines 2013: economics influencing science. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2014;69:1158-1161.
14. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6:e1000097.
15. Golder S, Loke Y. Search strategies to identify information on adverse effects: a systematic review. J Med Libr Assoc. 2009;97:84-92.
16. Division of AIDS. Table for grading the severity of adult and pediatric adverse events. Version 1.0, December, 2004; clarification August 2009. Available at: http://rsc.tech-res.com/Document/safetyandpharmacovigilance/ Table-for-Grading-Severity-of-Adult-Pediatric-Adverse-Events. pdf. Accessed April 27, 2015.
17. Higgins JPT, A D, Sterne JAC. Chapter 8: assessing risk of bias in included studies. In: Higgins JPT, Green S, eds. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 (Updated 2011). Chichester, United Kingdom: The Cochrane Collaboration. Available at: http://www.cochrane-handbook.org. Accessed April 27, 2015.
18. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE, et al. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ. 2008;336:924-926.
19. DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1986;7:177-188.
20. Freeman MFTJ. Transformations related to the angular and the square root. Ann Inst Stat Mathematics. 1950;21:607-611.
21. Miller J. The inverse of the Freeman-Tukey double arcsine transformation. Am Stat. 1978;32:138.
22. Sterne JA, Sutton AJ, Ioannidis JP, et al. Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials. BMJ. 2011;343:d4002.
23. Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, et al. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ. 2003;327:557-560.
24. Bartlett JA, Johnson J, Herrera G, et al. Long-term results of initial therapy with abacavir and Lamivudine combined with Efavirenz, Amprenavir/Ritonavir, or Stavudine. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2006;43:284-292.
25. INITIO Trial International Co-ordinating Committee, Yeni P, Cooper DA, et al. Virological and immunological outcomes at 3 years after starting antiretroviral therapy with regimens containing non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor, protease inhibitor, or both in INITIO: open-label randomised trial. Lancet. 2006;368:287-298.
26. Maggiolo F, Ripamonti D, Gregis G, et al. Once-a-day therapy for HIV infection: a controlled, randomized study in antiretroviral-naive HIV-1-infected patients. Antivir Ther. 2003;8:339-346.
27. Tashima K, Staszewski S, Nelson M, et al. Efficacy and tolerability of long-term efavirenz plus nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors for HIV-1 infection. AIDS. 2008;22:275-279.
28. Kumar P, Dejesus E, Huhn G, et al. Evaluation of cardiovascular biomarkers in a randomized trial of fosamprenavir/ritonavir vs. efavirenz with abacavir/lamivudine in underrepresented, antiretroviral-naive, HIV-infected patients (SUPPORT): 96-week results. BMC Infect Dis. 2013; 13:269.
29. Currier J, Lazzarin A, Sloan L, et al. Antiviral activity and safety of aplaviroc with lamivudine/zidovudine in HIV-infected, therapy-naive patients: the ASCENT (CCR102881) study. Antivir Ther. 2008;13:297-306.
30. Vernazza P, Wang C, Pozniak A, et al. Efficacy and safety of lersivirine (UK-453,061) versus efavirenz in antiretroviral treatment-naive HIV-1-infected patients: week 48 primary analysis results from an ongoing, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, phase IIb trial. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2013;62:171-179.
31. Clifford DB, Evans S, Yang Y, et al. Long-term impact of efavirenz on neuropsychological performance and symptoms in HIV-infected individuals (ACTG 5097s). HIV Clin Trials. 2009;10:343-355.
32. Gulick RM, Ribaudo HJ, Shikuma CM, et al. Three- vs four-drug antiretroviral regimens for the initial treatment of HIV-1 infection: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2006;296:769-781.
33. Gutierrez-Valencia A, Viciana P, Palacios R, et al. Stepped-dose versus full-dose efavirenz for HIV infection and neuropsychiatric adverse events: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151:149-156.
34. Group ES, Puls R, Amin J, et al. Efficacy of 400 mg efavirenz versus standard 600 mg dose in HIV-infected, antiretroviral-naive adults (ENCORE1): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2014;383:1474-1482.
35. Go F, Dykeman M, Santos J, et al. Supporting clients on methadone maintenance treatment: a systematic review of nurse's role. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2011;18:17-27.
36. Andersson LM, Vesterbacka J, Blaxhult A, et al. Lopinavir/ritonavir, atazanavir/ritonavir, and efavirenz in antiretroviral-naive HIV-1-infected individuals over 144 weeks: an open-label randomized controlled trial. Scand J Infect Dis. 2013;45:543-551.
37. Clifford DB, Evans S, Yang Y, et al. Impact of efavirenz on neuro-psychological performance and symptoms in HIV-infected individuals. Ann Intern Med. 2005;143:714-721.
38. Cohen C, Elion R, Ruane P, et al. Randomized, phase 2 evaluation of two single-tablet regimens elvitegravir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir dis-oproxil fumarate versus efavirenz/emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for the initial treatment of HIV infection. AIDS. 2011;25:F7-F12.
39. Cohen C, Wohl D, Arribas JR, et al. Week 48 results from a randomized clinical trial of rilpivirine/emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate vs. efavirenz/emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in treatment-naive HIV-1-infected adults. AIDS. 2014;28:989-997.
40. Daar ES, Tierney C, Fischl MA, et al. Atazanavir plus ritonavir or efavirenz as part of a 3-drug regimen for initial treatment of HIV-1. Ann Intern Med. 2011;154:445-456.
41. Echeverria P, Negredo E, Carosi G, et al. Similar antiviral efficacy and tolerability between efavirenz and lopinavir/ritonavir, administered with abacavir/lamivudine (Kivexa), in antiretroviral-naive patients: a 48-week, multicentre, randomized study (Lake Study). Antivir Res. 2010;85:403-408.
42. Fischl MA, Ribaudo HJ, Collier AC, et al. A randomized trial of 2 different 4-drug antiretroviral regimens versus a 3-drug regimen, in advanced human immunodeficiency virus disease. J Infect Dis. 2003; 188:625-634.
43. Gallant JE, Rodriguez AE, Weinberg WG, et al. Early virologic nonresponse to tenofovir, abacavir, and lamivudine in HIV-infected antiretroviral-naive subjects. J Infect Dis. 2005;192:1921-1930.
44. Gaytan J, dl GE, Garcia M, et al. Nevirapine or efavirenz en combination with two nucleoside analogues for treatment naive HIV infected patients. Med Int Mex. 2004;20:24-28.
45. Honda M, Ishisaka M, Ishizuka N, et al. Open-label randomized multicenter selection study of once daily antiretroviral treatment regimen comparing ritonavir-boosted atazanavir to efavirenz with fixed-dose abacavir and lamivudine. Intern Med. 2011;50:699-705.
46. Lennox JL, DeJesus E, Lazzarin A, et al. Safety and efficacy of raltegravir-based versus efavirenz-based combination therapy in treatment-naive patients with HIV-1 infection: a multicentre, double-blind randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2009;374:796-806.
47. Mallolas J, Pich J, Penaranda M, et al. Induction therapy with trizivir plus efavirenz or lopinavir/ritonavir followed by trizivir alone in naive HIV-1-infected adults. AIDS. 2008;22:377-384.
48. Manosuthi W, Sungkanuparph S, Tantanathip P, et al. A randomized trial comparing plasma drug concentrations and efficacies between 2 non-nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitor-based regimens in HIV-infected patients receiving rifampicin: the N2R Study. Clin Infect Dis. 2009;48:1752-1759.
49. Markowitz M, Nguyen BY, Gotuzzo E, et al. Rapid and durable antiretroviral effect of the HIV-1 Integrase inhibitor raltegravir as part of combination therapy in treatment-naive patients with HIV-1 infection: results of a 48-week controlled study. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2007;46:125-133.
50. Nelson M, Stellbrink HJ, Podzamczer D, et al. A comparison of neuropsychiatric adverse events during 12 weeks of treatment with etravirine and efavirenz in a treatment-naive, HIV-1-infected population. AIDS. 2011;25:335-340.
51. Nunez M, Soriano V, Martin-Carbonero L, et al. SENC (Spanish efavirenz vs. nevirapine comparison) trial: a randomized, open-label study in HIV-infected naive individuals. HIV Clin Trials. 2002;3:186-194.
52. Phidisa IIWTfPP; Ratsela A, Polis M, Dhlomo S, et al. A randomized factorial trial comparing 4 treatment regimens in treatment-naive HIV-infected persons with AIDS and/or a CD4 cell count ,200 cells/muL in South Africa. J Infect Dis. 2010;202:1529-1537.
53. Pozniak AL, Morales-Ramirez J, Katabira E, et al. Efficacy and safety of TMC278 in antiretroviral-naive HIV-1 patients: week 96 results of a phase IIb randomized trial. AIDS. 2010;24:55-65.
54. Puls RL, Srasuebkul P, Petoumenos K, et al. Efavirenz versus boosted atazanavir or zidovudine and abacavir in antiretroviral treatment-naive, HIV-infected subjects: week 48 data from the Altair study. Clin Infect Dis. 2010;51:855-864.
55. Riddler SA, Haubrich R, DiRienzo AG, et al. Class-sparing regimens for initial treatment of HIV-1 infection. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:2095-2106.
56. Sax PE, DeJesus E, Mills A, et al. Co-formulated elvitegravir, cobicistat, emtricitabine, and tenofovir versus co-formulated efavirenz, emtricitabine, and tenofovir for initial treatment of HIV-1 infection: a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial, analysis of results after 48 weeks. Lancet. 2012; 379:2439-2448.
57. Sierra-Madero J, Villasis-Keever A, Mendez P, et al. Prospective, randomized, open label trial of Efavirenz vs Lopinavir/Ritonavir in HIV+ treatment-naive subjects with CD4+,200 cell/mm3 in Mexico. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2010;53:582-588.
58. Sinha S, Raghunandan P, Chandrashekhar R, et al. Nevirapine versus efavirenz-based antiretroviral therapy regimens in antiretroviral-naive patients with HIV and tuberculosis infections in India: a pilot study. BMC Infect Dis. 2013;13:482.
59. Squires K, Lazzarin A, Gatell JM, et al. Comparison of once-daily atazanavir with efavirenz, each in combination with fixed-dose zidovu-dine and lamivudine, as initial therapy for patients infected with HIV. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2004;36:1011-1019.
60. Swaminathan S, Padmapriyadarsini C, Venkatesan P, et al. Efficacy and safety of once-daily nevirapine- or efavirenz-based antiretroviral therapy in HIV-associated tuberculosis: a randomized clinical trial. Clin Infect Dis. 2011;53:716-724.
61. van den Berg-Wolf M, Hullsiek KH, Peng G, et al. Virologic, immunologic, clinical, safety, and resistance outcomes from a long-term comparison of efavirenz-based versus nevirapine-based antiretro-viral regimens as initial therapy in HIV-1-infected persons. HIV Clin Trials. 2008;9:324-336.
62. van Leth F, Phanuphak P, Ruxrungtham K, et al. Comparison of first-line antiretroviral therapy with regimens including nevirapine, efavirenz, or both drugs, plus stavudine and lamivudine: a randomised open-label trial, the 2NN Study. Lancet. 2004;363:1253-1263.
63. van Lunzen J, Maggiolo F, Arribas JR, et al. Once daily dolutegravir (S/GSK1349572) in combination therapy in antiretroviral-naive adults with HIV: planned interim 48 week results from SPRING-1, a dose-ranging, randomised, phase 2b trial. Lancet Infect Dis. 2012;12:111-118.
64. Wester CW, Thomas AM, Bussmann H, et al. Non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor outcomes among combination antiretroviral therapy-treated adults in Botswana. AIDS. 2010;24(suppl 1):S27-S36.
65. Cooper DA, Heera J, Goodrich J, et al. Maraviroc versus efavirenz, both in combination with zidovudine-lamivudine, for the treatment of antiretroviral-naive subjects with CCR5-tropic HIV-1 infection. J Infect Dis. 2010;201:803-813.
66. Grinsztejn B, De Castro N, Arnold V, et al. Raltegravir for the treatment of patients co-infected with HIV and tuberculosis (ANRS 12 180 Reflate TB): a multicentre, phase 2, non-comparative, open-label, randomised trial. Lancet Infect Dis. 2014;14:459-467.
67. Gazzard B, Duvivier C, Zagler C, et al. Phase 2 double-blind, randomized trial of etravirine versus efavirenz in treatment-naive patients: 48-week results. AIDS. 2011;25:2249-2258.
68. Mollan KR, Smurzynski M, Eron JJ, et al. Association between efavirenz as initial therapy for HIV-1 infection and increased risk for suicidal ideation or attempted or completed suicide: an analysis of trial data. Ann Intern Med. 2014;161:1-10.
69. Campbell TB, Smeaton LM, Kumarasamy N, et al. Efficacy and safety of three antiretroviral regimens for initial treatment of HIV-1: a randomized clinical trial in diverse multinational settings. PLoS Med. 2012;9: e1001290.
70. Smith C, Ryom L, Monforte A, et al. Lack of association between use of efavirenz and death from suicide: evidence from the D: A:D study. J Int AIDS Soc. 2014;17:19512.
71. Golder S, Loke YK, Bland M. Meta-analyses of adverse effects data derived from randomised controlled trials as compared to observational studies: methodological overview. PLoS Med. 2011;8:e1001026.
72. Haas DW, Ribaudo HJ, Kim RB, et al. Pharmacogenetics of efavirenz and central nervous system side effects: an Adult AIDS Clinical Trials Group study. AIDS. 2004;18:2391-2400.
73. Chowers MY, Gottesman BS, Leibovici L, et al. Reporting of adverse events in randomized controlled trials of highly active antiretroviral therapy: systematic review. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2009;64:239-250.
74. Al-Dakkak I, Patel S, McCann E, et al. The impact of specific HIV treatment-related adverse events on adherence to antiretroviral therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. AIDS Care. 2013; 25:400-414.