Plant characterization of Roundup Ready 2 Yield® soybean, MON 89788, for use in ecological risk assessment

Transgenic Research

Volumn 24, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 213-225

  Horak, Michael J ^a   Rosenbaum, Eric W ^a   Kendrick, Daniel L ^a   Sammons, Bernard ^a   Phillips, Samuel L ^a   Nickson, Thomas E ^a   Dobert, Raymond C ^a   Perez, Tim ^a  

^a MONSANTO COMPANY   (United States)

Author keywords

Ecological risk assessment; Glyphosate tolerance; Soybean

Indexed keywords

HERBICIDE;

DRUG EFFECTS; ECOLOGY; ENVIRONMENT; GENETICS; GERMINATION; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; PLANT SEED; RISK ASSESSMENT; SOYBEAN; TRANSGENIC PLANT; UNITED STATES;

ECOLOGY; ENVIRONMENT; GERMINATION; HERBICIDES; PLANTS, GENETICALLY MODIFIED; RISK ASSESSMENT; SEEDS; SOYBEANS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84941731745     PISSN: 09628819     EISSN: 15739368     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11248-014-9839-3     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Alexander MP (1980) A versatile stain for pollen, fungi, yeast and bacteria. Stain Technol 55:13–18
2. Association of Official Seed Analysts (2000) Tetrazolium testing handbook. AOSA, Lincoln, NE
3. Association of Official Seed Analysts (2002) Rules for testing seeds. AOSA, Lincoln, NE
4. Baker HG (1974) The evolution of weeds. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 5:1–24
5. CERA (Center for Environmental Risk Assessment) (2011) A review of the environmental safety of the CP4 EPSPS protein. Environ Biosaf Res 10:5–25
6. CFIA (Canadian Food Inspection Service) (2012) Directive 94-08, revised July 4, 2012. Assessment criteria for determining environmental safety of plants with novel traits. CFIA, Ottawa. http://www.inspection.gc.ca/plants/plants-with-novel-traits/applicants/directive-94-08/eng/1304475469806/1304475550733. Accessed 29 January 2014
7. CFR (U.S. Code of Federal Regulations) (2008) Title 7, Part 340. Introduction of organisms and products altered or produced through genetic engineering which are plant pests or which there is reason to believe are plant pests. Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, USDA
8. Conner AJ, Glare TR, Nap JP (2003) The release of genetically modified crops into the environment. Plant J 33:19–46
9. EFSA (European Food Safety Authority) (2004) Guidance document of the Scientific Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms for the risk assessment of genetically modified plants and derived food and feed. EFSA J 99:1–94
10. Heck GR, Armstrong CL, Astwood JD, Behr CF, Bookout JT, Brown SM, Cavato TA, DeBoer DL, Deng MY, George C, Hillyard JR, Hironaka CM, Howe AR, Jakse EH, Ledesma BE, Lee TC, Lirette RP, Mangano ML, Mutz JN, Qi Y, Rodriguez RE, Sidhu SR, Silvanovich A, Stoecker MA, Yingling RA, You J (2005) Development and characterization of a CP4 EPSPS-based, glyphosate-tolerant corn event. Crop Sci 44:329–339
11. Hill RA, Sendashonga C (2003) General principles for risk assessment of living modified organisms: lessons from chemical risk assessment. Environ Biosafety Res 2:81–88
12. Horak MJ, Rosenbaum EW, Phillips SL, Huizinga K, Kendrick DL, Carson D, Clark PL, Nickson TE. Characterization of the ecological interactions of Roundup Ready 2 Yield® soybean, MON 89788, for use in ecological risk assessment. Transgenic Res (submitted)
13. Horak MJ, Rosenbaum EW, Woodrum CL, Martens AB, Mery RF, Cothren JT, Burns JA, Nickson TE, Pester TA, Jiang C, Hart JL, Sammons B (2007) Characterization of Roundup Ready Flex cotton, ‘MON 88913’, for use in ecological risk assessment: evaluation of seed germination, vegetative and reproductive growth, and ecological interactions. Crop Sci 47:268–277
14. Mumm RH, Walters DS (2001) Quality control in the development of transgenic crop seed products. Crop Sci 41:1381–1389
15. Nickson TE (2008) Planning environmental risk assessment for genetically modified crops: problem formulation for stress-tolerant crops. Plant Physiol 147:494–502
16. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (1993) Safety considerations for biotechnology: scale-up of crop plants. OECD, Paris
17. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2000) Consensus document on the biology of Glycine max (L.) Merr. (soybean). Series on Harmonization of Regulatory Oversight in Biotechnology No. 15. OECD, Paris
18. Pedersen P (2004) Soybean growth and development. Publication PM 1945. Iowa State University, Ames, IA
19. Phillips McDougall (2011) The cost and time involved in the discovery, development and authorisation of a new plant biotechnology derived trait. http://croplife.org/plant-biotechnology/regulatory-2/cost-of-bringing-a-biotech-crop-to-market/. Accessed 8 June 2014
20. Prado JR, Segers G, Voelker T, Carson D, Dobert R, Phillips J, Cook K, Cornejo C, Monken J, Grapes L, Reynolds T, Martino-Catt S (2014) Genetically engineered crops: from idea to product. Annu Rev Plant Biol 65:769–790
21. Radosevich S, Holt J, Ghersa C (1997) Weed ecology: implications for management, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York
22. Raybould A (2007) Ecological versus ecotoxicological methods for assessing the environmental risks of transgenic crops. Plant Sci 173:589–602
23. Roberts A, Devos Y, Raybould A, Bigelow P, Gray A (2013) Environmental risk assessment of GE plants under low-exposure conditions. Transgenic Res. doi:10.1007/s11248-013-9762-z
24. Sammons B, Whitsel J, Stork LG, Reeves W, Horak M (2014) Characterization of drought-tolerant maize MON 87460 for use in environmental risk assessment. Crop Sci 54:719–729
25. SAS Institute (2002–2003) SAS Version 9.1 online documentation. SAS Inst., Cary, NC
26. Warwick SI, Stewart CN Jr (2005) Crops come from wild plants—how domestication, transgenes, and linkage together shape ferality. In: Gressel JB (ed) Crop ferality and volunteerism. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 9–30
27. Wolt JD, Keese P, Raybould A, Fitzpatrick JW, Burachik M, Gray A, Olin SS, Schiemann J, Sears M, Wu F (2010) Problem formulation in the environmental risk assessment for genetically modified plants. Transgenic Res 19:425–436