Hearing in slow-motion: Humans underestimate the speed of moving sounds

Scientific Reports

Volumn 5, Issue , 2015, Pages

  Senna, Irene ^a   Parise, Cesare V ^a   Ernst, Marc O ^a  

^a BIELEFELD UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84941710331     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20452322     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/srep14054     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Van Dam, L. C. J., Parise, C. V. and Ernst, M. O. In Sensory Integration and The Unity Of Consciousness (eds D. Bennett and J. Trommershäuser), 209-229 (MIT press, 2014).
2. Thompson, P. Perceived rate of movement depends on contrast. Vision Res. 22, 377-380 (1982).
3. Stone, L. and Thompson, P. Human speed perception is contrast dependent. Vision Res. 32, 1535-1549 (1992).
4. Snowden, R. J., Stimpson, N. and Ruddle, R. A. Speed perception fogs up as visibility drops. Nature 392, 450 (1998).
5. Blakemore, M. R. and Snowden, R. J. The effect of contrast upon perceived speed: a general phenomenon? Perception 28, 33-48 (1999).
6. Pretto, P., Bresciani, J. P., Rainer, G. and Blthoff, H. H. Foggy perception slows us down. eLife 1, e00031 (2012).
7. Weiss, Y., Simoncelli, E. and Adelson, E. Motion illusions as optimal percept. Nat. Neurosci. 5, 598-604 (2002).
8. Stocker, A. A. and Simoncelli, E. P. Noise characteristics and prior expectations in human visual speed perception. Nat. Neurosci. 9, 578-585 (2006).
9. Welchman, A. E., Lam, J. M. and Bülthoff, H. H. Bayesian motion estimation accounts for a surprising bias in 3D vision. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105, 12087-12092 (2008).
10. Sotiropoulos, G., Seitz, A. R. and Seris, P. Changing expectations about speed alters perceived motion direction. Curr. Biol. 21, R883-R884 (2011).
11. Wichmann, F. and Hill, N. The psychometric function: I. Fitting, sampling, and goodness of fit. Percept. Psychophys. 63, 1293-1313 (2001).
12. Simoncelli, E. P. Vision and the statistics of the visual environment. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 13, 144-149 (2003).
13. Burge, J. and Geisler, W. S. Optimal defocus estimation in individual natural images. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108, 16849-16854 (2011).
14. Girshick, A. R., Landy, M. S. and Simoncelli, E. P. Cardinal rules: visual orientation perception reflects knowledge of environmental statistics. Nat. Neurosci. 14, 926-932 (2011).
15. Parise, C. V., Knorre, K. and Ernst, M. O. Natural auditory scene statistics shapes human spatial hearing. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111, 6104-6108 (2014).
16. Knill, D. and Richards, W. Perception as Bayesian Inference (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1996).
17. Meyer, G. and Wuerger, S. Cross-modal integration of auditory and visual motion signals. NeuroReport 12, 2557-2600 (2001).
18. Gilden, D. L., Thornton, T. and Mallon, M. W. 1/f Noise in Human Cognition. Science 267, 1837-1839 (1995).
19. Kleiner, M., Brainard, D., Pelli, D. Whats new in Psychtoolbox-3. Perception 36, 1-16 (2007).
20. Carlile, S. and Best, V. Discrimination of sound source velocity in human listeners. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 111, 1026-1035 (2002).
21. Feron, F. X., Frissen, I., Boissinot, J. and Guastavino, C. Upper limits of auditory rotational motion perception. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 128, 3703-3714 (2010).