Divergence and convergence in nutrition science

Trends in Food Science and Technology

Volumn 45, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 245-250

  Penders, Bart ^a   Spruit, Shannon L ^b   Sikkema, Jan ^c   Maat, Jan ^d   Schuurbiers, Daan ^e  

^a MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

^d TOP INSTITUTE FOOD AND NUTRITION   (Netherlands)

^e Responsible Innovation Collective   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Collaboration; Convergence; Divergence; Nutrigenomics; Research cultures; Research policy

Indexed keywords

ELECTRONIC DATA INTERCHANGE;

COLLABORATION; CONVERGENCE; DIVERGENCE; NUTRIGENOMICS; RESEARCH CULTURE; RESEARCH POLICIES;

NUTRITION;

EID: 84941656248     PISSN: 09242244     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tifs.2015.07.008     Document Type: Review

References (24)

1. Biesalski H.K., Aggett P.J., Anton R., Bernstein P.S., Blumberg J., Heaney R.P., et al. 26th Hohenheim consensus conference, September 11, 2010 scientific substantiation of health claims: evidence-based nutrition. Nutrition 2011, 27:S1-S20.
2. Collins H.M., Evans R. Rethinking expertise 2007, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago & London.
3. Crombie A. Styles of scientific thinking in the European tradition. The history of argument and explanation in the mathematical and biomedical sciences and arts 1994, Vol. 3. Duckworth, London.
4. Fleck L. Entstehung und Entwicklung einer Wissenschaftlichen Tatsache. Einführung in die Lehre vom Denkstil und Denkkollektiv 1980 [1935], Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main.
5. Fujimura J.H., Chou D.Y. Dissident in science: styles of scientific practice and controversy over the cause of aids. Social Science in Medicine 1994, 38:1017-1036.
6. Gieryn T.F. Cultural boundaries of science. Credibility on the line 1999, University of Chicago Press, Chicago & London.
7. Hackett E.J. Introduction to the special guest-edited issue on scientific collaboration. Social Studies of Science 2005, 35(5):667-672.
8. Hacking I. 'Style' for historians and philosophers. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 1992, 23:1-20.
9. Hendrickx K. Bodies of evidence. An anthropology of the health claim 2014, Université de Liège, Liège (B).
10. Knorr-Cetina K. Epistemic cultures: How the sciences make knowledge 1999, Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA & London.
11. Lewis J., Bartlett A. Inscribing a discipline: tensions in the field of bioinformatics. New Genetics and Society 2013, 32:243-263.
12. Lin K., Kools H., de Groot P.J., Gavai A.K., Basnet R.K., Cheng F., et al. MADMAX - management and analysis database for multiple ~omics experiments. Journal of Integrative Bioinformatics 2011, 8:160.
13. Müller M., Kersten S. Nutrigenomics: goals and strategies. Nature Reviews Genetics 2003, 4:315-322.
14. Parker J.N., Hampton S.E. Collaboration and productivity in scientific synthesis. BioScience 2011, 61:900-910.
15. Parker J.N., Vermeulen N., Penders B. Collaboration in the new life sciences 2010, Ashgate, Farnham (UK).
16. Penders B., Goven J. Nutrigenomics and the stewardship of scientific promises. Biotechnology Journal 2010, 5:909-912.
17. Penders B., Horstman K., Vos R. Walking the line between lab and computation: the 'moist' zone. Bioscience 2008, 58:747-755.
18. Penders B., Vos R., Horstman K. A question of style: method, integrity and the meaning of proper science. Endeavour 2009, 33:93-98.
19. Pickstone J.V. Ways of knowing. A new history of science, technology and medicine 2000, Manchester University Press, Manchester.
20. Schoenberger E. Interdisciplinarity and social power. Progress in Human Geography 2011, 25:365-382.
21. Shrum W., Genuth J., Chompalov I. Structures of scientific collaboration 2007, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
22. Webster A. Crossing boundaries social science in the policy room. Science, Technology & Human Values 2007, 32:458-478.
23. Wynne B. Misunderstood misunderstandings: social identities and the public uptake of science. Public Understanding of Science 1992, 1:281-304.
24. Wynne B. Public understanding of science. Handbook of science and technology studies 1995, 361-389. Sage, London. S. Jasanoff, G.E. Markle, J.C. Petersen, T. Pinch (Eds.).