Robotic whipple procedure for pancreatic cancer: The moffitt cancer center pathway

Cancer Control

Volumn 22, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 340-351

  Rashid, Omar M ^a,d   Mullinax, John E ^a   Pimiento, Jose M ^a,b   Meredith, Kenneth L ^c   Malafa, Mokenge P ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA   (United States)

^b H LEE MOFFITT CANCER CENTER AND RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^c SARASOTA MEMORIAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

^d HOLY CROSS HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABLATION THERAPY; ANASTOMOSIS; ARTICLE; CANCER SURGERY; CLINICAL PATHWAY; CONVALESCENCE; DISSECTION; HEPATOJEJUNOSTOMY; HUMAN; PANCREAS CANCER; PANCREATICODUODENECTOMY; PATIENT SELECTION; PERIOPERATIVE PERIOD; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; RISK BENEFIT ANALYSIS; ROBOT ASSISTED SURGERY; SURGICAL APPROACH; TREATMENT INDICATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME; ABDOMINAL SURGERY; PANCREATIC NEOPLASMS; PROCEDURES; ROBOTIC SURGICAL PROCEDURE;

DIGESTIVE SYSTEM SURGICAL PROCEDURES; HUMANS; PANCREATIC NEOPLASMS; ROBOTIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES;

EID: 84941656025     PISSN: 10732748     EISSN: 15262359     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/107327481502200313     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts & Figures 2015. Atlanta, GA: American Cancer Society; 2015. http://www.cancer.org/acs/groups/content/@editorial/documents/document/acspc-044552.pdf. Accessed June 6, 2015.
2. Cameron JL, Riall TS, Coleman J, et al. One thousand consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies. Ann Surg. 2006;244(1):10-15.
3. Giulianotti PC, Coratti A, Angelini M, et al. Robotics in general surgery: personal experience in a large community hospital. Arch Surg. 2003;138(7):777-784.
4. Zureikat AH, Nguyen KT, Bartlett DL, et al. Robotic-assisted major pancreatic resection and reconstruction. Arch Surg. 2011;146(3):256-261.
5. Lai EC, Yang GP, Tang CN. Robot-assisted laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy--a comparative study. Int J Surg. 2012;10(9):475-479.
6. Cirocchi R, Partelli S, Trastulli S, et al. A systematic review on robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy. Surg Oncol. 2013;22(4):238-246.
7. Daouadi M, Zureikat AH, Zenati MS, et al. Robot-assisted minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy is superior to the laparoscopic technique. Ann Surg. 2013;257(1):128-132.
8. Hanna EM, Rozario N, Rupp C, et al. Robotic hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery: lessons learned and predictors for conversion. Int J Med Robot. 2013;9(2):152-159.
9. Suman P, Rutledge J, Yiengpruksawan A. Robotic distal pancreatectomy. JSLS. 2013;17(4):627-635.
10. Cirocchi R, Partelli S, Coratti A, et al. Current status of robotic distal pancreatectomy: a systematic review. Surg Oncol. 2013;22(3):201-207.
11. Abood GJ, Can MF, Daouadi M, et al. Robotic-assisted minimally invasive central pancreatectomy: technique and outcomes. J Gastrointest Surg. 2013;17(5):1002-1008.
12. Strijker M, van Santvoort HC, Besselink MG, et al. Robot-assisted pancreatic surgery: a systematic review of the literature. HPB (Oxford). 2013;15(1):1-10.
13. Zureikat AH, Moser AJ, Boone BA, et al. 250 robotic pancreatic resections: safety and feasibility. Ann Surg. 2013;258(4):554-562.
14. Bergström M, Azadani A, Falk P, et al. Stress response and well-being after open, laparoscopic, and NOTES transgastric uterine horn resection in a randomized porcine model. Surg Endosc. 2014;28(8):2421-2427.
15. Veenhof AA, Vlug MS, van der Pas MH, et al. Surgical stress response and postoperative immune function after laparoscopy or open surgery with fast track or standard perioperative care: a randomized trial. Ann Surg. 2012;255(2):216-221.
16. Karanika S, Karantanos T, Theodoropoulos GE. Immune response after laparoscopic colectomy for cancer: a review. Gastroenterol Rep(Oxf). 2013;1(2):85-94.
17. Palanivelu C, Jani K, Senthilnathan P, et al. Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: technique and outcomes. J Am Coll Surg. 2007;205(2):222-230.
18. Asbun HJ, Stauffer JA. Laparoscopic vs open pancreaticoduodenectomy: overall outcomes and severity of complications using the Accordion Severity Grading System. J Am Coll Surg. 2012;215(6):810-819.
19. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma. v2.2015. Published March 6, 2015. http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/pancreatic.pdf. Accessed June 10, 2015.
20. Chuong MD, Springett GM, Freilich JM, et al. Stereotactic body radiation therapy for locally advanced and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer is effective and well tolerated. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013;86(3):516-522.
21. Haynes AB, Weiser TG, Berry WR, et al; Safe Surgery Saves Lives Study Group. A surgical safety checklist to reduce morbidity and mortality in a global population. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(5):491-499.
22. Arain NA, Dulan G, Hogg DC, et al. Comprehensive proficiencybased inanimate training for robotic surgery: reliability, feasibility, and educational benefit. Surg Endosc. 2012;26(10):2740-2745.
23. Dulan G, Rege RV, Hogg DC, et al. Developing a comprehensive, proficiency-based training program for robotic surgery. Surgery. 2012;152(3):477-488.