A component-based scientific toolkit for reacting flows

Computational Fluid and Solid Mechanics 2003

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 1401-1405

  Lefantzi, Sophia ^a   Ray, Jaideep ^a  

^a SANDIA NATIONAL LABORATORIES   (United States)

Author keywords

Common Component Architecture (CCA); Component based software; Reacting flows; Scientific computing; Structured Adaptive Mesh Refinement (SAMR)

Indexed keywords

COMMON COMPONENT ARCHITECTURE; COMPONENT BASED SOFTWARE; INDEPENDENT COMPONENTS; PROOF OF CONCEPT; REACTING FLOWS; SCIENTIFIC SIMULATIONS; SIMULATION CODE; STRUCTURED ADAPTIVE MESH REFINEMENT;

NATURAL SCIENCES COMPUTING;

EID: 84941644055     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1016/B978-008044046-0.50343-2     Document Type: Chapter

References (17)

1. Allan BA, Armstrong RC, Wolfe AP, Ray J, Bernholdt DE, Kohn JA The CCA core specifications in a distributed memory SPMD framework. Concurrency: Practice and Experience 2002, 14:323-345. Also at. http://www.ccaforum.org/ccafe03a/index.html.
2. Armstrong R, Gannon D, Geist A, Keahy K, Kohn S, McInnes L, Parker S, Smolenski B Towards a common component architecture for high performance scientific computing. Proceedings of the 8th International Symposium on High Performance Distributed Computing 1999.
3. Berger MJ, Oliger J Adaptive mesh refinement for hyperbolic partial differential equations. J Comp Phys 1984, 53:484-523.
4. Strang G On the construction and comparison of difference schemes. SIAM J Numer Anal 1968, 5(3):506-517.
5. Sportisse B An analysis of operator splitting techniques in the stiff case. J Comp Phys 2000, 161:140-168.
6. Cohen SD, Hindmarsh AC Cvode, a stiff/nonstiff ode solver in C. Comput Phys 1996, 10(2):138-143.
7. Shampine LF, Sommeijer BP, Verwer JG RKC: An explicit solver for parabolic PEDs. J Comp Appl Math 1997, 88:315-326.
8. Frenklach M, Wang H, Goldenberg M, Smith GP, Golden DM, Bowman CT, Hanson RK, Gardiner WC, Lissianski V GRI-Mech-an optimized detailed chemical reaction mechanism for methane combustion. Technical Report GRI-95/0058 November 1, 1995, Gas Research Institute, Gas Research Institute, 8600 West Bryn Mawr Avenue, Chicago, Illinois 60631-3562. http://diesel.me.berkeley.edu/~gri_mech/new21/version12/text12.html.
9. Majda A, Sethian J The derivation and numerical solution of the equations for zero Mach number combustion. Comb Sci Technol 1985, 42:185-205.
10. Williams FA Combustion Theory 1985, Addison-Wesley, New York. 2nd ed.
11. Rutland CJ, Ferziger JH Simulations of flame-vortex interactions. Combust Flame 1991, 84:343-360.
12. Mahalingam S, Chen JH, Vervisch L Finite-rate chemistry and transient effects in direct numerical simulations of turbulent nonpremixed flames. Combust Flame Aug 1995, 102(3):285-297.
13. Najm HN A conservative low Mach number projection method for reacting flow modeling. Transport Phenomena in Combustion 1996, Vol. 2:921-932. Taylor and Francis, Washington, DC. S.H. Chan (Ed.).
14. Dryer FL, Yetter RA, Rabitz H A comprehensive reaction mechanism for carbon monoxide/hydrogen/oxygen kinetics. Combust Sci Technol 1991, 79:97-128.
15. Paul PH DRFM: A New Package for the Evaluation of Gas-Phase-Transport Properties. Sandia Report SAND98-8203 November 1997, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM.
16. Kee RJ, Lutz AE, Miller JA Senkin: A Fortran program for, predicting homogeneous gas phase chemical kinetics with sensitivity analysis. Technical Report 87-8248 1988, Sandia National Laboratories, PO Box 969, Livermore, CA-94551.
17. Lefantzi S, Ray J, Najm HN Using the common component architecture to design high performance scientific simulation codes. Accepted, International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium 2003.