Impact of an online writing aid tool for writing a randomized trial report: The COBWEB (Consort-based WEB tool) randomized controlled trial

BMC Medicine

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2015, Pages

  Barnes, Caroline ^b,c   Boutron, Isabelle ^a,b,c   Giraudeau, Bruno ^c,d   Porcher, Raphael ^a,b,c   Altman, Douglas G ^e   Ravaud, Philippe ^a,b,c,f  

^a HÔTEL DIEU   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ PARIS DESCARTES   (France)

^c PARIS DESCARTES UNIVERSITY   (France)

^d UNIVERSITÉ DE TOURS   (France)

^e UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^f Mailman School of Public Health   (United States)

Author keywords

Clinical epidemiology; CONSORT statement; Randomized controlled trial; Reporting guidelines; Transparency

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; FEMALE; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MALE; ONLINE SYSTEM; PHYSIOTHERAPY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); RATING SCALE; SCORING SYSTEM; WEB BROWSER; WRITING; CONTROLLED STUDY; MEDICAL LITERATURE; METHODOLOGY; PUBLICATION; PUBLISHING; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SOFTWARE; STANDARDS;

ADULT; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MEDICAL WRITING; PERIODICALS AS TOPIC; PUBLISHING; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; RESEARCH DESIGN; SOFTWARE;

EID: 84941549169     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17417015     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s12916-015-0460-y     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Glasziou P, Altman DG, Bossuyt P, Boutron I, Clarke M, Julious S, et al. Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research. Lancet. 2014;383:267-76.
2. Chalmers I, Glasziou P. Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence. Lancet. 2009;374:86-9.
3. Moher D, Hopewell S, Schulz KF, Montori V, Gotzsche PC, Devereaux PJ, et al. CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ. 2010;340:c869.
4. Campbell MK, Piaggio G, Elbourne DR, Altman DG. Consort 2010 statement: extension to cluster randomised trials. BMJ. 2012;345:e5661.
5. Piaggio G, Elbourne DR, Pocock SJ, Evans SJ, Altman DG. Reporting of noninferiority and equivalence randomized trials: extension of the CONSORT 2010 statement. JAMA. 2012;308:2594-604.
6. Ioannidis JP, Evans SJ, Gotzsche PC, O'Neill RT, Altman DG, Schulz K, et al. Better reporting of harms in randomized trials: an extension of the CONSORT statement. Ann Intern Med. 2004;141:781-8.
7. Boutron I, Moher D, Altman DG, Schulz KF, Ravaud P. Extending the CONSORT statement to randomized trials of nonpharmacologic treatment: explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med. 2008;148:295-309.
8. CONSORT Endorsers Journals and Organizations. http://www.consort-statement.org/about-consort/endorsers . (Accessed 31/8/2015).
9. Hopewell S, Altman DG, Moher D, Schulz KF. Endorsement of the CONSORT Statement by high impact factor medical journals: a survey of journal editors and journal 'Instructions to Authors'. Trials. 2008;9:20.
10. Hopewell S, Dutton S, Yu LM, Chan AW, Altman DG. The quality of reports of randomised trials in 2000 and 2006: comparative study of articles indexed in PubMed. BMJ. 2010;340:c723.
11. Glasziou P, Meats E, Heneghan C, Shepperd S. What is missing from descriptions of treatment in trials and reviews? BMJ. 2008;336:1472-4.
12. Schiller P, Burchardi N, Niestroj M, Kieser M. Quality of reporting of clinical non-inferiority and equivalence randomised trials - update and extension. Trials. 2012;13:214.
13. Ntala C, Birmpili P, Worth A, Anderson NH, Sheikh A. The quality of reporting of randomised controlled trials in asthma: a systematic review. Prim Care Respir J. 2013;22:417-24.
14. Sinha S, Ashby E, Jayaram R, Grocott MP. Quality of reporting in randomized trials published in high-quality surgical journals. J Am Coll Surg. 2009;209:565-71. e561.
15. Clark L, Schmidt U, Tharmanathan P, Adamson J, Hewitt C, Torgerson D. Poor reporting quality of key Randomization and Allocation Concealment details is still prevalent among published RCTs in 2011: a review. J Eval Clin Pract. 2013;19:703-7.
16. To MJ, Jones J, Emara M, Jadad AR. Are reports of randomized controlled trials improving over time? A systematic review of 284 articles published in high-impact general and specialized medical journals. PLoS One. 2013;8:e84779.
17. Hopewell S, Collins GS, Boutron I, Yu LM, Cook J, Shanyinde M, et al. Impact of peer review on reports of randomised trials published in open peer review journals: retrospective before and after study. BMJ. 2014;349:g4145.
18. Turner L, Shamseer L, Altman DG, Schulz KF, Moher D. Does use of the CONSORT Statement impact the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials published in medical journals? A Cochrane review Syst Rev. 2012;1:60.
19. Ghimire S, Kyung E, Kang W, Kim E. Assessment of adherence to the CONSORT statement for quality of reports on randomized controlled trial abstracts from four high-impact general medical journals. Trials. 2012;13:77.
20. Hopewell S, Ravaud P, Baron G, Boutron I. Effect of editors' implementation of CONSORT guidelines on the reporting of abstracts in high impact medical journals: interrupted time series analysis. BMJ. 2012;344:e4178.
21. Yurdakul S, Mustafa BN, Fresko I, Seyahi E, Yazici H. Brief report: inadequate description and discussion of enrolled patient characteristics and potential inter-study site differences in reports of randomized controlled trials: a systematic survey in six rheumatology journals. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2014;66:1395-9.
22. Hewitt C, Hahn S, Torgerson DJ, Watson J, Bland JM. Adequacy and reporting of allocation concealment: review of recent trials published in four general medical journals. BMJ. 2005;330:1057-8.
23. Hoffmann TC, Erueti C, Glasziou PP. Poor description of non-pharmacological interventions: analysis of consecutive sample of randomised trials. BMJ. 2013;347:f3755.
24. Altman DG, Moher D, Schulz KF. Improving the reporting of randomised trials: the CONSORT Statement and beyond. Stat Med. 2012;31:2985-97.
25. Hirst A, Altman DG. Are peer reviewers encouraged to use reporting guidelines? A survey of 116 health research journals. PLoS One. 2012;7:e35621.
26. Shamseer L, Stevens A, Skidmore B, Turner L, Altman DG, Hirst A, et al. Does journal endorsement of reporting guidelines influence the completeness of reporting of health research? A systematic review protocol Syst Rev. 2012;1:24.
27. Boutron I, Ravaud P. Improving the reporting of clinical research. Br J Surg. 2009;96:449-50.
28. Writing aid tool. http://cochrane.fr/writingtool/testwebsite/ . (Accessed 31/8/2015)
29. Giraudeau B, Ravaud P, Donner A. Sample size calculation for cluster randomized cross-over trials. Stat Med. 2008;27:5578-85.
30. Turner RM, White IR, Croudace T. Analysis of cluster randomized cross-over trial data: a comparison of methods. Stat Med. 2007;26:274-89.
31. Cobo E, Cortes J, Ribera JM, Cardellach F, Selva-O'Callaghan A, Kostov B, et al. Effect of using reporting guidelines during peer review on quality of final manuscripts submitted to a biomedical journal: masked randomised trial. BMJ. 2011;343:d6783.