-
1
-
-
0036191550
-
Many faces of the minimal clinically important difference (MCID): a literature review and directions for future research
-
PID: 11845014
-
Beaton DE, Boers M, Wells GA. Many faces of the minimal clinically important difference (MCID): a literature review and directions for future research. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2002;14:109–114.
-
(2002)
Curr Opin Rheumatol.
, vol.14
, pp. 109-114
-
-
Beaton, D.E.1
Boers, M.2
Wells, G.A.3
-
2
-
-
0035115609
-
Looking for important change/differences in studies of responsiveness. OMERACT MCID Working Group. Outcome measures in rheumatology: minimal clinically important difference
-
COI: 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MzjvVeqtQ%3D%3D, PID: 11246687
-
Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Katz JN, Wright JG, Wells G, Boers M, Strand V, Shea B. Looking for important change/differences in studies of responsiveness. OMERACT MCID Working Group. Outcome measures in rheumatology: minimal clinically important difference. J Rheumatol. 2001;28:400–405.
-
(2001)
J Rheumatol.
, vol.28
, pp. 400-405
-
-
Beaton, D.E.1
Bombardier, C.2
Katz, J.N.3
Wright, J.G.4
Wells, G.5
Boers, M.6
Strand, V.7
Shea, B.8
-
3
-
-
79959894241
-
Project group of the EF3X-trial. Fracture surgery of the extremities with the intra-operative use of 3D-RX: q randomized multicenter trial (EF3X-trial)
-
PID: 21733185
-
Beerekamp MS, Ubbink DT, Maas M, Luitse JS, Kloen P, Blokhuis TJ, Segers MJ, Marmor M, Schep NW, Dijkgraaf MG, Goslings JC; project group of the EF3X-trial. Fracture surgery of the extremities with the intra-operative use of 3D-RX: q randomized multicenter trial (EF3X-trial). BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2011;12:151.
-
(2011)
BMC Musculoskelet Disord.
, vol.12
, pp. 151
-
-
Beerekamp, M.S.1
Ubbink, D.T.2
Maas, M.3
Luitse, J.S.4
Kloen, P.5
Blokhuis, T.J.6
Segers, M.J.7
Marmor, M.8
Schep, N.W.9
Dijkgraaf, M.G.10
Goslings, J.C.11
-
4
-
-
84859180449
-
Clinical research and patient-rated outcome measures in hand surgery
-
PID: 22464236
-
Calfee RP, Adams AA. Clinical research and patient-rated outcome measures in hand surgery. J Hand Surg Am. 2012;37:851–855.
-
(2012)
J Hand Surg Am.
, vol.37
, pp. 851-855
-
-
Calfee, R.P.1
Adams, A.A.2
-
5
-
-
0037567512
-
Defining clinically meaningful change in health-related quality of life
-
PID: 12812812
-
Crosby RD, Kolotkin RL, Williams GR. Defining clinically meaningful change in health-related quality of life. J Clin Epidemiol. 2003;56:395–407.
-
(2003)
J Clin Epidemiol.
, vol.56
, pp. 395-407
-
-
Crosby, R.D.1
Kolotkin, R.L.2
Williams, G.R.3
-
6
-
-
33846005794
-
Minimally important change determined by a visual method integrating an anchor-based and a distribution-based approach
-
PID: 17033901
-
de Vet HC, Ostelo RW, Terwee CB, van der Roer N, Knol DL, Beckerman H, Boers M, Bouter LM. Minimally important change determined by a visual method integrating an anchor-based and a distribution-based approach. Qual Life Res. 2007;16:131–142.
-
(2007)
Qual Life Res.
, vol.16
, pp. 131-142
-
-
de Vet, H.C.1
Ostelo, R.W.2
Terwee, C.B.3
van der Roer, N.4
Knol, D.L.5
Beckerman, H.6
Boers, M.7
Bouter, L.M.8
-
7
-
-
33749390540
-
Minimal changes in health status questionnaires: distinction between minimally detectable change and minimally important change
-
PID: 16925807
-
de Vet HC, Terwee CB, Ostelo RW, Beckerman H, Knol DL, Bouter LM. Minimal changes in health status questionnaires: distinction between minimally detectable change and minimally important change. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2006;4:54.
-
(2006)
Health Qual Life Outcomes.
, vol.4
, pp. 54
-
-
de Vet, H.C.1
Terwee, C.B.2
Ostelo, R.W.3
Beckerman, H.4
Knol, D.L.5
Bouter, L.M.6
-
8
-
-
84901402871
-
Which measure should be used to assess the patient’s functional outcome after distal radius fracture?
-
PID: 24873095
-
Gupta S, Halai M, Al-Maiyah M, Muller S. Which measure should be used to assess the patient’s functional outcome after distal radius fracture? Acta Orthop Belg. 2014;80:116–118.
-
(2014)
Acta Orthop Belg.
, vol.80
, pp. 116-118
-
-
Gupta, S.1
Halai, M.2
Al-Maiyah, M.3
Muller, S.4
-
9
-
-
0036195669
-
Methods to explain the clinical significance of health status measures
-
PID: 11936935
-
Guyatt GH, Osoba D, Wu AW, Wyrwich KW, Norman GR. Clinical Significance Consensus Meeting Group. Methods to explain the clinical significance of health status measures. Mayo Clin Proc. 2002;77:371–383.
-
(2002)
Mayo Clin Proc.
, vol.77
, pp. 371-383
-
-
Guyatt, G.H.1
Osoba, D.2
Wu, A.W.3
Wyrwich, K.W.4
Norman, G.R.5
-
10
-
-
0024852022
-
Measurement of health status: ascertaining the minimal clinically important difference
-
COI: 1:STN:280:DyaK3c7gslClsQ%3D%3D, PID: 2691207
-
Jaeschke R, Singer J, Guyatt GH. Measurement of health status: ascertaining the minimal clinically important difference. Control Clin Trials. 1989;10:407–415.
-
(1989)
Control Clin Trials.
, vol.10
, pp. 407-415
-
-
Jaeschke, R.1
Singer, J.2
Guyatt, G.H.3
-
11
-
-
70349742604
-
Global rating of change scales: a review of strengths and weaknesses and considerations for design
-
PID: 20046623
-
Kamper SJ, Maher CG, Mackay G. Global rating of change scales: a review of strengths and weaknesses and considerations for design. J Man Manip Ther. 2009;17:163–170.
-
(2009)
J Man Manip Ther.
, vol.17
, pp. 163-170
-
-
Kamper, S.J.1
Maher, C.G.2
Mackay, G.3
-
12
-
-
84876670121
-
Comparative responsiveness and minimal clinically important differences for idiopathic ulnar impaction syndrome
-
PID: 23404422
-
Kim JK, Park ES. Comparative responsiveness and minimal clinically important differences for idiopathic ulnar impaction syndrome. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013;471:1406–1411.
-
(2013)
Clin Orthop Relat Res.
, vol.471
, pp. 1406-1411
-
-
Kim, J.K.1
Park, E.S.2
-
13
-
-
0027200353
-
Interpretation of quality of life changes
-
COI: 1:STN:280:DyaK2c%2FgsVyjuw%3D%3D, PID: 8401458
-
Lydick E, Epstein RS. Interpretation of quality of life changes. Qual Life Res. 1993;2:221–226.
-
(1993)
Qual Life Res.
, vol.2
, pp. 221-226
-
-
Lydick, E.1
Epstein, R.S.2
-
14
-
-
84941321767
-
-
MacDermid JC. The patient-rated wrist evaluation (PRWE) user manual.2007. Accessed September 18, 2014
-
MacDermid JC. The patient-rated wrist evaluation (PRWE) user manual.2007. Available at: http://srs-mcmaster.ca/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/English-PRWE-User-Manual.pdf. Accessed September 18, 2014.
-
-
-
-
15
-
-
0032200609
-
Patient rating of wrist pain and disability: a reliable and valid measurement tool
-
COI: 1:STN:280:DyaK1M%2FlsVGhug%3D%3D, PID: 9840793
-
MacDermid JC, Turgeon T, Richards RS, Beadle M, Roth JH. Patient rating of wrist pain and disability: a reliable and valid measurement tool. J Orthop Trauma. 1998;12:577–586.
-
(1998)
J Orthop Trauma.
, vol.12
, pp. 577-586
-
-
MacDermid, J.C.1
Turgeon, T.2
Richards, R.S.3
Beadle, M.4
Roth, J.H.5
-
16
-
-
84867866490
-
Statistics corner: a guide to appropriate use of correlation coefficient in medical research
-
COI: 1:STN:280:DC%2BC3sngt12kug%3D%3D, PID: 23638278
-
Mukaka MM. Statistics corner: a guide to appropriate use of correlation coefficient in medical research. Malawi Med J. 2012;24:69–71.
-
(2012)
Malawi Med J.
, vol.24
, pp. 69-71
-
-
Mukaka, M.M.1
-
17
-
-
0003636270
-
-
Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany
-
Müller ME, Nazarian S, Koch P, Schatzker J. The Comprehensive Classification of Fractures of Long Bones. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag; 1990.
-
(1990)
The Comprehensive Classification of Fractures of Long Bones
-
-
Müller, M.E.1
Nazarian, S.2
Koch, P.3
Schatzker, J.4
-
18
-
-
0037980149
-
Interpretation of changes in health-related quality of life the remarkable universality of half a standard deviation
-
PID: 12719681
-
Norman GR, Sloan JA, Wyrwich KW. Interpretation of changes in health-related quality of life the remarkable universality of half a standard deviation. Med Care. 2003;41:582–592.
-
(2003)
Med Care.
, vol.41
, pp. 582-592
-
-
Norman, G.R.1
Sloan, J.A.2
Wyrwich, K.W.3
-
19
-
-
37549004786
-
Recommended methods for determining responsiveness and minimally important differences for patient-reported outcomes
-
PID: 18177782
-
Revicki D, Hays RD, Cella D, Sloan J. Recommended methods for determining responsiveness and minimally important differences for patient-reported outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008;61:102–109.
-
(2008)
J Clin Epidemiol.
, vol.61
, pp. 102-109
-
-
Revicki, D.1
Hays, R.D.2
Cella, D.3
Sloan, J.4
-
20
-
-
7444255435
-
Reliable change and minimum important difference (MID) proportions facilitated group responsiveness comparisons using individual threshold criteria
-
PID: 15528051
-
Schmitt JS, Di Fabio RP. Reliable change and minimum important difference (MID) proportions facilitated group responsiveness comparisons using individual threshold criteria. J Clin Epidemiol. 2004;57:1008–1018.
-
(2004)
J Clin Epidemiol.
, vol.57
, pp. 1008-1018
-
-
Schmitt, J.S.1
Di Fabio, R.P.2
-
21
-
-
84856578795
-
Upper extremity-specific measures of disability and outcomes in orthopaedic surgery
-
PID: 22298061
-
Smith MV, Calfee RP, Baumgarten KM, Brophy RH, Wright RW. Upper extremity-specific measures of disability and outcomes in orthopaedic surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012;94:277–285.
-
(2012)
J Bone Joint Surg Am.
, vol.94
, pp. 277-285
-
-
Smith, M.V.1
Calfee, R.P.2
Baumgarten, K.M.3
Brophy, R.H.4
Wright, R.W.5
-
22
-
-
84875530247
-
Minimal clinically important differences of 3 patient-rated outcomes instruments
-
PID: 23481405
-
Sorensen AA, Howard D, Tan WH, Ketchersid J, Calfee RP. Minimal clinically important differences of 3 patient-rated outcomes instruments. J Hand Surg Am. 2013;38:641–649.
-
(2013)
J Hand Surg Am.
, vol.38
, pp. 641-649
-
-
Sorensen, A.A.1
Howard, D.2
Tan, W.H.3
Ketchersid, J.4
Calfee, R.P.5
-
23
-
-
0031788970
-
Sensitivity to change of the Roland-Morris back pain questionnaire: part 1
-
COI: 1:STN:280:DyaK1M%2FitFClsg%3D%3D, PID: 9806623
-
Stratford PW, Binkley JM, Riddle DL, Guyatt GH. Sensitivity to change of the Roland-Morris back pain questionnaire: part 1. Phys Ther. 1998;78:1186–1196.
-
(1998)
Phys Ther.
, vol.78
, pp. 1186-1196
-
-
Stratford, P.W.1
Binkley, J.M.2
Riddle, D.L.3
Guyatt, G.H.4
-
24
-
-
77950482655
-
Minimal clinically important differences in ASES and simple shoulder test scores after nonoperative treatment of rotator cuff disease
-
PID: 20124055
-
Tashjian RZ, Deloach J, Green A, Porucznik CA, Powell AP. Minimal clinically important differences in ASES and simple shoulder test scores after nonoperative treatment of rotator cuff disease. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;92:296–303.
-
(2010)
J Bone Joint Surg Am.
, vol.92
, pp. 296-303
-
-
Tashjian, R.Z.1
Deloach, J.2
Green, A.3
Porucznik, C.A.4
Powell, A.P.5
-
25
-
-
84898454956
-
Surgery versus conservative treatment in patients with type A distal radius fractures: a randomized controlled trial
-
PID: 24642190
-
Walenkamp MM, Goslings JC, Beumer A, Haverlag R, Leenhouts PA, Verleisdonk EJ, Liem RS, Sintenie JB, Bronkhorst MW, Winkelhagen J, Schep NW. Surgery versus conservative treatment in patients with type A distal radius fractures: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014;15:90.
-
(2014)
BMC Musculoskelet Disord.
, vol.15
, pp. 90
-
-
Walenkamp, M.M.1
Goslings, J.C.2
Beumer, A.3
Haverlag, R.4
Leenhouts, P.A.5
Verleisdonk, E.J.6
Liem, R.S.7
Sintenie, J.B.8
Bronkhorst, M.W.9
Winkelhagen, J.10
Schep, N.W.11
-
26
-
-
79960935980
-
Baseline dependency of minimal clinically important improvement
-
PID: 21372203
-
Wang YC, Hart DL, Stratford PW, Mioduski JE. Baseline dependency of minimal clinically important improvement. Phys Ther. 2011;91:675–688.
-
(2011)
Phys Ther.
, vol.91
, pp. 675-688
-
-
Wang, Y.C.1
Hart, D.L.2
Stratford, P.W.3
Mioduski, J.E.4
-
27
-
-
0030298376
-
The minimal important difference: who’s to say what is important?
-
COI: 1:STN:280:DyaK2s%2FkslGltQ%3D%3D, PID: 8892487
-
Wright JG. The minimal important difference: who’s to say what is important? J Clin Epidemiol. 1996;49:1221–1222.
-
(1996)
J Clin Epidemiol.
, vol.49
, pp. 1221-1222
-
-
Wright, J.G.1
|