메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 473, Issue 10, 2015, Pages 3235-3241

The Minimum Clinically Important Difference of the Patient-rated Wrist Evaluation Score for Patients With Distal Radius Fractures

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANALGESIA; ARTICLE; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL STATUS; GOLD STANDARD; HUMAN; INTERNAL CONSISTENCY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MINIMUM CLINICALLY IMPORTANT DIFFERENCE; MINIMUM DETECTABLE CHANGE; OPEN REDUCTION; OSTEOSYNTHESIS; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PATIENT RATED WRIST EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RADIUS FRACTURE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; SCORING SYSTEM; SHOULDER PAIN; TREATMENT OUTCOME; TREATMENT RESPONSE; VOLAR PLATE FIXATION; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; RADIUS FRACTURES; SELF EVALUATION; WRIST;

EID: 84941315282     PISSN: 0009921X     EISSN: 15281132     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11999-015-4376-9     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (133)

References (27)
  • 1
    • 0036191550 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Many faces of the minimal clinically important difference (MCID): a literature review and directions for future research
    • PID: 11845014
    • Beaton DE, Boers M, Wells GA. Many faces of the minimal clinically important difference (MCID): a literature review and directions for future research. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2002;14:109–114.
    • (2002) Curr Opin Rheumatol. , vol.14 , pp. 109-114
    • Beaton, D.E.1    Boers, M.2    Wells, G.A.3
  • 2
    • 0035115609 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Looking for important change/differences in studies of responsiveness. OMERACT MCID Working Group. Outcome measures in rheumatology: minimal clinically important difference
    • COI: 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MzjvVeqtQ%3D%3D, PID: 11246687
    • Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Katz JN, Wright JG, Wells G, Boers M, Strand V, Shea B. Looking for important change/differences in studies of responsiveness. OMERACT MCID Working Group. Outcome measures in rheumatology: minimal clinically important difference. J Rheumatol. 2001;28:400–405.
    • (2001) J Rheumatol. , vol.28 , pp. 400-405
    • Beaton, D.E.1    Bombardier, C.2    Katz, J.N.3    Wright, J.G.4    Wells, G.5    Boers, M.6    Strand, V.7    Shea, B.8
  • 4
    • 84859180449 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Clinical research and patient-rated outcome measures in hand surgery
    • PID: 22464236
    • Calfee RP, Adams AA. Clinical research and patient-rated outcome measures in hand surgery. J Hand Surg Am. 2012;37:851–855.
    • (2012) J Hand Surg Am. , vol.37 , pp. 851-855
    • Calfee, R.P.1    Adams, A.A.2
  • 5
    • 0037567512 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Defining clinically meaningful change in health-related quality of life
    • PID: 12812812
    • Crosby RD, Kolotkin RL, Williams GR. Defining clinically meaningful change in health-related quality of life. J Clin Epidemiol. 2003;56:395–407.
    • (2003) J Clin Epidemiol. , vol.56 , pp. 395-407
    • Crosby, R.D.1    Kolotkin, R.L.2    Williams, G.R.3
  • 7
    • 33749390540 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Minimal changes in health status questionnaires: distinction between minimally detectable change and minimally important change
    • PID: 16925807
    • de Vet HC, Terwee CB, Ostelo RW, Beckerman H, Knol DL, Bouter LM. Minimal changes in health status questionnaires: distinction between minimally detectable change and minimally important change. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2006;4:54.
    • (2006) Health Qual Life Outcomes. , vol.4 , pp. 54
    • de Vet, H.C.1    Terwee, C.B.2    Ostelo, R.W.3    Beckerman, H.4    Knol, D.L.5    Bouter, L.M.6
  • 8
    • 84901402871 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Which measure should be used to assess the patient’s functional outcome after distal radius fracture?
    • PID: 24873095
    • Gupta S, Halai M, Al-Maiyah M, Muller S. Which measure should be used to assess the patient’s functional outcome after distal radius fracture? Acta Orthop Belg. 2014;80:116–118.
    • (2014) Acta Orthop Belg. , vol.80 , pp. 116-118
    • Gupta, S.1    Halai, M.2    Al-Maiyah, M.3    Muller, S.4
  • 9
    • 0036195669 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Methods to explain the clinical significance of health status measures
    • PID: 11936935
    • Guyatt GH, Osoba D, Wu AW, Wyrwich KW, Norman GR. Clinical Significance Consensus Meeting Group. Methods to explain the clinical significance of health status measures. Mayo Clin Proc. 2002;77:371–383.
    • (2002) Mayo Clin Proc. , vol.77 , pp. 371-383
    • Guyatt, G.H.1    Osoba, D.2    Wu, A.W.3    Wyrwich, K.W.4    Norman, G.R.5
  • 10
    • 0024852022 scopus 로고
    • Measurement of health status: ascertaining the minimal clinically important difference
    • COI: 1:STN:280:DyaK3c7gslClsQ%3D%3D, PID: 2691207
    • Jaeschke R, Singer J, Guyatt GH. Measurement of health status: ascertaining the minimal clinically important difference. Control Clin Trials. 1989;10:407–415.
    • (1989) Control Clin Trials. , vol.10 , pp. 407-415
    • Jaeschke, R.1    Singer, J.2    Guyatt, G.H.3
  • 11
    • 70349742604 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Global rating of change scales: a review of strengths and weaknesses and considerations for design
    • PID: 20046623
    • Kamper SJ, Maher CG, Mackay G. Global rating of change scales: a review of strengths and weaknesses and considerations for design. J Man Manip Ther. 2009;17:163–170.
    • (2009) J Man Manip Ther. , vol.17 , pp. 163-170
    • Kamper, S.J.1    Maher, C.G.2    Mackay, G.3
  • 12
    • 84876670121 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Comparative responsiveness and minimal clinically important differences for idiopathic ulnar impaction syndrome
    • PID: 23404422
    • Kim JK, Park ES. Comparative responsiveness and minimal clinically important differences for idiopathic ulnar impaction syndrome. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013;471:1406–1411.
    • (2013) Clin Orthop Relat Res. , vol.471 , pp. 1406-1411
    • Kim, J.K.1    Park, E.S.2
  • 13
    • 0027200353 scopus 로고
    • Interpretation of quality of life changes
    • COI: 1:STN:280:DyaK2c%2FgsVyjuw%3D%3D, PID: 8401458
    • Lydick E, Epstein RS. Interpretation of quality of life changes. Qual Life Res. 1993;2:221–226.
    • (1993) Qual Life Res. , vol.2 , pp. 221-226
    • Lydick, E.1    Epstein, R.S.2
  • 14
    • 84941321767 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • MacDermid JC. The patient-rated wrist evaluation (PRWE) user manual.2007. Accessed September 18, 2014
    • MacDermid JC. The patient-rated wrist evaluation (PRWE) user manual.2007. Available at: http://srs-mcmaster.ca/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/English-PRWE-User-Manual.pdf. Accessed September 18, 2014.
  • 15
    • 0032200609 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Patient rating of wrist pain and disability: a reliable and valid measurement tool
    • COI: 1:STN:280:DyaK1M%2FlsVGhug%3D%3D, PID: 9840793
    • MacDermid JC, Turgeon T, Richards RS, Beadle M, Roth JH. Patient rating of wrist pain and disability: a reliable and valid measurement tool. J Orthop Trauma. 1998;12:577–586.
    • (1998) J Orthop Trauma. , vol.12 , pp. 577-586
    • MacDermid, J.C.1    Turgeon, T.2    Richards, R.S.3    Beadle, M.4    Roth, J.H.5
  • 16
    • 84867866490 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Statistics corner: a guide to appropriate use of correlation coefficient in medical research
    • COI: 1:STN:280:DC%2BC3sngt12kug%3D%3D, PID: 23638278
    • Mukaka MM. Statistics corner: a guide to appropriate use of correlation coefficient in medical research. Malawi Med J. 2012;24:69–71.
    • (2012) Malawi Med J. , vol.24 , pp. 69-71
    • Mukaka, M.M.1
  • 18
    • 0037980149 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Interpretation of changes in health-related quality of life the remarkable universality of half a standard deviation
    • PID: 12719681
    • Norman GR, Sloan JA, Wyrwich KW. Interpretation of changes in health-related quality of life the remarkable universality of half a standard deviation. Med Care. 2003;41:582–592.
    • (2003) Med Care. , vol.41 , pp. 582-592
    • Norman, G.R.1    Sloan, J.A.2    Wyrwich, K.W.3
  • 19
    • 37549004786 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Recommended methods for determining responsiveness and minimally important differences for patient-reported outcomes
    • PID: 18177782
    • Revicki D, Hays RD, Cella D, Sloan J. Recommended methods for determining responsiveness and minimally important differences for patient-reported outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008;61:102–109.
    • (2008) J Clin Epidemiol. , vol.61 , pp. 102-109
    • Revicki, D.1    Hays, R.D.2    Cella, D.3    Sloan, J.4
  • 20
    • 7444255435 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Reliable change and minimum important difference (MID) proportions facilitated group responsiveness comparisons using individual threshold criteria
    • PID: 15528051
    • Schmitt JS, Di Fabio RP. Reliable change and minimum important difference (MID) proportions facilitated group responsiveness comparisons using individual threshold criteria. J Clin Epidemiol. 2004;57:1008–1018.
    • (2004) J Clin Epidemiol. , vol.57 , pp. 1008-1018
    • Schmitt, J.S.1    Di Fabio, R.P.2
  • 22
    • 84875530247 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Minimal clinically important differences of 3 patient-rated outcomes instruments
    • PID: 23481405
    • Sorensen AA, Howard D, Tan WH, Ketchersid J, Calfee RP. Minimal clinically important differences of 3 patient-rated outcomes instruments. J Hand Surg Am. 2013;38:641–649.
    • (2013) J Hand Surg Am. , vol.38 , pp. 641-649
    • Sorensen, A.A.1    Howard, D.2    Tan, W.H.3    Ketchersid, J.4    Calfee, R.P.5
  • 23
    • 0031788970 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Sensitivity to change of the Roland-Morris back pain questionnaire: part 1
    • COI: 1:STN:280:DyaK1M%2FitFClsg%3D%3D, PID: 9806623
    • Stratford PW, Binkley JM, Riddle DL, Guyatt GH. Sensitivity to change of the Roland-Morris back pain questionnaire: part 1. Phys Ther. 1998;78:1186–1196.
    • (1998) Phys Ther. , vol.78 , pp. 1186-1196
    • Stratford, P.W.1    Binkley, J.M.2    Riddle, D.L.3    Guyatt, G.H.4
  • 24
    • 77950482655 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Minimal clinically important differences in ASES and simple shoulder test scores after nonoperative treatment of rotator cuff disease
    • PID: 20124055
    • Tashjian RZ, Deloach J, Green A, Porucznik CA, Powell AP. Minimal clinically important differences in ASES and simple shoulder test scores after nonoperative treatment of rotator cuff disease. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;92:296–303.
    • (2010) J Bone Joint Surg Am. , vol.92 , pp. 296-303
    • Tashjian, R.Z.1    Deloach, J.2    Green, A.3    Porucznik, C.A.4    Powell, A.P.5
  • 26
    • 79960935980 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Baseline dependency of minimal clinically important improvement
    • PID: 21372203
    • Wang YC, Hart DL, Stratford PW, Mioduski JE. Baseline dependency of minimal clinically important improvement. Phys Ther. 2011;91:675–688.
    • (2011) Phys Ther. , vol.91 , pp. 675-688
    • Wang, Y.C.1    Hart, D.L.2    Stratford, P.W.3    Mioduski, J.E.4
  • 27
    • 0030298376 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The minimal important difference: who’s to say what is important?
    • COI: 1:STN:280:DyaK2s%2FkslGltQ%3D%3D, PID: 8892487
    • Wright JG. The minimal important difference: who’s to say what is important? J Clin Epidemiol. 1996;49:1221–1222.
    • (1996) J Clin Epidemiol. , vol.49 , pp. 1221-1222
    • Wright, J.G.1


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.