Microcrystalline cellulose filled composites for wooden artwork consolidation: Application and physic-mechanical characterization

Materials and Design

Volumn 83, Issue , 2015, Pages 611-619

  Cataldi, Annalisa ^a   Deflorian, Flavio ^a   Pegoretti, Alessandro ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TRENTO   (Italy)

Author keywords

Composites; Consolidation; Mechanical properties; Microcrystalline cellulose; Wood

Indexed keywords

ACETONE; CELLULOSE; COMPOSITE MATERIALS; CONSOLIDATION; CRYSTALLINE MATERIALS; MECHANICAL PROPERTIES; MERCURY (METAL);

COMMERCIAL POLYMERS; DEGRADATION CONDITION; FILLED COMPOSITES; IMPACT ABSORBED ENERGY; MECHANICAL CHARACTERIZATIONS; MERCURY INTRUSION POROSIMETRY; MICRO-CRYSTALLINE CELLULOSE; WOOD CONSOLIDATIONS;

WOOD;

ABIES ALBA; BEND STRENGTH; COMPOSITES; DEGRADATION; JUGLANS; MICROCRYSTALLINE CELLULOSE; WOOD;

EID: 84941308877     PISSN: 02641275     EISSN: 18734197     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2015.06.037     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Unger A., Schniewind A.P., Unger W. Conservation of Wood Artifacts: A Handbook 2001, Springer.
2. Toniolo L., Paradisi A., Goidanich S., Pennati G. Mechanical behaviour of lime based mortars after surface consolidation. Constr. Build. Mater. 2011, 25:1553-1559.
3. G. Borsoi, M. Tavares, R.V. António Santos Silva, Studies of the performance of nanostructured and other compatible consolidation products for historical renders, in: Ana Maria Pires Pinto, António Sérgio Pouzada (Eds.), Materials Science Forum, 2012, pp. 942-947.
4. Wang Y., Schniewind A.P. Consolidation of deteriorated wood with soluble resins. J. Am. Inst. Conserv. 1985, 24:77-91.
5. Horie V. Materials for Conservation: Organic Consolidants, Adhesives and Coatings 2010, Routledge.
6. Giachi G., Capretti C., Donato I.D., Macchioni N., Pizzo B. New trials in the consolidation of waterlogged archaeological wood with different acetone-carried products. J. Archaeol. Sci. 2011, 38:2957-2967.
7. Lionetto F., Frigione M. Effect of novel consolidants on mechanical and absorption properties of deteriorated wood by insect attack. J. Cultural Heritage 2012, 13:195-203.
8. Mosoarca M., Gioncu V. Historical wooden churches from Banat Region, Romania. Damages: modern consolidation solutions. J. Cultural Heritage 2013, 14:e45-e59.
9. Crisci G.M., La Russa M.F., Malagodi M., Ruffolo S.A. Consolidating properties of Regalrez 1126 and Paraloid B72 applied to wood. J. Cultural Heritage 2010, 11:304-308.
10. Chiantore O., Lazzari M. Photo-oxidative stability of paraloid acrylic protective polymers. Polymer 2001, 42:17-27.
11. Atar M. Effects of impregnation with Imersol-AQUA on the bending strength of some wood materials. Mater. Des. 2008, 29:1707-1712.
12. Bhat I-u-H., Abdul Khalil H.P.S., Awang K.B., Bakare I.O., Issam A.M. Effect of weathering on physical, mechanical and morphological properties of chemically modified wood materials. Mater. Des. 2010, 31:4363-4368.
13. Keskin H. Impact of impregnation chemical on the bending strength of solid and laminated wood materials. Mater. Des. 2009, 30:796-803.
14. Lionetto F., Frigione M. Mechanical and natural durability properties of wood treated with a novel organic preservative/consolidant product. Mater. Des. 2009, 30:3303-3307.
15. Christensen M., Kutzke H., Hansen F.K. New materials used for the consolidation of archaeological wood-past attempts, present struggles, and future requirements. J. Cultural Heritage 2012, 13. S183-S90.
16. Tuduce-Trăistaru A.A., Câmpean M., Timar M.C. Compatibility indicators in developing consolidation materials with nanoparticle insertions for old wooden objects. Int. J. Conserv. Sci. 2010, 1:219-226.
17. P. Thummanukitcharoen, S. Limpanart, K. Srikulkit, Preparation of organosilane treated microcrystalline cellulose (Simcc) and the polypropylene/Simcc composite, in: 18th International Conference on Composite Materials, Jeju Island, Korea, 2011.
18. Spoljaric S., Genovese A., Shanks R.A. Polypropylene-microcrystalline cellulose composites with enhanced compatibility and properties. Composites Part A 2009, 40:791-799.
19. Shanks R.A., Hodzi c.A., Ridderhof D. Composites of poly (lactic acid) with flax fibers modified by interstitial polymerization. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2006, 99:5-13.
20. S.V. Glass, S.L. Zelinka, Wood Handbook, Chapter 04: Moisture Relations and Physical Properties of Wood, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory, Madison, WI, 2010.
21. J.F. Siau, Wood: Influence of Moisture on Physical Properties, Virginia Polytechnic institute and State University, Dept. of Wood Science & Forest Products, Virginia, 1995.
22. C. Skaar, Wood-Water Relationships, Springer, 1988.
23. Lionetto F., Quarta G., Cataldi A., Cossa A., Auriemma R., Calcagnile L., et al. Characterization and dating of waterlogged woods from an ancient harbor in Italy. J. Cultural Heritage 2014, 15:213-217.
24. Cook R.A., Hover K.C. Mercury porosimetry of hardened cement pastes. Cem Concr. Res. 1999, 29:933-943.
25. Plötze M., Niemz P. Porosity and pore size distribution of different wood types asdetermined by mercury intrusion porosimetry. Eur. J. Wood Prod. 2011, 69:649-657.
26. Dorigato A., Pegoretti A. Flexural and impact behaviour of carbon/basalt fibers hybrid laminates. J. Compos. Mater. 2014, 48:1121-1130.
27. Eaton R., Hale M. Wood: Decay, Pests and Protection 1993, Chapman and Hall.
28. ASTM Standard D143-94, Standard Test Methods for Small Clear Specimens of Timber, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, USA, 1994.