Deixis

Corpus Pragmatics: A Handbook

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 331-359

  Rühlemann, Christoph ^a   O’Donnell, Matthew Brook ^b  

^a PHILIPPS UNIVERSITY MARBURG   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84941285920     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139057493.018     Document Type: Chapter

References (61)

1. Aijmer, K. 1987. Oh and Ah in English conversation. In W. Meijs (ed.), Corpus Linguistics and Beyond, pp. 61-68. Amsterdam and Atlanta: Rodopi.
2. Aijmer, K. 1989. Themes and tails: The discourse functions of dislocated elements. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 12: 137-154.
3. Andersen, G. 1998. The pragmatic marker like from a relevance-theoretic perspective. In A. H. Jucker and Y. Ziv (eds), Discourse Markers: Descriptions and Theory, pp. 147-170. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
4. Ashby, W. J. 1988. The syntax, pragmatics, and sociolinguistics of left- and rightdislocation in French. Lingua 75: 203-229.
5. Baayen, H. 2008. Analyzing Linguistic Data: A Practical Introduction to Statistics Using R. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6. Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S. and Finegan, E. 1999. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Pearson Education.
7. Buchstaller, I. 2011. Quotations across the generations: A multivariate analysis of speech and thought introducers across 5 decades of Tyneside speech. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 7 (1): 59-92.
8. Bühler, K. 1990 [1934]. Theory of Language: The Representational Function of Language. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
9. Caffi, C. and Janney, R. W. 1994. Towards a pragmatics of emotive communication. Journal of Pragmatics 22: 325-373.
10. Carter, R. A. and McCarthy, M. J. 1995. Grammar and the spoken language. Applied Linguistics 16 (2): 141-158.
11. Carter, R. A. and McCarthy, M. J. 2006. Cambridge Grammar of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12. Clancy, B. 2010. 'Hurry up baby son all the boys is finished with their breakfast': A sociopragmatic analysis of Irish settled and traveller family discourse. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Mary Immaculate College, University of Limerick, Ireland.
13. Clark, J. and DeRose, S. 1999. XML Path Language XPath Version 1.0. Online at: www.w3.org/TR/xpath (accessed May 2011).
14. Crystal, D. 2003. A Dictionary of Linguistics and Phonetics (fifth edition). Oxford: Blackwell.
15. Dalgaard, P. 2008. Introductory Statistics with R (second edition). Berlin: Springer.
16. Diessel, H. 1999. Demonstratives: Form, Function, and Grammaticalization. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
17. Fillmore, C. J. 1997. Lectures on Deixis. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
18. Goffman, E. 1974. Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Social Organization of Experience. New York: Harper and Row.
19. Goodwin, C. and Duranti, A. 1992. Rethinking context: An introduction. In A. Duranti and C. Goodwin (eds), Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon, pp. 1-42. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20. Gries, S. T. 2009. Statistics for Linguistics with R: A Practical Introduction. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
21. Halliday, M. A. K. and Hasan, R. 1976. Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
22. Hanks, W. F. 1992. The indexical ground of deictic reference. In A. Duranti and C. Goodwin (eds), Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon, pp. 43-76. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23. Hanks, W. F. 2009. Fieldwork on deixis. Journal of Pragmatics 41: 10-24.
24. Hanks, W. F. 2011. Deixis and indexicality. In W. Bublitz and N. R. Norrick (eds), Foundations of Pragmatics, vol. 1 of Handbooks of Pragmatics, pp. 315-346. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
25. Hoey, M. 2005. Lexical Priming: A New Theory of Words and Language. London and New York: Routledge.
26. Hoey, M. and O'Donnell, M. B. 2008. Lexicography, grammar, and textual position. International Journal of Lexicography 21 (3): 293-309.
27. Hoey, M. and O'Donnell, M. B. 2013. Examining associations between lexis and textual position in hard news stories. In M. Charles, N. Groom and S. John (eds), Corpora, Grammar, Text and Discourse: In Honour of Susan Hunston. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
28. Hundt, M., Nesselhauf, N. and Biewer, C. (eds) 2007. Corpus Linguistics and the Web. Amsterdam and New York: Rodopi.
29. Jones, P. 1995. Philosophical and theoretical issues in the study of deixis: A critique of the standard account. In K. Green (ed.), New Essays in Deixis: Discourse, Narrative, Literature, pp. 27-48. Amsterdam and Atlanta: Rodopi.
30. Jucker, A. H. and Smith, S. W. 2003. Reference assignment as a communicative task: Differences between native speakers, ESL- and EFL-speakers. In E. Mengel, H.-J. Schmid and M. Steppat (eds), Proceedings of Anglistentag 2002, Bayreuth, pp. 401-410. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag.
31. Leech, G. 2000. Grammars of spoken English: New outcomes of corpus oriented research. Language Learning 50 (4): 675-724.
32. Leech, G. 2007. New resources, or just better old ones? The holy grail of representativeness. In M. Hundt, N. Nesselhauf and C. Biewer (eds), Corpus Linguistics and the Web, pp. 133-150. Amsterdam and New York: Rodopi.
33. Levinson, S. C. 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
34. Levinson, S. C. 2004. Deixis. In L. R. Horn and G. Ward (eds), The Handbook of Pragmatics, pp. 97-121. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
35. Lyons, J. 1977. Semantics, vols I, II. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
36. Mahlberg, M. and O'Donnell, M. B. 2008. A fresh view of the structure of hard news stories. In Proceedings of the 19th European Systemic Functional Linguistics Conference and Workshop. Online at: scidok.sulb.uni-saarland.de/volltexte/2008/1700/
37. Marmaridou, S. S. A. 2000. Pragmatic Meaning and Cognition. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
38. Mindt, D. 2000. An Empirical Grammar of the English Verb System. Berlin: Cornelsen.
39. Oakes, M. P. 1998. Statistics for Corpus Linguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
40. O'Donnell, M. B., Scott, M., Mahlberg, M. and Hoey, M. 2012. Exploring text-initial words, clusters and concgrams in a newspaper corpus. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory (special issue) 8 (1): 73-101.
41. O'Keeffe, A., Clancy, B. and Adolphs, S. 2011. Introducing Pragmatics in Use. London and New York: Routledge.
42. Perlman, A. 1969. 'This' as a third article in American English? American Speech 44 (1): 76-80.
43. Rayson, P. 2008. From key words to key semantic domains. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 13 (4): 519-549.
44. Roberts, C. 2004. Context in dynamic interpretation. In L. R. Horn and G. Ward (eds), The Handbook of Pragmatics, pp. 197-220. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
45. Römer, U. 2010. Establishing the phraseological profile of a text type: The construction of meaning in academic book reviews. English Text Construction 3 (1): 95-119.
46. Rühlemann, C. 2007. Conversation in Context: A Corpus-Driven Approach. London: Continuum.
47. Rühlemann, C. 2013. Narrative in English Conversation: A Corpus Analysis of Storytelling. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
48. Rühlemann, C., Bagoutdinov, A. and O'Donnell, M. B. 2011. Windows on the mind: Pauses in conversational narrative. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 16 (2): 198-232.
49. Rühlemann, C. and O'Donnell, M. B. 2012. Towards a corpus of conversational narrative: Construction and annotation of the Narrative Corpus. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 8 (2): 313-350.
50. Sacks, H. 1992. Lectures on Conversation, vols I, II. Cambridge: Blackwell.
51. Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A. and Jefferson, G. 1974. A simplest systematics for the organisation of turn-taking for conversation. Language 50 (4): 696-735.
52. Schwarz-Friesel, M. and Consten, M. 2011. Reference and anaphora. In W. Bublitz and N. R. Norrick (eds), Foundations of Pragmatics, vol. 1 of Handbooks of Pragmatics, pp. 347-372. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
53. Scott, M. 1997. PC analysis of key words - and key key words. System 25 (2): 233- 245.
54. Scott, M. and Tribble, C. 2006. Textual Patterns: Key Words and Corpus Analysis in Language Education. Amsterdam and New York: John Benjamins.
55. Smith, S. W., Hiromi, P. N., Andrews, S. and Jucker, A. H. 2005. Setting the stage: How speakers prepare listeners for the introduction of referents in dialogues and monologues. Journal of Pragmatics 37: 1865-1895.
56. Stenström, A. 1998. From sentence to discourse: Cos (because) in teenage talk. In A. H. Jucker and Y. Ziv (eds), Discourse Markers: Descriptions and Theory, pp. 127- 146. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
57. Strauss, S. 2002. This, that, and it in spoken American English: A demonstrative system of gradient focus. Language Sciences 24: 131-152.
58. Tanz, C. 1980. Studies in the Acquisition of Deictic Terms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
59. Wald, B. 1983. Referents and topic within and across discourse units: Observations from current vernacular English. In F. Klein-Andreu (ed.), Discourse Perspectives on Syntax, pp. 91-116. New York: Academic Press.
60. Walmsley, P. 2007. XQuery. Sebastopol, CA: O'Reilly.
61. Yule, G. 1996. Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.