How you talk about climate change matters: A communication network perspective on epistemic skepticism and belief strength

Global Environmental Change

Volumn 35, Issue , 2015, Pages 148-161

  Leombruni, Lisa V ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Climate change; Communication; Interpersonal influence; Public attitudes; Skepticism; Social networks

Indexed keywords

CHRISTIANITY; CLIMATE CHANGE; COMMUNICATION BEHAVIOR; COMMUNICATION NETWORK; CULTURE; DEMOGRAPHIC METHOD; GOVERNANCE APPROACH; INDIVIDUAL-BASED MODEL; PUBLIC ATTITUDE; SOCIAL NETWORK;

EID: 84941208398     PISSN: 09593780     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.08.006     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. Akerlof K., Maibach E.W., Fitzgerald D., Cedeno A.Y., Neuman A. Do people personally experience global warming, and if so how, and does it matter?. Global Environ. Change 2013, 23(1):81-91. 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.07.006.
2. Aldrich H.E., Zimmer C. Entrepreneurship Through Social Networks (SSRN Scholarly Paper No. ID 1497761) 1986, Social Science Research Network, Rochester, NY, Retrieved from http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=1497761.
3. Allum N., Sturgis P., Tabourazi D., Brunton-Smith I. Science knowledge and attitudes across cultures: a meta-analysis. Public Understanding Sci. 2008, 17(1):35-54. 10.1177/0963662506070159.
4. Anderegg W.R.L., Prall J.W., Harold J., Schneider S.H. Expert credibility in climate change. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2010, 107(27):12107-12109. 10.1073/pnas.1003187107.
5. Bord R.J., O'Connor R.E., Fisher A. In what sense does the public need to understand global climate change?. Public Understanding Sci. 2000, 9(3):205-218. 10.1088/0963-6625/9/3/301.
6. Borick C.P., Rabe B.G. A reason to relieve: examining the factors that determine individual views on global warming. Social Sci. Q. 2010, 91:777-800. 10.1111/j 1540-6237.2010.00719.x.
7. Boykoff M.T., Boykoff J.M. Balance as bias: global warming and the US prestige press. Global Environ. Change 2004, 14(2):125-136. 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2003.10.001.
8. Burt R.S. Structural holes and good ideas. Am. J. Sociol. 2004, 110(2):349-399. 10.1086/421787.
9. Burt R.S. The gender of social capital. Rationality Soc. 1998, 10(1):5-46. 10.1177/104346398010001001.
10. Burt R.S. The social capital of opinion leaders. Ann. Am. Acad. Political Social Sci. 1999, 566(1):37-54. 10.1177/000271629956600104.
11. Burt R.S. Toward a Structural Theory of Action: Network Models of Social Structure, Perception, and Action 1982, Academic Press, New York, NY.
12. Capstick S.B., Pidgeon N.F. What is climate change scepticism? Examination of the concept using a mixed methods study of the UK public. Global Environ. Change 2014, 24:389-401. 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.08.012.
13. Carrasco J.A., Hogan B., Wellman B., Miller E.J. Collecting social network data to study social activity-travel behavior: an egocentric approach. Environ. Plann. B: Plann. Des. 2008, 35:961-980. 10.1068/b3317t.
14. Christakis N., Fowler N. The spread of obesity in a large social network over 32 years. New Engl. J. Med. 2007, 357(4):370-379.
15. Cook J., Nuccitelli D., Green S.A., Richardson M., Winkler B., Painting R., Way R., Jacobs P., Skuce A. Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literature. Environ. Res. Lett. 2013, 8(2).
16. Davis J.A., Smith T.W., Marsden P.V. General Social Surveys: Cumulative Codebook: 1972-2006 2007, NORC, Chicago.
17. Dunlap R.E., McCright A.M. A widening gap: republican and democratic views on climate change. Environ.: Sci. Policy Sustain. Dev. 2008, 50:26-35.
18. Eagle N., Macy M., Claxton R. Network diversity and economic development. Sci. (New York, N.Y.) 2010, 328(5981):1029-1031. 10.1126/science.1186605.
19. Feldman L., Maibach E.W., Roser-Renouf C., Leiserowitz A. Climate on cable: the nature and impact of global warming coverage on Fox News, CNN, and MSNBC. Int. J. Press/Politics 2012, 1-29. Published online. 10.1177/1940161211425410.
20. Field A. Discovering Statistics using IBM SPSS Statistics 2013, SAGE Publications, London. fourth ed.
21. Fowler J.H., Christakis N.A. Dynamic spread of happiness in a large social network: longitudinal analysis over 20 years in the Framingham heart study. Br. Med. J. 2008, 337:2338-2347.
22. Freeman L.C. Centrality in social networks: conceptual clarification. Social Netw. 1979, 1:215-239.
23. Fu Y.C. Measuring personal networks with daily contacts: a single-item survey question and the contact diary. Social Netw. 2005, 27(3):169-186. 10.1016/j.socnet.2005.01.008.
24. Gallup (2012, March 30). Americans' worries about global warming up slightly. Retrieved from: . http://www.gallup.com/poll/153653/americans-worries-global-warming-slightly.aspx.
25. Giles-Corti B., Donovan J. Relative influences of individual, social environmental, and physical environmental correlates of walking. Am. J. Public Health 2003, 93(9):1583-1589.
26. Granovetter M.S. The strength of weak ties. Am. J. Sociol. 1973, 78(6):1360-1380. 10.2307/2776392.
27. Hamilton L.C., Keim B.D. Regional variation in perceptions about climate change. Int. J. Climatol. 2009, 29(15):2348-2352. 10.1002/joc.1930.
28. Hoggan J. Climate Cover-up: The Crusade to Deny Global Warming 2009, Greystone Books, Berkeley, CA.
29. Huckfeldt R.R., Sprague J. Citizens, Politics and Social Communication: Information and Influence in an Election Campaign 1995, Cambridge University Press, New York, NY.
30. Kahan D.M., Peters E., Wittlin M., Slovic P., Ouellette L.L., Braman D., Mandel G. The polarizing impact of science literacy and numeracy on perceived climate change risks. Nat. Clim. Change 2012, 2:732-735. 10.1038/nclimate1547.
31. Kaplan M.F., Miller C.E. Group decision making and normative versus informational influence: effects of type of issue and assigned decision rule. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 1987, 53(2):306-313. 10.1037/0022-3514.53.2.306.
32. Klotzbach P., Gray W., Shama U., Harman L. United States Landfall Probability Page: Methodology 2009, Colorado State University & Bridgewater State College, Retrieved from http://typhoon.atmos.colostate.edu/.
33. Krosnick J.A., MacInnis B. Does the American public support legislation to reduce greenhouse gas emissions?. Daedalus 2013, 142(1):26-39. 10.1162/DAED_a_00183.
34. Lazarsfeld P.F., Merton R.K. Friendship as a Social Process: A Substantive and Methodological Analysis 1954, 18-66. Freedom and Control in Modern Society. M. Berger, T. Abel (Eds.).
35. Lazer D. Networks in political science: back to the future. PS: Political Sci. Politics 2011, 44(01):61-68. 10.1017/S1049096510001873.
36. Leiserowitz A., Maibach E., Roser-Renouf C., Feinberg G., Howe P. Climate change in the American mind: Americans' global warming beliefs and attitudes in September, 2012. Yale Project on Climate Change Communication 2012, Yale University and George Mason University, New Haven, CT, http://environment.yale.edu/climate/files/Climate-Beliefs-September-2012.pdf.
37. Leiserowitz A., Maibach E., Roser-Renouf C., Feinberg G., Rosenthal S. Climate change in the American mind: April, 2014. Yale Project on Climate Change Communication 2014, Yale University and George Mason University, New Haven, CT.
38. Leiserowitz A., Maibach E., Roser-Renouf C., Feinberg G., Rosenthal S. Climate change in the American mind: March, 2015. Yale Project on Climate Change Communication 2015, Yale University and George Mason University, New Haven, CT.
39. Leviston Z., Walker I., Morwinski S. Your opinion on climate change might not be as common as you think. Lett.: Nat. Clim. Change 2012, 3:334-337. 10.1038/nclimate1743.
40. Lewandowsky S., Gignac G.E., Vaughan S. The pivotal role of perceived scientific consensus in acceptance of science. Nat. Clim. Change 2012, 3:399-404. 10.1038/nclimate1720.
41. Lewandowsky S., Gignac G.E., Oberauer K. The role of conspiracist ideation and worldviews in predicting rejection of science. PloS ONE 2013, 8(10):e75637.
42. Lyons A., Clark A., Kashima Y., Kurz T. Cultural dynamics of stereotypes: social network processes and the perpetuation of stereotypes. Stereotype Dynamics: Language Based Approaches to the Formation, Maintenance, and Transformation of Stereotypes 2012, Psychology Press, Philadelphia, PA. Y. Kashima, K. Fiedler, P. Freytag (Eds.).
43. Marsden P.V. Interviewer effects in measuring network size using a single name generator. Social Netw. 2003, 25(1):1-16. 10.1016/S0378-8733(02)9-6.
44. McCright A.M., Dunlap R.E. Challenging global warming as a social problem: an analysis of the conservative movement's counter-claims. Soc. Probl. 2000, 47(4):499-522. 10.2307/3097132.
45. McCright A.M., Dunlap R.E. Defeating Kyoto: the conservative movement's impact on U.S. climate change policy. Soc. Probl. 2003, 50(3):348-373. 10.1525/sp.2003.50.3.348.
46. McCright A.M., Dunlap R.E. The politicization of climate change and polarization in the American public's views of global warming, 2001-2010. Sociol. Q. 2011, 52(2):155-194. 10.1111/j.1533-8525.2011.01198.x.
47. McCright A.M., Dunlap R.E. Cool dudes: the denial of climate change among conservative white males in the United States. Global Environ. Change 2011, 21(4):1163-1172. 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.06.003.
48. McPherson M., Smith-Lovin L., Cook J.M. Birds of a feather: homophily in social networks. Ann. Rev. Sociol. 2001, 27:415-444.
49. Monge P.R., Contractor N.S. Theories of Communication Networks 2003, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
50. Morrison E.W. Newcomers' relationships: the role of social network ties during socialization. Acad. Manag. J. 2002, 45(6):1149-1160. 10.2307/3069430.
51. Nisbet M.C., Myers T. The polls-trends twenty years of public opinion about global warming. Public Opin. Q. 2007, 71(3):444-470. 10.1093/poq/nfm031.
52. NOAA's National Weather Service (2013). Storm Prediction Center: Severe Weather GIS Page. Retrieved December 1, 2013, from . http://www.spc.noaa.gov/gis/svrgis/.
53. Nguyen T.H., Tsai, J., Jiang A., Bowring E., Maheswaran R., Tambe M., 2012. Security games on social networks Social Networks and Social Contagion, AAAI 2012 Fall Symposium. (AAAI Technical Report FS-12-08).
54. O'Connor R.E., Bord R.J., Fisher A. Risk perceptions, general environmental beliefs, and willingness to address climate change. Risk Anal. 1999, 19:461-471.
55. Olli E., Grendsted G., Wollebaek D. Correlates of environmental behaviors: bringing back social context. Environ. Behav. 2001, 33(2):181-208.
56. Oreskes N., Conway E.M. Defeating the merchants of doubt. Nature 2010, 465(7299):686-687. 10.1038/465686a.
57. Pew Research Center, 2013. Climate change: Key data points from Pew Research. Pew Research Center. Retrieved July 5, 2014. from: . http://www.pewresearch.org/key-data-points/climate-change-key-data-points-from-pew-research/.
58. Pew Research Center for the People and the Press, 2009. Fewer Americans See Solid Evidence of Global Warming. Retrieved January 17, 2013. from: . http://www.people-press.org/2009/10/22/fewer-americans-see-solid-evidence-of-global-warming/.
59. Poortinga W., Spence A., Whitmarsh L., Capstick S., Pidgeon N.F. Uncertain climate: an investigation into public scepticism about anthropogenic climate change. Global Environ. Change 2011, 21(3):1015-1024. 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.03.001.
60. Rahmstorf, S., 2004. The climate sceptics. Potsdam: Potsdam Institute for Climate Research. Retrieved from: . http://www.pik-potsdam.de/~stefan/Publications/Other/rahmstorf_climate_sceptics_2004.pdf.
61. Ramirez-Ortiz G., Caballero-Hoyos R., Ramirez-Lopez G., Valente T.W. The effects of social networks on tobacco use among high-school adolescents in Mexico. Salud Publica Mex. 2012, 54(4):433-441.
62. Reifman A., Watson W.K., McCourt A. Social networks and college drinking: probing processes of social influence and selection. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 2006, 32:820-832.
63. Rice R.E., Donohew L., Clayton R. Peer network, sensation seeking, and drug use among junior and senior high school students. Connections 2003, 25(2):32-58.
64. Ruef M., Aldrich H.E., Carter N.M. Homophily, strong ties, and isolation among US entrepreneur. Am. Sociol. Rev. 2003, 68(2):195-222. 10.2307/1519766.
65. Smith N., Leiserowitz A. The rise of global warming skepticism: exploring affective image associations in the United States over time. Risk Anal. 2012, 32(6):1021-1032.
66. U.S. Census Bureau (2014, February 7). State & County Quick Facts. Retrieved from: . http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/00000.html.
67. U.S. Census Bureau, 2014. USA Census Quickfacts. Retrieved from: . http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/00000.html.
68. USDA Forest Service, 2012. Fire Detection GIS Data. Remote Sensing Applications Center. Retrieved from: . http://activefiremaps.fs.fed.us/gisdata.php.
69. Valente T., Hoffman R., Ritt-Olson H., Lichtman K., Anderson Johnson C. Effects of a social-network method for group assignment strategies on peer-led tobacco prevention programs in schools. Am. J. Public Health 2003, 93(11):1837-1843.
70. van der Linden S.L., Leiserowitz A.A., Feinberg G.D., Maibach E.W. The scientific consensus on climate change as a gateway belief: experimental evidence. PLoS ONE 2015, 10(2):e0118489. 10.1371/journal.pone.0118489.
71. Whitmarsh L. Scepticism and uncertainty about climate change: dimensions, determinants and change over time. Global Environ. Change 2011, 21(2):690-700. 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.01.016.
72. Wrong D.H. The oversocialized conception of man in modern sociology. Am. Sociol. Rev. 1961, 26(2):183-193.
73. Yeaman S., Schick A., Lehmann L. Social network architecture and the maintenance of deleterious cultural traits. J. R. Soc. Interface 2012, 9(70):848-858.
74. Zehr S.C. Public representations of scientific uncertainty about global climate change. Public Understanding Sci. 2000, 9(2):85-103. 10.1088/0963-6625/9/2/301.