Success in the achieving cardiovascular excellence in Colorado (A CARE) home blood pressure monitoring program: A report from the shared networks of Colorado Ambulatory Practices and Partners (SNOCAP)

Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine

Volumn 28, Issue 5, 2015, Pages 548-555

  DeAlleaume, Lauren ^a,b   Parnes, Bennett ^a   Zittleman, Linda ^a   Sutter, Christin ^a   Chavez, Robert ^a   Bernstein, Jackie ^c   LeBlanc, William ^a   Dickinson, Miriam ^a   Westfall, John M ^a,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b DENVER HEALTH AND HOSPITAL AUTHORITY   (United States)

^c SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d Colorado HealthOP ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

Community Based Participatory Research; Hypertension; Practice based Research; Quality Improvement

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BLOOD PRESSURE MEASUREMENT; BLOOD PRESSURE METER; BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING; BLOOD PRESSURE REGULATION; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE; CARDIOVASCULAR RISK; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIABETES MELLITUS; DIASTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE; EVALUATION STUDY; FEMALE; HEALTH PROGRAM; HOME MONITORING; HUMAN; HYPERTENSION; INTERNET; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL AUDIT; MIDDLE AGED; MOBILE PHONE; PRIMARY MEDICAL CARE; QUASI EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; RURAL AREA; SYSTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE; TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT; UNITED STATES; URBAN AREA; YOUNG ADULT; ADOLESCENT; AMBULATORY CARE; BLOOD PRESSURE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COLORADO; MULTICENTER STUDY; PARTICIPATORY RESEARCH; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PATIENT EDUCATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; STANDARDS;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AMBULATORY CARE; BLOOD PRESSURE; BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING, AMBULATORY; COLORADO; COMMUNITY-BASED PARTICIPATORY RESEARCH; FEMALE; HUMANS; HYPERTENSION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PATIENT EDUCATION AS TOPIC; QUALITY IMPROVEMENT; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84941201465     PISSN: 15572625     EISSN: 15587118     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2015.05.150024     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Egan B, Zhao Y, Axon R. US trends in prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension, 1988-2008. JAMA 2010;303:2043-50.
2. Pickering T, Miller N, Ogedegbe G, Krakoff L, Artinian N, Goff D. Call to action on use and reimbursement for home blood pressure monitoring: a joint scientific statement from the American Heart Association, American Society Of Hypertension, and Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association. Hypertension 2008;52:10-29.
3. Viera A, Cohen L, Mitchell C, Sloane P. Use of home blood pressure monitoring by hypertensive patients in primary care: survey of a practice-based research network cohort. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) 2008;10:280-6.
4. Tirabassi J, Fang J, Ayala C. Attitudes of primary care providers and recommendations of home blood pressure monitoring-DocStyles, 2010. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) 2013;15:224-9.
5. Fuchs SC, de Mello RG, Fuchs FC. Home blood pressure monitoring is better predictor of cardiovascular disease and target organ damage than office blood pressure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Curr Cardiol Rep 2013;15:413.
6. Bliziotis IA, Destounis A, Stergiou GS. Home versus ambulatory and office blood pressure in predicting target organ damage in hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Hypertens 2012;30: 1289-99.
7. Cappuccio F, Kerry S, Forbes L, Donald A. Blood pressure control by home monitoring: meta-analysis of randomised trials. BMJ 2004;329:145.
8. Self-measured blood pressure monitoring: comparative effectiveness. Comparative effectiveness review no. 45. AHRQ publication no. 12-EHC002-1. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2012. Available from: http://effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/index.cfm/ search-for-guides-reviews-and-reports/?productid- 941&pageaction-displayproduct. Accessed July 11, 2015.
9. McManus RJ, Mant J, Bray EP, et al. Telemonitoring and self-management in the control of hypertension (TASMINH2): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2010;376:163-72.
10. Ward AM, Takahashi O, Stevens R, Heneghan C. Home measurement of blood pressure and cardiovascular disease: systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies. J Hypertens 2012;30:449-56.
11. Uhlig K, Patel K, Ip S, Kitsios GD, Balk EM. Selfmeasured blood pressure monitoring in the management of hypertension: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Ann Intern Med 2013;159:185-94.
12. Schroeder K, Fahey T, Ebrahim S. Interventions for improving adherence to treatment in patients with high blood pressure in ambulatory settings. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004;(2):CD004804.
13. Hill MN, Miller NH, DeGeest S; American Society of Hypertension Writing Group. ASH position paper: adherence and persistence with taking medication to control high blood pressure. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) 2010;12:757-64.
14. German Hypertension Society, German Society of Hypertension and Prevention. Tested measuring instruments 2001-2014. Available from: http://www. hochdruckliga.de/messgeraete-mit-pruefsiegel.html. Accessed July 11, 2015.
15. Chobanian A, Bakris G, Black H, et al. The seventh report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure: the JNC 7 report. JAMA 2003;289: 2560-72.
16. Arrieta A, Woods J, Qiao N, Jay S. Cost-benefit analysis of home blood pressure monitoring in hypertension diagnosis and treatment: an insurer perspective. Hypertension 2014: 64:891-6.
17. Fukunaga H, Ohkubo T, Kobayashi M, et al. Costeffectiveness of the introduction of home blood pressure measurement in patients with office hypertension. J Hypertens 2008:4:685-90.
18. Soghikian K, Casper SM, Fireman BH, et al. Home blood pressure monitoring. effect on use of medical services and med care costs. Med Care 1992:30:855-65.