Get a life? the impact of the European Working Time Directive: The case of UK senior doctors

Health Economics (United Kingdom)

Volumn 24, Issue 10, 2015, Pages 1272-1288

  Dolton, Peter J ^a,b,c   Kidd, Michael P ^d   Fooken, Jonas ^e  

^a LONDON SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SUSSEX   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^d QUEENSLAND UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Australia)

^e JOINT RESEARCH CENTRE   (Italy)

Author keywords

European Working Time Directive; evaluation of active labour market policy

Indexed keywords

CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROLLED STUDY; EUROPE; HUMAN; PHYSICIAN; PHYSICIAN INCOME; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROPENSITY SCORE; UNITED KINGDOM; WORK SCHEDULE; WORKING TIME;

EID: 84941187479     PISSN: 10579230     EISSN: 10991050     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/hec.3082     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Aaronson S, Figura A,. 2010. How biased are measures of cyclical movements in productivity and hours? Review of Income and Wealth 56 (3): 539-558.
2. Ashenfelter O,. 1978. Estimating the effects of training programs on earnings. Review of Economics and Statistics 60: 47-57.
3. Baum-Snow, N, and, Neal D,. 2009. Mismeasurement of usual hours worked in the census and ACS. Economics Letters 102 (1): 39-41.
4. Becker S, Ichino A,. 2002. Estimates of average treatment effects based on propensity scores. The Stata Journal 2: 358-377.
5. Bertrand M, Duflo E, Mullainathan S,. 2004. How much should we trust differences-in-differences estimates? Quarterly Journal of Economics 119 (1): 249-75.
6. Crepon B, Kramarz F,. 2002. Employed 40 hours or not employed 39: lessons from the 1982 mandatory reduction of the workweek. Journal of Political Economy 110 (6): 1355-89.
7. Dehejia R, Wahba S,. 1999. " Propensity score matching methods for nonexperimental causal studies ", Working Paper 6829, National Bureau of Economics Research.
8. Department of Health. 2005. All staff in the NHS, 1997-2004, HMSO, London.
9. Estevao M, Sa F,. 2006. " Are the french happy with the 35 hours workweek? ", IMF Working Paper, no. 251.
10. Francesconi M, Klaauw, W, (2004). " The consequences of 'in-work' benefit reform in Britain: new evidence from panel data ", Discussion Paper No. 1248.
11. Leuven E, Sianesi B,. 2003. " PSMATCH2: Stata module to perform full mahalanobis and propensity score matching, common support graphing and covariate imbalance testing ". Available: http://ideas.repec.org/c/boc/bocode/s432001.html
12. Longmore D,. 2012. ' A witness account of the rise and fall of the NHS ', Shield Crest Aylesbury.
13. Mueser P, Troske K, Gorislavsky A,. 2003. " Using state administrative data to measure program performance ", University of Missouri-Columbia.
14. National Statistics. 2005. Labour Force Survey [Online] Available: http://www.statistics.gov.uk/about/data/guides/LabourMarket/sources/household/ LFS.asp and http://www.statistics.gov.uk/STATBASE/Source.asp?vlnk=358&More=Y
15. Pemberton M,. 2012. The Doctor Will See You Now. Hodder and Stoughton: London.
16. Reinowski E, Schultz B, Wiemers J,. 2004. " Evaluation of further training programmes with an optimal matching algorithm ", HALLE INSTITUTE FOR ECONOMIC RESEARCH (IWH).
17. Talbot-Smith A, Pollock A,. 2006. The New NHS: A Guide. Routledge: London.