Factors influencing sex differences in poststroke functional outcome

Stroke

Volumn 46, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 860-863

  Lisabeth, Lynda D ^a,b   Reeves, Mathew J ^c   Baek, Jonggyu ^b   Skolarus, Lesli E ^a   Brown, Devin L ^a   Zahuranec, Darin B ^a   Smith, Melinda A ^a   Morgenstern, Lewis B ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^c MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Outcomes research; Sex; Stroke

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BODY MASS; BRAIN ISCHEMIA; COGNITION; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL STATUS; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MARRIAGE; NURSING HOME; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; POSTSTROKE FUNCTIONAL OUTCOME; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEX DIFFERENCE; CONVALESCENCE; FOLLOW UP; ISCHEMIC ATTACK, TRANSIENT; MEDICAL RECORD; MIDDLE AGED; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; RISK FACTOR; STROKE; TEXAS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VERY ELDERLY;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; COGNITION; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; ISCHEMIC ATTACK, TRANSIENT; MALE; MEDICAL RECORDS; MIDDLE AGED; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; RISK FACTORS; SEX FACTORS; STROKE; TEXAS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84941173600     PISSN: 00392499     EISSN: 15244628     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.007985     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Reeves MJ, Bushnell CD, Howard G, Gargano JW, Duncan PW, Lynch G, et al. Sex differences in stroke: epidemiology, clinical presentation, medical care, and outcomes. Lancet Neurol. 2008;7:915-926. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422 (08) 70193-5.
2. Morgenstern LB, Smith MA, Sánchez BN, Brown DL, Zahuranec DB, Garcia N, et al. Persistent ischemic stroke disparities despite declining incidence in Mexican Americans. Ann Neurol. 2013;74:778-785. doi: 10.1002/ana.23972.
3. Williams LS, Yilmaz EY, Lopez-Yunez AM. Retrospective assessment of initial stroke severity with the NIH Stroke Scale. Stroke. 2000;31:858-862.
4. Kalichman L, Rodrigues B, Gurvich D, Israelov Z, Spivak E. Impact of patient's weight on stroke rehabilitation results. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2007;86:650-655. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e318115f41b.
5. Boden-Albala B, Litwak E, Elkind MS, Rundek T, Sacco RL. Social isolation and outcomes post stroke. Neurology. 2005;64:1888-1892. doi: 10.1212/01. WNL.0000163510.79351. AF.
6. Glass TA, Berkman LF, Hiltunen EF, Furie K, Glymour MM, Fay ME, et al. The Families In Recovery From Stroke Trial (FIRST): primary study results. Psychosom Med. 2004;66:889-897. doi: 10.1097/01. psy.0000146326.01642.ca.
7. Mant J, Carter J, Wade DT, Winner S. Family support for stroke: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2000;356:808-813. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736 (00) 02655-6.
8. Piau A, Campo E, Rumeau P, Vellas B, Nourhashémi F. Aging society and gerontechnology: a solution for an independent living? J Nutr Health Aging. 2014;18:97-112. doi: 10.1007/s12603-013-0356-5.