Preference toward future mode of delivery: How do antepartum preferences and prior delivery experience contribute?

Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine

Volumn 28, Issue 14, 2015, Pages 1673-1678

  Sparks, Teresa N ^a   Yeaton Massey, Amanda ^b   Granados, Jesus M ^c   Handler, Stephanie J ^d   Meyer, Michelle R ^c   Caughey, Aaron B ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^e OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Cesarean delivery; delivery experience; maternal preferences; vaginal delivery

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; ARTICLE; CESAREAN SECTION; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DELIVERY; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; ETHNIC DIFFERENCE; FEMALE; GESTATIONAL AGE; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MATERNAL ATTITUDE; OUTPATIENT; PARITY; PATIENT PREFERENCE; PRENATAL CARE; PRENATAL PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUERPERIUM; VAGINAL DELIVERY; FOLLOW UP; HEALTH CARE SURVEY; OBSTETRIC DELIVERY; PREGNANCY; PROCEDURES; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PSYCHOLOGY; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ADULT; CESAREAN SECTION; DELIVERY, OBSTETRIC; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HEALTH CARE SURVEYS; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; PARITY; PATIENT PREFERENCE; POSTPARTUM PERIOD; PREGNANCY; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 84941106145     PISSN: 14767058     EISSN: 14764954     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/14767058.2014.964674     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Osterman MJK, et al. Births: final Data for 2012. National Vital Statistics Reports 2013;62. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr62/nvsr62-09.pdf [last accessed 18 Feb 2014].
2. Solheim KN, Esakoff TF, Little SE, et al. The effect of cesarean delivery rates on the future incidence of placenta previa, placenta accreta, and maternal mortality. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2011;24:1341-6.
3. Fridman M, Korst LM, Chow J, et al. Trends in maternal morbidity before and during pregnancy in California. Am J Public Health 2014;104:S49-57.
4. Yang YT, Mello MM, Subramanian SV, Studdert DM. Relationship between malpractice litigation pressure and rates of cesarean section and vaginal birth after cesarean section. Med Care 2009;47:234-42.
5. Murthy K, Grobman WA, Lee TA, Holl JL. Association between rising professional liability insurance premiums and primary cesarean delivery rates. Obstet Gynecol 2007;110:1264-9.
6. Scott J (ed). NIH state-of-the-science conference: cesarean delivery on maternal request. Bethesda (MD): National Institutes of Health; 2006.
7. Bettes BA, Coleman VH, Zinberg S, et al. Cesarean delivery on maternal request: obstetrician-gynecologists' knowledge, perception, and practice patterns. Obstet Gynecol 2007;109:57-66.
8. Minkoff H, Powderly KR, Chervenak F, McCullough LB. Ethical dimensions of elective primary cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2004;103:387-92.
9. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Committee Opinion No. 559. Cesarean delivery on maternal request. Obstet Gynecol 2013;121:904-7.
10. Potter JE, Berquo E, Perpetuo IH, et al. Unwanted caesarean sections among public and private patients in Brazil: prospective study. Br Med J 2001;323:1155-8.
11. Murray SF. Relation between private health insurance and high rates of caesarean section in Chile: qualitative and quantitative study. Br Med J 2000;321:1501-5.
12. Angeja AC, Washington AE, Vargas JE, et al. Chilean women's preferences regarding mode of delivery: which do they prefer and why? BJOG 2006;113:1253-8.
13. Pang MW, Lee TS, Leung AK, et al. A longitudinal observational study of preference for elective cesarean section among nulliparous Hong Kong Chinese women. BJOG 2007;114:623-9.
14. Maharlouei N, Rezaianzadeh A, Hesami E, et al. The preference of Iranian women to have normal vaginal or cesarean deliveries. J Res Med Sci 2013;18:943-50.
15. Torloni MR, Betran AP, Montilla P, et al. Do Italian women prefer cesarean section? Results from a survey on mode of delivery preferences. BMC Pregn Childbirth 2013;13:78.
16. Yamasamit W, Chaithongwongwatthana S. Attitude and preference of Thai pregnant women towards mode of delivery. J Med Assoc Thai 2012;95:619-24.
17. Karlstrom A, Nystedt A, Johansson M, Hildingsson I. Behind the myth - few women prefer cesarean section in the absence of medical or obstetrical factors. Midwifery 2011;27:620-7.
18. Haines H, Pallant JF, Karlstrom A, Hildingsson I. Cross-cultural comparison of levels of childbirth-related fear in an Australian and Swedish sample. Midwifery 2011;27:560-7.
19. Li WY, Liabsuetrakul T, Stray-Pedersen B. Change of childbirth preference after delivery among nulliparous Chinese women and their partners. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2014;40:184-91.
20. Romero ST, Coulson CC, Galvin SL. Cesarean delivery on maternal request: a western North Carolina perspective. Matern Child Health J 2012;16:725-34.
21. Declercq ER, Sakala C, Corry MP, Applebaum S. Listening to Mothers II: report of the Second National U.S. Survey of women's childbearing experiences. J Perinat Educ 2007;16:9-14.
22. McCourt C, Weaver J, Statham H, et al. Elective cesarean section and decision making: a critical review of the literature. Birth 2007;34:65-79.
23. Hildingsson I, Radestad I, Rubertsson C, Waldenstrom U. Few women wish to be delivered by caesarean section. BJOG 2002;109:618-23.
24. Gamble JA, Creedy DK. Women's preference for a cesarean section: incidence and associated factors. Birth 2001;28:101-10.
25. Kasai KE, Nomura RM, Benute GR, et al. Women's opinions about mode of birth in Brazil: a qualitative study in a public teaching hospital. Midwifery 2010;26:319-26.
26. Behague DP, Victora CG, Barros FC. Consumer demand for cesarean sections in Brazil: informed decision making, patient choice, or social inequality? A population based birth cohort study linking ethnographic and epidemiological methods. Br Med J 2002;324:942-5.
27. Dursun P, Yanik FB, Zeyneloglu HB, et al. Why women request cesarean section without medical indication? J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2011;24:1133-7.
28. Ecker J. Elective cesarean delivery on maternal request. JAMA 2013;309:1930-6.
29. Price AM, Coates C, Symeonides C, et al. Chocolate frogs do not increase completion of parent survey: Randomised study. J Paediatr Child Health 2014. [Epub ahead of print]. doi: 10.1111/jpc.12606.
30. Baruch Y, Holtom BC. Survey response rate levels and trends in organizational research. Hum Relations 2008;61:1139-60.
31. Asch DA, Jedrziewski MK, Christakis NA. Response rates to mail surveys published in medical journals. J Clin Epidemiol 1997;50:1129-36.