The Three Domains structure of energy-climate transitions

Technological Forecasting and Social Change

Volumn 98, Issue , 2015, Pages 290-302

  Grubb, Michael ^a   Hourcade, Jean Charles ^b   Neuhoff, Karsten ^c,d  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b Centre International de Recherche sur lEnvironnement et le Developpement   (France)

^c TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN   (Germany)

^d DIW BERLIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Behavioural economics; Climate policy; Energy innovation; Energy transitions; Evolutionary economics; Sustainable development; Three Domains

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

CLIMATE POLICY; ENERGY TRANSITIONS; ENVIRONMENTAL CONSTRAINTS; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; EVOLUTIONARY ECONOMICS; INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTIONS; POLICY INSTRUMENTS; THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK;

ECONOMICS;

CLIMATE CHANGE; DECISION MAKING; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; INNOVATION; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

EID: 84941023084     PISSN: 00401625     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2015.05.009     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Allcott H., Greenstone M. Is there an energy efficiency gap?. J. Econ. Perspect. 2012, 26(1):3-28.
2. Ambec S., Cohen M.A., Elgie S., Lanoie P. The Porter hypothesis at 20: can environmental regulation enhance innovation and competitiveness?. Rev. Environ. Econ. Policy 2013, res016.
3. Arentsen M., Kemp R., Luiten E. Technological change and innovation for climate protection: the governance challenge. Global Warming and Social Innovation: The Challenge of a Climate Neutral Society 2002, 59-81.
4. Bashmakov I. Three laws of energy transitions. Energy Policy 2007, 35(7):3583-3594.
5. Brulle Robert J. Institutionalizing delay: foundation funding and the creation of US climate change counter-movement organizations. Clim. Chang. 2014, 122:681-694.
6. Chang H.J. Economics: The User's Guide 2014, Bloomsbury Publishing, USA.
7. CMA Competition and markets authority enquiry into the UK energy market Updated Issues Statement, (accessed 17 April 2015). https://assets.digital.cabinet-office.gov.uk/media/54e378a3ed915d0cf7000001/Updated_Issues_Statement.pdf.
8. Decanio S., et al. New Directions in the Economics and Integrated Assessment of Global Climate Change 2000, Pew Centre on Global Climate Change, Washington DC.
9. Edenhofer O., Lessmann K., Kemfert C., Grubb M., Köhler J. Induced technological change: exploring its implications for the economics of atmospheric stabilization: synthesis report from the innovation modeling comparison project. Energy J. 2006, 57-107.
10. Edenhofer O., Pichs-Madruga R., Sokona Y., Farahani E., Kadner S., Seyboth K., Minx J.C. Climate change 2014: Mitigation of climate change. Working group III contribution to the fifth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, UK and New York. 2014.
11. System innovation and the transition to sustainability: theory, evidence and policy 2004, Edward Elgar Publishing. B. Elzen, F.W. Geels, K. Green (Eds.).
12. EGEE Expert Group on Energy Efficiency. Realising the potential for energy efficiency: targets, policies and measures for G8 countries 2007, UN Foundation, Washington DC.
13. GEA Global Energy Assessment Report 2012, IIASA, Laxenberg Austria.
14. Geels F.W. From sectoral systems of innovation to socio-technical systems: insights about dynamics and change from sociology and institutional theory. Res. Policy 2006, 33(6):897-920.
15. Grubb M. On the distinguishing features of energy systems and innovation Submission to the Competition and Markets Authority Enquiry into the UK Energy Market, available on. https://www.gov.uk/cma-cases/energy-market-investigation#responses-to-updated-issues-statement.
16. Grubb M., Köhler J., Anderson D. Induced technical change in energy and environmental modeling: analytic approaches and policy implications. Annu. Rev. Energy Environ. 2002, 27(1):271-308.
17. Grubb M., Hourcade J.C., Neuhoff K. Planetary Economics: Energy, Climate Change and the Three Domains of Sustainable Development 2014, Routledge.
18. Hood C. Summing Up the Parts: Combining Policy Instruments for Least-cost Mitigation Strategies 2011, International Energy Agency, Paris.
19. Houghton J., Ding Y., Griggs D.J., Noguer M., van der Linden P.J., Dai X., Johnson C.A. IPCC 2001: Climate Change 2001. The Climate change Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovemmental Panel on Climate Change 2001, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
20. IEA http://www.iea.org/ieaenergy/.
21. IPCC Fourth Assessment Report-WG3 2007, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
22. Jaffe Adam B., Newell Richard G., Stavins Robert N. A tale of two market failures: technology and environmental policy. Ecol. Econ. 2005, 54(2):164-174.
23. Kahneman D. Thinking, Fast and Slow 2011, Farrar, Straus and Giroux, US.
24. Kahneman D., Tversky R. Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 1979, 47(2):263-291.
25. The Economics of Climate Change and the Change of Climate in Economics 2013, vol. 22. Routledge, (article version with same title in Energy Policy 35.10 (2007): 5181-5194). K. Maréchal (Ed.).
26. Marechal K., Lazaric N. Overcoming inertia: insights from evolutionary economics into improved energy and climate policies. Clim. Pol. 2010, 10(1):103-119.
27. Mazzucato M. The Entrepreneurial State: Debunking Public vs. Private Sector Myths 2013, Anthem Press.
28. McKinsey and Company Pathways to low carbon economy 2009, McKinsey, New York.
29. Climate Change 2007: Mitigation Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 2007, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. B. Metz, O.R. Davidson, P.R. Bosch (Eds.).
30. Murphy R., Jaccard M. Energy efficiency and the cost of GHG abatement: a comparison of bottom-up and hybrid models for the US. Energy Policy 2011, 39(11):7146-7155.
31. NERA Circularity toolkit for policy makers, report for Ellen McArthur Foundation (forthcoming). http://www.nera.com.
32. OECD Climate and carbon: aligning prices and policies. OECD Environment Policy Paper No. 1 2013, OECD, Paris.
33. Porter M., van der Linde C. Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. J. Econ. Perspect. 1995, 9(4):97-118. (Autumn).
34. Rayner Steve, Malone Elizabeth L. Human choice and Climate Change: An International Assessment 1998, Battelle Press, Columbus, OH.
35. Rickards L., Wiseman J., Kashima Y. Barriers to effective climate change mitigation: the case of senior government and business decision makers. WIREs Clim. Change 2014, 5:753-773. 10.1002/wcc.305.
36. Romer P.M. Endogenous technological change. J. Polit. Econ. 1990, S71-S102.
37. Rozenberg J., Vogt-Schilb A., Hallegatte S. Efficiency and acceptability of climate policies: race against the lock-ins. Rev. Environ. Energy Econ. 2013.
38. Simon H.A. A behavioural model of rational choice. Q. J. Econ. 1955, 69(1):99-118.
39. Simon H.A. Theories of decision-making in economics and behavioral science. Am. Econ. Rev. 1959, 253-283.
40. Solow R.M. A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth. Q. J. Econ. 1956, 70(1):65-94.
41. Staub-Kaminski I., Zimmer A., Jakob M., Marschinski R. Climate policy in practice: a typology of obstacles and implications for integrated assessment modeling. Clim. Change Econ. 2014, 05(01).
42. Stern N. Why Are We Waiting?: The Logic, Urgency, and Promise of Tackling Climate Change 2015, MIT Press.
43. Unruh G.C. Escaping carbon lock in. Energy Policy 2002, 30:317-325.
44. Vogt-Schilb Adrien, Hallegatte Stephane When Starting With the Most Expensive Option Makes Sense: Use and Misuse of Marginal Abatement Cost Curves 2011, World Bank, (https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/3567).
45. Wagner F., Amann M., Borken-Kleefeld J., Cofala J., Hoeglund-Isaksson L., Purohit P., Rafaj P., Schoepp W., Winiwarter W. Sectoral marginal abatement cost curves: implications for mitigation pledges and air pollution co-benefits for Annex I countries. Sustain. Sci. 2012, 7(2):169-184.