Persistently Biased: The Devil Shift in Water Privatization in Jakarta

Review of Policy Research

Volumn 32, Issue 5, 2015, Pages 600-621

  Leong, Ching ^a  

^a NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

Author keywords

Advocacy coalition framework; Beliefs; Institutional change; Intractable policies; Narratives; Water privatization

Indexed keywords

ADVOCACY; INSTITUTIONAL REFORM; PRIVATIZATION; SOCIAL MOVEMENT; WATER RESOURCE;

INDONESIA; JAKARTA;

EID: 84941008618     PISSN: 1541132X     EISSN: 15411338     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/ropr.12138     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Abelson, R. P. (1968). Theories of cognitive consistency; a sourcebook. Chicago: Rand McNally. Retrieved from http://archive.org/details/diechemischepra00eistgoog
2. Bakker, K. (2006). Conflicts over water supply in Jakarta. In B. Barraqué &E.Vlachos (Eds.), Urban water conflicts, an analysis on the origins and nature of water-, un rest and conflicts in the urban context. Paris, France: UNESCO Working series SC-2006/WS/19.
3. Bakker, K. (2007). The "commons" versus the "commodity": Alter-globalization, anti-privatization and the human right to water in the global south. Antipode, 39(3), 430-455.
4. Barker, D. C., &Tinnick, J. D. (2006). Competing visions of parental roles and ideological constraint. American Political Science Review, 100(2), 249-263.
5. Barry, J., &Proops, J. (1999). Seeking sustainability discourses with Q methodology. Ecological Economics, 28, 337-345.
6. Bel, G., &Warner, M. (2008). Does privatization of solid waste and water services reduce costs? A review of empirical studies. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 52(12), 1337-1348.
7. Birdsall, N., &Nellis, J. (2002). Winners and losers: Assessing the distributional impacts of privatization. Center for Global Development Working Paper No. 6. Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=999986
8. Brown, S. (1980). Political subjectivity: Applications of Q-methodology in political science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
9. Campbell, J. L., &Pedersen, O. K. (2001). The rise of neoliberalism and institutional analysis. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
10. Durning, D. (1999). The transition from traditional to postpositive policy analysis: A role for Q-methodology. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 18, 389-410.
11. Elgin, D. J., &Weible, C. M. (2013). A stakeholder analysis of Colorado climate and energy issues using policy analytical capacity and the advocacy coalition framework. Review of Policy Research, 30(1), 114-133.
12. Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
13. Finger, M., &Allouche, J. (2002). Water privatisation: Transnational corporations and the re-regulation of the water industry. London: Spon Press.
14. Fischer, F., &Forester, J. (1993). The argumentative turn in policy analysis and planning. Duke University Press.
15. Haarmeyer, D., &Coy, D. (2002). An overview of private sector participation in the global and US water and wastewater sector. In P. Seidenstat, D. Haarmeyer, &S. Hakim (Eds.), Reinventing water and wastewater systems: Global lessons for improving water management (pp. 7-27). New York: John Wiley &Sons.
16. Hall, D., Lobina, E., &de la Motte, R. (2005). Public resistance to privatisation in water and energy. Development in Practice, 15(3-4), 286-301.
17. Harris, C., Hodges, J., &Schur, M. (2003). Infrastructure projects: A review of cancelled private projects. Washington, DC: World Bank.
18. Harsono, A. (2005a). From the Thames to the Ciliwung. Online-Materialien aus dem Asienhaus Nummer 1. Essen, Germany: Asia House Germany.
19. Harsono, A. (2005b). When water and political power intersect. Retrieved from http://www.nieman.harvard.edu/reports/article/101044/When-Water-and-Political-Power-Intersect.aspx
20. Harrison, A. A. (1976). Individuals and groups: Understanding social behaviour. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing Co.
21. Hay, C. (2001). The "crisis" of Keynesianism and the rise of neoliberalism in Britain: An ideational institutionalist approach. In J. L. Campbell &O. Pedersen (Eds.), The rise of neoliberalism and institutional analysis (pp. 193-218). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
22. Hay, C. (2006). Constructivist institutionalism. In R. A. W. Rhodes, S. Binder, &B. Rockman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of political institutions (pp. 56-74). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
23. Heikkila, T., Pierce, J., Gallaher, S., Kagan, J., Crow, D., &Weible, C. (2014). Understanding a period of policy change: The case of hydraulic fracturing disclosure policy in Colorado. Review of Policy Research, 31(2), 65-87.
24. Hout, W., &Robison, R. (Eds.). (2009). Development and the politics of governance. London, UK: Routledge.
25. Iwanami, M., &Nickson, A. (2008). Assessing the regulatory model for water supply in Jakarta. Public Administration and Development, 28(4), 291-300.
26. Japan Bank for International Corporation (JBIC). (2001). Jakarta water supply distribution pipeline project. Retrieved from http://www.jbic.go.jp/english/oec/post/2001/pdf/e_project_36_all.pdf
27. Johnstone, N., &Wood, L. (2001). Private firms and public water. Realising social and environmental objectives in developing countries. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
28. Jones, M. D., &McBeth, M. K. (2010). A narrative policy framework: Clear enough to be wrong? Policy Studies Journal, 38(2), 329-353
29. Kapoor, K., &Arvirianty, A. (2014, May 18). A first for Indonesia, ethnic Chinese leader takes charge in the capital. Reuters. Jakarta. Retrieved from http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/05/18/us-indonesia-ahok-idUSBREA4H00P20140518
30. Lanti, A. (2006). A regulatory approach to the Jakarta water supply concession contracts. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 22(2), 255-276.
31. Laurie, N., &Marvin, S. (1999). Globalisation, neo-liberalism and negotiated development in the Andes: Bolivian water and the Misicuni dream. Environment and Planning, 31, 1401-1415.
32. Lejano, R. P., &Leong, C. (2012). A hermeneutic approach to explaining and understanding public controversies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(4), 793-814.
33. Lynn, L. E. Jr. (1999). A place at the table: Policy analysis, its postpositive critics, and the future of practice. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 18, 411-425.
34. Marin, P. (2009). Public-private partnerships for urban water utilities: A review of experiences in developing countries. Washington, DC: World Bank Publications.
35. Munro, G. D., Ditto, P. H., Lockhart, L. K., Fagerlin, A., Gready, M., &Peterson, E. (2002). Biased assimilation of sociopolitical arguments: Evaluating the 1996 U.S. presidential debate. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 24(1), 15-26. doi:10.1207/S15324834BASP2401_2
36. PAM Jaya and PAM Lyonnaise Jaya (PALYJA). (2001). Cooperation Agreement Amended and Restated (RCA) as of 22 October 2001 Concerning Clean Water Supply and Service Improvement for the Western Part of Jakarta (Main contract). Jakarta: PAM Jaya and PT PAM Lyonnaise JAYA.
37. PAM Jaya and PAM Lyonnaise Jaya (PALYJA). (2005). Brief on Palyja. Unpublished.
38. PAM Jaya and Thames PAM Jaya (TPJ). (2001). Cooperation Agreement Amended and Restated (RCA) as of 22 October 2001 Concerning Clean Water Supply and Service Improvement for the Eastern Part of Jakarta (Main contract). Jakarta: PAM Jaya and PT PAM Lyonnaise JAYA.
39. Pelletier, D., Kraak, V., McCullum, C., Uusitalo, U., &Rich, R. (1999). The shaping of collective values through deliberative democracy: An empirical study from New York's North Country. Policy Sciences, 32, 103-131.
40. Perard, E. (2012). Private sector participation in water infrastructure: Review of the last 20 years and the way forward. Washington, DC: World Bank.
41. Platts' Global Water Report. (2002). Jakarta: Test bed for public private partnership. Issue 146: pp. 1-3.
42. Prasad, N. (2006). Privatisation results: Private sector participation in water services after 15 years. Development Policy Review, 24(6), 669-692.
43. Quattrone, G. A., &Tversky, A. (1988). Contrasting rational and psychological analyses of political choice. American Political Science Review, 82(3), 719-736. doi:10.2307/1962487
44. Sabatier, P. A. (1988). An advocacy coalition framework of policy change and the role of policy-oriented learning therein. Policy Sciences, 21(2-3), 129-168. doi:10.1007/BF00136406
45. Sabatier, P. A. (2007). Theories of the policy process. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
46. Sabatier, P., Hunter, S., &McLaughlin, S. (1987). The devil shift: Perceptions and misperceptions of opponents. The Western Political Quarterly, 40(3), 449. doi:10.2307/448385
47. Sabatier, P., &Weible, C. (2007). The advocacy coalition framework: Innovation and clarifications. In P. Sabatier (Ed.), Theories of the policy process (2nd ed.). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
48. Schlager, E. (1995). Policy making and collective action: Defining coalitions within the advocacy coalition framework. Policy Sciences, 28(3), 243-270. doi:10.1007/BF01000289
49. Schmidt, V. A. (2002). Does discourse matter in the politics of welfare state adjustment? Comparative Political Studies, 35(2), 168-193. doi:10.1177/0010414002035002002
50. Schmidt, V. A. (2006). Democracy in Europe: The EU and national polities. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
51. Schmidt, V. A. (2008). Discursive institutionalism: The explanatory power of ideas and discourse. Annual Review of Political Science, 11(1), 303-326. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.060606.135342
52. Spronk, S. (2007). Roots of resistance to urban water privatization in Bolivia: The "new working class, "the crisis of neoliberalism, and public services. International Labor and Working-Class History, 71(1), 8-28.
53. Steelman, T. A., &Maguire, L. A. (1999). Understanding participant perspectives: Q-methodology in national forest management. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 18(3), 361-388. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1520-6688(199922)18:3<361::AID-PAM3>3.0.CO;2-K
54. Stone, D. (2001). Policy paradox: The art of political decision making (3rd ed.). New York: W. W. Norton &Company.
55. 2O: The contested terrain of water privatization. Capitalism Nature Socialism, 16(1), 81-98.
56. Thompson, M., Ellis, R., &Wildavsky, A. (1990) Cultural theory. Political cultures. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
57. Tutuko, K. (2001). Jakarta water supply. Sustainable Urban Services, Hong Kong Seminar, Hong Kong: Pam Jaya.
58. van Eeten, M. (2001). Recasting intractable policy issues: The wider implications of the Netherlands civil aviation controversy. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 20, 391-414.
59. Vaswani, K. (2014, July 22). What does Jokowi win mean for Indonesia? BBC News. Jakarta. Retrieved from http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-28397552
60. Wardhani, D. A., &Elyda, C. (2015, January 24). PAM Jaya to acquire Palyja shares. Retrieved from http://m.thejakartapost.com/news/2015/01/24/pam-jaya-acquire-palyja-shares.html
61. Weible, C. M., Sabatier, P. A., &McQueen, K. (2009). Themes and variations: Taking stock of the advocacy coalition framework. Policy Studies Journal, 37(1), 121-140. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.2008.00299.x
62. Wicklund, R. A., &Brehm, J. W. (1976). Perspectives on cognitive dissonance. Hillsdale, NJ: Psychology Press.
63. World Bank. (1997). The private sector in infrastructure: Strategy, regulation and risk. Washington, DC: Author.
64. World Business Council for Sustainable Development and the International Council of Forest and Paper Associations. (2005). Joint position paper to inform the Europe and North Asia (ENA) Forest Law Enforcement and Governance (FLEG) Ministerial Process. Retrieved from http://environment.yale.edu/tfd/uploads/WBCSD_ICFPA_position_paper.pdf