C-TOC (Cognitive Testing on Computer)

Alzheimer Disease and Associated Disorders

Volumn 29, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 213-221

  Jacova, Claudia ^a   McGrenere, Joanna ^a   Lee, Hyunsoo S ^a   Wang, William W ^a   Le Huray, Sarah ^a   Corenblith, Emily F ^a   Brehmer, Matthew ^a   Tang, Charlotte ^b   Hayden, Sherri ^a   Beattie, B Lynn ^a   Hsiung, Ging Yuek R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN FLINT   (United States)

Author keywords

Alzheimer disease; computerized cognitive testing; interface design; mild cognitive impairment; neuropsychological testing; normal cognitive aging; usability

Indexed keywords

AGED; ALZHEIMER DISEASE; APHASIA; ARTICLE; BOSTON NAMING TEST; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COGNITION; COGNITIVE TESTING ON COMPUTER; CONSULTATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEMENTIA; DEMENTIA ASSESSMENT; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; EPISODIC MEMORY; EXECUTIVE FUNCTION; EXECUTIVE FUNCTION TEST; FACE VALIDITY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MALE; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGRAM ACCEPTABILITY; REASSURANCE; SATISFACTION; TASK PERFORMANCE; TOKEN TEST; VALIDATION STUDY; VISUAL MEMORY; WECHSLER ADULT INTELLIGENCE SCALE; WORD RECOGNITION; AGING; COGNITION DISORDERS; EARLY DIAGNOSIS; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; VERY ELDERLY;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AGING; COGNITION; COGNITION DISORDERS; DEMENTIA; EARLY DIAGNOSIS; EXECUTIVE FUNCTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS;

EID: 84940992907     PISSN: 08930341     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/WAD.0000000000000055     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Alzheimer Society of Canda. Rising Tide: The Impact of Dementia on Canadian Society [online]. Available at: http://www. alzheimer. ca/english/newsevents/rising-tide. htm. Accessed June 24, 2013.
2. World Health Organization and Alzheimer's Disease International. Dementia: A Public Health Priority. Mental Health Publications [serial online] 2012. Available at: http://www. who. int/mental-health/publications/dementia-report-2012/en/. Accessed June 24, 2013.
3. Petersen RC, Smith GE, Waring SC, et al. Mild cognitive impairment: clinical characterization and outcome. Arch Neurol. 1999;56:303-308.
4. Graham JE, Rockwood K, Beattie BL, et al. Prevalence and severity of cognitive impairment with and without dementia in an elderly population. Lancet. 1997;349:1793-1796.
5. Jacova C, Kertesz A, Blair M, et al. Neuropsychological testing and assessment for dementia. Alzheimer Dement. 2007;3:299-317.
6. Folstein MF, Folstein S, McHugh PR. Mini-mental state: A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975;12:189-198.
7. Nasreddine ZS, Phillips NA, Bedirian V, et al. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: A brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. J AmGeriatr Soc. 2005;53:695-699.
8. Stuss DT, Meiran N, Guzman DA, et al. Do long tests yield a more accurate diagnosis of dementia than short tests? A comparison of 5 neuropsychological tests. Arch Neurol. 1996;53:1033-1039.
9. Sano M. Neuropsychological testing in the diagnosis of dementia. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol. 2006;19:155-159.
10. Chui H, Zhang Q. Evaluation of dementia: A systematic study of the usefulness of the American Academy of Neurology's practice parameters. Neurology. 1997;49:925-935.
11. Bauer RM, Iverson GL, Cernich AN, et al. Computerized neuropsychological assessment devices: joint position paper of the American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology and the National Academy of Neuropsychology. Clin Neuropsychol. 2012;26:177-196.
12. Egerhazi A, Berecz R, Bartok E, et al. Automated Neuro-psychological Test Battery (CANTAB) in mild cognitive impairment and in Alzheimer's disease. Prog Neuropsycho-pharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2007;31:746-751.
13. Dwolatzky T, Whitehead V, Doniger GM, et al. Validity of a novel computerized cognitive battery for mild cognitive impairment. BMCGeriatr. 2003;3:4-16.
14. Saxton J, Morrow L, Eschman A, et al. Computer assessment of mild cognitive impairment. Postgrad Med. 2009;121: 177-185.
15. Tornatore JB, Hill E, Laboff JA, et al. Self-administered screening for mild cognitive impairment: initial validation of a computerized test battery. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2005;17:98-105.
16. Gualtieri CT, Johnson LG. Neurocognitive testing supports a broader concept of mild cognitive impairment. Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen. 2005;20:359-366.
17. Gualtieri CT, Johnson LG. Reliability and validity of a computerized neurocognitive test battery, CNS vital signs. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2006;21:623-643.
18. Darby D, Maruff P, Collie A, et al. Mild cognitive impairment can be detected by multiple assessments in a single day. Neurology. 2002;59:1042-1046.
19. Wild K, Howieson D, Webbe F, et al. Status of computerized cognitive testing in aging: A systematic review. Alzheimers Dement. 2008;4:428-437.
20. Tierney MC, Lermer MA. Computerized cognitive assessment in primary care to identify patients with suspected cognitive impairment. J Alzheimers Dis. 2010;20:823-832.
21. Schlegel RE, Gilliland K. Development and quality assurance of computer-based assessment batteries. Arch Clin Neuro-psychol. 2007;22(suppl 1):S49-S61.
22. Preece J, Rogers Y, Sharp H. Interaction Design. 1st ed. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons; 2002.
23. Moscovitch M, Umilta C. Modularity and neuropsychology: modules and central processes in attention and memory. In: Schwartz MF, ed. Modular Deficits in Alzheimer-type Dementia. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1990:1-59.
24. Fabrigoule C, Rouch I, Taberly A, et al. Cognitive process in preclinical phase of dementia. Brain. 1998;121:135-141.
25. Andel R, Gatz M, Pedersen NL, et al. Deficits in controlled processing may predict dementia: A twin study. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2001;56:P347-P355.
26. Dumas JS. User-based evaluations. In: Jacko JA, Sears A, eds. The Human-Computer Interaction Book. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2003:1093-1117.
27. Chui T, Tran K, Maheux H. Canada's Ethnocultural Mosaic, 2006 Census: Statistics Canada, 2008.
28. Storey JE, Rowland JT, Basic D, et al. The Rowland Universal Dementia Assessment Scale (RUDAS): A multicultural cognitive assessment scale. Int Psychogeriatr. 2004;16:13-31.
29. Jacova C, Peters KR, Beattie BL, et al. Cognitive impairment no dementia-neuropsychological and neuroimaging characterization of an amnestic subgroup. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2008;25:238-247.
30. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders IV Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Assocation; 2000.
31. McKhann G, Drachman DA, Folstein M, et al. Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease-report of the the NINCDS-ADRDA Work Group under the auspices of Department of Health and Human Services Task Force on Alzheimer's disease. Neurology. 1984;34:939-944.
32. Neary D, Snowden JS, Gustafson L, et al. Frontotemporal lobar degeneration: A consensus on clinical diagnostic criteria. Neurology. 1999;51:1546-1554.
33. Brehmer MM, McGrenere M, Tang C, et al. Investigating interruptions in the context of computerized cognitive testing of older adults. In: Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI) 2012. Austin, TX: ACM Press; 2012:2649-2658.
34. Zickuhr K. Generations 2010 [online]. Available at: http:// www. pewinternet. org/2010/12/16/generations-2010/. Accessed June 24, 2013.