Competition with wind-pollinated plant species alters floral traits of insect-pollinated plant species

Scientific Reports

Volumn 5, Issue , 2015, Pages

  Flacher, Floriane ^a   Raynaud, Xavier ^a   Hansart, Amandine ^b   Motard, Eric ^c   Dajoz, Isabelle ^c  

^a SORBONNE UNIVERSITÉ   (France)

^b CNRS   (France)

^c UNIVERSITÉ PARIS DESCARTES   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANATOMY AND HISTOLOGY; ANIMAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPETITIVE BEHAVIOR; FLOWER; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; INSECT; PHYSIOLOGY; POLLINATION; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; WIND;

ANIMALS; COMPETITIVE BEHAVIOR; FLOWERS; INSECTS; POLLINATION; SPECIES SPECIFICITY; WIND;

EID: 84940987081     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20452322     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/srep13345     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Xia, J., & Wan, S. Global response patterns of terrestrial plant species to nitrogen addition. New Phytol. 179, 428-439 (2008
2. Meekins, J. F., & McCarthy, B. C. Responses of the biennial forest herb Alliaria petiolata to variation in population density, nutrient addition and light availability. J. Ecol. 88, 447-463 (2000
3. Burkle, L. A., & Irwin, R. E. The effects of nutrient addition on floral characters and pollination in two subalpine plants, Ipomopsis aggregata and Linum lewisii. Plant Ecol. 203, 83-98 (2009
4. Müller, I., Schmid, B., & Weiner, J. The effect of nutrient availability on biomass allocation patterns in 27 species of herbaceous plants. Perspect. Plant Ecol. Evol. Syst. 3, 115-127 (2000
5. Havens, K., Preston, K. A., Richardson, C., & Delph, L. F. Nutrients affect allocation to male and female function in Abutilon theophrasti (Malvaceae). Am. J. Bot. 82, 726-733 (1995
6. Muñoz, A. A., Celedon-Neghme, C., Cavieres, L. A., & Arroyo, M. T. K. Bottom-up effects of nutrient availability on flower production, pollinator visitation, and seed output in a high-Andean shrub. Oecologia 143, 126-35 (2005
7. Burkle, L. A., & Irwin, R. E. Beyond biomass: measuring the effects of community-level nitrogen enrichment on floral traits, pollinator visitation and plant reproduction. J. Ecol. 98, 705-717 (2010
8. Soper-Gorden, N. L., & Adler, L. S. Abiotic conditions affect floral antagonists and mutualists of Impatiens capensis (Balsaminaceae). Am. J. Bot. 100, 679-689 (2013
9. Lau, T.-C., & Stephenson, A. G. Effect of soil nitrogen on pollen production, pollen grain size and pollen performance in Cucurbita pepo (Cucurbitaceae). Am. J. Bot. 80, 763-768 (1993
10. Xiong, S., & Nilsson, C. The effects of plant litter on vegetation: a meta-Analysis. J. Ecol. 87, 984-994 (1999
11. Baude, M., et al. Litter inputs and plant interactions affect nectar sugar content. J. Ecol. 99, 828-837 (2011
12. Petanidou, T., Goethals, V., & Smets, E. The effect of nutrient and water availability on nectar secretion and nectary structure of the dominant Labiatae species of phrygana. Syst. Geogr. Plants 68, 233-244 (1999
13. Schenk, H. J. Root competition: beyond resource depletion. J. Ecol. 94, 725-739 (2006
14. Nötzold, R., Blossey, B., & Newton, E. The influence of below ground herbivory and plant competition on growth and biomass allocation of purple loosestrife. Oecologia 113, 82-93 (1997
15. Partzsch, M., & Bachmann, U. Is Campanula glomerata threatened by competition from expanding grasses? Results from a 5-year pot-experiment. Plant Ecol. 212, 251-261 (2011
16. Weiner, J. The influence of competition on plant reproduction in Plant reproductive ecology: patterns and strategies (eds Lovett-Doust J., & Lovett-Doust L.) Ch.11, 228-245 (Oxford university press, 1988
17. Dafni, A. in Pollination ecology: a practical approach (eds Rickwood D., & Hames B. D.) (Oxford university press, 1992
18. Proctor, M., Yeo, P., & Lack, A. in The natural history of pollination. (eds Timber press) (Timber press, 1996
19. Lázaro, A., Hegland, S. J., & Totland, O. The relationships between floral traits and specificity of pollination systems in three Scandinavian plant communities. Oecologia 157, 249-57 (2008
20. Mitchell, R. J., Karron, J. D., Holmquist, K. G., & Bell, J. M. The influence of Mimulus ringens floral display size on pollinator visitation patterns. Funct. Ecol. 18, 116-124 (2004
21. Martin, N. H. Flower size preferences of the honeybee (Apis mellifera ) foraging on Mimulus guttatus (Scrophulariaceae). Evol. Ecol. 6, 777-782 (2004
22. Conner, J. K., & Rush, S. The effect of flower size and number on pollinator visitation to wild radish, Raphanus raphanistrum. Oecologia 105, 509-516 (1996
23. Stang, M., Klinkhamer, P. G. L., & Van der Meijden, E. Size constraints and flower abundance determine the number of interactions in a plant flower visitor web. Oikos 112, 111-121 (2006
24. Cartar, R. V. Resource tracking by Bumble Bees: responses to plant-level differences in quality. Ecology 85, 2764-2771 (2004
25. Cnaani, J., Thomson, J. D., & Papajà, D. R. Flower choice and learning in foraging Bumblebees: effects of variation in nectar volume and concentration. Ethology 112, 278-285 (2006
26. Cardoza, Y. J., Harris, G. K., & Grozinger, C. M. Effects of soil quality enhancement on pollinator-plant interactions. Psyche a J. Entomol. 2012, (2012
27. Partzsch, M., Piesch, C., & Hensen, I. A comparative study of germination biology and plant performance in two dry grassland species. Folia Geobot. 46, 35-48 (2011
28. Weigelt, A., & Jolliffe, P. Indices of plant competition. J. Ecol. 91, 707-720 (2003
29. Gurevitch, J., Scheiner, S. M., & Fox, G. A. Competition and other interactions among plants in The ecology of plants 2nd edn, Vol.1 (eds Sinauer, A.D.) Ch.10, 226-256 (Sinauer Associates, 2006
30. Cahill, J. F. Lack of relationship between below-ground competition and allocation to roots in 10 grassland species. J. Ecol. 91, 532-540 (2003
31. Raynaud, X., & Leadley, P. W. Soil characteristics play a key role in modeling nutrient competition in plant communities. Ecology 85, 2200-2214 (2004
32. Rajaniemi, T. K. Evidence for size asymmetry of belowground competition. Basic Appl. Ecol. 4, 239-247 (2003
33. Callaway, R. M. Positive interactions among plants. Bot. Rev. 61, 306-349 (1995
34. Gurevitch, J., Scheiner, S. M., & Fox, G. A. Soils, mineral nutrition, and belowground interactions in The ecology of plants 2nd edn, Vol.1 (eds Sinauer, A.D.) Ch.4, 71-97 (Sinauer Associates, 2006
35. Pitelka, L. F. Energy allocations in annual and perennial Lupines (lupinus: Leguminosae). Ecology 58, 1055-1065 (1977
36. Trinder, C., Brooker, R., Davidson, H., & Robinson, D. Dynamic trajectories of growth and nitrogen capture by competing plants. New Phytol. 193, 948-958 (2012
37. Pyke, G. H. What does it cost a plant to produce floral nectar? Nature 350, 58-59 (1991
38. Southwick, E. E. Photosynthate allocation to floral nectar: a neglected energy investment. Ecology 65, 1775-1779 (1984
39. Snow, A. A., & Whigham, D. F. Costs of flower and fruit production in Tipularia discolor (Orchidaceae). Ecology 70, 1286-1293 (1989
40. Wurst, S., & van Beersum, S. The impact of soil organism composition and activated carbon on grass-legume competition. Plant Soil 314, 1-9 (2009
41. Kaschuk, G., Kuyper, T. W., Leffelaar, P. A., Hungria, M., & Giller, K. E. Are the rates of photosynthesis stimulated by the carbon sink strength of rhizobial and arbuscular mycorrhizal symbioses? Soil Biol. Biochem. 41, 1233-1244 (2009
42. De Pascual-Teresa, S., & Sanchez-Ballesta, M. T. Anthocyanins: from plant to health. Phytochem. Rev. 7, 281-299 (2008
43. Gardener, M. C., & Gillman, M. P. The effects of soil fertilizer on amino acids in the floral nectar of corncockle, Agrostemma githago (Caryophyllaceae). Oikos 92, 101-106 (2001
44. Kiaer, L. P., Weisbach, A. N., & Weiner, J. Root and shoot competition: a meta-Analysis. J. Ecol. 101, 1298-1312 (2013
45. Hegland, S. J., & Totland, Ø. Relationships between species' floral traits and pollinator visitation in a temperate grassland. Oecologia 145, 586-94 (2005
46. Goulson, D., Stout, J. C., Hawson, S. A., & Allen, J. A. Floral display size in comfrey, Symphytum officinale L. (Boraginaceae): Relationships with visitation by three bumblebee species and subsequent seed set. Oecologia 113, 502-508 (1998
47. Leiss, K. A., & Klinkhamer, P. G. L. Spatial distribution of nectar production in a natural Echium vulgare population: Implications for pollinator behaviour. Basic Appl. Ecol. 6, 317-324 (2005
48. Snow, A. A. Pollination intensity and potential seed set in Passiflora vitifolia. Oecologia 55, 231-237 (1982
49. Gange, A. C., & Smith, A. K. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi influence visitation rates of pollinating insects. Ecol. Entomol. 30, 600-606 (2005
50. Barber, N. A., & Soper Gorden, N.L. How do belowground organisms influence plant-pollinator interctions? J. Plant Ecol. 8, 1-11 (2015
51. Hill, M., Mountford, J., Roy, D., & Bunce, R. Ellenberg's indicator values for British plants (volume 2a) In Technical Annex to ECOFACT Research report series, Vol. 2. (Institute of Terrestrial Ecology, 1999
52. Southwick, A. K., & Southwick, E. E. Aging effect on nectar production in two clones of Asclepias syriaca. Oecologia 56, 121-125 (1983
53. R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. (2014). Available at: http://www.R-project.org/. (Accessed: 27th march 2015
54. Pinheiro, J., Bates, D., DebRoy, S., Sarkar, D., & R Core Team. nlme: Linear and Nonlinear Mixed Effects Models R package version 3.1-117 (2014). Available at: http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=nlme. (Accessed: 27th march 2015
55. Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. R package version 1.1-6 (2014). Available at: http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lme4. (Accessed: 27th march 2015
56. Aickin, M., & Gensler, H. Adjusting for multiple testing when reporting research results: The Bonferroni vs Holm methods. Am. J. Public Health 86, 726-728 (1996
57. Hothorn, T., Bretz, F., & Westfall, P. Simultaneous Inference in General Parametric Models. Biometrical J. 50, 346-363 (2008