The enforcement of awards set aside in the country of origin

ICSID Review

Volumn 14, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 16-45

  Gaillard, Emmanuel ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PARIS EST CRÉTEIL   (France)

^b Shearman and Sterling LLP   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84940920032     PISSN: 02583690     EISSN: 20491999     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/icsidreview/14.1.16     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. International Arbitration: Liber Amicorum for Martin Domke 157 (P. Sanders, ed. 1967)
2. E. Gaillard, Thirty Years of Lex Mercatoria: Towards the Selective Application of Transnational Rules, 10 ICSID Rev.-FILJ 208 (1995)
3. B. Goldman, 1985 Rev. Arb. 430
4. J. Robert, D. Thompson, 1 J. lnt'l Arb. 67 (1985)
5. A.J. van de Berg, The New York Arbitration Convention of 1988 (1981), at 89
6. E. Gaillard, 1994 Journal du Droit International 701
7. C. Jarrosson, 1994 Rev. Arb. 377
8. B. Oppetit, 1994 RTD COM. 702
9. E. Gaillard, 1997 Journal du Droit International 1 033
10. P. Fouchard, 1997 Rev. Arb. 376
11. P. Fouchard, La pom!e internationale de l'annulation de Ia sentence arbitrale dans le pays d'origine, 1997 Rev. Arb. 329
12. D. W Rivkin, The Enforcement of Awards Nullified in the Country of Origin: The American Experience, Report presented to the ICCA Congress in Paris, May 1998. 25
13. C. Jarrosson, Note, 1995 Rev. Arb. 639
14. B. Laurent and N. Meyer Fabre, 1995 Bull. ASA 118
15. E. Gaillard, 1997 Journal du Droit International 1 033
16. P. Fouchard, 1997 Rev. Arb. 376
17. Fouchard, Gaillard, Goldman On International Commercial Arbitration (E. Gaillard, J. Savage, eds.) (1999)
18. B. Leurent, Reflexions sur l'efficacite internationale des sentences arbitrales, Trav. co. fr. DIP, 1994-95, Pedone 1996, p. 181
19. B. Goldman, Une bataille judiciaire autour de Ia lex mercatoria: I' affaire Norsolor, 1983 Rev. Arb. 379
20. P. Fouchard, La portee internationale de I' annulation de Ia sentence arbitrale dans son pays d' origine, 1997 Rev. Arb. 329
21. P. Kahn, Polish Ocean Line, 1993 Journal du Droit International 360
22. E. Gaillard, Note, 1994 Journal du Droit International 701
23. J-F. Poudret, QueUe solution pour en finir avec !'affaire Hilmarton? Reponse a Philippe Fouchard, 1998 Rev. Arb., No. 1
24. H. Gharavi, Chroma/loy: Another View, 12 Mealey's Inr'l. Arb. Rep. 21 (Jan. 1997)
25. H. Gharavi, The Legal Inconsistencies of Chromalloy, 12 Mealey's lnt'l. Arb. Rep. 21 (May 1997)
26. E. Schwartz, A Comment on Chromalloy-Hilmarton, a l'americaine, 14 J. lnt'l Arb. 125 (June 1997)
27. Paulsson, Rediscovering the N.Y. Convention: Further Reflections on Chroma/loy, 12 Mealey's lnr'l. Arb. Rep. 20 (Apr. 1997)
28. J. Paulsson, Enforcing Arbitral Awards Notwithstanding a Local Standard Annulment, 1 ICC Bull. 14 (1998)
29. G. Sampliner, Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards After Annulment in their Country of Origin, 11 Mealey's lnt'l. Arb. Rep. 22 (Sept. 1996)
30. E. Gaillard, Enforcement of a Nullified Foreign Award, N.Y.L.J., Oct. 2, 1997
31. Paulsson, May or Must Under the New York Convention: An Exercise in Syntax and Linguistics, 2 Arb. lnt'l 1998
32. A. Samuel, Jurisdictional Problems in International Commercial Arbitration: A Study of Belgian, Dutch, English, French, Swedish, Swiss, US and West German Law 293 (1989)
33. H. Holtzman, A Task for the 21st Century: Creating a New International Court for Resolving Disputes on the Enforceability of Awards, in The Internalization of International Arbitration (1995)