Maternal effects on tree phenotypes: Considering the microbiome

Trends in Plant Science

Volumn 20, Issue 9, 2015, Pages 541-544

  Vivas, Maria ^a   Kemler, Martin ^a   Slippers, Bernard ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PRETORIA   (South Africa)

Author keywords

Endophytes; Epigenetic; Maternal environment; Microbiome

Indexed keywords

ENDOPHYTE; FUNGUS; GENETICS; MICROBIOLOGY; MICROFLORA; PHENOTYPE; PHYSIOLOGICAL STRESS; PHYSIOLOGY; PLANT BREEDING; TREE;

ENDOPHYTES; FUNGI; MICROBIOTA; PHENOTYPE; PLANT BREEDING; STRESS, PHYSIOLOGICAL; TREES;

EID: 84940900670     PISSN: 13601385     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tplants.2015.06.002     Document Type: Review

References (51)

1. Germain R.M., Gilbert B. Hidden responses to environmental variation: maternal effects reveal species niche dimensions. Ecol. Lett. 2014, 17:662-669.
2. Burgess S.C., Marshall D.J. Adaptive parental effects: the importance of estimating environmental predictability and offspring fitness appropriately. Oikos 2014, 123:769-776.
3. Rix K., et al. Paternal and maternal effects on the response of seed germination to high temperatures in Eucalyptus globulus. Ann. For. Sci. 2012, 69:673-679.
4. Roach D.A., Wulff R.D. Maternal effects in plants. Ann. Rev. Eco. Syst. 1987, 18:209-235.
5. Zilber-Rosenberg I., Rosenberg E. Role of microorganisms in the evolution of animals and plants: the hologenome theory of evolution. FEMS Microb. Rev. 2008, 32:723-735.
6. Peñuelas J., Terradas J. The foliar microbiome. Trends Plant Sci. 2014, 19:278-280.
7. Donohue K. Completing the cycle: maternal effects as the missing link in plant life histories. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 2009, 364:1059-1074.
8. Holeski L.M., et al. Transgenerational defense induction and epigenetic inheritance in plants. Trends Eco. Evol. 2012, 27:618-626.
9. Lopez G.A., et al. Maternal and carryover effects on early growth of Eucalyptus globulus. Can. J. For. Res. 2003, 33:2108-2115.
10. Elwell A.L., et al. Separating parental environment from seed size effects on next generation growth and development in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Environ. 2011, 34:291-301.
11. Whittle C.A., et al. Adaptive epigenetic memory of ancestral temperature regime in Arabidopsis thaliana. Botany 2009, 87:650-657.
12. Rasmann S., et al. Herbivory in the previous generation primes plants for enhanced insect resistance. Plant Physiol. 2012, 158:854-863.
13. Boyko A., Kovalchuk I. Genome instability and epigenetic modification - heritable responses to environmental stress?. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2011, 14:260-266.
14. Herman J.J., Sultan S.E. Adaptive transgenerational plasticity in plants: case studies, mechanisms, and implications for natural populations. Front. Plant Sci. 2011, 2:1-10.
15. Borgman E.M., et al. Using among-year variation to assess maternal effects in Pinus aristata and Pinus flexilis. Botany 2014, 92:805-814.
16. Herman J.J., et al. Adaptive transgenerational plasticity in an annual plant: grandparental and parental drought stress enhance performance of seedlings in dry soil. Integr. Comp. Biol. 2012, 52:77-88.
17. Thor G., et al. Lichen diversity and red-listed lichen species relationships with tree species and diameter in wooded meadows. Biodivers. Conserv. 2010, 19:2307-2328.
18. Porazinska D.L., et al. Ecometagenetics confirm high tropical rainforest nematode diversity. Mol. Ecol. 2010, 19:5521-5530.
19. Roossinck M.J., et al. Ecogenomics: using massively parallel pyrosequencing to understand virus ecology. Mol. Ecol. 2010, 19:81-88.
20. Verma V.C., Gange A.C. Advances in Endophytic Research 2014, Springer.
21. Vorholt J.A. Microbial life in the phyllosphere. Nat. Rev. Micro. 2012, 10:828-840.
22. Mycorrhizal Symbiosis 2008, Academic Press. 3rd edn. S. Smith, D. Read (Eds.).
23. Andrews J.H., Harris R.F. The ecology and biogeography of microorganisms on plant surfaces. Ann. Rev. Phytopathol. 2000, 38:145-180.
24. Ganley R.J., Newcombe G. Fungal endophytes in seeds and needles of Pinus monticola. Mycol. Res. 2006, 110:318-327.
25. Kauhanen M., et al. Endophytic fungi in Siberian larch (Larix sibirica) needles. For. Pathol. 2006, 36:434-446.
26. Stefani F.O.P., Bérubé J.A. Biodiversity of foliar fungal endophytes in white spruce (Picea glauca) from southern Québec. Can. J. Bot. 2006, 84:777-790.
27. Rodriguez R.J., et al. Fungal endophytes: diversity and functional roles. New Phytol. 2009, 182:314-330.
28. Rodriguez R.J., et al. Stress tolerance in plants via habitat-adapted symbiosis. ISME J. 2008, 2:404-416.
29. García E., et al. The endophytic mycobiota of Arabidopsis thaliana. Fungal Divers. 2013, 60:71-89.
30. Horton M.W., et al. Genome-wide association study of Arabidopsis thaliana leaf microbial community. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5:5320.
31. Ganley R. Density and Diversity of Fungal Endophytes Isolated from Needles of Pinus radiata 2008, SCION.
32. Martín J., et al. Resistance to Dutch Elm disease reduces presence of xylem endophytic fungi in elms (Ulmus spp.). PLoS ONE 2013, 8:e56987.
33. Ďurkovič J., et al. Host responses and metabolic profiles of wood components in Dutch elm hybrids with a contrasting tolerance to Dutch elm disease. Ann. Bot. 2014, 114:47-59.
34. Clay K. Effects of fungal endophytes on the seed and seedling biology of Lolium perenne and Festuca arundinacea. Oecologia 1987, 73:358-362.
35. Novas M.V., et al. Comparative study of growth parameters on diaspores and seedlings between populations of Bromus setifolius from Patagonia, differing in Neotyphodium endophyte infection. FLORA 2003, 198:421-426.
36. Davitt A.J., et al. Understanding context-dependency in plant-microbe symbiosis: the influence of abiotic and biotic contexts on host fitness and the rate of symbiont transmission. Env. Exp. Bot. 2011, 71:137-145.
37. Peng Q., et al. Effects of seed hydropriming on growth of Festuca sinensis infected with Neotyphodium endophyte. Fungal Ecol. 2013, 6:83-91.
38. Hamilton C., Faeth S. Asexual Neotyphodium endophytes in Arizona fescue: a test of the seed germination and pathogen resistance hypothesis. Symbiosis 2005, 38:69-85.
39. Hodgson S., et al. Vertical transmission of fungal endophytes is widespread in forbs. Ecol. Evol. 2014, 4:1199-1208.
40. Stanley M., et al. Mycorrhizal symbiosis increases growth, reproduction and recruitment of Abutilon theophrasti Medic. in the field. Oecologia 1993, 94:30-35.
41. Varga S., et al. Transgenerational effects of plant sex and arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis. New Phytol. 2013, 199:812-821.
42. Nuortila C., et al. Mycorrhizal symbiosis has contrasting effects on fitness components in Campanula rotundifolia. New Phytol. 2004, 164:543-553.
43. Zhou C., et al. HISTONE DEACETYLASE19 is involved in jasmonic acid and ethylene signaling of pathogen response in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2005, 17:1196-1204.
44. Jeon J., et al. Histone acetylation in fungal pathogens of plants. Plant Pathol. J. 2014, 30:1-9.
45. Nonogaki H. Seed dormancy and germination - emerging mechanisms and new hypotheses. Front. Plant Sci. 2014, 5:233.
46. Creelman R.A., Mullet J.E. Jamonic acid distribution and action in plants: regulation during development and response to biotic and abiotic stress. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1995, 92:4114-4119.
47. Matilla A.J. Ethylene in seed formation and germination. Seed Sci. Res. 2000, 10:111-126.
48. Knief C., et al. Metaproteogenomic analysis of microbial communities in the phyllosphere and rhizosphere of rice. ISME J. 2012, 6:1378-1390.
49. Molina L.G., et al. Metatranscriptomic analysis of small RNAs present in soybean deep sequencing libraries. Genet. Mol. Biol. 2012, 35:292-303.
50. Bodenhausen N., et al. A synthetic community approach reveals plant genotypes affecting the phyllosphere microbiota. PLoS Genet. 2014, 10:e1004283.
51. Busby P.E., et al. Differentiating genetic and environmental drivers of plant-pathogen community interactions. J. Ecol. 2014, 102:1300-1309.