Accuracy of Fluoroscopic Guided Acetabular Component Positioning During Direct Anterior Total Hip Arthroplasty

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 30, Issue 9, 2015, Pages 102-106

  Slotkin, Eric M ^a   Patel, Preetesh D ^b   Suarez, Juan C ^b  

^a READING HOSPITAL AND MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b DEPARTMENT OF COLORECTAL SURGERY   (United States)

Author keywords

Accuracy; Complication; Component position; Fluoroscopy; Hip arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

ABDUCTION; ACCURACY; ACETABULAR COMPONENT POSITIONING; ANATOMIC LANDMARK; ANTEVERSION; ARTICLE; FLUOROSCOPY; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; RANGE OF MOTION; REPRODUCIBILITY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SUPINE POSITION; SURGICAL APPROACH; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; ACETABULUM; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; DEVICES; HIP PROSTHESIS; HIP REPLACEMENT; LEARNING CURVE; PATIENT POSITIONING; PROCEDURES; RADIOGRAPHY; SURGERY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ACETABULUM; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; FLUOROSCOPY; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; LEARNING CURVE; PATIENT POSITIONING; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SUPINE POSITION; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84940893053     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: 15328406     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.03.046     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Wan Z., Boutary M., Dorr L.D. The influence of acetabular component position on wear in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2008, 23:51.
2. D'Lima D.D., Urquhart A.G., Buehler K.O., et al. The effect of the orientation of the acetabular and femoral components on the range of motion of the hip at different head-neck ratios. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2000, 82:315.
3. Dorr L.D., Wan Z. Causes of and treatment protocol for instability of total hip replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1998, 355:144.
4. Lewinnek G.E., Lewis J.L., Tarr R., et al. Dislocation after total hip replacement arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1978, 60:217.
5. Paterno S.A., Lachiewicz P.F., Kellet S.S. This influence of patient-related factors and the position of the acetabular component on the rate of dislocation after total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1997, 79:1202.
6. Bozic K.J., Kamath A.F., Ong K., et al. Comparative epidemiology of revision arthroplasty: failed THA poses greater clinical and economic burdens than failed TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2015, 473(6):2131.
7. Harris W.J. Advances in surgical technique for total hip replacement: without and with osteotomy of the greater trochanter. Orthop Clin North Am 1980, 146:188.
8. Woo R.Y., Morrey B.F. Dislocations after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1982, 64(9):1295.
9. McCollum D.E., Gray W.J. Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty: causes and prevention. Clin Orthop 1990, 261:159.
10. Lembeck B., Mueller O., Reize P., et al. Pelvic tilt makes acetabular cup navigation inaccurate. Acta Orthop 2005, 76(4):517.
11. Hallert O., Li Y., Brismar H., et al. The direct anterior approach: initial experience of a minimally invasive technique for total hip arthroplasty. J Orthop Surg Res 2012, 7:17.
12. Barton C., Kim P.R. Complications of the direct anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am 2009, 40:371.
13. de Verteuil R., Imamura M., Zhu S., et al. A systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost effectiveness and economic modeling of minimal incision total hip replacement approaches in the management of arthritic disease of the hip. Health Technol Assess 2008, 12(26):223.
14. Masonis J., Thompson C., Odum S. Safe and accurate: learning the direct anterior total hip arthroplasty. Orthopedics 2008, 31(12 Suppl. 2).
15. Anda S., Svenningsen S., Grontvedt T., et al. Pelvic inclination and spatial orientation of the acetabulum. A radiographic, computed tomographic and clinical investigation. Acta Radiol 1990, 31:389.
16. DiGioia A.M., Jaramaz B., Blackwell M., et al. The Otto Aufranc Award. Image guided navigation system to measure intraoperative acetabular implant alignment. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1998, 355:8.
17. Barrack R.L., Krempec J.A., Clohisy J.C., et al. Accuracy of acetabular component position in hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2013, 95:1760.
18. Gross T.P., Liu F., Webb L. Intraoperative radiographs for placing acetabular components in hip resurfacing arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2011, 469(6):1554.
19. Tannast M., Langlotz F., Kubiak-Langer M., et al. Accuracy and potential pitfalls of fluoroscopy-guided acetabular cup placement. Comput Aided Surg 2005, 10:329.
20. Nam D., Sculco P.K., Su E.P., et al. Acetabular component positioning in primary THA via and anterior, posterolateral, or posterolateral-navigated surgical technique. Orthopedics 2013, 36(12):e1482.
21. Alvarez A., Suarez J.C., Patel P.D., et al. Fluoroscopic imaging of acetabular cup position during THA through a direct anterior approach. Orthopedics 2013, 36(10):776.
22. Kennedy J.G., Rogers W.B., Soffe K.E., et al. Effect of acetabular component orientation on recurrent dislocation, pelvic osteolysis, polyethylene wear, and component migration. J Arthroplasty 1998, 13(5):530.
23. Conroy J.L., Whitehouse S.L., Graves S.E., et al. Risk factors for revision for early dislocation in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2008, 23(6):857.
24. Polkowski G.G., Nunley R.M., Ruh E.L., et al. Does standing affect acetabular component inclination and version after THA?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2012, 470:2988.
25. Eckman K., Hafez M.A., Jaramaz B., et al. Accuracy of pelvic flexion measurements from lateral radiographs. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006, 451:154.
26. DiGioia A.M., Hafez M.A., Jaramaz B., et al. Functional pelvic orientation measured from lateral standing and sitting radiographs. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006, 453:272.
27. Wan Z., Malik A., Jaramaz B., et al. Imaging and navigation measurement of acetabular component position in THA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009, 467:32.