Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the danish consensus version of the 10-item perceived stress scale

Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment and Health

Volumn 41, Issue 5, 2015, Pages 486-490

  Eskildsen, Anita ^a   Dalgaard, Vita Ligaya ^a   Nielsen, Kent Jacob ^a   Andersen, Johan Hviid ^a   Zachariae, Robert ^b   Olsen, Lis Raabæk ^c   Jørgensen, Anders ^d   Christiansen, David Høyrup ^a  

^a Regional Hospital West Jutland University Research Clinic   (Denmark)

^b AARHUS UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

^c Child and Adolescent Mental Health Center   (Denmark)

^d Rigshospitalet   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Agreement; Danish translation; Denmark; Minimal clinically important change; Minimal detectable change; Occupational stress; PSS 10; Psychometric properties; Reliability; Responsiveness; Work related stress

Indexed keywords

NUMERICAL MODEL; PERCEPTION; PSYCHOLOGY; RESEARCH WORK;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL EVALUATION; CONSENSUS; CONSENSUS DEVELOPMENT; CONSTRUCT VALIDITY; CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY; DANISH CONSENSUS; EVOLUTIONARY ADAPTATION; FACE VALIDITY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERNAL CONSISTENCY; INTERRATER RELIABILITY; JOB STRESS; LANGUAGE PROCESSING; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PATIENT DECISION MAKING; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PERCEIVED STRESS SCALE; POPULATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOMETRY; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; VALIDATION PROCESS; CULTURAL COMPETENCE; DENMARK; MENTAL STRESS; MIDDLE AGED; OCCUPATIONAL DISEASES; OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH; PERCEPTION; PSYCHOLOGY; QUESTIONNAIRE; REPRODUCIBILITY;

DENMARK;

ADULT; CULTURAL COMPETENCY; DENMARK; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OCCUPATIONAL DISEASES; OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH; PERCEPTION; PSYCHOMETRICS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; ROC CURVE; STRESS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 84940847882     PISSN: 03553140     EISSN: 1795990X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5271/sjweh.3510     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Arends I, Bruinvels DJ, Rebergen DS, Nieuwenhuijsen K, Madan I, Neumeyer-Gromen A, et al. Interventions to facilitate return to work in adults with adjustment disorders. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;12:CD006389. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd006389.pub2
2. Lazarus RS. Psychological stress and coping in adaptation and illness. Int J Psych Med. 1974;5,(4):321-33. http://dx.doi.org/10.2190/T43T-84P3-QDUR-7RTP
3. Cohen S, Kamarck T, Mermelstein R. A global measure of perceived stress. J Health Soc Behav. 1983;24:385-396. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2136404
4. Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, van der Windt DA, Knol DL, Dekker J, et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60(1):34-42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.012
5. Fayers PM, Machin D. Quality of life. The assessment, analysis and interpretation of patient-reported outcomes. second ed. West Sussex, England: John Wiley & Sons; 2007.
6. Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Knol DL, Stratford PW, Alonso J, Patrick DL, et al. The COSMIN checklist for evaluating the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties: a clarification of its content. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010;10:22,2288-10-22.
7. Lee E. Review of the Psychometric Evidence of the Perceived Stress Scale. Asian Nurs Res. 2012;6(4):121-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anr.2012.08.004
8. Nordin M, Nordin S. Psychometric evaluation and normative data of the Swedish version of the 10-item perceived stress scale. Scand J Psychol. 2013;54(6):502-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/sjop.12071
9. Chaaya M, Osman H, Naassan G, Mahfoud Z. Validation of the Arabic version of the Cohen perceived stress scale (PSS-10) among pregnant and postpartum women. BMC Psychiatry. 2010;10(1):111. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-10-111
10. Mimura C, Griffiths P. A Japanese version of the Perceived Stress Scale: cross-cultural translation and equivalence assessment. BMC Psychiatry. 2008;8(1):85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-8-85
11. Olsen LR, Mortensen EL, Bech P. Prevalence of major depression and stress indicators in the Danish general population. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2004;109(2):96-103. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.0001-690X.2003.00231.x
12. Mehlsen M, Pedersen AD, Jensen AB, Zachariae R. No indications of cognitive side-effects in a prospective study of breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy. Psychooncology. 2009;18(3):248-57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pon.1398
13. Jorgensen A. Oxidatively generated DNA/RNA damage in psychological stress states. Dan Med J. 2013;60(7):B4685.
14. Willert MV, Thulstrup AM, Hertz J. Changes in stress and coping from a randomized controlled trial of a three-month stress management intervention. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2009;35(2):145-52. http://dx.doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.1313
15. Sood A, Prasad K, Schroeder D, Varkey P. Stress management and resilience training among department of medicine faculty: A pilot randomized clinical trial. Journal of General Internal Medicine. 2011;26(8):858-61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-011-1640-x
16. Revicki D, Hays RD, Cella D, Sloan J. Recommended methods for determining responsiveness and minimally important differences for patient-reported outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008;61(2):102-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.03.012
17. Wild D, Grove A, Martin M, Eremenco S, McElroy S, Verjee-Lorenz A, et al. Principles of Good Practice for the Translation and Cultural Adaptation Process for Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) Measures: report of the ISPOR Task Force for Translation and Cultural Adaptation. Value Health. 2005;8(2):94-104. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4733.2005.04054.x
18. Olsen LR, Mortensen EL, Bech P. Dokumentation for den danske udgave af SCL-90-R[Documentation of the Danish version of the SCL-90-R]. In: Hartmann P, editor. SCL-90-R Vejledning til administration og scoring [SCL-90-R administration and scoring]. Dansk Psykologisk Forlag; 2007. p. 51-71.
19. Olsen LR, Mortensen EL, Bech P. The SCL-90 and SCL-90R versions validated by item response models in a Danish community sample. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2004;110(3):225. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0447.2004.00399.x
20. Derogatis LR. SCL-90-R: Symptom Checklist-90-R. Administration, scoring and procedures manual. 1st ed. Minneapolis, MN: National Computer Systems; 1977.
21. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1988.
22. Gwaltney CJ, Shields AL, Shiffman S. Equivalence of Electronic and Paper-and-Pencil Administration of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures: A Meta-Analytic Review. Value in Health. 2008;11(2):322-33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4733.2007.00231.x
23. Angst F. The new COSMIN guidelines confront traditional concepts of responsiveness. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011;11:152;11:152; author reply 152,2288-11-152.